Don't eat raw stuff

Daily reminder that eating raw stuff is retarded because cooking makes nutrients more available to you

Cooking is in part what allowed us to get more nutrients and become smarter as cave men

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know man, that guy looks pretty jacked. Raw liver might be the move

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eat steroids raw, not meat.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Then why does cooking dog food remove nutrients from it (for dogs)?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because dog food is made to be eaten while the owner not having to cook anything, I assume they process it to make the nutrients more available, either by cooking, or by other processes.
      I've never heard of dog food being cooked making it lose nutrients. What source did you take this from?

      >cooking makes nutrients more available to you
      that's true for vegetables, but the opposite for meat and eggs.

      It's true for virtually all foods. Cooking breaks down the protein a bit so your gut only has to finish the job.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Because dog food is made to be eaten while the owner not having to cook anything, I assume they process it to make the nutrients more available, either by cooking, or by other processes
        This doesn't make any sense grammatically.

        When I said "cooking dog food" I was referring to food that is raw, like raw meat and organs, AKA what dogs/wolves naturally eat, and cooking that. Not cooking already-cooked dog food like canned food or kibble. That doesn't make any sense.

        >where did I hear this
        I don't remember and I don't know if it's actually true.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Because dog food is made to be eaten while the owner not having to cook anything, I assume they process it to make the nutrients more available, either by cooking, or by other processes
          Because dog food is made to be eaten without the owner having to cook it for the dog*, I assume they process it to make the nutrients more available, either by cooking beforehand*, or by other processes
          Fixed.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            dude what the fuck are you talking about. we are talking about RAW food that IS NOT COOKED beforehand. please slow down and read and use your brain before you type another nonsense post.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I was just fixing my sentence because it was really badly put together. I didn't engage with your other points because you not only said you have no source, buy you also assumed I was supposed to know you meant normal food given to dogs when you said dog food.
              Dog food is food that is sold as dog food, like picrel, retard. Giving a chicken breast to a dog does not make it dog food, it's just food. Every person that speaks English will assume picrel if they hear someone talking about "dog food"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >calling someone stupid when your english comprehension and writing skills are horrible
                like pottery. no one is cooking dehydrated kibble btw, and you are retarded for thinking that's what I was referring to.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                How many languages do you speak, anon? Can you have conversations in all of them, maybe with some mistakes here and there?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not arrogant like you, so I don't insult people's intelligence when I misinterpret things in languages I don't understand. That's the difference between me and you.

                >hurr i speak broken english which is the language of the entire world and internet, i'm better than you!
                >i'm bad at reading though, and that means you're retarded
                god what an incredible gay.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I've actually designed a AAFCO-compliant veterinary formula back when my employer had an Animal Health division, and I can tell you they are only made to hit nutrient ranges using approved ingredients and pass microbial testing after processing and packaging.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >protein is the only nutrient

        god you're retarded. You've never heard of micronutrients?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Cooking breaks down the protein a bit so your gut only has to finish the job.
        Cooking absolutely does not significantly alter protein structure in meat, and the small intestine has 0 issue digesting all of the amino acids from protein unless you have some kind of disorder.

        I don't know why I'm the one who has to tell you this, but the human body is REALLY good at digesting the food it eats. That's why your poop is brown and stinky and doesn't look anything like the food you eat (again, unless you have some kind of disorder).

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >i assume it is like this therefore it must be so

        holy mother of reasoning. you truly are a genius

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I didn't say it must be this way, this is why I used the word "assume"

          >protein is the only nutrient

          god you're retarded. You've never heard of micronutrients?

          Which micronutrients get less absorbed when cooked?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            water-soluble vitamins: vitamin C and the B vitamins — thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), pyridoxine (B6), folic acid (B9), and cobalamin (B12)
            fat-soluble vitamins: vitamins A, D, E, and K
            minerals: primarily potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium

            https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/cooking-nutrient-content#cooking-amp-nutrients

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They have to add synthetic vitamin D to milk that’s heated (pasteurized).
        Cooking destroys for example B vitamins, vitamin C, enzymes.
        So you’re wrong, you stupid moron.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          except milk naturally has very little vitamin D, raw milk has almost no vitamin D, the reason why SOME pasteurised milk is fortified with vitamin D is to prevent deficiencies specially in childhood
          you're fucking retarded, pasteurization does fucking nothing to non water soluble vitamins

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You are a disingenuous moron.
            That is just one (1) example of what cooking does to food. Off yourself and your lineage.
            B vitamins are all destroyed, enzymes, etc. Protein strands get disrupted. Buh buh buh we gudda put da synthetic vitamin durrr.

            https://i.imgur.com/0uQbaGI.png

            humans are definitely adapted to a fully cooked foods diet
            anyone that claims otherwise is a fucking retard
            >but muh dogs and cats suffer from a fully cooked diet
            only if the cooked food is exposed to the elements for a long time, kibble targeted towards cats and dogs is fortified with nutrients that are specifically vulnerable to degradation from long shelf life(months and sometimes even years), roasting a chicken and feeding it to your dog is perfectly fine and will barely make a dent on its creatine, taurine, carnosine and carnitine content

            also, we aren't dogs or cats we're human, cats and dogs have special dietary requirements that we don't have(carnitine, carn, and we have special dietary requirements that cats and dogs don't have(vitamin C and vitamin K1)
            our instestine, our teeth, our stomach and everything else are well adapted to a 100% cooked foods diet

            >also, we aren't dogs or cats we're human, cats and dogs have special dietary requirements that we don't have
            You mean the nutrients that we destroy by cooking? Seems legit.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Because dog food is made to be eaten while the owner not having to cook anything, I assume they process it to make the nutrients more available, either by cooking, or by other processes.
        Lmao there’s been a study where they feed cats raw and cooked foods. Guess which one has more chronic illnesses? Cooked! Just like your brain.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you mean the few amino acids that are heat sensitive like carnitine that dogs need to eat in their diet but humans don't?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I literally don't know, otherwise I would have been more specific.
        >humans don't need carnitine
        False. Most people are deficient in carnitine and see improvements with carnitine supplementation (or diet changes that would do the same thing, e.g. eating more red meat). Same with creatine

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      are you a canine?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you have different biochemistry than a canine?

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >cooking makes nutrients more available to you
    that's true for vegetables, but the opposite for meat and eggs.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >eggs
      Raw egg whites literally bind biotin and prevent you from absorbing it. So that is categorically false.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        meanwhile raw yolks have double the nutrients than cooked yolks. That's why you seperate the yolks from the whites, and cook the whites and eat the yolks raw. Your parents never taught you this?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No, and no one I've ever met has been taught this by their parents. You are the weird one, anon.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    sorry bit off topic but i just came across something that says canned tuna contains a lot of mercury and you shouldn't eat a lot of it
    i have been eating 2 cans of tuna per day for the past year straight, that's about 1.7kg of tuna per week
    should i be worried about this mercury thing?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      anon....

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        what do you mean..

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i'm so sorry...

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            HAHAHA stop messing with me should i genuinely be concerned or not

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >eating 2 cans of tuna per day for the past year straight
      literally why? cut it out of your diet at least a month or so

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        well i eat the same thing for lunch and dinner
        250 grams of raw pasta with 120 grams of tuna
        what would cutting it out for a month do if i'm gonna eat it again afterwards..

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >raw pasta
          What do you mean by this?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            i boil it, i just meant the quantity is 250g raw and then i cook it, not 250g of cooked pasta

            >what would cutting it out for a month do
            The danger of mercury is it accumulating in your brain due to being fat-soluble. This means it takes a very long time to flush out of your system, because your brain doesn't exactly have a high turnover rate. This also means, when you start experiencing symptoms, you will experience them for a long time even if you stop eating all sources of mercury instantly.

            oh, thank you for the informations
            could you tell me what symptoms i could be experiencing without realising it? i'm sure if i google stuff it'll just make me paranoid

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              oh while i'm at it i also drink more than 1 liter of whole milk per day, is that dangerous too?

              please tell me your trolling
              if not, cut out tuna immediately

              i promise i'm not trolling but now i'm genuinely worried and will get bloodwork done urgently, surely that will show if i have abnormally high levels of mercury

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Milk is absolutely based and 1 liter a day is a fine amount. Anything that comes from cows is gonna be good for you.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                What about cow poop?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes it is good for your land by sequestering carbon into it.
                >cow urine
                Now that one I don't know about. Maybe it's good for plants or bugs or something.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I don't know, I haven't studied any neurology yet, so I would just be getting my information off google too. If you are generally feeling fine I wouldn't worry about it too much, but I would definitely stop eating tuna (and other predatory fish). Salmon and sardines are good fish to eat since they're low on the food chain. But I personally prefer beef as my go-to meat.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                okay thank you
                i mean i haven't noticed anything in particular, google says stuff like impaired speech, muscle strength, etc. but i feel like i have none of these

                i like beef but i'm not sure i could eat it everyday

                It’s just a myth dude spread by the chicken farming garden gnome to trick you into eating chicken. Think about it, if mercury were so bad why would tuna have so much of it?

                right, mercury is good and i should drink it straight from old thermometers, right?

                Milk is absolutely based and 1 liter a day is a fine amount. Anything that comes from cows is gonna be good for you.

                big smile of relief on my face, thank you anon, i love cows

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >what would cutting it out for a month do
          The danger of mercury is it accumulating in your brain due to being fat-soluble. This means it takes a very long time to flush out of your system, because your brain doesn't exactly have a high turnover rate. This also means, when you start experiencing symptoms, you will experience them for a long time even if you stop eating all sources of mercury instantly.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ...yes you should definitely be worried and you should stop eating tuna. you generally shouldn't be eating predator fish (tuna, cod, halibut) anyway, with all the pollution in the ocean like microplastics.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        WTF MAN
        currently abroad so can't get bloodwork done, but will do when i can
        what can i replace tuna with, chicken breasts?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      please tell me your trolling
      if not, cut out tuna immediately

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s just a myth dude spread by the chicken farming garden gnome to trick you into eating chicken. Think about it, if mercury were so bad why would tuna have so much of it?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        lol I don't know if this is a joke but tuna are high in mercury because of biological magnification. low levels of pollution at the bottom of the food chain (phytoplankton & tiny fishes in the ocean) build up to high levels of pollution at the top of the food chain (tuna -> humans eating tuna).

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is mercury kosher?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are probably fine but go get a blood test and see what your mercury level is.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If we gave animals cooked food how long would it take to evolve them to our level? Wouldn’t mind a cat gf tbh.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It would lead to your cat having more health problems. No cat girl, sorry.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There is a documentary on youtube.
      Cooked meat and milk vs uncooked.
      After a few generation the cooked food cats where fucked.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    But I love sushi bro

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ITS UP!!!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      corny is a gay

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Shut the fuck up Kenny

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mercury cured my depression, I make more mistakes but people say I'm more fun now. My skin looks youthful and tight.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hello friends, I am an actual dietitian. I'd like to say something about OP's argument. The concept of "cooking makes nutrients more available to you" mostly applies to PLANTS that we aren't naturally designed to eat (leafs, tubers, etc). It is certain types of carbs in plants that we can't digest, that get turned into other types of carbs that we can digest when we cook it. For fruits and animal foods (that we are evolutionarily designed to eat without cooking them), this argument doesn't really apply. There are some exceptions, like certain proteins in for example egg get slightly more bio-available when you cook them, but for most animals foods like meats, this is simply not true. Raw meat is very, very bio-available to us, because, well, obviously, nature literally designed us to eat these foods raw. Another extremely important thing to take into account, is micro-nutrients. Generally speaking, heat and moisture (aka, cooking) will destroy or remove micro nutrients from the food, reducing the overall nutritional value of the food. So when we are talking about a food that is extremely bio-available to begin with, like meat/organ meat, eating it raw obviously is the superior choice, because cooking does not increase the bio-availability of the macro nutrients, but it does reduce the content of the micro nutrients. When we are talking about other foods, for example a plant tuber like a potato, then yeah, cooking it will help you.

    In short it's really simple. Foods that we are naturally designed to eat (fruits and animals) do not need to be cooking, because naturally literally designed us to digest them raw. Foods that we aren't designed to eat raw; vegetables (leaves, stems, tubers) do need to be cooked.

    The hypothesis that cooking allowed us to get smarter as cavemen is not really true. It's a little more complex. Cooking allowed us to tap into new plant food sources, which allowed us to switch to agriculture, which freed up time for other professions

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Cooking allowed us to tap into new plant food sources
      This has nothing to do with increasing the brain size of humans. Our brains got larger with the invention of tools (which we used to hunt and kill animals better) which happened hundreds of thousands of years before agriculture. I'm not sure if you meant this but that's what you were implying.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Cooking is in part what allowed us to get more nutrients and become smarter as cave men
    I don't have an informed opinion on this theory, but it would support Lamarckism.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you won't stop me from eating tatar

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tartare, lad.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mince is already pre chewed, I still wouldn’t eat that shot regularly due to salmonella and parasites

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        in EU it's generally safe to eat

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stop posting this old dwarf phaggot here. Noone cares, get a life OP.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He didn't do anything wrong.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course
    If we didn’t cook our food we would still be apes
    Anyone that eats nothing but raw meat runs the risk of constant bowel issues and psychosis
    Why don’t people want a balanced diet anymore and just look to meme diets

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If we didn’t cook our food we would still be apes
      This is categorically false. Brain size increase correlated with tools, not cooking. This is a basic undisputed fact.
      >Anyone that eats nothing but raw meat runs the risk of constant bowel issues
      This is also categorically false, not that many people actually do this, but you can have perfect bowel function with 0 fiber (many studies exist proving this, I'd be happy to link them).
      >and psychosis
      Now this is straight up delusion. Vegans typically have mental disorders like depression and anxiety (multiple studies showing this). I've never heard of this happening with people who eat a lot of meat, which contains important compounds for mental function (creatine, carnosine, etc.).

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        All of you responses are categorically false
        Apes use tools
        Fibre isn’t the only factor in perfectly functioning bowels
        Vegans and Carnivore are two sides of the same coin

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Fibre isn’t the only factor in perfectly functioning bowels
          Uh of course it's not, hence why "you can have perfect bowel function with 0 fiber" (you can also have perfect bowel function with fiber).

          What does that have anything to do with what I said? Do you even know what "categorically false" means?

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like to think he purged after every video in which he ate raw organs.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    humans are definitely adapted to a fully cooked foods diet
    anyone that claims otherwise is a fucking retard
    >but muh dogs and cats suffer from a fully cooked diet
    only if the cooked food is exposed to the elements for a long time, kibble targeted towards cats and dogs is fortified with nutrients that are specifically vulnerable to degradation from long shelf life(months and sometimes even years), roasting a chicken and feeding it to your dog is perfectly fine and will barely make a dent on its creatine, taurine, carnosine and carnitine content

    also, we aren't dogs or cats we're human, cats and dogs have special dietary requirements that we don't have(carnitine, carn, and we have special dietary requirements that cats and dogs don't have(vitamin C and vitamin K1)
    our instestine, our teeth, our stomach and everything else are well adapted to a 100% cooked foods diet

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      (carnitine, carnosine, taurine, creatine)*

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >humans are definitely adapted to a fully cooked foods diet
      Try to think about this for a minute:
      >Our ancestors have been eating raw fruits and meats for millions of years, and only a few thousands of years ago, they started to eat certain plants that we couldn't eat before due to cooking techniques.
      >Right now, our modern diets consists mainly of these man made modern plants that we need to cook before consumption.
      Your conclusion is: "look guys, we currently eat mostly plants that we need to cook! So therefore humans have adapted to eat a cooked diet!!"
      Are you fucking retarded? Are you just going to completely ignore how the foods that our ancestors originally used to eat (fruits and animals) don't need to be cooked at all?
      Your argument is comparable to saying that humans are supposed to be fat, because most people are fat right now.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Our ancestors have been eating raw fruits and meats for millions of years
        Human’s have been cooking meat since before homo sapiens evolved. It is not a recent development.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I recommend you to look that up again. How long humans have been cooking foods is under heavy debate and criticism, and the evidence that they have been doing it for that long (or at least, that it played a significant role in their overall diet) really isn't that strong at all.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It is. And thinking that literally destroying nutrients is a good idea shows what an utter retard you truly are.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >cats and dogs have special dietary requirements that we don't have(carnitine, carn
      Both of these are necessary for proper function in humans, as I described in my post above.

      Also, humans only "need vitamin C" with a high-carb diet, and don't need it on a keto diet (which dogs and cats mostly eat). Anyway, even with carbs, you need a very small amount of vitamin c.
      >Vitamin K1
      Vitamin K1 (plant-based vitamin K) literally does nothing lol. Humans need vitamin K2 (animal-based vitamin K) just like cats and dogs.

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15514282/
      >Menaquinone is AKA vitamin K2, only found in animal-based foods
      >K2 intake inversely proportional to deaths from heart disease and all-cause mortality, no relationship at all with K1
      >The relative risk (RR) of CHD mortality was reduced in the mid and upper tertiles of dietary menaquinone compared to the lower tertile
      >Intake of menaquinone was also inversely related to all-cause mortalityand severe aortic calcification
      >Phylloquinone intake was not related to any of the outcomes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Pottinger Experiment.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Foods that need to be cooked to be eaten are suboptimal. Your diet should be mostly foods that can be consumed raw, since the complete opposite of
    >cooking makes nutrients more available to you
    is true. Cooking destroys nutrients. This is common sense, right? Heating something to the temperatures used to cook damages it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      is getting parasitic or viral/bacterial infection optimal?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Eating foods that can give you parasites is suboptimal. Past that, eat whole cuts of meat and lightly sear the outside if you have a weak immune system.

        no, it's literally been proven with feeding studies that cooked meats encourage muscle growth better than raw meats.

        Nice source you got there, kid.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Kid
          I'm an actual food scientist working for a major nutrition company. You're out of your league, boy.

          https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/148/10/1564/5094772

          https://nutrition.ansci.illinois.edu/sites/nutrition.ansci.illinois.edu/files/13.%20Bailey%20et%20al.%2C%20DIAAS%20in%20meat%20products%2C%20BJN%2C%20June%2013%2C%202020.pdf

          Post the studies

          scholar.google.com exists. educate yourselves before you buy into geared-up dipshits selling supplements.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I'm an actual food scientist working for a major nutrition company.
            >posts study on pigs
            >posts a second study that proves him wrong
            You're not serious, are you? Did you just run off to google some shit that sounded right or something? Your second study literally says that cooking meat too much makes it less digestible.

            >Eating foods that can give you parasites is suboptimal
            seafood is full of parasites and viruses
            land animal meat is full of parasites and viruses specially wild game

            what are you gonna eat raw that you can be sure has no parasites?

            I don't recall ever telling you that you needed to eat meat in the first place, but I already said

            Eating foods that can give you parasites is suboptimal. Past that, eat whole cuts of meat and lightly sear the outside if you have a weak immune system.

            [...]
            Nice source you got there, kid.

            >eat whole cuts of meat and lightly sear the outside if you have a weak immune system
            Buying some beef liver from a small local farmer and lightly searing the outside before eating it will 100% prevent the possibility of any sort of parasite/bacteria/virus.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Haha wtf bro? Have you read the actual studies you posted? They literally disprove your point... Also, did you actually think that saying you work for a "major nutrition company" was going to give you more credit? "Oh look guys, this dude works for a large corporation that funds scientist to create biased studies that promote selling processed foods. Let's all listen to him! He sounds like a good, neutral source of information..."

            Not that any of it is true though. If you actually were a scientist you would have spotted in the abstracts that the studies you linked don't prove your point at all. I 100% guarantee everyone that this guy is larper. Or, in the rare case that he is an actual scientist, this just goes to show the quality of scientists that work for big corporations, pushing processed foods like sneed oils

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Eating foods that can give you parasites is suboptimal
          seafood is full of parasites and viruses
          land animal meat is full of parasites and viruses specially wild game

          what are you gonna eat raw that you can be sure has no parasites?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no, it's literally been proven with feeding studies that cooked meats encourage muscle growth better than raw meats.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Post the studies

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Kid
        I'm an actual food scientist working for a major nutrition company. You're out of your league, boy.

        https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/148/10/1564/5094772

        https://nutrition.ansci.illinois.edu/sites/nutrition.ansci.illinois.edu/files/13.%20Bailey%20et%20al.%2C%20DIAAS%20in%20meat%20products%2C%20BJN%2C%20June%2013%2C%202020.pdf

        [...]
        scholar.google.com exists. educate yourselves before you buy into geared-up dipshits selling supplements.

        >the science LITERALLY shows it!
        >i am a SCIENTIST!
        >doesn't read or understand scientific studies
        >tells people to educate themselves while proving himself wrong
        pottery. what a clown world we live in.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stop spamming this ugly old dwarf. Not fitness related.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      his stans just can't accept that they've been duped into thinking that eating trimmings while choking down nasty supplements will make them yoked.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you can not and will not stop me from eating raw sewage

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    How old does a garloid have to get before they are this big? Oldest one I have gotten was 6 months before it escaped.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I eat raw liver and beef because it's tasty af. Cooked liver is insanely nutritious.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just realized that most people prefer medium-rare steak over well-done steak. This probably proves raw meat is more nutritious than cooked meat.

    Why would people prefer a less nutritious version of food? No one eats raw potatoes or green bananas.

    I have no other evidence for my claim, but I think this is enough.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, at least it shows you are thinking about what you observe, unlike most cattle.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, at least it shows you are thinking about what you observe, unlike most cattle.

      To add another reply, I think people overeat because they are malnourished because their body isn’t getting what it needs. So it desperately eats whatever it sees. The body says “Eat this and it might have the nutrients you need”. Nutrients not delivered. Cycle continues.
      The other extreme is when people eat very little. No appetite. They eat little because they can sense some food doesn’t have the nutrients, so it is unappetizing and a chore to eat. Their body is saying “don’t eat that, there’s no nutrients you need”
      When I started eating raw steak I felt this sort of longing after it like I was longing after that satisfaction I could only feel from it alone. Otherwise eating is a horrible chore.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's a great point and I agree. That's why goyslop has such low satiety—basically 0 nutrient content.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I just realized that most people prefer medium-rare steak over well-done steak
      because it's the trendy thing to do.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        "Trendy" implies it's not universal across all cultures at all points in history. I don't know any cultures (modern or historical) that prefer steak well-done.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *