Here's the biggest redpill you'll get: Everyone hates you. Everyone is tired of your shit. It's not just the tards on /misc/. It's everyone. Your days are clunted and within ten years you'll be labeled as what you are again, which is mentally ill.
If by no ass you mean a tiny little petite butt on a petite woman, no. If you mean a flat bony ass with no definition then yes. The only difference between them and short men is that the no assed women still have sex lol
I fricked a fat girl (like 190 at 5'4), and she had the worst fat storage genetics i've ever seen. She had zero ass despite being so heavy and a thick waist. Paint her white and put her next to a fridge and they would look like twins.
>had zero ass despite being so heavy and a thick waist. Paint her white and put her next to a fridge and they would look like twins.
Sounds like pajeet women. Lots of them have male bodyfat distribution. No other race does.
I like small pretty asses though (I like them big of course too). You know what? That's what is not fair. Men actually are attracted to different kinds of women. Skinny? We smash. Fit? We smash. Tall? We smash. A little bit chubby? We smash. Short? We smash. Asian? We smash. White? We smash. No breasts? We smash. And so on...
Women on the other hand only really want to smash guys who follow certain standards. That's not fair.
It's fair in the sense that women have much more investment when it comes to sex biologically (the purpose of sex is ultimately making babies), and therefore have an inclination to be pickier. Plus they have lower sex drives due to lower test, so they're not as eager to bang anything like a guy, more to find the guy who would make a good partner.
If you had 50+ women of all shapes and sizes messaging you on a dating app, you'd probably start to get pretty picky too.
there is a difference between wanting to frick and wanting a relationship. if you dont have standards in the type of women you want to spend resources on, you are literally a cuck
Women don't have shortcomings that are equivalent to a man's. A guy will exist who likes tiny asses, the same can't be said of a woman who likes tiny dicks.
pretty much, but guys seem to give asians a pass on it.
Learn English before you ever try and post again
Good, because ass is for Black folk and coping fatasses who think they're high test
>Learn English before you ever try and post again
based, thank you anon
you sound like a moron.
>because ass is for Black folk
Fricking /misc/cels man
Cope /misc/troon.
>implying
Here's the biggest redpill you'll get: Everyone hates you. Everyone is tired of your shit. It's not just the tards on /misc/. It's everyone. Your days are clunted and within ten years you'll be labeled as what you are again, which is mentally ill.
because only dicklets tend to go for asians
If by no ass you mean a tiny little petite butt on a petite woman, no. If you mean a flat bony ass with no definition then yes. The only difference between them and short men is that the no assed women still have sex lol
I bulled for a couple on reddit and the dude was freakishly tall, like 6'5+ giraffe tier
Was it worth it? What did they pay u
How do u qualify as a bull
it's basically all about the face for chicks. no ass can be squated away and fat can be burned. not much you can do about the face.
Nope. A woman with no ass has a higher sexual market value than 75% of men.
Not really. I am Brazilian
I fricked a fat girl (like 190 at 5'4), and she had the worst fat storage genetics i've ever seen. She had zero ass despite being so heavy and a thick waist. Paint her white and put her next to a fridge and they would look like twins.
>had zero ass despite being so heavy and a thick waist. Paint her white and put her next to a fridge and they would look like twins.
Sounds like pajeet women. Lots of them have male bodyfat distribution. No other race does.
Go to Mexico some time
Pretty true; old women, tall women, and women with no asses are all repulsive to me
I like small pretty asses though (I like them big of course too). You know what? That's what is not fair. Men actually are attracted to different kinds of women. Skinny? We smash. Fit? We smash. Tall? We smash. A little bit chubby? We smash. Short? We smash. Asian? We smash. White? We smash. No breasts? We smash. And so on...
Women on the other hand only really want to smash guys who follow certain standards. That's not fair.
It's fair in the sense that women have much more investment when it comes to sex biologically (the purpose of sex is ultimately making babies), and therefore have an inclination to be pickier. Plus they have lower sex drives due to lower test, so they're not as eager to bang anything like a guy, more to find the guy who would make a good partner.
If you had 50+ women of all shapes and sizes messaging you on a dating app, you'd probably start to get pretty picky too.
>Plus they have lower sex drives
sounds like you never even talked to a woman let alone have sex with one. they all frickin horny as hell
Some are more horny than others, but overall women have much lower sex drives than men. They just don't have the testosterone like we do.
there is a difference between wanting to frick and wanting a relationship. if you dont have standards in the type of women you want to spend resources on, you are literally a cuck
mamamoo?
Women don't have shortcomings that are equivalent to a man's. A guy will exist who likes tiny asses, the same can't be said of a woman who likes tiny dicks.