>be lanklet with long limbs. >have much longer ROM than manlets

>be lanklet with long limbs
>have much longer ROM than manlets
>our lifts with the same weight are treated the same

Solely relying on weight totals for lift records is a scam made up by manlets. I'm going a further distance with the same weight. Moving a weight 2 inches is barely a feat of strength.

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Being taller also usually should mean you weigh more and have more muscle on you. Plus you're not really making sense - Assuming you have long arms, you should have a great deadlift. Assuming you're just big without long arms, you should have a great bench. So which one is it? Just sounds like an excuse to be a DYEL.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'll give you long arms with short legs is indeed easier because the ROM is shorter. But, long arms with long legs negates this.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        As someone with long arms n legs, I don't think I agree. Having both just means you're not a God at the deadlift, but you have A LOT of space to fill with muscle, meaning you can still outlift manlets with ease.

        >Being taller also usually should mean you weigh more and have more muscle on you.
        this. manlets shouldn't lift. lanky people are the only ones who can put on a ton of muscle and still have aesthetics

        Didn't say manlets shouldn't lift, but it definitely will have a bigger impact on lanklets coz they have just so muchhhh space they can fill out.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Being taller also usually should mean you weigh more and have more muscle on you.
      this. manlets shouldn't lift. lanky people are the only ones who can put on a ton of muscle and still have aesthetics

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Disprove physics manlets.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that just means youre weaker
      >muh longer arms! muh leverage! muh ROM!
      yes, being weaker or stronger is a combination of factors and youre probably only now figuring it out, you're weak mate, just lift more

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    heh, outlifted by a manlet king at the gym again?

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    1. This is weapons grade copium. b***h ass op can't outlift a fricking manlet at his gym. Kek.
    2. I agree sorta. 1/2/3/4 is easy as frick if you're a bloat lord, but it's harder when you are very lean. As such, I feel that the new minium IST standard be changed to 1x/2x/3x/4x, where x equals one's body weight.
    3. Op is gay and the distance the weight moves (rom) is proportional to body size, which is proportional to body weight. Op is a little b***h. b***hes are female. Post breasts or gtfo. Don't forget timestamp, ho.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sorry physics was a tough subject for you.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You're legitimately mentally handicapped, aren't you? Poor little guy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If w=fxd, and you get out lifted by a manlet, the manlet is producing more force, whereas you with your long little limbs are producing a greater distance.
        Cope harder brainlet.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          My example is with the same weight not more weight. Force would be the constant and distance would be variable. Still in your example the manlet would have to generate more force over a shorter distance to equal or surpass the work the lanklet does with less force over a longer distance.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The premise is that lanklet op is out-lifted by a manlet, by enough that he is coping hard. Neither of the variables is to be considered a constant. But contextually, i am certain that the difference in weight is proportionally higher than that of arm length. Thus manlet does more work than b***h ass op. PER YOUR OWN EQUATION. You have proven that manlets are superior (objectively untrue but you collectively argue poorly, so im on their side now). Lanklets btfo.
            Manlet defamation physics fails again. Lanklets cope. At the very least fph and wph have virtue in their derision of sinners. Manlet hate threads lack substance, and are full of whiny b***hes writhing in their envious seethe, which is pitiful.
            Now, im sure the next manlet hate thread is up, so I'll see you over there. Imma switch sides again and talk about leverage.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              holy shit simmer down, Frodo.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Bet im taller and stronger than you, brainlet. Don't reply. Just rope.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, tall guys do more work, but it's the price you pay for getting to mog the manlets
    And yes, technically if the same weight is lifted by a tall guy, more work is done. But normalizing weights lifted by distance would also be a big cope akin to body positivity BS, so stop doing that

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You are clearly not tall enough, I see no manlets in my gym

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >be DYEL weak lanklet
    >can't get gains because lanklet giraffe
    >cope on IST by shitposting

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As a lanklet teenager I used to think I was weak to the point something was seriously wrong with me.
    Turns out I was no weaker than any other kid.
    Its just that having long arms means shitty leverage points and pushing the weights through a further distance.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not short but I used to go to the gym with this dude from work who was super tall and built huge. He would work out with this other guy but occasionally I would bench press with them since I could go heavy with a spotter. Big guy would get so frustrated when I would bench more then him. I knew it was physics but wouldn't tell him that. Other guy would give him shit over it.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The manlets send their regards homosexual

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *