Beauty Standards

Have the "beauty standards" significantly changed since the last century?

Will people in the future like "bigger bodies" more than they like fit people?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is no future.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think people in the future will hate all of us for failing them.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    muttilated garden gnomemerican

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Our beauty standards haven't changed at all since Ancient Greece and will remain unchanged for the next thousands of years. We like thin/athletic people.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Even before ancient greece, it’s just that the greeks were able to perfectly depict this ideal with their art and sculpting skills.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Our beauty standards haven't changed at all since Ancient Greece and will remain unchanged for the next thousands of years. We like thin/athletic people.
      /This

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yet everyone’s a fat fuck. Beauty standards are the same but expectations are out the fucking window. No one wants to call out the glutinous fucks

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Explain this chud

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ancient pervert was bad at sculpting

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Tumblr tier sculpture

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Someone makes a joke sculpture
        >Four thousand years later people dig up your garden gnome, fat feminists pretend like this was some magic fertility beauty goddess
        >Thousands of other sculptures from dozens of cultures thousands of years ago depict royalty and the godesses as thin, hour glass shaped
        >"Nooo noooo beauty is a totally made up construct!! White pepo baaaaad!!!"

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >carve statue of man
          >don't make it have a 12 inch dick because that would look stupid and detract from the rest of the sculpture
          >few hundred years later everyone thinks you were pedophile baby dick lovers that hated big penises

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you obsessed with peniseses, anon?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I can talk about them because I'm not 12

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                good, i don't want to talk about penises with someone who's 12

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                so you admit you want to talk about penises though aha

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Stop being a gay.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            lmao, that one's bigger than mine when flaccid. It's a perfectly normal cock.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Gib Nefertiti gf

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sometimes I wonder if in a thousand years people will find a hard drive filled with scat and fart porn and think that's what people were into back then. I wonder if historians with conflicts of interest will insist its definitive proof the plight of some kind of fart lovers political party is just. They'll claim it was normal to love shit sexually and that the cultures of the 2000s were built on a love of shit. They'll look at buildings and art from this era and point out how design motifs and forms reference turds and poop spewed across those shelf-like German toilets.

          Fears like these keep me up at night.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is this before or after ancient Greece?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Way before

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        when that was made being fat would have meant you were very wealthy as that would be the only way you could afford that much food, similar thing happened in America during the great depression, it wasn't so much being fat was attractive cause they were fat, being fat was a status symbol similar to a nice car or house or 1000$ pair of shoes now.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No one blames the shows, they blame trump and white men

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        i can see why they died out

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the latest research indicates that these carvings were most likely made by pregnant women who were stuck in caves with nothing else to do and made carvings of their own bodies to pass the time, hence the lack of facial features

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It was supposed to represent the great mother ergo pregnant woman

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is like concluding that being fat is a beauty standard in Asia because they have fat buddha statues

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That was the standard.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ancient etsy artist

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I like how this is the only example of an obese being favored. Literally every society wants skinny people.
        Besides, when bigger people WERE respected, it wasn't for their bodies. It was because they had more money or resources.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Based.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/kE9DibF.png

        >carve statue of man
        >don't make it have a 12 inch dick because that would look stupid and detract from the rest of the sculpture
        >few hundred years later everyone thinks you were pedophile baby dick lovers that hated big penises

        Is this particularly small anyways? Assuming David and Neptune here are ust cold/just did some pushups or something this would be completely normal.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/kE9DibF.png

        >carve statue of man
        >don't make it have a 12 inch dick because that would look stupid and detract from the rest of the sculpture
        >few hundred years later everyone thinks you were pedophile baby dick lovers that hated big penises

        [...]
        Is this particularly small anyways? Assuming David and Neptune here are ust cold/just did some pushups or something this would be completely normal.

        >Is this particularly small anyways?
        looks like a regular 5.5''-6.5'' grower, that maybe shrunk a bit due to physical activity, to me. they were supposed to be gods, or perfect men, not monkeys

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm like 7" but when cold my peepee is at best 3"

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, not really. Fat was considered beautiful in the middle ages and well into the renaissance.
      Then again, what was considered fat then is a bit chubby today.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just because filthy, lazy, unwashed, fat aristocrats bought artists to depict them does not mean that anyone actually found them beautiful.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Fat was considered beautiful in the middle ages and well into the renaissance.
        and how do you know this?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Being fat was more like a status symbol.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It wasn't considered beautiful, it was simply an indicator of wealth which itself is attractive. There is a difference between beauty and attraction.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it wasn't, you absolute gay. That's the same revisionist bullshit as when C-gradr professors declare that ancient Greece practiced pederasty en masse. The reason the "plump" look was so abundant within certain art forms was not due to it being the beauty standard, nor was it "valuable" as a sign of wealth. The reason was because reference materials for artists were very sparse in that time. Artists, unless given basically unlimited patronage, needed to use forms that were available to them as reference for poses and portraiture. The majority of women in the middle ages were pre-occupied with agrarian labor, assisting their husbands/families with whatever trade they worked in, were raising children, or some combination of the above. They did not have the time to hang around painters all day to capture the shape of their bodies.
        But do you know who did? The fucking women of the aristocracy who had fuck all work to do. Those women were thus more likely to be overweight and thus were used as reference material. Barring that, artists would also need to use other paintings for their references, so if they referenced other artists that had depicted the fat aristocratic women, guess who got unintentionally replicated after the fact? In some cases, artists would just add feminine traits like tits to aristocratic males (I'm forgetting the name of one particular artist who did this numerous times).
        Don't take feminist scholars and their historical revisions so genuinely.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >artists would just add feminine traits like tits to aristocratic males (I'm forgetting the name of one particular artist who did this numerous times).
          michelangelo, and his infamous '' men with tits'' scuptures and painting

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            There was another one im thinking of. Last name started with R (not Rembrandt)

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              rossetti ? it's way way latter, it's from the 19th century

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this. evolution makes us favor slim, athletic partners over fat slobs.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      So true

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Our beauty standards haven't changed at all since Ancient Greece and will remain unchanged for the next thousands of years. We like thin/athletic people.
      Amerimutt detected.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Explain yourself gay

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      nobody other than extreme mentally ill minority thinks right is a beauty standard. it's literally forced gnomish propaganda.

      this guy said it. everyone would forever opt for the 1992 version given the chance

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Basically this
      No matter how hard garden gnomes try to influence people to become degenerate fat slobs, I know in my heart that this is one thing they can't change.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This was never true and will never be true.

    Obesity and poor health are viscerally disgusting to all. Its instinct.

    Not even the gay teenagers who applaud this advertising crap that you clearly cherry picked think the two on the right look anything other than gross.

    Stop acting like what soulless marketers advertise must be what normies believe. Its marketing. They just want consoomers to consoome.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anon…over half the population of the first world is obese. You seriously think it’s all marketing?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. The marketing is targeted towards fats. I never see ads like this because I am not fat. No one sees ad campaigns like that and thinks, wow that's so beautiful I want to become fat

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >fats
          Stop using such dehumanizing terms. You don't call regular people "thins", right?

          The respectful term is "biggers".

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >You don't call regular people "thins", right?

            no, regular people aren't thin anymore, they are fat but not hamplanet ( yet) ,fit people are but a minority

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You cant use that because you dont know their struggles but a more relaxed fat person might allow you to use the term "bigga"

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I personally call them twinks

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Big fat idiots are the perfect consumer cattle. They unquestionably purchase the most nonsense with very little consideration. It's really a manifold perfection of what the upper echelons of society idealize. The food industry provides gluttony, the pharmaceutical industry keeps them just barely alive, the fashion industry caters to their burgeoning glut, the politicians cater to their demands for excess in exchange for votes, Hollywood and pop culture glorify their indulgences by promoting weakness, being content with insecurities and flaunting their unabated need for consumption.

      The most simple answer is the realization that you are in this world, but not of it, and should never give any of them the time of day.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, people all recognize that the left is attractive and the right is not; we just have to collectively pretend that isnt the case so we aren’t called closed minded bigots.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Legit makes me want to end it. I used to wear CK earlier in my professional career but their advertising has honestly steered me away from them. It's not make or break for them but my job requires me to be on top of trends every couple of years so they lost a cyclical customer.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There's only one kind of "bigger body" I find acceptable.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this is literally worse than the OP pic including the man on the right

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        this.literally a 100% male body and a masculine face produced by literal male hormones. only a full-blown homosexual would find that even remotely passable

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >girlswithmuscle.com
      >just select gay porn on pornhub you utter gay

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lizzo thirsted for Chris Evans openly and rejected a fat black dude who did the same to her. That's all you need to know

        this is literally worse than the OP pic including the man on the right

        I don't care what you anons think; I'd mount her like a horse.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this is literally worse than the OP pic including the man on the right

      this.literally a 100% male body and a masculine face produced by literal male hormones. only a full-blown homosexual would find that even remotely passable

      https://i.imgur.com/0ruuL6T.jpg

      Lizzo thirsted for Chris Evans openly and rejected a fat black dude who did the same to her. That's all you need to know

      [...]
      I don't care what you anons think; I'd mount her like a horse.

      I understand you totally.
      I love buff girls but what I hate is how their faces become very manly from the steroid use.
      You might say that I'm retarded because I don't like the manly face but the manly body is ok but it's just how I feel about female bodybuilders.
      I don't like male bodybuilders, I don't like men, I like women with large muscles.
      You wouldn't understand, it's not your fetish.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Really ideal is just low bf%

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Have the "beauty standards" significantly changed since the last century?

    No, but there is more nuance the average ISTard thinks.

    > Will people in the future like "bigger bodies" more than they like fit people?

    No, but it's a supply and demand thing. Supply for thin people is tanking, there's only so many to go around. So many are settling for larger people.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      those fuckers are inbred

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Have the "beauty standards" significantly changed since the last century?
    No. Current progressive leaders just bring ugly to the forefront. People still prefer the bodies in the left. It's just been buried by proproganda from our dysgenic elite.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This says nothing about ideal aesthetics;

    Corporations have just studied the marketing/sales statistics and decided that campaigns depicting fat trannies were more successful in the current environment.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Corporations have just studied the marketing/sales statistics and decided
      Burgers?

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Have the "beauty standards" significantly changed since the last century?
    Bit more emphasis on the butt and less on boobs due to the negrified culture but other than that not really. ~~*They*~~'ve just decided to feature ugly people everywhere, but no one finds them attractive, everyone still knows they're ugly. It's a conscious choice to find the ugliest creaturas possible for any leading role or advertising or whatever.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fat girls with bellies is my fetish so in a way I'm blessed, less competition.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Forcing ugliness into the faces of the populace and browbeating them into saying it's beautiful is a form of mass demoralisation and humiliation.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Beauty standards, despite the claim of sociologists, are genetic, not social.
    However, social status is determined by society. So while you might not be attracted physically to a person, you might be attracted to the benefit in status being with them will bring you.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It used to be more attractive to be fat, because it meant you were likely wealthy in a time full of poorfags. Big dicks used to be seen as unsightly and unclean.

      Beauty standards are dictated by a huge amount of factors, just like everything else.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Complete nonsense.

        >It used to be more attractive to be fat,
        Not physical attraction, and well-built != fat.
        It was attractive in the sense that it was associated with being wealthy.
        Like I explained, you could be attracted to the social status that comes with wealth. But that type of attraction is different from physical attraction. Physical attraction is genetic.

        >Big dicks used to be seen as unsightly and unclean.
        Horseshit.
        Big dicks had the same appeal as they do today.
        That is, when you see a IST, attractive, well endowed man you assume that he's a brainlet.
        Just like today, the QB is hot but dumb.

        This myth persists because people fail to understand why Greco-Romans made their statues the way they did. The answers are simple:
        >protruding things break easier
        >giving them massive dongs distract from the rest of the work
        We see in graffiti Romans enjoyed drawing dicks just like middle schoolers do. But it would be inappropriate on real artwork.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're ugly.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I am.
            It doesn't matter what era I live in, I will always be ugly... because sexual attraction is genetic.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              What happened to the Anglos?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Too polite.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why must I be subjected to such ugliness every day? Gay morons, obese morons, you name it. I am tired.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Beauty standards literally changed in 2015-2016 when batshit liberals started trying to redefine everything at the start of the current indoctrination campaign to slander white people(namely men) and certain politicians by claiming everything good for you or requiring discipline is unfair and somehow a result of white supremacy. I wish I was making this shit up but...godamn....can anyone else really pinpoint a year?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Shit hit the fan in 2011 with Occupy Wall Street

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The fact that some people started shilling obesity didn't change the beauty standards

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fat people in fashion is really just a big fat meme at this point. Currently if you go to a mall or even just Target or some shit (I get you guys don't go outside but bear with me), you'll notice the fat mannequins they brought in not too many years ago have been removed and replaced with one with thinner sexier figures. I think I saw one retail store total that actually had fat mannequins, but it was a specialty store for fatties; all the other stores must have figured they had to drop that shit.
    Surprise, surprise, one sells better than the other.

    Same thing with fashion shows. Currently 99% of models are pencil thin like they used to be, but they keep exactly one fat bitch and one chud each of which you'll see exactly once during the whole show likely just to offer some sort of internet liability protection. Its pretty funny tbh.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad Calvin Klein did these. They made it really easy for me and the bros to boycot anything with their name on it.

    >shirts, boxers, pants, socks, suits
    >into the trash it goes

    Only a gay would wear anything with their brand on it from here on out. I hope they go broke.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I went to Calvin Klein's official website to prove to myself that OP is just cherrypicking, and there's literally not one white person on their site. Mostly black people, and the fat black woman was the worst. Fuck them lmao. I'm sorry OP.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Beauty standards haven't changed, its just that media has gotten so easy to use as a platform for screeching that the ugliest 5% can now push "body positivity" campaigns like this. doesn't change that 99% of all individuals who are even remotely fuckable wouldn't touch these two whales with a 20 foot pole

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    A fart sound effect plays in my head every time I see one of these fucking hogs modeling. They all think they look so fucking sexy but I take one look at their fucking shoots and think of a wet fucking sloppy ass rip playing in my head every time I see one of these braphogs. I know I sound extremely autisitc I can't really explain it but look at that picture and listen to this and tell me you don't chuckle like a retard. https://youtube.com/shorts/o9weGVXGc1g?feature=share

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The future is going to bifurcate into obese mystery meat lumpenproles and instathots/fitness influencers on the other - with little in-between.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    How does this happened?
    Having """big breasts""" become an excuse to be an overweight?
    No matter how big your breasts are if it's smaller than your belly it's never sexy.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they haven't changed and people don't actually like bigger bodies now nor will they ever like those disgusting blobs. you're confusing beauty standards with cultural marxism and demoralizing propaganda

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    is it a guy or girl on left 2022?

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Beauty standards haven't changed. Fat acceptance is a political agenda and a psyop. I'm not saying we should hunt down and lynch fatsos. We should encourage them though to change their life style with a balanced diet, without sugary fatty crap like soda, candies, fast food and access to exercise.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >We should encourage them though to change their life style with a balanced diet, without sugary fatty crap like soda, candies, fast food and access to exercise.
      you know neither of the side wants this, fatty chan need their sugary fix, and companies need to sell their sugary crap, don't you remember that the sugar industry used to bully from hell and back the dude who did research about how sugar is way more insidious and bad for your health than fat ?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Im down to start lynching tbqhwyf, those subhumans are an assault on my eyesight.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tattoos
    I fucking hate this. Especially tatoos on fat unfit people with terrible posture.

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jon Stewart wrote in 2004 that America was getting so fat it would be easier to change the standards of beauty than for people to fucking diet and exercise.
    Welcome to thunderdome, bitch.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Beauty standards were already failing in the 90's. Wahlberg looks like a short farmer boy and Moss always looked like she had some light case of some birth defect syndrome.

    You need to go back a long time

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bost pody

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just noticed the bra on the browner thing.
    What the fuck? What gender is it?

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I work with 2 fat women, probably about the same bodyfat % and the same age. One has a gigantic, round, perfect ass (she never excercies), visible hour-glass figure, and big ol tiddies. The other one looks like complete shit. I'm not sure what my point is but I felt like sharing

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Beauty standards haven't changed at all and even the fatties would admit that left is preferred if they were honest.

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Attraction is instinctual. The only thing all the propaganda does is change the way society views and reacts to it. It doesn't change what we get sexually aroused by.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >The creation of the most powerful nation in Europe in less than 5 years
    >The Autobahn
    >The Volkswagen
    >The 40-hr work week in Europe
    >Overtime
    >The uniforms of the party organizations
    >Paid vacations
    >Pensions for mothers who had lots of children
    >The Havaara Agreement
    >Anti-smoking and anti-alcohol campaigns
    >Animal and environmental protection laws
    >Employment protection for Black folks
    >Created the most diverse, multicultural, multiethnic army in history
    >Thwarted Stalin's plan to invade Europe
    >Created the greatest political expression of anti-racism in history (yes, really)
    >Granted citizenship to numerous garden gnomes and allowed them to serve in the Wehrmacht
    >Hitler youth fitness and training program

    How were they the bad guys again?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >More State
      >More State
      >More State
      >More State

      Hint: Its the socialism

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They would’ve gassed a runt like you too. Liberal democracy is the only political system that allows the continued existence of largely useless politics fanboys with room temp IQs

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        1. No they wouldn't
        2. There were no gas chambers

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How were they the bad guys again?
      >Thwarted Stalin's plan to invade Europe
      You answered your own question.

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Buy are garments you fat lazy slobs
    I see a company trying to adjust their demographic to maintain profits in a dostopian world.

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being normal and buying Calvin Klein.
    Calvin Klein is chud underwear.
    Hot people wear Björn Borg.

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, it's demoralization

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe we as a society have evolved to think beyond physical beauty.

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are those men wearing bras?

  43. 2 months ago
    HATE

    Reminder Mark Wahlberg was a dwarf and nobody cared. Stallone, Mel Gibson etc 5'9

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, the elevation of pathology/attempt to usurp beauty standards with obesity is orchestrated by postmodernists and not an organic event. No amount of cope will change the fact obesity makes you less attractive and damages your health. You can either be an adult and tackle this head on by improving your health or be infantile and change the rules so that you can pretend to feel better about yourself.

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    One is an ad. The other is propaganda.

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, it's because America failed.

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s cyclical. Big bodies are in vogue for a decade or so, and then everyone will want to be skinny again. Look at how Kim kardashian has gone skelly mode this year. Thickness took over around 2012 or so, and it is now taking a back seat

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *