Doesn't change DNA evidence. The cromag masturbation session started on this site because someone found out yids had a high percentage of neanderthal dna as well and the dialogue shifted instantly from "Neanderthal dna strength supremacy" to "uhhh uhh.. cro magnon muh strongest!".
And East Asians have 5%-7% of their genome coming directly from neanderthal and they excel in mathematics and authoritarianism and are not known for their physical strength. >see what I did there
White people did not evolve from morons, we diverged far earlier than you realize, there were in fact migrations back into Africa from Asia and Europe, probably more than one or two.
we diverged from modern morons a long, long time ago. Its also possible that morons are a descendant of Eurasians mixed with literal pre-human primates.
>isn't enough to influence biology to any real degree.
stop saying shit you know nothing about, the amount of genetic material itself has almost zero relation to how important or significant it is in expression
Utter nonsense. The genetic difference between human and Chimpanzee is less than 1 %, while at the same time, the average European has 2-4 % neanderthal DNA. A difference in DNA of a few percent is more than enough to make a significant difference.
(In either case, it's far more important WHAT DNA is different than HOW MUCH of it anyway.)
>A difference in DNA of a few percent is more than enough to make a significant difference.
No it isn't. If human beings had around, say, 10% of Neanderthal DNA, then, it would have some impact, though still only a small impact, since it is only 10% and would still be completely overshadowed by the 90% of you that is homo sapien. >In either case, it's far more important WHAT DNA is different than HOW MUCH of it anyway.
I've never seen a person who's 4% black look like a 100% white guy, so no, you're just straight up wrong about that. Amount matters tremendously.
He didn't even make a point about chimps, moron. All he did was say the genetic difference between humans and chimps is less than 1%. What's there to argue against? Are you retarded? And I'll reply to whatever I feel like, gay.
You haven't seen a girl that liked you either so they don't exist either
Just because you don't understand how something works, it doesn't make it wrong.
Your whole post was about how 2% doesnt change anything yes chimps are less than 1% different, do you not understand how retardedly contradictory youre being? Oh no you do understand it and thats why you chose to ignore it and have yet to acknowledge this, either discuss a topic properly or fuck off but dont bring gnomish rat tactics here
Bro, you're 99% homo sapien, shut the fuck up. You're in the same boat as the rest of us. >Look, guys, I'm 1/10000th Neanderthal, that's pretty much the same as being 100% Neanderthal, right?
No, it isn't. You're not a filthy Neanderthal, and you never will be.
And yet your DNA is 99% closer to those from that "shithole" than it ever will be to your precious failed species. You're like that kid who betrays his friends to hang with with a different group who doesn't even like him. Imagine betraying your own species whom you have infintely more in common with to try to fit in with an inferior, loser species that doesn't even exist anymore. How pathetic.
> Has a wife. > Successful gaming career. > Became rich and moved to Japan. > Even his dogs got invited by local people to visit a place to increase tourism. > Seething yet?
All of those things can be attributed to his homo sapien DNA, not his Neanderthal DNA. Honestly, do you seriously think a measly 2% of his DNA is doing all the heavy lifting? Come the fuck on now. Don't be stupid. It's his godly homo sapien DNA that got him those things, not his inferior, vestigial neandercuck DNA.
Nope. Just correcting you on what the success of the homo sapien in question is attributed to, which is his homo sapien DNA. Stop being a species traitor. You're as much of a homo sapien as I am. Accept it.
>isn't enough to influence biology to any real degree.
stop saying shit you know nothing about, the amount of genetic material itself has almost zero relation to how important or significant it is in expression
Uh, yes it does, bro... Someone with 2% Neanderthal DNA isn't going to get the same benefits from it as someone with 100% Neanderthal DNA. Are you fucking retarded?
>Uh, yes it does, bro... Someone with 2% Neanderthal DNA isn't going to get the same benefits from it as someone with 100% Neanderthal DNA. Are you fucking retarded?
Benefits? what the fuck are you talking about. That was absolutely not the claim what so ever. However a 10% neandertahl could present and be essentially in all ways a neanderthal while a 10% AMH could present and be AMH in all ways relevant. Besides, we're not even close to understanding the ways neanderthal introgression has affected our evolution or how the genes we've inherited express and don't express. 4% Neanderthal DNA is an insane amount, it's essentially as if you had a full blooded neanderthal as great great grandparents. You can find people who look today like a copy of their great great grandparent by looking at photos.
>Benefits? what the fuck are you talking about.
I'm saying that any influence or benefit that a measly 2% of Neanderthal DNA would provide would be completely negligible, you moron. The 98% of you that is homo sapien is doing all the heavy lifting. The 2% Neanderthal DNA is doing nothing, since it's only 2% of you, so it might as well be essentially 0% at that point, that's how close to zero it is. >Besides, we're not even close to understanding the ways neanderthal introgression has affected our evolution or how the genes we've inherited express and don't express
I can give you the answer: It's had barely any affect on us, since it's too little of an amount to cause anything significant to happen, especially with us being so far removed from Neanderthals at this point. >4% Neanderthal DNA is an insane amount, it's essentially as if you had a full blooded neanderthal as great great grandparents
No it isn't. It's an incredibly trivial amount that is doing nothing. Also, you're gonna have to add a lot more "greats" to that.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>The 98% of you that is homo sapien is doing all the heavy lifting
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/MLACourse/Original8Hour/Genetics/gene_expression.html
jesus christ dude just learn to read on anything before you speak on it >It's had barely any affect on us
genes inherited from neandertahsl so far have proven to affect our physiology, our immune system, sleep, bone density, reproductive system health etc etc. some of which are extremely crucial to our evolution. For example, there's an SNP inherited from neanderthals which causes premature births BUT helps prevent miscarriages, you seriously don't think a gene like that will affect the long term evolution of a population that's a carrier as opposed to one that isn't? >No it isn't. It's an incredibly trivial amount that is doing nothing.
zero citation nor does it follow any logic what so ever. >Also, you're gonna have to add a lot more "greats" to that.
on average you recieve circa 6% (+- depending a lot of factors) from your great great grandparents. We have humans on earth that are close to 3-4% neanderthal. So one more great to my statement:)
2 months ago
Anonymous
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/MLACourse/Original8Hour/Genetics/gene_expression.html
So? It's wrong and so are you. >genes inherited from neandertahsl so far have proven to affect our physiology, our immune system, sleep, bone density, reproductive system health etc etc
Wrong, they're simply masiattribured to Neanderthal DNA, when it's actually a result of our homo sapien DNA. Nice job trying to sound smart, though. You failed miserably. >zero citation nor does it follow any logic what so ever.
It doesn't need a citation, moron. It's perfectly logical to say that a trivial amount of something won't really have much of an effect on something, since that's the case for everything. By your logic, someone who's only 1/20th native American could end up looking 100% native American, yet they never do, since the amount of DNA present in their bodies is too insignificant to cause that to happen. That's why when you see mixed-race people who are less than 10% black, they don't even look the slightest bit black at all. You wouldn't even be able to tell unless they pointed it out. Sorry, but what I said was perfectly logical. You're just retarded. >on average you recieve circa 6% (+- depending a lot of factors) from your great great grandparents. We have humans on earth that are close to 3-4% neanderthal. So one more great to my statement:)
Nope, you need to go back tens of thousands of years to get that figure. The Neanderthal DNA present in people today has been completely diluted by our homo sapien DNA. It's not doing anything, dude. It's basically vestigial. Get over it.
Why is the black man in this thread angry about this? You guys are better runners and hold very little fat. Good at explosive stuff. Whitey is stronger though.
>Whitey is stronger though.
Not true, blacks just don't waste their time with autistic shit like powershitting and tossing cabers.
Your Neanderthal dna is probably holding you back in terms of strength/athleticism if anything.
I want to know why i look exactly like the left picture and why my family (very white) is riddled with all the traits associated with high neanderthal dna like addiction, depression, and sporting prowess yet 23andme gives me a measely 2%
Because there's no reason to believe that the higher % of neanderthal DNA you have the "stronger" your neanderthal traits will be, without knowing any other context. An SNP is literally a hyper tiny fraction of your DNA but you just need one of them that helps express whatever trait. This SNP will not manifest itself "stronger" just because you have a bunch more junk or inactivated genetic material.
So those 200ish neanderthal traits could be doing a much larger portion of the influence than the other 7000? I guess that makes sense, i mean when two parents have a kid there are definitely more dominant genes
yes assuming you have them, and it's not about influence, it's about expression within an environment. All you need to have the issues with addiction that comes from neanderthals is simply the SNPs that are associated with this and an environment for them to express. Of course all of these traits could just be completely unrelated to neanderthals, I'm just saying someone who is 1% neanderthal has no reason to be have more neanderthal traits than someone with 3% without knowing any other context
Im not one for blaming problems on things like genes like the fatties do but the addiction for example has literally plagued every male in my family going back like 200+ years, every single one has a story like oh he was an amazing builder but ruined it with alcoholism, gambling etc etc so I do find it believable to be related, it seems like a fight between excelling in things and staving off whatever theyre addicted to like its deeply ingrained in them
>every single one has a story like oh he was an amazing builder but ruined it with alcoholism
could just happen to be your family being good at keeping memories of relatives and ancestors. Since this is like every single poorer male in the western world up until after WW2 or so. Alcoholism was the only way to cope with the world sucking ass back then
Why isnt anyone talking about the fact that Blacks have the DNA of a lesser known equivalent of the neanderthal which isnt present in white people at all
Jesus, give a man time to reply, you impatient queer.
Your whole post was about how 2% doesnt change anything yes chimps are less than 1% different, do you not understand how retardedly contradictory youre being? Oh no you do understand it and thats why you chose to ignore it and have yet to acknowledge this, either discuss a topic properly or fuck off but dont bring gnomish rat tactics here
How is it contradictory? I never said homo sapiens and neanderthal DNA wasn't similar. I said that having a measly 4% of neanderthal DNA isn't really gonna do anything when your DNA 96% of your DNA is made up homo sapien DNA. You don't even understand what we're arguing about. You're arguing a completely different thing from what I'm arguing. If I had 4% chimp DNA, if that were possible, I wouldn't resemble a chimp. You would still barely be able to tell me apart from a full human, just like how if a white person had 4% african DNA, he wouldn't even look the slightest bit black, he would still look fully white.
>THEN WHY ARE CHIMPS DIFFERENT WITH ONLY 1% DIFFERENCE
Because it's not the same kind of DNA, retard. Plus, you're confused with the 4% DNA thing that I keep saying. I dunno, maybe I'm just not explaining it well enough. How many times am I gonna have to explain this to you? The 1% of chimp DNA isn't the same thing that I'm arguing about with the 4% of Neanderthal DNA. We're arguing about different things and you don't really seem to get that.
Alright, take two people, a white person and a black person, they have a baby, the baby comes out 50% white, 50% black, right? Yes. That offspring then breeds with another 100% white person, now their child becomes 75% white, 25% black. And then this happens again, and then again, and then again. Now, what happens when the percentage of their black genes becomes this low (<15%)? Oh, that's right, they begin to not really possess the features of the black side and really only possess the features of their white side, because MOST OF THEIR DNA IS WHITE! The less DNA you have of a particular thing, the less you're going to resemble that particular thing. It's the same thing with the Neanderthal DNA, it's too small of an amount to be significant in any way. It might have some SMALL, mostly irrelevant and unnoticable effect, but that's it. How are you not getting this?
I already said sending walls of text that explain nothing isnt going to work, if you need to send a post that big you dont understand the topic enough and saying "no that dna is different" with no clarification on whats different doesnt answer anything
You really need it simplified to that degree, huh? Just how dumb are you? And I'll make my fucking posts as long as they need to be, you lazy retard.
Anyway, the point is that you're conflating genetic difference in DNA with AMOUNT of said DNA you possess. They're not the same thing. Understand now? No, of course you don't.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>4% is nothing >1% difference with chimps changes everything >y-yeah but ITS DIFFERENT >omg you dont understand? Ill send you a long wall of text hoping you get scared off even tho i address nothing about the post >ITS JUST DIFFERENT OKAY IDIOT??
2 months ago
Anonymous
It's funny that you're trying (and failing miserably) to mock me when you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. Like, what is it you don't get? All you're doing is conflating things and arguing with me out of confusion. I've answered your questions, but you're just too stubborn to listen to the answers.
Dont worry you low iq pussy you can form a group of other low iq pussies and overpower us superior neanderthals, thats how you won last time too
Seethe harder, Neandercuck. Guess which one of us is extinct... You lost. 😉
2 months ago
Anonymous
Dont worry you low iq pussy you can form a group of other low iq pussies and overpower us superior neanderthals, thats how you won last time too
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Yeah, that's right, we lost to you low iq pussies. Lol. See that? I totally owned that guy by pointing out that we lost, right guys?
So, this is the fabled "Neanderthal intelligence", huh? Way to self-own, bro.
2 months ago
Anonymous
I can see youre already forming a low iq group
2 months ago
Anonymous
Wow, sorry, I didn't mean to beat you so hard that you regress to only responding in single paragraph sentences. It affected you that much, huh? Sorry about that kiddo. Still you never should have expected to win an argument against me in the first place, since I'm so good at it. In fact, I've never been beaten and never will be. Anyway, I'll stop bullying you now. GG.
Yes... Also massive joints, legs and calves. I never seen anyone with calves as big as mine and I dont train it. It is as if I was made to climb hills and shit.
Ibero from mother side, italic and austrian form father side
I'm like this too. Tall and I have a handsome cromagnid face. I've never broken a bone, but that could be to do with a lack of effort/opportunity growing up as much as invincible neanderbones.
Considering that the average European has about 2 to 4 % neanderthal dna and that European men win strongman contests with ease I'd say it does.
>Considering that the average European has about 2 to 4 % neanderthal dna
That doesn't prove anything we have 41% of the same dna as a banana.
>I don't know how GWAS or gene families work
Europeans have more paralogues with Neanderthals than other races.
Wow big words man. Leave Neanderthal thread now or else
>Considering that the average European has about 2 to 4 %
Humans and dogs have 94% genetic similarity
The difference is that dogs, plants and other animals and lesser life forms do not get registered in our DNA.
You missed the point completely
How much of that is because of white women?
browncel moment
that would be the cromag genes
No, it's quite literally neanderthal.
Neanderthals were inferior.
Thank you!!
Doesn't change DNA evidence. The cromag masturbation session started on this site because someone found out yids had a high percentage of neanderthal dna as well and the dialogue shifted instantly from "Neanderthal dna strength supremacy" to "uhhh uhh.. cro magnon muh strongest!".
Why wouldn't that only support the claim? garden gnomes are sniveling dysgenic messes.
And East Asians have 5%-7% of their genome coming directly from neanderthal and they excel in mathematics and authoritarianism and are not known for their physical strength.
>see what I did there
poos and chinks have more neanderthal dna than europeans, even some north african groups like tunisians have more than the euro average of neanderthal
That picture is stupid, the homo sapiens who encountered Neanderthals would be dark skinned, they hadn't had time to evolve into whites at that point.
there's no such thing as evolutinon
white people came from atlantis
White people did not evolve from morons, we diverged far earlier than you realize, there were in fact migrations back into Africa from Asia and Europe, probably more than one or two.
we diverged from modern morons a long, long time ago. Its also possible that morons are a descendant of Eurasians mixed with literal pre-human primates.
This is what happens when you allow rednecks to homeschool their children.
Earliest human ancestor came from bulgaria/greece.
No. The amount of Neanderthal DNA present in humans, even those with a "significant amount", isn't enough to influence biology to any real degree.
I forgot to mention I'm gnomish btw not sure if that matters
>isn't enough to influence biology to any real degree.
stop saying shit you know nothing about, the amount of genetic material itself has almost zero relation to how important or significant it is in expression
Utter nonsense. The genetic difference between human and Chimpanzee is less than 1 %, while at the same time, the average European has 2-4 % neanderthal DNA. A difference in DNA of a few percent is more than enough to make a significant difference.
(In either case, it's far more important WHAT DNA is different than HOW MUCH of it anyway.)
>A difference in DNA of a few percent is more than enough to make a significant difference.
No it isn't. If human beings had around, say, 10% of Neanderthal DNA, then, it would have some impact, though still only a small impact, since it is only 10% and would still be completely overshadowed by the 90% of you that is homo sapien.
>In either case, it's far more important WHAT DNA is different than HOW MUCH of it anyway.
I've never seen a person who's 4% black look like a 100% white guy, so no, you're just straight up wrong about that. Amount matters tremendously.
Explain his point about chimps then, im not involved in your guys shit but i hate gays who pick and choose what they reply to
He didn't even make a point about chimps, moron. All he did was say the genetic difference between humans and chimps is less than 1%. What's there to argue against? Are you retarded? And I'll reply to whatever I feel like, gay.
Just because you don't understand how something works, it doesn't make it wrong.
Your whole post was about how 2% doesnt change anything yes chimps are less than 1% different, do you not understand how retardedly contradictory youre being? Oh no you do understand it and thats why you chose to ignore it and have yet to acknowledge this, either discuss a topic properly or fuck off but dont bring gnomish rat tactics here
You haven't seen a girl that liked you either so they don't exist either
No.
We didn't retain any of their cool genes.
Their genes aren't cool, gay. They're inferior to ours.
seething shitskin nigcel that has 0% neanderthal dna
Bro, you're 99% homo sapien, shut the fuck up. You're in the same boat as the rest of us.
>Look, guys, I'm 1/10000th Neanderthal, that's pretty much the same as being 100% Neanderthal, right?
No, it isn't. You're not a filthy Neanderthal, and you never will be.
and yet africa is still a shithole
And yet your DNA is 99% closer to those from that "shithole" than it ever will be to your precious failed species. You're like that kid who betrays his friends to hang with with a different group who doesn't even like him. Imagine betraying your own species whom you have infintely more in common with to try to fit in with an inferior, loser species that doesn't even exist anymore. How pathetic.
cope nigcel
Lmao, seething
ape
You're just as much of a nigcel as I am, bro. 😉
>That doesn't prove anything we have 41% of the same dna as a banana.
I look like the guy on the left and I'm not even white
Remember this man is 2% Neanderthal.
> Has a wife.
> Successful gaming career.
> Became rich and moved to Japan.
> Even his dogs got invited by local people to visit a place to increase tourism.
> Seething yet?
He mogs you.
All of those things can be attributed to his homo sapien DNA, not his Neanderthal DNA. Honestly, do you seriously think a measly 2% of his DNA is doing all the heavy lifting? Come the fuck on now. Don't be stupid. It's his godly homo sapien DNA that got him those things, not his inferior, vestigial neandercuck DNA.
> Black gay ITT malding about a successful pure bred Aryan.
Nope. Just correcting you on what the success of the homo sapien in question is attributed to, which is his homo sapien DNA. Stop being a species traitor. You're as much of a homo sapien as I am. Accept it.
Uh, yes it does, bro... Someone with 2% Neanderthal DNA isn't going to get the same benefits from it as someone with 100% Neanderthal DNA. Are you fucking retarded?
>Uh, yes it does, bro... Someone with 2% Neanderthal DNA isn't going to get the same benefits from it as someone with 100% Neanderthal DNA. Are you fucking retarded?
Benefits? what the fuck are you talking about. That was absolutely not the claim what so ever. However a 10% neandertahl could present and be essentially in all ways a neanderthal while a 10% AMH could present and be AMH in all ways relevant. Besides, we're not even close to understanding the ways neanderthal introgression has affected our evolution or how the genes we've inherited express and don't express. 4% Neanderthal DNA is an insane amount, it's essentially as if you had a full blooded neanderthal as great great grandparents. You can find people who look today like a copy of their great great grandparent by looking at photos.
>Benefits? what the fuck are you talking about.
I'm saying that any influence or benefit that a measly 2% of Neanderthal DNA would provide would be completely negligible, you moron. The 98% of you that is homo sapien is doing all the heavy lifting. The 2% Neanderthal DNA is doing nothing, since it's only 2% of you, so it might as well be essentially 0% at that point, that's how close to zero it is.
>Besides, we're not even close to understanding the ways neanderthal introgression has affected our evolution or how the genes we've inherited express and don't express
I can give you the answer: It's had barely any affect on us, since it's too little of an amount to cause anything significant to happen, especially with us being so far removed from Neanderthals at this point.
>4% Neanderthal DNA is an insane amount, it's essentially as if you had a full blooded neanderthal as great great grandparents
No it isn't. It's an incredibly trivial amount that is doing nothing. Also, you're gonna have to add a lot more "greats" to that.
>The 98% of you that is homo sapien is doing all the heavy lifting
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/MLACourse/Original8Hour/Genetics/gene_expression.html
jesus christ dude just learn to read on anything before you speak on it
>It's had barely any affect on us
genes inherited from neandertahsl so far have proven to affect our physiology, our immune system, sleep, bone density, reproductive system health etc etc. some of which are extremely crucial to our evolution. For example, there's an SNP inherited from neanderthals which causes premature births BUT helps prevent miscarriages, you seriously don't think a gene like that will affect the long term evolution of a population that's a carrier as opposed to one that isn't?
>No it isn't. It's an incredibly trivial amount that is doing nothing.
zero citation nor does it follow any logic what so ever.
>Also, you're gonna have to add a lot more "greats" to that.
on average you recieve circa 6% (+- depending a lot of factors) from your great great grandparents. We have humans on earth that are close to 3-4% neanderthal. So one more great to my statement:)
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Class/MLACourse/Original8Hour/Genetics/gene_expression.html
So? It's wrong and so are you.
>genes inherited from neandertahsl so far have proven to affect our physiology, our immune system, sleep, bone density, reproductive system health etc etc
Wrong, they're simply masiattribured to Neanderthal DNA, when it's actually a result of our homo sapien DNA. Nice job trying to sound smart, though. You failed miserably.
>zero citation nor does it follow any logic what so ever.
It doesn't need a citation, moron. It's perfectly logical to say that a trivial amount of something won't really have much of an effect on something, since that's the case for everything. By your logic, someone who's only 1/20th native American could end up looking 100% native American, yet they never do, since the amount of DNA present in their bodies is too insignificant to cause that to happen. That's why when you see mixed-race people who are less than 10% black, they don't even look the slightest bit black at all. You wouldn't even be able to tell unless they pointed it out. Sorry, but what I said was perfectly logical. You're just retarded.
>on average you recieve circa 6% (+- depending a lot of factors) from your great great grandparents. We have humans on earth that are close to 3-4% neanderthal. So one more great to my statement:)
Nope, you need to go back tens of thousands of years to get that figure. The Neanderthal DNA present in people today has been completely diluted by our homo sapien DNA. It's not doing anything, dude. It's basically vestigial. Get over it.
who else here has the occipital bun
Why is the black man in this thread angry about this? You guys are better runners and hold very little fat. Good at explosive stuff. Whitey is stronger though.
>Whitey is stronger though.
Not true, blacks just don't waste their time with autistic shit like powershitting and tossing cabers.
Your Neanderthal dna is probably holding you back in terms of strength/athleticism if anything.
holy cope my Black
I want to know why i look exactly like the left picture and why my family (very white) is riddled with all the traits associated with high neanderthal dna like addiction, depression, and sporting prowess yet 23andme gives me a measely 2%
Because there's no reason to believe that the higher % of neanderthal DNA you have the "stronger" your neanderthal traits will be, without knowing any other context. An SNP is literally a hyper tiny fraction of your DNA but you just need one of them that helps express whatever trait. This SNP will not manifest itself "stronger" just because you have a bunch more junk or inactivated genetic material.
So those 200ish neanderthal traits could be doing a much larger portion of the influence than the other 7000? I guess that makes sense, i mean when two parents have a kid there are definitely more dominant genes
yes assuming you have them, and it's not about influence, it's about expression within an environment. All you need to have the issues with addiction that comes from neanderthals is simply the SNPs that are associated with this and an environment for them to express. Of course all of these traits could just be completely unrelated to neanderthals, I'm just saying someone who is 1% neanderthal has no reason to be have more neanderthal traits than someone with 3% without knowing any other context
Im not one for blaming problems on things like genes like the fatties do but the addiction for example has literally plagued every male in my family going back like 200+ years, every single one has a story like oh he was an amazing builder but ruined it with alcoholism, gambling etc etc so I do find it believable to be related, it seems like a fight between excelling in things and staving off whatever theyre addicted to like its deeply ingrained in them
>every single one has a story like oh he was an amazing builder but ruined it with alcoholism
could just happen to be your family being good at keeping memories of relatives and ancestors. Since this is like every single poorer male in the western world up until after WW2 or so. Alcoholism was the only way to cope with the world sucking ass back then
Why isnt anyone talking about the fact that Blacks have the DNA of a lesser known equivalent of the neanderthal which isnt present in white people at all
There really is a shitskin seething in here
evolution is fake as the other theories about our origin
Dubs and true. We have gone too deep into the rabbit hole of theories and extrapolations to the point we know nothing exact about everything.
witnessed
There's no point arguing with this dude. He just doesn't get it and never will.
Aww, running away because you're getting pressed, are you? Pathetic.
Just got here mate
Actually, I'm the guy you gays have been arguing with this whole thread. Bunch of morones can't even beat me in a simple argument. Pathetic.
moron is ducking me and i just referred him to one line from a post he already replied to, homosapein behavioir if ive ever seen it
Jesus, give a man time to reply, you impatient queer.
How is it contradictory? I never said homo sapiens and neanderthal DNA wasn't similar. I said that having a measly 4% of neanderthal DNA isn't really gonna do anything when your DNA 96% of your DNA is made up homo sapien DNA. You don't even understand what we're arguing about. You're arguing a completely different thing from what I'm arguing. If I had 4% chimp DNA, if that were possible, I wouldn't resemble a chimp. You would still barely be able to tell me apart from a full human, just like how if a white person had 4% african DNA, he wouldn't even look the slightest bit black, he would still look fully white.
THEN WHY ARE CHIMPS DIFFERENT WITH ONLY 1% DIFFERENCE
Your gnomish tactics dont work here youre not avoiding the point by spamming unrelated walls of text
>THEN WHY ARE CHIMPS DIFFERENT WITH ONLY 1% DIFFERENCE
Because it's not the same kind of DNA, retard. Plus, you're confused with the 4% DNA thing that I keep saying. I dunno, maybe I'm just not explaining it well enough. How many times am I gonna have to explain this to you? The 1% of chimp DNA isn't the same thing that I'm arguing about with the 4% of Neanderthal DNA. We're arguing about different things and you don't really seem to get that.
Alright, take two people, a white person and a black person, they have a baby, the baby comes out 50% white, 50% black, right? Yes. That offspring then breeds with another 100% white person, now their child becomes 75% white, 25% black. And then this happens again, and then again, and then again. Now, what happens when the percentage of their black genes becomes this low (<15%)? Oh, that's right, they begin to not really possess the features of the black side and really only possess the features of their white side, because MOST OF THEIR DNA IS WHITE! The less DNA you have of a particular thing, the less you're going to resemble that particular thing. It's the same thing with the Neanderthal DNA, it's too small of an amount to be significant in any way. It might have some SMALL, mostly irrelevant and unnoticable effect, but that's it. How are you not getting this?
I already said sending walls of text that explain nothing isnt going to work, if you need to send a post that big you dont understand the topic enough and saying "no that dna is different" with no clarification on whats different doesnt answer anything
You really need it simplified to that degree, huh? Just how dumb are you? And I'll make my fucking posts as long as they need to be, you lazy retard.
Anyway, the point is that you're conflating genetic difference in DNA with AMOUNT of said DNA you possess. They're not the same thing. Understand now? No, of course you don't.
>4% is nothing
>1% difference with chimps changes everything
>y-yeah but ITS DIFFERENT
>omg you dont understand? Ill send you a long wall of text hoping you get scared off even tho i address nothing about the post
>ITS JUST DIFFERENT OKAY IDIOT??
It's funny that you're trying (and failing miserably) to mock me when you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. Like, what is it you don't get? All you're doing is conflating things and arguing with me out of confusion. I've answered your questions, but you're just too stubborn to listen to the answers.
Seethe harder, Neandercuck. Guess which one of us is extinct... You lost. 😉
Dont worry you low iq pussy you can form a group of other low iq pussies and overpower us superior neanderthals, thats how you won last time too
>Yeah, that's right, we lost to you low iq pussies. Lol. See that? I totally owned that guy by pointing out that we lost, right guys?
So, this is the fabled "Neanderthal intelligence", huh? Way to self-own, bro.
I can see youre already forming a low iq group
Wow, sorry, I didn't mean to beat you so hard that you regress to only responding in single paragraph sentences. It affected you that much, huh? Sorry about that kiddo. Still you never should have expected to win an argument against me in the first place, since I'm so good at it. In fact, I've never been beaten and never will be. Anyway, I'll stop bullying you now. GG.
Yes... Also massive joints, legs and calves. I never seen anyone with calves as big as mine and I dont train it. It is as if I was made to climb hills and shit.
Ibero from mother side, italic and austrian form father side
I'm like this too. Tall and I have a handsome cromagnid face. I've never broken a bone, but that could be to do with a lack of effort/opportunity growing up as much as invincible neanderbones.
Why aren't they black
this muh dna is as cringe as muh heritage was for boomers. Having 2 percent DNA of something doesn't make you it.
Itt retards
This neanderthal reconstruction looks cute. I think if you saw one IRL you would rather jump off a clip then to have to deal wih such "humans".