Do you even lift?

Imagine some chad Giant from the antidiluvian era smacks your girls ass and pulls out a sword bigger than you...what do?

Also Giants from the days of Noah are totally politcal, What happened to these creatures from Genesis 6?

I already know the answer but i want /misc/'s take on the situation.

>answer = Flood

>more giants in Middle east killing special operations/ CIA assets because lulz back up glowie.

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i guarantee those swords were ceremonial or decorative or used in some sort of very specific situation

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They went underground or were taken into other dimensions by their fathers.

      Shut the frick up, know-nothing, Godless glowBlack person.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day

        https://i.imgur.com/gGptMf0.jpg

        Ok you still have to lift this fricking 500lb hunk of sharpened iron.

        >morons get btfo’d by a simple fact
        Lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ok you still have to lift this fricking 500lb hunk of sharpened iron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Imagine some chad Giant from the antidiluvian era
        The 14th century was not the antediluvian era.

        >smacks your girls ass and pulls out a sword bigger than you...what do?
        Since guns were a thing in the 14th century I'd probably shoot him in his god damn head, and since he was a public rapists and adulterer violating another man's wife I would not even get a sideways glance for it.

        >I already know the answer but i want /misc/'s take on the situation.
        These swords are from a palace at the end of the mediaeval period. The style of sword itself, the way they were made, the very material in their construction are all constituent with that. They were clearly a decoration, no man could actually lift those fricking things much less swing them around in a battle. They are not some kind of evidence of fricking giants from your israelite book of fairytales.

        If they were just decorative then 'you' are five guys with a pully.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Checked. hurry along to illuminate more mid-wits.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're about a century or two off with arquebuses so good luck using firearms to deal with him.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >no man could actually lift those fricking things much less swing them around in a battle

          You can actually lift them and swing them

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that 9 foot sword is 50lbs tops.
        t. guy who used to train with a 12 foot long bar of steel.
        and no its not easy to swing but its doable

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >that 9 foot sword is 50lbs tops.
          It would be useless on a battlefield. The space required to use it would require all your comrades to stand far away from you. You'd need like 20 feet of space just for you to use it. That means you have no comrades at your sides to protect you.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >would be useless in a battlefield
            no you. kys

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            look. hot rolled steel bar 9 feet long by 3/16ths thick by 2 inches wide is approximate 13 lbs (1.4lbs per foot). kind of heavy but no where near 500lbs. with the giant pommel for balance the sword is probably 30-40lbs or like i said less than 50lbs tops

            [...]
            [...]
            [...]
            Did you fricking idiots miss the part where they weigh 500 wiener sucking pounds? They aren't two handed swords, they are way fricking bigger than that.

            please see. you can go on any metals website and clearly buy a bar of metal that could make one of those 9 foot swords using nothing but an angle grinder. a 20 foot chuck is about $36 and could make two of those swords.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              a steel rolled bar that thick and wide? im confused

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you can buy flat bat in any number of thicknesses and widths. if i was going to buy some to make a sword i would get something 3/16ths thick by around 2 inches wide. its fairly cheap

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >battlefield
            Longswords and two handers were seldom deployed on regular battlefields, as that was not their purpose. They are specialty weapons for shock troops, mercenary forces, and irregular clashes. Also seldom for anti-cavalry. Swords in general were seldom used as primary weapons in war, save for some brief periods where the short sword and shield wall became viable, as in late roman heavy infantry. Still rather niche.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Seldom used for war
              If you're a fricking weeb what the frick are you talking about? Swords have primarily been used for the entirety of human history more specifically swords around that era were used all over the fricking place. Hell the saber alone was the primary weapon for the grand majority of most infantry and cavalry for quite a few fricking centuries up until the end of the 1st world war. That is so fricking wrong I won't to physically slap the dick out of your mouth.

              Anyway no, those swords were primarily used by the German Landsknechte mercenary groups as an area of denial weapon inthat they didn't so much swing the sword as you would a longsword as roll the blade in scything motions using it's mass as a way to keep the blade in motion and keep opponents at bay. So like one dude in a street could theoretically keep multiple opponents out of a very very long distance and usually no one would think to bring a spear or a bow as it was primarily used to keep VIPs safe from brigands. Scary fricking weapon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're embarrassing yourself. Swords were mainly sidearms throughout history. The main battlefield weapons have always been the spear and the bow, in all eras until gunpowder. Kys.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong Black person spears were primarily used throughout the early ages until such a time as the phalanx became the primary means of warfare during the era. More specifically it became an arms race of cavalry using lances after the fall of rome with the byzantine empire. During which it became an increasing arms race to fight heavy armor such as plate mail. Which meant that spears weren't used, except in the case of fighting against heavily armored cavalry. Any other fights usually mean such weapons as maces, swords, and polearms such as the billhook as they were cheap to produce and far more effective than a fricking spear was.

                I mean for sanity's sake axes had a longer battlefield role than spears did in terms of use. Unless you truly want to be fricking israelite and argue a rifle with a bayonet is just a short spear you're just flat out fricking wrong. Sabers alone outlive both the bow and spear by centuries in mainland Europe. If anything spears were used far more as ceremonial pieces or status symbols than swords, it's just despite one deity having a notable spear, swords were far more prevalent in mythology.

                You're a fricking moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Whatever sort of polearm and however you want to call sharp long sticks, they were far more prevalent than swords as a primary weapon. The entire second paragraph of your post was literally agreeing with me. But now you're backpedaling and going on tangents, because you were wrong and everyone can tell how much of a moron you are. Frick off.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Polearms are the king of late-medieval times and onward until the gradual adoption of massed line infantry tactics, the ratios of pike and shotte flipped until pike squares and polearms as a general weapon of the field were outdated, and full firepower was needed to best an enemy with the same. With full plate armor that emerged during the middle ages, polearms were the best bet of dealing with armor.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, I know. But some people think they can just spend five minutes on wikipedia and then come in here to argue with literal self declared autists. Not sure if they understand how stupid they look, but it gets on my nerves regardless.
                Anyways, I hate to admit it but this whole topic really is best left to /x/ whether true or not. There are less controversial ways to discuss government corruption and coverrups. I'm off to watch some documentary about epstein and maxwell. Cheers to all frens.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Enjoy, glad to see another history oriented anon

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >meme
                >memehistory pic
                Liike I don't undderstand why everyone doesn't use wikipedia for all their history ! Stop thinkin! stop being an autistic! gets on me nerves! ooo new goyslop just droped! Cheers frens! XOXO

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What about axes?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                He’s an idiot

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ah now there's a post that makes your ancestors smile.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you need to be more nuanced. swords were the primary weapon of many cavalry and infantry units. the lance fell out of favor with cavalry hard.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe in china, swords were most common in england

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Bullshit. What the primary weapon was varied based on culture and time period. Swords were used as primary weapons by ancient Gauls and Romans for example. Sabres were especially widespread throughout history. Scimitars and sabers were used extensively in the middle east for ages.
                Muh spear always is a midwit redditor's take.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That's the point of a claymore. Clearing a large space and everyone gets out of the way. That's 20 feet of space you control. One 9 foot chad can protect a whole flank...

            Canadians wouldn't understand...

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Until you literally just get shot by an arrow and everyone laughs at you for not having a shield so you can twirl around with your stupidly oversized sword, isolated from anything that could protect you

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              ctrl-F "claymore" - one result found.

              A hat tip to you, but I'm disappointed that nobody else knew the name of that sword or what it's used for.

              Some of ya'll need o go watch braveheart.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Reference

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              these weights are not accurate lmao
              the top 2 or 3 might be close but the bottom ones are atleast 4 times heavier than that

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                post forearm

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you ok finbro?
                no one would be able to swing a sword of 14kg around properly.
                thats link swinging a little infant lol.

                https://i.imgur.com/pRKDd4f.jpg

                israelites drove giants to extinction

                https://i.imgur.com/OPvBvr6.jpg

                only high IQ take here
                nu pol is death

                lowest IQ take in here by a large margin.
                if middle easterners from 4k years ago saw todays europeans they would also call them giants.
                giants did not go extinct. they are simply everywhere now.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              those references are so moronic its like when someone says something is a schoolbus and a half long

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          its 20 pounds tops. The small one is like 8-10 pounds.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        bro.. you might be moronic

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nah i just know more than you. shill harder homosexual.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        where is that mountain range located? would like to see for myself, or at least see it on various satellite images.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          me too bumping question

          https://i.imgur.com/gGptMf0.jpg

          Ok you still have to lift this fricking 500lb hunk of sharpened iron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >500lbs
        A standard sword is between 4 and 7 lbs on average. A great sword usually tops out at around 12 lbs. These swords don't weigh more than 30 lbs.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Not even that. A normal longsword would weight around 1-1,8kg (2,2-4 pounds).

          As others have said, those are bearing sword, impractical and only used to show off wealth.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Those swords don't weigh 500 pounds moron. They aren't any bigger than a zweihander or claymore.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wonder what people will think when they unearth replica swords from video games and anime like the buster sword.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >w-what are these holes for?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A two handed sword is a little above 2/3kg

      Even those could be briefly brandished, given a long enough hilt to leverage the blade and by not being unbalanced.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >finds something he can't explain
      >must be ceremonial
      "Academics" get the rope first.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Occam's razor fatty, ever heard of it?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No, tell us

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          sounds like a razor owned by a guy named occam, no need to look further into it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm more of a Gilette guy

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Irevelant countries always invent scams like that for tourists. Ofc its work like a wonder with Ameritards raised by israelitelywood.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Being ceremonial is an explanation you midwit homosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      9 inch dicklet homosexual detected

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They're for cutting off horse legs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thats what I thought

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >ceremonial
      ah, the catch-all cope for denialist morons. As If it matters. Go ahead and follow your own logic. Did people gain superhuman strength during "ceremony"? Did their height suddenly quadruple to necessitate 30 feet tall doorways and tunnels?
      "explaining away" is not the same as providing credible hypothesis. Black person.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sure, swords are never used in any ceremonial roles.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ok why isn't it fricking 15 feet long and 300+ lbs?

          IGNORE CEREMONY gayS.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yeah definitely can't see why anyone would make a couple of big ass swords to hang on walls or anything, must be giant ass skyrim entities which the israelites are hiding

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        have a nice day, naive little /X/ moron

        Hey /X/ homosexuals were you banned on X for being incredible homosexuals so you come post this embarrassing garbage here? Sad.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Cry more homosexual.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >30 feet tall doorways

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They had large machines to wheel in.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/QIdlh6z.jpg

          >30 feet tall doorways
          .

          https://i.imgur.com/Laecl94.jpg

          >30 feet tall doorways
          ..

          churches have doors like that so you can walk in with raised standards.

          https://i.imgur.com/ZKmBYwH.jpg

          For all my bait guys saying this is ceremonial....yea right just like all the other styles and types of weapons found all over the world.

          Also Video related, whats up with low iQ shill regurgitating the ceremony meme?

          Literately Catholic church and the jesuits covering up thousands of bones and disccoveries from the antidiluvian period as if they're proving some arbitrary point...but in reality they're just shilling for Big Church POPE BOi...daddy francis or whatever.

          shadow on man goes behind.
          shadow on "skele" goes infront.
          bad photoshop is just bad.
          gtfo poisoning the well shill.

          https://i.imgur.com/H3KnQAx.jpg

          Wow the shills really landed in this thread.
          Over the target, as usual.

          go away you moron. you stifle actual discussion about archaeology with your null wit takes.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >church builders in antiquity design structures because of some arbitrary rule that standards have to be 25-30ft tall
            >anon claims this without explaining how a normal-sized human could possibly carry a standard that tall, much less control it in the slightest breeze
            YOU are the moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >30 feet tall doorways
        .

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >30 feet tall doorways
        ..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Ignores that the halls and rooms and other doors within the structure are fit to human measurements
          >Pretends like rich people have not and will not always find frivolous ways to show off their power and wealth
          >it must be giants because real life is boring

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >makes blanket statement that the interiors of all the structures i posted are like he says without showing proof
            and
            >ignores the fact that buildings can be gutted and rebuilt
            Not gonna work homosexual

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nothing will work because you're suffering from cognitive bias
              I have better things to do with my life than convince you that you believe in fantasy bullshit because your life is boring.

              Peace out Black person, frick the feds, frick israelites, and frick you

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                right back at ya, mindslave

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Humans are dumb and equate big with important. We have been making big dumb objects in the form of something recognisable for non functional reasons forever.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                kys shittball

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >ignores the fact that buildings can be gutted and rebuilt
              what about doors? they can't be rebuilt?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That would be pretty awesome having front doors like those.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are ceremonial. They're calling bearing swords. Swords were expensive, like the price of a nice car back then. So richgays would have giant ones made and show them off at parades.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't they use them for beheadings?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Don't think so. Executioner swords had a blade shape that maximized cutting. No point and no taper.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I mean, look at the size of those swords in OP's image
          not even the world's strongest man could ever use those to reliably behead anyone, if they could manage to swing them at all

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the small one is basically a normal greatsword, even slightly thinner. I'm sure there were big guys that could swing those. They're probably like 20 pounds. They could just be decorative too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, those were cavalry swords

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Of course they are.
      The inference that they belonged to giants is just hipster moronation

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Those swords look brand new. Clearly fake history bullshit… I’m sure giant swords were around in the past but this is moronic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no, they were used by carpathian cave giants hired by the bozgor kings

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesn't know that men were this strong in the past
      Not surprising coming from an effeminate European.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >i guarantee
      "Extraordinary claims" bong. It is one thing to say "I'd bet", or "I assume". It is another thing entirely to say "I know for a fact".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      oy vey

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        We live in the age of manlets.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Since you are regularly consuming chemical foods.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The fricking israelites poisoned our food to make us into weak manlets like them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Big ass sword for executions for example.
      One thing is for sure and that's there never were "giants" and the big book of the israelite is bullshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The weapons are obviously late medieval and the one in the middle in particular belongs to a series made in Passau, marked with the city's seal of the running wolf. Variants of this series are also kept in Scotland where they are often attributed to William Wallace and the low countries, where they're said to have belonged to Pier Gerlofs Donia.

      All of these attributions are false. They are ceremonial swords and were literally commissioned for that purpose.

      This.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        With that weapon, do you think anyone has ever been killed?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No, because it was not a battlefield weapon but a ceremonial weapon.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >people were never killed intentionally in ceremonies

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Not in the late medieval Christian middle ages.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zweih%C3%A4nder

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landsknecht

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You're completely right in the sense that two-handed swords existed and were used on the battlefields, but these swords in particular are much larger than swords meant for battlefield use. Also, they were made in a much earlier period (early 15th century, i.e. roughly 100 years before your typical Zweihänder/Montante).

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >ceremonial

      IT'S ALWAYS THE SAME EXCUSE FROM HISTORIANS, AGAIN AND AGAIN

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You got so much hate for this comment and two people agreeing. Even if there were a giant humanoid proportionate enough for that to be an appropriately sized weapon, those handles would make them unusable or counter-intuitive maybe with the exception of the top one.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good post anon, it does look like something like that. Swords with blades that long would require hilts that are much longer than the ones displayed have. Historically, zweihanders were used in combat, as well as other big swords and ones specifically made for executions, but those 2 look just silly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      In the netherlands, we had some frisian called "lange pier", which means "big pier". He existed and fought many battles with pic related. That's his sword.

    • 1 year ago
      Tyrone

      This, brainlets will disagree
      t. Zweihander user from DS3

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Did you lvl dex you fkn gay?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they were used by Titans/gigants

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that's what dyels say, but I'm not convinced. It's not like 250cm tall men didn't get born 500 years ago

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Usually, but not necessarily. Fresian mercenaries are known to have used swords of similar size. Either to cleave 3 men at once, or braced like a spear against a cavelry charge.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That massive fricking lump of iron was used to cleave a rider and horse in half, would often just be dragged around the field and swung sideways due to its frick ton weight.

      They often roamed around in large packs of soldiers who had their backs though so when this giant fricking thing was raised up and swung down with every bit of strength they had it would kill the guy because they would think "I can block it with my sword or shield" and it normally just broke it too.

      These guys got killed often too mind you, normally by arrows.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, zhiehanders exist, do you moronicly think they were also only ceremonial?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Some zweihanders were used but there was also oversized ones that were not intended to be used other than for display.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      anglo cope

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      actualy those ridicoulously big swords are the resoult of :
      >i am le knight bow to me filthy peasants that can not afford a sword
      >lose in a fight with a spear man due to spear range advantage
      >order the ridicoulusly large sword to prove "sword superiority"
      the knights were pomperous morons when it comes to warfare

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Imagine some chad Giant from the antidiluvian era smacks your girls ass and pulls out a sword bigger than you...what do?
    Shoot him dead and get laid obviously

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A sling literally has the impact force of 9mm pistol if I remember correctly. Idk how it would fair against armor though if you struck the chest/center mass. It probably would do little damage unfortunately with even lightweight chest armor on an opponent that large.

      Basically seems like it has to be a head shot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No fricking way

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm trying to find the video where some guy tests its and actually can use the sling really well. It sounds like a crack of thunder its honestly fricking sick.

          I think it had to be about 10-15ft range at most for lethal strike (9mm) comparison but can do serious damage at even 30ft assuming you have a perfectly round pebble for each example.

          Sup David? Surprised to see you on the chans

          Sup, wanna see my rock collection?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >It sounds like a crack of thunder
            you sure that's not just the sling itself when he releases it?
            dont get me wrong, a sling is still a weapon, but no way is someone swinging it fast enough for the pebble to go supper sonic.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >you sure that's not just the sling itself when he releases it?

              Kek No no it is the crack of the sling itself however I've seen other people use them poorly. The crack, from what I've seen, is an indicator that it was done properly and there will be real force behind it.

              That being said it still sounds cool and again I wish I could find the video but at a close range it was akin a to 9mm based on feet traveled per second

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              What is the only human made aparatus (non motorized) that breaks the soubd barrier? The whip, so yeah, maybe its possible.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            A sling with lead shot could kill at 100s of yards

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Really? Seems to be contradictory evidence from looking it up on lethality and distance.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >perfectly round pebble
            They used lead bullets shaped for the task. And they killed at a lot farther distance than 15 ft.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              My favourite was one reading KYΑΙ, literally "Get pregnant" I presume the ancient way of telling someone to get fricked

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A sling literally has the impact force of 9mm pistol if I remember correctly. Idk how it would fair against armor though if you struck the chest/center mass. It probably would do little damage unfortunately with even lightweight chest armor on an opponent that large.

          Basically seems like it has to be a head shot.

          Momentum perhaps, but energy delivered (and hence penetration) is far lower than even a 22lr. It's like how you can use your weight and push someone over and deliver more momentum to them than a bullet, but the energy transfer is low.
          It's because energy goes up with the square of velocity whereas momentum is linear with velocity.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sup David? Surprised to see you on the chans

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You make a good DM

  3. 1 year ago
    1 Post by This ID

    They were ornaments back then to. moronic people back then thought they looked scary too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Dumb gay. Making a sword like that was a tremendous task back then. They didn't just make them to hang them from walls

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >hang from walls
        oh not at all, some thing as retarted as that you would have it travel the entire empire, to every small even more retarted village.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I believe there was mythological races but they were all killed off

    Giants were probably Nephilim.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nephilim are alive and well in DUMBs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        yeah man it must be this super fantastical shit with zero real evidence behind it and not rich people doing rich people shit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          True. These ceremonial tents were made in the medieval age with bone tools.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You were so on point with this response I almost took it seriously.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you thought 6 foot was tall?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >A bearing sword is a type of oversized, unwieldy ceremonial sword usually carried by a squire or servant during parades to demonstrate the wealth and status of its owner.[1] Often held upright and lavishly decorated, these swords were not intended for combat or practical use.[2] Carried by royal bodyguards as a display of power, bearing swords were used throughout Europe from at least as early as the medieval period and as late as the 18th century.[3][4]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >whats a cargo cult artifact

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. Their moronic explanations or theories. Just keep asking the questions

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Shill harder goy.
      Besides the majority of /misc/ knows Christ is Lord, therefore all ancient speculation and stories of the book of enoch are confirmed true. Get out of here with the bait "Discovery Channel" answer.

      Like you probably think we went to the moon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Besides the majority of /misc/ knows Christ is Lord
        have a nice day christcuck, most of /misc/ does NOT follow your moronic cult. Only you dumbfrick mutts are stupid enough to think that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Majority of Misc is Christian you moronic newbie

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        is there no other explanation you can think of as to why that ai made that image when prompted with "God"

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          AI have claimed to be nephilim and attempted to trick people,Christ is king

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Giant from the antidiluvian
    >what do?

    Invoke the name of Christ.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >antidiluvian era
    >days of Noah
    >creatures from Genesis 6
    >flood
    Personally I didn't really like the lore in israeli fanatasy book #1, I think Sapkowski's nuanced take on empire and economy in the Witcher was far more enjoyable because it connected fantasy to realism in a way that was both entertaining and allegorical to the empires of old. israeli fantasy really wen off the rails in book #5 with the magical zombie israelite on a stick, that's just ridiculous.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Sapkowski's nuanced take on empire and economy in the Witcher
      Just read the first of the Witcher. Incredibly overrated tripe. Sapokowki is a lolbertish commie Black person and his stories are incredibly boring. Don't tell me it gets better or that the translation sucks. The books are gay as frick and not based nor redpilled.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Read the short story collections bro, that's where the good shit is. Sapkowski can't write an epic for shit but his short stories and worldbuilding are second to none

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >what do?
    throw rock

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >5ft+swords
    >tfw anime was real all along
    Kenshin might have really fought giant ninjas.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      WOAH NO WAY THERE MUST BE GIANT PEOPLE IN THE MILITARY THIS PICTURE PROVES IT

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >you're a big guy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      First attempt of into space? Imagine the recoil on that thing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why is his finger not capable of reaching the trigger? Is that even a trigger? Why is the barrel bent at the end? That's not a real rifle....

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      americans be like:
      >big guns?? dey must of been for giants
      >sheesh grandpa forgot to tell me about those giants in the army back then

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Okay but people in the 14th century weren't giants. These big heavy swords aren't for combat, but for artistic/ceremonial purposes.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this board is the largest concentration of morons on the internet. congratulations, glowBlack folk. you killed /misc/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I’m not your brah

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >When you thought you could piss into the ocean
      Need to lurk more

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Jannies killed the board. And homosexual
      mods not glowies.

      >When you thought you could piss into the ocean
      Need to lurk more

      Checkd.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The question is why do you believe word for word what some old israelites wrote about in a book? Do you also think the earth is 6000 year old? Lmao. Abrahamic religions are a joke

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes I do, I think the world was created already aged kinda like a clone being born as an adult or a rolling start in a race

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well these swords wouldn't be used for fencing. They'd be used for a single blow against a rider from the ground and then the user would swap to another weapon.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A two handed sword is a little above 2/3kg

      Even those could be briefly brandished, given a long enough hilt to leverage the blade and by not being unbalanced.

      Dumb gay. Making a sword like that was a tremendous task back then. They didn't just make them to hang them from walls

      >A bearing sword is a type of oversized, unwieldy ceremonial sword usually carried by a squire or servant during parades to demonstrate the wealth and status of its owner.[1] Often held upright and lavishly decorated, these swords were not intended for combat or practical use.[2] Carried by royal bodyguards as a display of power, bearing swords were used throughout Europe from at least as early as the medieval period and as late as the 18th century.[3][4]

      Did you fricking idiots miss the part where they weigh 500 wiener sucking pounds? They aren't two handed swords, they are way fricking bigger than that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds like you need to hit the gym or go on HRT homosexual

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No chance those things weigh 500 lbs.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          K

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Dude look how they are mounted. Do you have any idea what 500 lbs feels like? Go to your nearest gym ans load a barbell with 5 plates and see what that is like. These swords would have to be fricking tungsten if they were 500 lbs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds like you need to hit the gym or go on HRT homosexual

        Ye, eat some eggs and steak homosexual.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://collections.royalarmouries.org/object/rac-object-122.html
        20 bls max I bet
        And even that's way too heavy to effectively swing

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        yes I missed that part because it wasnt there

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        found the dyel

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Run under his sword like a blood runner

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no wonder the israelites, giving the American Black the caananite giant genes to destroy the wealth and prosperity of the white man; all have their mandingo Black folk sleeping with the wives of these godless glowies spreading lies about basic history and biology

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Its humanly impossible to lift a sword over 30lbs In battle

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      However, it is giantly possible

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Giant swings sword at me with a velocity of a whopping 10 mph.. I get on all fours, do the dinosaur, get up and unsheathe my dragon dagger, freshly coated in super poison… I run up and flick him across the torso 8 times in 3.5 seconds, using figure 8 slices. He is weakened heavily and the super poison finishes him off. I quickly run away before I am smited by the giant’s final dying prayer. Why the frick would anybody use a sword that big and heavy?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'd just shoot him with a gun

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's a pretty dumb plan there you knife eared homosexual.
      First off said giant is several size categories larger than you.
      That means that your gay ass little dagger is going to be like a toddler attempting to stick an adult with a half inch blade.
      It'll merely cause a flesh wound in the best circumstances akin to s catscratch.
      Your "super poison"
      Guess what Silverleaf.
      His con modifiers + saving throws are going to make that a non issue.
      What you need......are tunnels.
      Big
      Fricking
      Tunnels.
      >Tunnel under battlefield
      >B8 dumbshit giant into Tunnel pit trap
      >giant falls
      >Boom zerg rush giant from above and below
      Now gtfo back to your gay little trees and unicorns while us real dwarves deal with the giants.
      After that we'll be coming for your trees to make barrels for the MASSIVE amounts of Dwarven stout we'll need to give your wives a taste of the BDC.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds gay, you ain't gay is you boy?

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    israelites drove giants to extinction

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      only high IQ take here
      nu pol is death

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, israelites have descended from the giants, but have evolved to pass off as humans. Only the nose remains unchanged.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tl; watch too may movies and thinks shields were a normal thing too back then lmao
    im sorry burger but 2 handed swords were almost the size of one handers they were made for speed but not really that useful compared to spears or one handers and parry daggers or bucklers, you get parried and killed easily, also locking swords with your opponent is moronic you literaly get stabbed in the face lmao

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      thats literally not the case in the historic record though. The bigger the weapon the better it was at killing. Sword beat dagger. Dagger and buckler beat sword. Two handed sword beat dagger and buckler. Spear beat two handed sword. Polearm beat spear. Thats why landsknechs literally had a dual line formation of flamberge and pistol wielders sandwiched between billhook weilders.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >muh spears
      Frick off Lindybeige

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >i guarantee those swords were ceremonial or decorative or used in some sort of very specific situation

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What do
    A 6,283 radians and leave her with the medieval

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >antidiluvian
    yeah I hate floods too

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I shoot him in the face with my sling

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This was blacksmiths showing off how good they were. The Japs have a similar one

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They are just fancy display pieces from back then you dumb christcuck

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sif did nothing wrong.
      Artorias was an easy boss
      Change my mind

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        idk i'm new to the game. really enjoy it so far, just beat sif today, one try. couldn't get over how cute she was while i was shooting her in the face with arrows

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Enjoy the playthrough.
          I'm playing Elden Ring right now and thoroughly enjoying.
          Going to play Dark Souls 3 next.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Unfeasible

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >posting weapons that never saw battle

    cringe

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Swords of the old ones, children of fallen angels, giants.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The secret to deciphering the ancient world is learning Aramaic. That's a start at least.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    For all my bait guys saying this is ceremonial....yea right just like all the other styles and types of weapons found all over the world.

    Also Video related, whats up with low iQ shill regurgitating the ceremony meme?

    Literately Catholic church and the jesuits covering up thousands of bones and disccoveries from the antidiluvian period as if they're proving some arbitrary point...but in reality they're just shilling for Big Church POPE BOi...daddy francis or whatever.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Shills gonna shill and morons gonna moron, anon.
      They've lost every campaign on this board so far that i've seen and they'll lose this one too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What's the official explanation for the nip giant in the vid?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        its from a movie called big man in japan from 2007, made by the jap in pic related

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Look at the edge of the bottom sword. Would you want to approach a guy swinging one of those around? Waiting for them to tire or waiting for archers would be a part of it, as it would likely be used to delay a much larger force at a choke point like a bridge or gate.
    I don't think it's a matter of being able to wield it and survive, I think it's just just a situational weapon.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What happened to these creatures from Genesis 6?
    THE israeliteS SEEK TO REBUILD NIMRODS FRACTURED RELIGION

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Antidiluvian era
    Some warriors from Central Europe usually used massive Zweihänder swords between the 14th and 16th centuries. Those were usually Landsknechts who fought along pikesmen, usually Halberdiers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yep, german and dutch

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Special Olympics
    Hungarian style

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Those swords only weigh like 50 lbs, which is tiresome but not heavy for any man who's not a manlet

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just noticed something.....

    Why is it that brits and Kangaroo gays are the ones shilling so hard for "Muh ceremony"?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Go look up what a bearing sword is, moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, go Frick yourself chang.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          this is the dunning kruger thing, right? not very healthy anon

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >not calling it takeshi's castle

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because Australia comes from English people. And English people like grand and impressive displays, whereas americans are more into Nascar, blacks and cheap disgusting candy and other low quality things. Basically America = cheesey cringey cheap crap. England = royalty, class, culture, professionalism and tradition. Hope this helps.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Classy machete fights in the street, classy Hispanic “football” worshipping,
        classy horrific caked makeup,
        classy dental care.
        The only classy thing you guys have is your bathroom stalls don’t have a moronic gap where people can see inside

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Australia is none of those things. Bunch of fricking criminals and moronic abbos larping as a nation. Covid camps btw lmfao

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Never have I ever thought I'd come to defend a bong, but yeah, being more intelligent on average, it would be normal for them to reach the actual conclusion of the matter faster than a mutt

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >HIS WEAPON WAS FAR TOO LARGE TO BE RIGHTFULLY CALLED A SWORD
    >IT WAS LARGER, THICKER, HEAVIER AND CRUDER THAN ANY NORMAL BLADE

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >*throws 30 feints just to UwU what's this and stabs you between you armour by a untrained peasant*

    KBlack folk fricking SEETHING

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gravity apparently got stronger or weaker or something and we shrunk. their blood couldn't circulate properly so the giants died off. or they drowned in the flood.

    i'v heard different versions. however I think they're real. but the photos go hiding along with the actual skeletons found all over the world. the fricking Smithsonian keeps "Losing them" but apparently they're real

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not gravity dumb moron burger. The amount of oxygen in the air got less.

  42. 1 year ago
    Sage

    ornamental

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wish giants were real, where's my snu snu dicky.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Take the meds, some people are larger than average but there is no evidence of giants and no saying it's been covered up only proves you gullible.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Unless those weigh 50 pounds or more I dont think you'd need to be a giant, just have good core control

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shake his hand and ask him to look after her

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >what do?
    Open one of his arteries and watch him bleed out.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not actually used or meant be used in combat , they were display , ceremonial
    Dippy

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >That's it! I'm inventing crossbows!

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All of our current issues are because Yeti mated with the hairless ape... a forbidden practice.

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They were just display pieces and flexing on other blacksmiths/towns/empires

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Before the flood, the world was very different. There was more oxygen content in the air meaning plants and animals would grow larger.

    The flood happened and it decimated the world. Sea levels rose, cutting off land bridges between continents. Mankind couldn't survive as the hunters they previously were, and so developed agriculture as a means to survive. This became the Jesus myth; the saviour of mankind had a body of bread and blood of alcohol; grain. He would be buried and rise again and again.

    Mankind then shrank in stature over time

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Picture makes them look bigger than they are, pic related.
    England had similar swords dating back to 15th centruy.
    Like the English ones which are 2 meteres long, they're likely ceremonial swords of state, or similar.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How much does the big one weigh ?

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Visited the museum in Solingen where they have many swords form all periods.
    The ones that got my attention were the German cavalry / infantry officer swords around 1890. Those were industrially made in large numbers, from good steel, looked completely optimized for the task of killing in everyday use. It can be said that they were the pinnacle of development, they were the last ones purpose-made for the military before they became obsolete because of machineguns.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Giants are real. Anyone saying otherwise is pushing historical revisionism on you.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    simply a scam, hight You are powerless in this world.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The bible acknowledged men like Beowulf and Hercules were real and morons still doubt it.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Imagine some chad Giant from the antidiluvian era smacks your girls ass and pulls out a sword bigger than you...what do?
    pull out my revolver and blow his dick off like the scene from indiana jones.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >manly tears poses with his derringer pocket revolver

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In Prague there is a library full of real giant books. For ceremony, as is tradition, of course of course

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The earth is flat, water always finds its level, giants existed

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    she's staring at it, craving BHC

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Afghan war was to kill the remaining few left in the highlands.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The Afghan war was to kill the remaining few left in the highlands.
      Did we get the last of them? What about the frost trolls in Northern Scandinavia?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I believe it.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is not medieval Europe, this is a map from 1444. I would recognize that shit anywhere.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >map is from 1444
      >names it map 1200

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anybody that used a sword like that would be dead instantly. Really stupid.

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The actual William Wallace series is pretty impressive. Saw it in Sterling and got my picture next to it. I'm 6-3 and this thing was approaching my height, including the few inches of the platform holding it.

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    "Dinosaurs" are a israelite invention. Most of the bones are actually from Giants and the skulls, etc. were destroyed en masse by the ~~*smithsonian*~~

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Simp for her, pull a woody and start breeding chad sons.

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I mean, it'd be kind of hot to watch a giant literally split my gf in half with his enormous giant-dick

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is the dumbest manufactured glowie conspiracy yet.

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    display swords then, display swords now
    >fake and gay

  73. 1 year ago
    Tyrone
  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you just know

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not hard to believe people used to be big enough to wield these swords.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it is because human beings were shorter on average, not taller.
      As has been pointed out in this thread in prior, these are decorative pieces.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What happened to these creatures from Genesis 6?
    The same thing that happened to the Jolly Green Giant and Thanos.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's a matter of perspective, also women are small.
    I could easily use those.

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Absolute state of /misc/.

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Too many $cience homosexuals in here.
    Giants are real.
    Cope, losers.

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >create ceremonial swords
    >700 years fast forward
    >some morons thing anybody used these for anything else than show
    every 14th century peasant had more intellect than most modern day normies

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes you insufferable moron Black person, giants still exist. It's called gigantism and it is a genetic defect
      Pretty much nobody with this defect lives past the age of 50. The strain on their very human heart and circulatory system having to pump blood an extra 3 feet up causes it to give out very early. Even people who are just abnormally tall suffer from health problems related to height.
      I'm 6'1 anon, am I descended from ancient fallen angels? WooOOOooOOOoOOO

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >a genetic defect
        It didn't used to be.
        And i thought you were leaving?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It didn't used to be.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >And i thought you were leaving?
          Oh I still am, it's been a whopping five minutes and i also haven't really wasted any time trying to explain to you why you are delusional about an ancient race of giants that magically still exist despite the flood wiping them out and they're all satan
          it's tiresome

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >pristine, unused and clearly ceremonial sword on display
    >IMAGUN DA NEFALIMS
    The israelite AI well-poisoner has been overclocked, I see. Shalom, c**ts.

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kick to balls. I do push ups daily,should do sth else,but shoud need to eat better

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    btw those swords are WAY less heavy than you think they are
    t.swordgay

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >what do
    Why even bothering to get a girl if a Tyrone ends up fricking her anyway??

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There is a tribe of these giants living in a cave system under the Rockies with an underwater river running through it.
    One day, In going to show them the way out. Probably in exchange for not eating me, but also because it will be great fun to show them the surface world, which is full of crazy little morons with magic tools.

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >decorative sword too large to be used survives in excellent condition because it was too large to be used

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Shh no critical thinking allowed

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Noah never existed.

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Reads this thread
    I better not see you schizos insulting bugmen for being too invested in fiction anymore

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People over 6 foot have evil blood in them. Its a genetic thing god tried to wipe out. They are satan spawn. Thats why there is so much subversive media against people under 6. Its all a israeli psyop

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >t. midge

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    417941789
    >Oh I still am
    right, because the thread is about to reach bump limit
    >race of giants that magically still exist despite the flood wiping them out and they're all satan
    I never said either of those things.

    The only people on this board who get so irrationally triggered by stuff like this are shills.
    >post walls of text
    >immediately resort to name calling
    >never post counter proofs
    I should have seen it right away. And no more (you)s for you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody anywhere has any reason to hide or not believe in giants. The dorks who spend life cataloging extinct hominid species would LOVE for giants to be real, they just aren't. Think how much more fun and interesting and popular that would make the study.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Nobody anywhere has any reason to hide or not believe in giants.
        Absolutely not true.
        ALL mainstream historians.
        ALL mainstream anthropologists.
        ALL mainstream archaeologists.
        EVERYONE who has ever believed in and pushed Darwinism as it applies to humans.
        They ALL have every reason.
        History is fake.
        Giants were real.
        Sooner or later you'll see.

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >US military was in Iraq to find giants
    this is a whitewash/astroturf to cover up that the US military was investigating cave systems underneath the Ziggurat.
    there are references to the “Burial Place of Gilgamesh” in the Hillary Clinton email archive
    https://www.reuters.com/article/pope-iraq-ur-preparations-int/popes-visit-to-iraqi-ziggurat-to-bring-together-several-faiths-and-hopefully-lure-more-visitors-idUSKBN2AM0XW

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Artificial and homosexual especially the 3rd grade art class gold chest thing kek. When does this homie blink to keep those eyes reflective from moisture?

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you guys listened to Varg you'd know these are open battlefield swords, not for dungeon crawling.

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wow the shills really landed in this thread.
    Over the target, as usual.

  98. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I want to see that sword next to a 6'4 muscular man not a 5'1 girl for dramatic effect
    Fricking disingenous site

  99. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How you think they really killed dragons? If you had the power to fly and breath fire how easy would it be to fight and kill a small monkey wielding a knife?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *