0 calorie soft drinks yay or nay. Surely they're alright?

0 calorie soft drinks yay or nay.

Surely they're alright?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yay

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nay still spikes your insulin levels. Just drink wate

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Actually I heard this is untrue. it doesent contain calories or carbs so it shouldnt effect your glucose levels.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Literally doesn't matter

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They taste shit.

      This is untrue, I have a friends with T1 diabetes and they drink sugar free soda because it doesn't spike their levels.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        People with T1 diabetes can't produce any insulin so even if they eat pure sugar it will melt cause a spike

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Insulin levels don't mean shit unless you're diabetic you stupid braindead gay.

      the sugar alternatives they use give you alzheimers or dementia...I guess late stage brain debilitation to cover all bases. They've done studies and we know it for a fact by now.

      That's ... bullshit? Literally did not find a single study that conclused that artificial sweeteners lead to Alzheimer's?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://examine.com/nutrition/do-artificial-sweeteners-spike-insulin/
      Sorry sweaty, but you have been deboonked

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the sugar alternatives they use give you alzheimers or dementia...I guess late stage brain debilitation to cover all bases. They've done studies and we know it for a fact by now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      prove it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >go on pubmed
        >look up studies with tag ''artificial sweetener'' ''alzheimers'' ''dementia''
        >get article name, look it up on libgen
        >read motherfucker

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >go find a study that agrees with me
          that's not proof

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            burden of proof is on you
            I know what I know
            you the one who remains in ignorance
            if you choose to disregard the wise advice
            ultimately your responsibility to yourself
            I don't even care I have my own scientific integrity

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >burden of proof isn't on me, the person who made the claim, it's on you
              oh sweetie, oh honey....no

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                then stay uninformed bro
                little baby bro needs to be spoonfed
                oh sweetie oh honey no

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your concession.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >concession
                >sweetie
                >honey

                yeah no wonder you can't keep sugar out your mouth, it's barely ever out your head...

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                what the fuck is this reddit garbage language, you sound like a woman
                https://www.dentalcarextra.com.au/blog/artificial-sweeteners-could-be-linked-early-stages-alzheimerrsquos-disease/
                https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/could-artificial-sweeteners-be-bad-for-your-brain-2017060711849

                5 seconds of googleing, 0 seconds of being a cringe retard making semantic arguments about who the burden of proof is on

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >look I linked 2 studies that display some sort of correlation, the science is settled!
                >burden of proof is cringe semantics
                holy shit you're dumb

                >https://www.dentalcarextra.com.au/blog/artificial-sweeteners-could-be-linked-early-stages-alzheimerrsquos-disease/
                >Researchers admit that more biological studies are needed in order to confirm definitively the effects of artificial sweeteners.

                >https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/could-artificial-sweeteners-be-bad-for-your-brain-2017060711849
                >Before you despair or give up your favorite diet beverage forever, keep in mind that a study of this sort has some major limitations that can lead to faulty conclusions. For example:

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >look I linked 2 studies that display some sort of correlation, the science is settled!
                well tell me mr. science on how it's supposed to be done? should i have linked 200 studies instead? for that you could do what the first guy told you to do, go look it up yourself, from which we get to the next point:
                >burden of proof is cringe semantics
                yes unironically, in this case, the burden of proof is for bugmen, real scientifically minded people won't just dismiss a claim because the other party (the first guy) won't provide a source (considering the information is very easily accessible), that's not science, that's politics. scientifically minded people won't choose to live in ignorance just because "its your job to prove it!!!" thats not intellectually honest

                >Researchers admit that more biological studies are needed in order to confirm definitively the effects of artificial sweeteners.
                you despair or give up your favorite diet beverage forever, keep in mind that a study of this sort has some major limitations that can lead to faulty conclusions. For example:

                pretty mute points, and if you actually looked at what the "for example:" section said, it was shit like "This study did not look at the overall health effects of diet soft drinks; it’s possible they are still a healthier choice than sugar-sweetened beverages.", which is obviously a stupid argument. the real question is why you so desperately want to defend unnatural chemicals.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You could have posted better, more definitive sources.
                correlation does not imply causation

                Either you didn't vet the sources before posting, or you actually believe things like "vaccinations cause autism"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >hows it supposed to be done
                You're supposed to post proof when asked to post proof, if you can't do this you're supposed to consneed that you don't know.
                >the burden of proof
                the burden of proof is always on the person making the claim, I can come out and say you're a huge gay, I can post supporting evidence by linking to your posts, but until I prove it you are not a gay just because I say so.
                >pretty mute points
                no, not really

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >I have my own scientific integrity

              Lol, but you don't understand how the burden of proof works?

              Tbf thats pretty good bait. You fucking retard.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I walk away knowing what I know
                you walk away learning nothing...
                hmm I wonder who should feel morally invested to better themselves? me or you...
                and the attitude that goes with it
                you're just a greedy needy little baby aren't you
                mommy has to bring the milker to your lips
                and put the tit in

                jesus grow up retard you think you won or did something there...newsflash its not a competition and if it were, you'd be losing because you cbf doing your own due diligence, just for yourself

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I wake up knowing I'm right
                Fuck you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                okay way to out yourself as a finished idiot
                no wonder you have such entitlement
                it pairs nicely with the delusions of grandeur

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Retard

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I have a study that says you're retarded, the science is settled.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just drink water gay

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ye, that doesnt mean they are good for you, or that you should drink a 2l bottle a day.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I sure hope they're alright, I drink like 8 of the fuckers each day. I was raised on soda and while the switch to diet after my young man metabolism vanished wasn't a problem I can't give them up completely.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    to be honest, I'm not so sure anymore
    aspartame is a carcinogen in rodents in high doses. 20mg/kg dose they gave the rats for life isn't very high, that's like 10 cans a day for a human, and they still saw an increase in Lymphoma/Leukemia in those rats. and 40mg/kg was shown to affect test and sperm count in rodents.
    studies that demonstrate negative impact of aspartame seem to be dismissed way too quickly

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm pretty sure they don't use aspartame anymore
      they use other derivatives of plant-based alcohols
      sort of like stevia or erythritol or whatever the name is
      anyways those are the ones that have now been proven to set on dementia/alzheimers in people in late age
      Just switch to iced tea for the antioxidants, and make budget for a low calorie cordial/syrup with a natural flavor like peach or whatever.
      I have a bottle of peach ice tea cordial right now, I need like 15ml to flavor a full 600ml mason jar of brewed and iced green tea. It only runs me 20 calories but it's worth it for 600ml of hydratation and satiation + antioxidants.
      Even a lite lemon cordial or pure lemon juice as natural fructose and gives some amount of slight sweetness.
      Just make your own drinks. If you're not making them at this point, you deserve for your body to be goyslopped.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Actually a good idea, will do this ty Anon

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          get yourself a big 1L+ enamel or heat resistant stone/steel tea pot
          it'll save you a lot of time brewing just one batch a day
          also get one of those big big ice cube silicon molds to cool it down much faster
          so you can consume it pretty much 20-30 mins after it's brewed
          make sure to let it brew long enough 15-20mins
          experiment with cordials, only get those made from natural flavor extracts, light or low sugar.
          The more you drink it, the more you will feel like you can get by with less and less cordial.

          Safe brews anon

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm still waiting on proof of your claim

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm pretty sure they don't use aspartame anymore

        Coke Zero still does. Not sure about other brands.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Most "Zero" or diet drinks still do.
          There was a limited run of coke sweetened with Stevia or whatever in the mid 10's.
          The problem with those other sweeteners is that you can't replicate the same initial taste in sugar, with no calories, with what you mentioned.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >I DRINK 1 LITRE OF MOUNTAIN DEW NO SUGAR A DAY AND CAN'T STOP, HELP

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    garden gnomes put something innit. Trust me.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    nay
    they mess with your body
    sugar bad
    fake sugar bad

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You are being cucked by your own body if you drink these.

    Forget whether or not aspartame is carcinogenic and instead ask yourself why you are consuming something that has at best zero nutritional value.

    >I am unable to use my bodies taste receptors as gauges of a substance's nutritional quality. Instead I use synthetic sugars to trick them into activating the happy chemicals in my brain.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Well you're using synthetic interactions on this Thai hentai forum to trick your brain into activating happy chemicals. I think that puts having a diet soda into perspective.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        At least I'm not spending money or impacting my digestive system.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    just drink water brah

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >you can't enjoy anything sweet
    >even if it has 2kcal per 100ml
    >you have to suffer while cutting
    I hope none of you morons eat more than 40g of protein during your cut or you're eating protein just to feel saturated, you have to eat 1500kcal worth in hypoglycemic carb like rice on your cut.
    The final redpill is to leave this board because all of you are stupid.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >artificial sweeteners
      >enjoy
      ngmi
      just stop coping and learn to enjoy healthy traditional beverages instead

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So wine with morphine like the romans?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >traditional beverages instead
        Coke is like 100 years old, it's hardly traditional
        Stop being a moron, there's no excuse to guzzle corn syrup / sugar
        That shit is gross anyways, feels so sticky and sickly sweet

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw cutting
      >had like 240g of protein yesterday
      feels gr8

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it fucks up your gut microbiome so avoid this shit

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Avoid sodas like the plague.
    Just drink iced tea or fruit juice if you want sweetness.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Carbonated drinks fuck your teeth up because youre soaking them in acid.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >melt your brain rather than drink some calories

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Literally all the research on why diet soda is bad are either:
    >people who drink diet soda are fat, so it makes you fat
    >aspartame, in a concentration orders of magnitude higher that any human would consume, gave rats cancer, so it gives you cancer
    >the body might act like it's glucose (no evidence btw), so it might spike your insulin levels (no evidence, also doesn't matter btw), so it gives you beetus

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Medical science might be retarded, but broscience is more retarded

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Medical science might be retarded, but broscience is more retarded

      Me not believing that anyone can be almost as good as sugar with zero downsides is still smarter than the both of you 2 combined
      The lack of evidence on both sides makes it so that you can't really have a discussion about it with an outcome
      But it is a fact that rats have very similar reactions to substances as humans, and yes, you really do only see fat people drink that shit whereas skinny/normal people pretty much always prefer normal coke

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      In that case looks who benefits the most from pushing these substances
      >do these substances make me healthier and my life better?
      >do the people who push these substances make enormous amounts of money from selling it?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Poison does not have calories so it cannot be bad for me
    This is your brain on CICO

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >unironically drinking goyslurp

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it doesnt matter
    you piss out liquid "calories" they're imaginary

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They haven't been around long enough to say with any certainty.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the correct answer

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Still best to avoid them all together. Train yourself to only drink water and eventually you'll stop craving carbonated and sweet beverages.

Your email address will not be published.