1.Scientists are full of shit(not all)
2.Ants might life 20 x who the fuck knows, besides that an Ant would lift 20x not to impress some 18 year twink but because the Ant has to do it for survival, whilst we do it not for physical neccessity but for more of Aesthetic Urban Culture.
yes and the so called ''scientists'' have created vaccines to 'cure' us from the diseases they made. the ants do not have this they have there own immune system which we have to. they dont need the vax. they have no idea of what is evil no scientists no nothing. they survive us Humans have truly lost are way. No wunder the ant lifts 20 times it body wait it is what they do to survive
yes scientists will tell you you will be fine after vax, but reality is this is what happens to you when you take there "medication''....spike protein comes out of the brain, killing you....the global elite must be removed...if you want youre eyes opened google search ''the one world government'....
1.Scientists are full of shit(not all)
2.Ants might life 20 x who the fuck knows, besides that an Ant would lift 20x not to impress some 18 year twink but because the Ant has to do it for survival, whilst we do it not for physical neccessity but for more of Aesthetic Urban Culture.
This is the quality IST shit posting I like to see, not the fucking brap, sips, or incel threads.
It's not relative. The amount of force required to rip apart molecule is constant, so lifting 5 grams when you weigh 1 gram is not the same as lifting 500 kg when you weigh 100 kg
He's not lying: The only males in any given ant colony are the "drones" that stay in the hive and orbit the queen. Watch a documentary on basic ant facts - they're pretty interesting creatures.
They would be weak as shit and die pretty quickly because of the square cube law.
There's a reason why ants are the size they are: everything bigger has died, and only the most optimized species has survived.
Creationist/evolutionist feud is retarded as shit. Both can coexist just fine, and a mix of both is probably closer to the truth than either of them separately.
>evolution can be proven
There has never been any experiment "proving" evolution ever. The fact you don't know this is pretty embarrassing considering it's quite a basic fact about the otherwise logical theory of evolution.
Or do you have breaking news about humans witnessing the creation of a new animal species (this has never happened)?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Bacteria, single celled organisms (including some animals) have been observed to directly change based of their environment and natural selection from generation to generation. Which in broader terms is the mechanism for evolution. Also the wealth of evidence in the fossil record, the fact that different animals display similar traits depending on similar environments (convergent evolution), the fact that all mammals, birds etc share very similar body plans with each other (in mammals 1 upper arm bone, 2 lower ones, same with legs, etc etc) oh and stuff as simple as dog breeds all point to evolution and natural selection being the correct hypothesis.
Or
A bunch of dudes wrote down some shit 6000 years ago, trust us lmao
1 month ago
Anonymous
>all those words to not even attempt to answer my direct and very clear question
embarrassing >dudes 6000 years ago
who are you quoting?
peak midwit post
1 month ago
Anonymous
He answered your question lol, you just don't know what he said or what you're talking about
1 month ago
Anonymous
How did he answer my question about witnessing speciation or an experiment "proving evolution?" He didn't mention witness speciation or any experiments proving evolution. And what does the Bible have anything to do with what I wrote?
The only thing worse than arrogance is laziness, what a gay you are.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>dog breeds are "natural selection" >dog breeds (all the same species) are examples of evolution (speciation occurring to fit a niche)
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's reasonable to assume that if man can breed dogs into certain niches for our own purposes fairly easily, it would happen naturally over longer time frames.
1 month ago
Anonymous
And what does that have to do with birds and mammals coming from a common ancestor (AKA evolution leading to speciation)? It has nothing to do with that. I cannot be any more clear.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I'm talking about evolution as a whole, its a pretty broad process
How did he answer my question about witnessing speciation or an experiment "proving evolution?" He didn't mention witness speciation or any experiments proving evolution. And what does the Bible have anything to do with what I wrote?
The only thing worse than arrogance is laziness, what a gay you are.
We have witnessed speciation, through the fossil record, evolution takes a long time to create novel species so designing an experiment is practically impossible, but through genetics and observing how species do change in the short term, proves it. Not sure why you're throwing around insults when you can't grasp 8th grade science concepts
1 month ago
Anonymous
>snapshots in time = witnessing speciation
This is some major coping. You realize that fossils of different species aren't proof that those species came from each other, right? You are guessing they came from each other. You are guessing that the data are evidence of your theory.
Peak 21st-century science worshipper logic. I love that you brought up 8th-grade science class, because your logic is perfectly fit for a middle schooler.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>I'm talking about evolution as a whole
Yes, that's why I'm specifically pointing out that you are talking about things that have nothing to do with what I'm talking about, because you are speaking broadly. Yes, animals can change their features over time to better fit their environments. No, there is no evidence of this leading to speciation. No, this does not explain how birds and mammals came from a small ancestor. No, you have no original thoughts. Yes, you are coping.
Oh wow thank you guys for pointing out how flawed my understanding of the natural world is, you have changed my perspective for the better and its all thanks to you, I was blind but now I see. I'm going to go now. Thank you both again I was wrong and you are right, I apologize for wasting your time.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I hope everyone reading this sees how irrational and unreasonable Science Worshippers are and how easily their worldview collapses when you ask thoughtful questions and point out their circular reasoning.
The Socratic method claims another victim lol.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Post body
1 month ago
Anonymous
1 month ago
Anonymous
kek he thinks he's socrates, your posts sound like a 14yo on reddit and socrates thought the earth was the center of the universe lmao I agree with him post body, wanna see what such an intellectual man looks like
1 month ago
Anonymous
Never claimed to be Socrates, cope & seethe. >14 yo on reddit
This would be the person angrily and sarcastically defending mainstream opinion because his whole worldview depends on never being wrong.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Still no body post, intriguing, I want objective fact, a picture of how you look will suffice
1 month ago
Anonymous
>gets called out for posting nonsense about speciation being proven (using dog breeds as a fucking example of speciation lmao) >concedes completely >stops making any points >turns to being sarcastic and "post body"
This is embarrassing. Is this how you acted when you learned Santa Claus isn't real? Merry Christmas btw
1 month ago
Anonymous
not even that anon, you just sound like a gay, and if you want to prove me wrong I need some of your direct evidence you twat
1 month ago
Anonymous
Do you have a good relationship with your father?
1 month ago
Anonymous
I do! Quit changing the subject and post a pic of yourself you fatty
1 month ago
Anonymous
I don't believe you, you type like someone raised by a single mom.
1 month ago
Anonymous
If anything you're being circular and goalposting, he's just saying that changes in organisms over time create new species. This has been accepted as fact long before the modern science shit now days
1 month ago
Anonymous
>changes in organisms over time create new species.
I know this is what he's saying. I'm saying there is no evidence of this and no experiments have been conducted to show this. This means this claim is unproven and has not gone through the scientific method. This means he, fervently defending this pseudoscience (i.e. science done outside of the scientific method), is a science worshipping NPC.
Do you think a chihuahua is different than a gray wolf? Do you think those organisms have changed over time? What about a coyote and a gray wolf? Guess what, gay, same species.
>accepted as a fact
Do you think something "accepted as a fact" has never been proven wrong in human history before, or even modern history?
Linking a research article isn't an argument. Try a little harder, please.
1 month ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/a2wqv0Y.jpg
>ctrl + F "speciation" >0 results found
embarassing
1 month ago
Anonymous
>ctrl + F "speciation" >0 results found
1 month ago
Anonymous
>grandstanding after an anon clearly didn't want to waste their time replying to your stupid ass
Pathetic, I bet your heartbeat replying to him was the highest it's been in years
1 month ago
Anonymous
>he didn't want to waste time replying to me >he kept replying to me
Pick one, anon. Are you samefagging?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Are you ever gonna post body like he asked you fat fuck?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>he
1 month ago
Anonymous
>scared
1 month ago
Anonymous
>I'm talking about evolution as a whole
Yes, that's why I'm specifically pointing out that you are talking about things that have nothing to do with what I'm talking about, because you are speaking broadly. Yes, animals can change their features over time to better fit their environments. No, there is no evidence of this leading to speciation. No, this does not explain how birds and mammals came from a small ancestor. No, you have no original thoughts. Yes, you are coping.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>I can bech 100 now but how do I know I will bench 225 someday?
1 month ago
Anonymous
But humans have witnessed creation of new species tho look up Darwin’s finches, and that's only of the top of my head. Easy to miss evidence and studies when you're actively ignoring them eh, mr baitman?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>But humans have witnessed creation of new species tho look up Darwin’s finches
lmao wtf are you talking about you retard? Darwin didn't witness the speciation of Darwin's finches. They were named after him by someone else almost 100 years after he died. holy shit you are so dumb
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin%27s_finches >They are thought to have evolved from a single finch species that came to the islands more than a million years ago.
Do you think Darwin was born 1 million years ago and lived hundreds of thousands of years? Don't ever respond to me again you smug gay.
Evolutionism doesn't explain the first lifeform. And the Vatican agreeing with shit doesn't really change anything.
1 month ago
Anonymous
That's true, I'm willing to accept the possibility of something like God creating the first spark, we may never know why or how we are here, and part of me thinks we never should.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>the model explaining the change of allele frequencies over time within a population doesn't address the creation of life
jannies tongue my anus
>bodyweight
Oh geez, thats funny. >"I-Im s-stronger than you! I lift more compared to my bodyweight!!"
If there's big rock that needs to be moved and you cannot move it and your girlfriend is snickering at you, I come in and lift the rock out of the way and fuck your girlfriend. Who is stronger? I am.
I can kill the bug with a single step. Ants don't mog anyone
Square cube law. Scale tards itt get the rope.
Why do trees only grow so tall?
Why can’t I build an A380 just 5 times bigger?
hey you fucking retard it's called scale. increased surface area doesn't scale linearly with volume.
congratulations you are not retarded
How does it apply here?
the force generated depends in large part
on the cross sectional area of the muscle, the mass of the animal depends on the volume
>But humans have witnessed creation of new species tho look up Darwin’s finches
lmao wtf are you talking about you retard? Darwin didn't witness the speciation of Darwin's finches. They were named after him by someone else almost 100 years after he died. holy shit you are so dumb
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin%27s_finches >They are thought to have evolved from a single finch species that came to the islands more than a million years ago.
Do you think Darwin was born 1 million years ago and lived hundreds of thousands of years? Don't ever respond to me again you smug gay.
congratulations you are retarded, this will be my one and only reply >find fossil >prove via genetics, etc. that it is ancestor of species A >prove via genetics, etc. that it is ancestor of species B >observe that species A is different species than species B >ergo speciation occurred
>observe points in time >something becomes proven
This isn't the scientific method and you are a peak midwit. What you are describing is "generating hypotheses."
>observe points in time >something becomes proven
This isn't the scientific method and you are a peak midwit. What you are describing is "generating hypotheses."
Here, this should help you understand where you went wrong. Let me know if you have any further questions.
Its do with magnitudes. 1kg can have more of an effect on 10kg than 10kg can to 100kg due to exponential forces such as gravity. A 1g ant moving a 140g leaf is having less forces (such as inertia) to deal with than a 100kg trying to move a 1000kg weight.
We can lift more than 1.5x bodyweight easily if our flesh is actually exoskeleton/ bone-skin
Also strength is better for smaller size. Engineering in submicro/nano level shows how rigid materials can become in smaller scale.
>ants are a giant family with a single mother who does nothing besides pump out more kids >extremely agressive towards other specjes >territorial >will enter ypur house without permission
Ants are the morons of species
>Humans aren't the only species capable of basic projectile weaponry
Please name 1 other animal that consistently hunts in coordinated packs using tools.
I can eat them in my burgers.
Kys Schwab
>implying Schwab will eat no bugs
No, you will eat the bugs
You WILL
Ants have there own ecosystems, they trade, protect , hunt and build underground cities
Thats also the reason why i think they "might" life 20 times there weights
1.I dont believe scientists because they lied before
2.Refer to rule 1.
Having said that, i am sure if you put a Human being in the same environment as an Ant he would as efficient or even better.
You are a fucking retard.
I would rather be a retard than dead, Anons.
Its clear that
1.Scientists are full of shit(not all)
2.Ants might life 20 x who the fuck knows, besides that an Ant would lift 20x not to impress some 18 year twink but because the Ant has to do it for survival, whilst we do it not for physical neccessity but for more of Aesthetic Urban Culture.
Mf piece of shit i typed lift both times
average phoneposter
You are a fucking moronbrained retard.
Boo hoo Anon, you hurt my little feelings.
Brb i am gonna go think about suicide because some random basement dweller called me a retard online.
If only.
>Urban Culture.
have a nice day. I hate citygays so goddsmn much.
Absolutely based post. I don't think humans can lift as much as ants solely with willpower, but this type of thinking is so refreshing to see.
Inalienably based
Antfags on suicide watch
>Thats also the reason why i think they "might" life 20 times there weights
You make a lot of sense you're obviously a man of science yourself.
yes and the so called ''scientists'' have created vaccines to 'cure' us from the diseases they made. the ants do not have this they have there own immune system which we have to. they dont need the vax. they have no idea of what is evil no scientists no nothing. they survive us Humans have truly lost are way. No wunder the ant lifts 20 times it body wait it is what they do to survive
>man, I really love my functioning immune sys-ACK!
Why is there a spike protein coming out of an ant in this picture?
my guess is cordyceps
yes scientists will tell you you will be fine after vax, but reality is this is what happens to you when you take there "medication''....spike protein comes out of the brain, killing you....the global elite must be removed...if you want youre eyes opened google search ''the one world government'....
This is the quality IST shit posting I like to see, not the fucking brap, sips, or incel threads.
Good work anon.
You are based and Myrmidon pilled. Come join us in Thessalia as we await prince Achilles
how is that leaf 20x the ant's weight
I can lift about a million ants though so who's really mogging who?
It's not relative. The amount of force required to rip apart molecule is constant, so lifting 5 grams when you weigh 1 gram is not the same as lifting 500 kg when you weigh 100 kg
>gf left me for an ant
It's fucking over.
Ants are females. That makes ur gf GAY
>ants are females
???
He's not lying: The only males in any given ant colony are the "drones" that stay in the hive and orbit the queen. Watch a documentary on basic ant facts - they're pretty interesting creatures.
> 6 legs
He got the number and you dont
>implying all of fit isn't brainless drones that are genetically programed to not think for themselves
lifting 0.1 grams by less than a centimeter takes less energy than lifting 60 kilograms 1.7 meters
>1.7 meter ohp
what's the point
Now imagine if ants were human-sized
They would be weak as shit and die pretty quickly because of the square cube law.
There's a reason why ants are the size they are: everything bigger has died, and only the most optimized species has survived.
>nuh uhhh God created everything 6000 years ago, he's the best
Creationist/evolutionist feud is retarded as shit. Both can coexist just fine, and a mix of both is probably closer to the truth than either of them separately.
What are you talking about, creationism is objectively wrong, even the Vatican has stated evolution is correct and can be proven lmao
>evolution can be proven
There has never been any experiment "proving" evolution ever. The fact you don't know this is pretty embarrassing considering it's quite a basic fact about the otherwise logical theory of evolution.
Or do you have breaking news about humans witnessing the creation of a new animal species (this has never happened)?
Bacteria, single celled organisms (including some animals) have been observed to directly change based of their environment and natural selection from generation to generation. Which in broader terms is the mechanism for evolution. Also the wealth of evidence in the fossil record, the fact that different animals display similar traits depending on similar environments (convergent evolution), the fact that all mammals, birds etc share very similar body plans with each other (in mammals 1 upper arm bone, 2 lower ones, same with legs, etc etc) oh and stuff as simple as dog breeds all point to evolution and natural selection being the correct hypothesis.
Or
A bunch of dudes wrote down some shit 6000 years ago, trust us lmao
>all those words to not even attempt to answer my direct and very clear question
embarrassing
>dudes 6000 years ago
who are you quoting?
peak midwit post
He answered your question lol, you just don't know what he said or what you're talking about
How did he answer my question about witnessing speciation or an experiment "proving evolution?" He didn't mention witness speciation or any experiments proving evolution. And what does the Bible have anything to do with what I wrote?
The only thing worse than arrogance is laziness, what a gay you are.
>dog breeds are "natural selection"
>dog breeds (all the same species) are examples of evolution (speciation occurring to fit a niche)
It's reasonable to assume that if man can breed dogs into certain niches for our own purposes fairly easily, it would happen naturally over longer time frames.
And what does that have to do with birds and mammals coming from a common ancestor (AKA evolution leading to speciation)? It has nothing to do with that. I cannot be any more clear.
I'm talking about evolution as a whole, its a pretty broad process
We have witnessed speciation, through the fossil record, evolution takes a long time to create novel species so designing an experiment is practically impossible, but through genetics and observing how species do change in the short term, proves it. Not sure why you're throwing around insults when you can't grasp 8th grade science concepts
>snapshots in time = witnessing speciation
This is some major coping. You realize that fossils of different species aren't proof that those species came from each other, right? You are guessing they came from each other. You are guessing that the data are evidence of your theory.
Peak 21st-century science worshipper logic. I love that you brought up 8th-grade science class, because your logic is perfectly fit for a middle schooler.
Oh wow thank you guys for pointing out how flawed my understanding of the natural world is, you have changed my perspective for the better and its all thanks to you, I was blind but now I see. I'm going to go now. Thank you both again I was wrong and you are right, I apologize for wasting your time.
I hope everyone reading this sees how irrational and unreasonable Science Worshippers are and how easily their worldview collapses when you ask thoughtful questions and point out their circular reasoning.
The Socratic method claims another victim lol.
Post body
kek he thinks he's socrates, your posts sound like a 14yo on reddit and socrates thought the earth was the center of the universe lmao I agree with him post body, wanna see what such an intellectual man looks like
Never claimed to be Socrates, cope & seethe.
>14 yo on reddit
This would be the person angrily and sarcastically defending mainstream opinion because his whole worldview depends on never being wrong.
Still no body post, intriguing, I want objective fact, a picture of how you look will suffice
>gets called out for posting nonsense about speciation being proven (using dog breeds as a fucking example of speciation lmao)
>concedes completely
>stops making any points
>turns to being sarcastic and "post body"
This is embarrassing. Is this how you acted when you learned Santa Claus isn't real? Merry Christmas btw
not even that anon, you just sound like a gay, and if you want to prove me wrong I need some of your direct evidence you twat
Do you have a good relationship with your father?
I do! Quit changing the subject and post a pic of yourself you fatty
I don't believe you, you type like someone raised by a single mom.
If anything you're being circular and goalposting, he's just saying that changes in organisms over time create new species. This has been accepted as fact long before the modern science shit now days
>changes in organisms over time create new species.
I know this is what he's saying. I'm saying there is no evidence of this and no experiments have been conducted to show this. This means this claim is unproven and has not gone through the scientific method. This means he, fervently defending this pseudoscience (i.e. science done outside of the scientific method), is a science worshipping NPC.
Do you think a chihuahua is different than a gray wolf? Do you think those organisms have changed over time? What about a coyote and a gray wolf? Guess what, gay, same species.
>accepted as a fact
Do you think something "accepted as a fact" has never been proven wrong in human history before, or even modern history?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680118/
Happy reading retard
Linking a research article isn't an argument. Try a little harder, please.
embarassing
>ctrl + F "speciation"
>0 results found
>grandstanding after an anon clearly didn't want to waste their time replying to your stupid ass
Pathetic, I bet your heartbeat replying to him was the highest it's been in years
>he didn't want to waste time replying to me
>he kept replying to me
Pick one, anon. Are you samefagging?
Are you ever gonna post body like he asked you fat fuck?
>he
>scared
>I'm talking about evolution as a whole
Yes, that's why I'm specifically pointing out that you are talking about things that have nothing to do with what I'm talking about, because you are speaking broadly. Yes, animals can change their features over time to better fit their environments. No, there is no evidence of this leading to speciation. No, this does not explain how birds and mammals came from a small ancestor. No, you have no original thoughts. Yes, you are coping.
>I can bech 100 now but how do I know I will bench 225 someday?
But humans have witnessed creation of new species tho look up Darwin’s finches, and that's only of the top of my head. Easy to miss evidence and studies when you're actively ignoring them eh, mr baitman?
>But humans have witnessed creation of new species tho look up Darwin’s finches
lmao wtf are you talking about you retard? Darwin didn't witness the speciation of Darwin's finches. They were named after him by someone else almost 100 years after he died. holy shit you are so dumb
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin%27s_finches
>They are thought to have evolved from a single finch species that came to the islands more than a million years ago.
Do you think Darwin was born 1 million years ago and lived hundreds of thousands of years? Don't ever respond to me again you smug gay.
Evolutionism doesn't explain the first lifeform. And the Vatican agreeing with shit doesn't really change anything.
That's true, I'm willing to accept the possibility of something like God creating the first spark, we may never know why or how we are here, and part of me thinks we never should.
>the model explaining the change of allele frequencies over time within a population doesn't address the creation of life
jannies tongue my anus
mechanically speaking that is a deadlift, they mog but still
square cube law
>steps on ant
>bodyweight
Oh geez, thats funny.
>"I-Im s-stronger than you! I lift more compared to my bodyweight!!"
If there's big rock that needs to be moved and you cannot move it and your girlfriend is snickering at you, I come in and lift the rock out of the way and fuck your girlfriend. Who is stronger? I am.
I can kill the bug with a single step. Ants don't mog anyone
This year alone I had at least 20 occasions in which I had to move a big rock to keep my gf.
> tfw being a powershitter
Post some rock moving stories
square cube law
How does it apply here?
congratulations you are not retarded
the force generated depends in large part
on the cross sectional area of the muscle, the mass of the animal depends on the volume
congratulations you are retarded, this will be my one and only reply
>find fossil
>prove via genetics, etc. that it is ancestor of species A
>prove via genetics, etc. that it is ancestor of species B
>observe that species A is different species than species B
>ergo speciation occurred
>observe points in time
>something becomes proven
This isn't the scientific method and you are a peak midwit. What you are describing is "generating hypotheses."
Here, this should help you understand where you went wrong. Let me know if you have any further questions.
top zozzle
>I am sure to win because of my superior speed
>how a 0.5g man fights a 50kg man
If they were human sized they would get crushed under their own weight
imagine if ants had the size of dogs for example, those fuckers would literally rule the world
>i can lift a brick
>the ant can obviously not
Case closed
Yet you never see an ant lift a car.
Weird.
This just proves bodyweight multipliers suck lol
a 60kg man benching 120kg is a lot less impressive than a 100+ kg man lifting 200kg
>a 60kg man benching 120kg is a lot less impressive than a 100+ kg man lifting 200kg
Cope tbh
im sure you think bodyweight exercises are impressive too lmao
That makes a lot of sense.
Its do with magnitudes. 1kg can have more of an effect on 10kg than 10kg can to 100kg due to exponential forces such as gravity. A 1g ant moving a 140g leaf is having less forces (such as inertia) to deal with than a 100kg trying to move a 1000kg weight.
>Ants can lift 20x their body
I can lift 20 million times their body weight. Also I don't die when someone spills coffee in my house.
We can lift more than 1.5x bodyweight easily if our flesh is actually exoskeleton/ bone-skin
Also strength is better for smaller size. Engineering in submicro/nano level shows how rigid materials can become in smaller scale.
Square cube law. Scale tards itt get the rope.
Why do trees only grow so tall?
Why can’t I build an A380 just 5 times bigger?
Can an ant deadlift (almost) 1pl8?
Otherwise it doesn't mog me
a 0x20 is still 0
humans don't have hydraulic systems like insects
>human moves a joystick in a crane
>lifts 44 million pounds, 220,000x greater than the weight of a human.
>0' 1'' at best
NGMI
>pound for pound mogging doesnt exist shills on suicide watch
manlet bros... we won
If we were as small as ants, we could lift much more. Physics work slightly different in small scale.
Too bad those physics aren't working out for you, manlet.
>why yes I do lift 20x my bodyweight for the glory of mommy, how could you tell?
>ants are a giant family with a single mother who does nothing besides pump out more kids
>extremely agressive towards other specjes
>territorial
>will enter ypur house without permission
Ants are the morons of species
I have to hold up more body mass than an ant
Also pic related. Who's really mogging whomst?
The turning point for humanity was the domestication of fire. Humans aren't the only species capable of basic projectile weaponry
You could argue that our entire genus, homo, was the turning point, walking upright freeing our hands to become master manipulators
>no homo
>the domestication of fire
I like this turn of phrase a whole lot anon
Good name for a band
No, it was pretty clearly the use of tools.
HANDS
I don't really know what point you're trying to make but, yes, humans use their hands and that's a big deal.
>Humans aren't the only species capable of basic projectile weaponry
Please name 1 other animal that consistently hunts in coordinated packs using tools.
I eat ants and crickets everyday at Taco Bell. Delicious.
>bw multiplier cope
hey you fucking retard it's called scale. increased surface area doesn't scale linearly with volume.
>lifting x your body weight is impressive
>this is what manlets actually believe
>step *crush*
Oh sorry didn't see you there little fella, sorry!
probably gets all that ant pussy
Yeah but ants weigh like fucking nothing
why overhead squat retard? better use yoke
here's a dude doing 555kg for 5 meters:
duuno his weight, let's assume 130kg
so this nibba can carry more than 4x his bw. ants stil mog him but he still is impressive