Funny: According to sports science this should work BUT no Olympic athlete in power sports trains like this. Either they do vastly more sets, like Oly lifters, or they do 8-10 reps with high speed like Track athletes.
Advanced trainees require different programming. The average hobbyist would not benefit by trying to mindlessly ape a world class athlete who's been training since childhood.
It is unironically a good thing that the training programs of elite athletes are not discussed in the common discourse around normal-people fitness.
You're retarded. It's the same notion as "well Michael Phelps eats like 10000 calories a day, so I should eat that much to gain olympic muscle".
Give me your mother's address. I'm going to
>guy is a professor at Stanford
Now I don't know the guy, personally, but throwing "he's a professor" doesn't defend anything.
"Professor" and "scientist" don't mean shit nowadays. He could've made it as a professor through women study programs or other meme fields. Doesn't mean his input is worth shit, just like those articles going "[...]according to experts" or "[...] science says." and with a little digging turns out it's some fat retard with a PhD in feminism history.
Pic very related.
This. The average person reading that tweet on twitter has no training experience. Simple programming works for untrained people.
Advanced trainees need more advanced training to progress obviously. But those aren't the people that guy is talking to
Doing anything that's moderately difficult everytime you work out and being consistent about doing that work will give you results. The problem is people are not consistent on working out and give up after a few weeks or being taken out of their routine for whatever reason
I use a d6 and d20
i roll 6 d6 to pick out sets
role a d20 for each to represent reps
Change weight depending on reps
Keeps things mixed up
I have one of these for upper, lower and calisthenics. For calisthenics I use a d100 though.
i do, but accessories are 4x8-10
Funny: According to sports science this should work BUT no Olympic athlete in power sports trains like this. Either they do vastly more sets, like Oly lifters, or they do 8-10 reps with high speed like Track athletes.
Nobody running track does 10s
Are you an olympic athlete? Do you want to be an olympic athlete?
>equating a very generalized workout plan/idea meant for your average couch potato with the training regimen of Olympic level athletes
IST never dissapoints
Advanced trainees require different programming. The average hobbyist would not benefit by trying to mindlessly ape a world class athlete who's been training since childhood.
It is unironically a good thing that the training programs of elite athletes are not discussed in the common discourse around normal-people fitness.
You're retarded. It's the same notion as "well Michael Phelps eats like 10000 calories a day, so I should eat that much to gain olympic muscle".
Give me your mother's address. I'm going to
>welcome to the huberman lab podcast where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday living
thanks but i'll stick to my actual program that has some thought put into it.
This guy is a professor at Stanford
He should get a real job
That makes me trust him less, if anything.
this
>guy is a professor at Stanford
Now I don't know the guy, personally, but throwing "he's a professor" doesn't defend anything.
"Professor" and "scientist" don't mean shit nowadays. He could've made it as a professor through women study programs or other meme fields. Doesn't mean his input is worth shit, just like those articles going "[...]according to experts" or "[...] science says." and with a little digging turns out it's some fat retard with a PhD in feminism history.
Pic very related.
Has he posted physique tho
He did, actually.
Can't find anything.
I work with scientists and I'm fixing their problems very often. I don't see your point
>equating a very generalized workout plan/idea meant for your average couch potato with the training regimen of Olympic level athletes
IST never dissapoints
>80/20
>3-5
hours
If you fall for any of this shit you are a hopeless midwit.
The midwit is the person who believes they're hard-and-fast rules or "facts" instead of just heuristic ballparks.
What I find the most unreal about all of this ‘science’ shit is they inevitably look like dogshit or at best normal.
I’ve done this for a while. I’d recommend it. It feels better to get the most out of a single exercise 3-5x5 than to do anything too complicated.
>Step 0: take a bunch of steroids
There's nothing wrong with what he said you dinguses. In fact, if all people do this society would be healthier as a whole.
This. The average person reading that tweet on twitter has no training experience. Simple programming works for untrained people.
Advanced trainees need more advanced training to progress obviously. But those aren't the people that guy is talking to
this
but your "set" is over the second you break form
if you cannot keep proper form you have reached point-of-failure
Basically doing SS forever with weighted pull ups
Doing anything that's moderately difficult everytime you work out and being consistent about doing that work will give you results. The problem is people are not consistent on working out and give up after a few weeks or being taken out of their routine for whatever reason
I use a d6 and d20
i roll 6 d6 to pick out sets
role a d20 for each to represent reps
Change weight depending on reps
Keeps things mixed up
I have one of these for upper, lower and calisthenics. For calisthenics I use a d100 though.