guys, two doctors recomended me to take my skin off. I'm probably gonna be circuncised in one month

guys, two doctors recomended me to take my skin off. I'm probably gonna be circuncised in one month

Im 27 and I am really worred about the surgery. you know someone who had the skin removed as an adult? how is their life?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    what is the cause that requires the shit to be cut off

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm having balanite (dont know the translation) over and over for the last 2 years. no medication seems to work

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        did you try anti fungal cream for a yeast infection

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >balanite
        Stop using dry ass soap, start moisturizing
        Learn how to relax your pelvic floor with reverse kegels
        Also try different diets and see how your eact

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Only wash with water. Keep the skin retracted at all times until it goes away. Cutting the skin (and nerves and sensation) away is dumb and never necessary.
        Foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and prevents the head from drying out and desensitizing. Also cosmetics wise, young cuts turn out better than adult cuts, although immoral.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Only wash with water. Keep the skin retracted at all times until it goes away. Cutting the skin (and nerves and sensation) away is dumb and never necessary.
        Foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and prevents the head from drying out and desensitizing. Also cosmetics wise, young cuts turn out better than adult cuts, although immoral.

        THIS OP. https://foreskinrestore.com/BXO.html

        >loss in mass
        OY VEY I LOST 0.0001 GR. of my mass! What a TRAGEDY! WOW!!
        Drama queen tier shit.

        >loss in sensitivity
        Again, this might be a pro or a con to some people, there are lots of the clients that are looking for way to last longer in sex and on top of that, it does not have that much is a significant rate in sensitivity loss, you are overexagarating

        >hardening of the glans
        Bullshit.

        >scarring
        The picrel is the "scar" that you are talking about in a succesfully and properly done circumcision surgery. I don't consider that a big medical problem, but since there are gays who obsess over the image of a penis they might find it disturbing to their aesthetic views.

        >mental and psychological distress
        A lion's share of people feel no difference in their daily life after getting circumcised due to the doctor's prescription.

        And also, why are you lying?? here are the pros:
        >decreases risk of urinary tract infections in infancy
        >decreases risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including female-to-male transmission of HIV
        >decreases risk of cervical cancer and some infections in female partners
        >prevents balanitis, balanoposthitis, paraphimosis, and phimosis
        >makes it easier to maintain good genital hygiene

        Fuck off garden gnome stop lying. Circumcising infants is always wrong as they did not consent.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >infants
          But we are not talking about an infant.
          I never said that circumcision is an important and necessary procedure - no. Stop putting words in my mouth. The OP's case would be better with it and it's a safe surgery with little to no side effects

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You said
            >decreases risk of urinary tract infections in infancy
            >prevents balanitis, balanoposthitis, paraphimosis, and phimosis
            >makes it easier to maintain good genital hygiene
            You're prescribing genital mutilation as a preventative measure for things that most likely will not happen. Also it's harder to keep a cut baby dick clean since the foreskin should be fused to the glans and not get shit all over it.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >also it's harder to keep a cut baby dick clean
              The exact opposite, actually. It's easier to clean it, lol, it's common knowledge.
              You are right about saying that the circumcision is not important and I agree, but it's not a horrifying event as you guys make it seem to be. Hopefully I made it clear

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Are you seriously so misinformed you believe you have to retract the foreskin of an infant? You've never had a foreskin or learned about one or cared for one I can tell. You wipe off the outside like a finger, there is no space inside the foreskin for anything to build up. It's like an extension of the urethra at that stage until puberty.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                What do you mean it's easier to clean? Don't you have running water in whatever trailer park you live in? Just wash your dick regularly you nasty fuck.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Also you're wrong about no side effects. I was mutilated as an infant and I can't jerk off to climax without mental stimulation or prostate stimulation period. It's an incredible loss of sensitivity and I feel next to nothing.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              But how do you know since you can't compare it?
              This seems like either an overexaggarated larp as someone who is in soulful pain or you have other sexual issues that are (surprise surprise!) have nothing to do with circumcision.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                What kind of other sexual issues? I have a massive penis 7.75x6" but no sensitivity. And it's because it's dry and fucked because someone took my life into their own hands for profit when I could not fight back.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Canesten+ cream (the one with added steroid) for a week 2x a day. then Canesten normally for 2 weeks after you're done. Do not wash with soap ever again during and after this unless it's for sexy time, then only wash with cetaphil.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Have you tried washing your dick once in a while?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >cutting off your foreskin because you're a retard that can't get rid of something easily curable
        I just KNOW you're american lmao.
        If you have balanitis and you don't have any STDs, then you just have a yeast infection. 150mg fluconazolum pills every other day for a week or two will work 99% of the time.
        If you still have red spots on your dick and don't have any STDs, UTIs or yeast infections, then you just have dry ass cracking skin and you need to put some coconut oil on your dick.
        Also reminder that a shitload of dudes have slight red spots on their dick tips naturally.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >help, I have problems with the skin on my glans
        >so I'll just cut away my foreskin and expose my glans at all times and let it get irritated even more than before, while also dealing with a wound on my dick at the same time
        Can't make this shit up lmao

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        that sucks bro, my condolences

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The foreskin is where all your testosterone cones from
    Don't do it anon

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      and if you do make sure to eat it

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      nota even a heeb, a shabbos goy marked as a golem servant. It's even worse.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why? Unless it is an actual medical emergency, don't fucking do it.
    You will lose sensation, there's scarring, there's good chance of erectile dysfunction, infection, losing your cock and even death. These are complications of said operation.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what? doc said in one month I'd be ok

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        cutting it off should be the LAST LAST LAST resort dude, you will regret it

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you had it removed and regreted?? how are things going?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >what? doc said in one month I'd be ok
        Ask for a contract then
        Inb4 socialized medicine

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >my finger aches so the doc says I should get it amputated
        anon don't be retarded

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is your doctor gnomish or a gay? Don't do it OP

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    check this
    you don't need an operation
    http://phimosisjourney.com/
    https://www.amazon.com/Phimoheal-Phimosis-Stretching-Rings-Kit/dp/B07X6PNJMP/ref=mp_s_a_1_6?crid=TPJLJ68MLNTU&keywords=phimosis+stretcher+kit&qid=1639062607&rnid=2941120011&s=hpc&sprefix=phimo%2Caps%2C279&sr=1-6

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Med student here.
    Nothing to worry about, goy. You will feel comfortable using your dick again in 1 week and in a month or so you shall go back to fucking ze chuds and yu VILL fuck zem and yu VILL love it.

    On a serious note tho, no, nothing's going to happen, this is a very easy surgery; a tale as old as time. You will last longer during sex and won't have to care about the hygiene that much anymore, obviously you still have to wash your dick, but it'll be much easier once the circumcision is done. There is nothing scary about circumcision, many such cases. Do not listen to the idiots in the thread saying "OY VEY YOU'RE CONVERTING TO JUDAISM NOW LMFAO WHAT A gay CHOPPING HIS DICK OFF YOU WILL BECOME A WOMAN NOW" no.

    P.S. no i'm not gnomish, I was just joking using their "accent" (garden gnomes actually don't talk like that)

    P.P.S. the sensitivity of the foreskin is valued around 20-25% of the whole dick, nothing much to lose here either, like a quarter or even less than that. That's literally it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      thanks a lot man

      you think there are many cases of regret? people dont get used with the new dick?

      (also: it gets ugly? its like a surgery to change the aspects of your gf's boobs)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The majority of the people get circumcised at a young age due to the religious reasons (and religion points at hygiene, which is medically proved).
        So those who got circumcised as babies have nothing to "regret", yk.
        A lot of the people who get circumcised at an older age have 1 month of no jerking off or sex and that's it, their life goes on the same way it did before. Almost all of them get it done due to the medical conditions such as yours and no they do not regret it in any way, maybe might feel bad for the aesthetic of a dick (if yes then they are probably ultragays)? Physically speaking it's 100% safe.

        I'll give you prons of circumcision and cons which you can google and search anywhere if you want to.
        Pros:
        >decreases risk of urinary tract infections in infancy
        >decreases risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including female-to-male transmission of HIV
        >decreases risk of cervical cancer and some infections in female partners
        >prevents balanitis, balanoposthitis, paraphimosis, and phimosis
        >makes it easier to maintain good genital hygiene

        >decreases the sensitivity of the penis (this could be a pro or a con to some people, cuz they might last longer and fuck better, enjoy their time more. But for some people who already last long this could be a con)

        Cons:
        >may be seen as disfigurement by some (as you can see by this /thread/)

        That's it. That's all there is to it. Nothing else, any other questions?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's like saying that removing your teeth prevents cavities - you are the biggest dumbass on this board.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            False comparison once again, garden gnomesus Christ there are so many victimplayers on this board who just love to victimize themselves because of something as a FORESKIN.
            I have seen everything...

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              No, your "pros" are the false comparisons. Make an argument against what I just said then, asswipe. You can't, can you? Braindead bitch with a chopped up, funny-looking dick.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Lol these anons hate that you’re speaking 100% truth

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          cut off your arm
          >decreases risk of arm cancer
          >decreases risk of finger injury
          >decreases risk of gangrene
          >decreases risk of frostbite
          >improves hygiene (less area to clean)

          Cons:
          >may be seen as disfigurement by some

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Med student here.
          Nothing to worry about, goy. You will feel comfortable using your dick again in 1 week and in a month or so you shall go back to fucking ze chuds and yu VILL fuck zem and yu VILL love it.

          On a serious note tho, no, nothing's going to happen, this is a very easy surgery; a tale as old as time. You will last longer during sex and won't have to care about the hygiene that much anymore, obviously you still have to wash your dick, but it'll be much easier once the circumcision is done. There is nothing scary about circumcision, many such cases. Do not listen to the idiots in the thread saying "OY VEY YOU'RE CONVERTING TO JUDAISM NOW LMFAO WHAT A gay CHOPPING HIS DICK OFF YOU WILL BECOME A WOMAN NOW" no.

          P.S. no i'm not gnomish, I was just joking using their "accent" (garden gnomes actually don't talk like that)

          P.P.S. the sensitivity of the foreskin is valued around 20-25% of the whole dick, nothing much to lose here either, like a quarter or even less than that. That's literally it

          Don't listen to this mong. There are literally no benifits to being circumcised. All that bullshit about STDs infections etc are all anecdotal evidence.
          >This guy was circumcised and had no STDs yet he never had sex
          There has not been one study that I have come across about circumcision that was any good and definitive. The hygiene argument is a load of shit too. It takes no longer to pull your skin back to wash that it would normally. If you're an unhygienic cunt, you're going to be disgusting regardless if you've had the mushroom cut or not.
          Now if you have sex, natural feels better for both men and women.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Student huh. If you graduate and ever do that to a child I will find you and slay you where you stand you demonic filth. If the bastard who did me was still alive I would tear him limb from limb with my bare hands.

      https://i.imgur.com/JrNP89E.jpg

      guys, two doctors recomended me to take my skin off. I'm probably gonna be circuncised in one month

      Im 27 and I am really worred about the surgery. you know someone who had the skin removed as an adult? how is their life?

      DO NOT FUCKING DO IT. IF YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND ME I WILL REPEAT: DO, NOT, FUCKING, DO, IT. I had it done to me as a child and it destroyed me. It was supposedly medically necessary (it fucking wasn't). The best thing you can do is to throw that doctor out the window. Do it for me anon.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No you wouldn't do shit and we both know that

        You have to fucking go back (to plebbit)

        I don't use any social media other than IST *if you can even call it that* and YouTube, which I use rarely. Stupid meme

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I am literally in hell thanks to scum like you. What do I even have to lose?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You have to fucking go back (to plebbit)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The majority of the people get circumcised at a young age due to the religious reasons (and religion points at hygiene, which is medically proved).
      So those who got circumcised as babies have nothing to "regret", yk.
      A lot of the people who get circumcised at an older age have 1 month of no jerking off or sex and that's it, their life goes on the same way it did before. Almost all of them get it done due to the medical conditions such as yours and no they do not regret it in any way, maybe might feel bad for the aesthetic of a dick (if yes then they are probably ultragays)? Physically speaking it's 100% safe.

      I'll give you prons of circumcision and cons which you can google and search anywhere if you want to.
      Pros:
      >decreases risk of urinary tract infections in infancy
      >decreases risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including female-to-male transmission of HIV
      >decreases risk of cervical cancer and some infections in female partners
      >prevents balanitis, balanoposthitis, paraphimosis, and phimosis
      >makes it easier to maintain good genital hygiene

      >decreases the sensitivity of the penis (this could be a pro or a con to some people, cuz they might last longer and fuck better, enjoy their time more. But for some people who already last long this could be a con)

      Cons:
      >may be seen as disfigurement by some (as you can see by this /thread/)

      That's it. That's all there is to it. Nothing else, any other questions?

      https://i.imgur.com/JrNP89E.jpg

      guys, two doctors recomended me to take my skin off. I'm probably gonna be circuncised in one month

      Im 27 and I am really worred about the surgery. you know someone who had the skin removed as an adult? how is their life?

      Imagine cutting a piece of your dick to "cure" an infection in the age of large spectrum antibiotics and antifungals
      If you are a medic we are better off being cured by abbo shamans

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Circumcision is a very easy and safe procedure alike to appendix removal, wisdom tooth removal or even tonsils removal which can also be treated with 82728272 of the pharmocological products out there from many different brands, but is it really worth the money, time and the effort you put into it instead of getting rid of something practically useless?
        There is a complex reason why these surgeries are being done since ancient times (tonsils removal is 3000 years old by the way) and medicine is a much more complex subject than "Oh, the garden gnomes do it, we shouldn't then!".

        Many researches and facts prove that there are little to no cons to it and it's being done for a reason. His doctor recommended that for him, since the medications did not work in 2 years of his treatment. And I doubt that we can give a better diagnise via internet on a website that has nothing to do with medicine either. Maybe just stop being such a fucking crybaby over some small part of skin on a dick? It's getting ridicilous honestly

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >removing appendix
          Barbaric.
          >owie I have a tummy ache
          >guess we better cut you open and remove this organ extremely important to proper immune function that we decided was an arbitrary organ put there for no reason

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >EXTREMELY IMPORTANT ORGAN
            You realize that appendix is a rudimented organ, right? God, the education really did fail, this is some... idk, 9th grade tier shit? Appendix is absolutely useless and there is absolutely no difference with or without living with it. It also gets removed if it gets infected (which happens a lot, ik tons of people irl who got it removed).

            For the medic nope, for the patient yes.
            I hope you will be treated with the same attitude toward risk you have with your patients
            Also the foreskin isn't an "useless piece of skin", you are either a female with no dick or a retard (or a mutt, the same thing)

            Ironic because instead of calming the OP down by saying how common circumcision is and how safe it is, you guys are fearmongering him on some baseless statements such as "Masturbation makes your hands grow hair" tier shit.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              We are not here to calm down a bot that uses an argument dear to IST (circumcision) to slide the forum.
              False comparison, the appendix is useless, the foreskin is not.
              Also this isn't reddit, you don't tell us what to think and what to do

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you don't tell us what to think or what to do
                But it's exactly what you are doing here right now by telling OP not to listen to his doctor and do what you're saying. Isn't that a bit hypocritical?

                Also foreskin is not something you can't live without like the schizos in this thread make it seem. Appendix also has some immune system benefits as some claim, but you will be perfectly fine without it. If his doctor recommended it to him then go get it, there is nothing to worry about.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >med student doling out 50 year old science because his med professor said so
              Many such cases.
              >https://thedishonscience.stanford.edu/articles/appendix-what-is-it-good-for

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Thus, our appendix has a purpose! It helps our immune system defend our bodies from infection (especially diarrheal disease) but we have found that we can survive without it if our risk of getting infected is greatly reduced by proper hygienic practices.

                NO SHIT!! This is exactly why people remove it, because it gets infected and it happens a lot since so many people have it cut off, wow! And you can perfectly live without it too which means that it's not a necessity-for-survival tool like the sourve you sent says it. Who would've thought...
                Next time send me something about the "VERY IMPORTANT" exxagarated use of our ear muscles that are used to move them, it'll be an interested read...

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >we can survive without it!
                >therefore cutting it out is the best option
                Oh no anon you got an eye infection! Better cut it out, you only need one to see anyway and you can survive without it. 5 fingers? Science says you only need 3. Got a booboo on your pinky? Might as well just cut it off. TWO KIDNEYS!?!?! What do you need TWO kidneys for? Just cut out the one with kidneystones, you don't need it.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >comparing appendix (whose use was literally shrinked down to "we have found that we can survive without it if the risk of infection is high" in his own source he sent me) to a kidney

                What's next? Comparing a finger to heart or brain? Go on, I am totally enjoying this so-called argument and your moron tier logic

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Cut off your penis.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can survive without your other kidney if the risk of infection is high.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          For the medic nope, for the patient yes.
          I hope you will be treated with the same attitude toward risk you have with your patients
          Also the foreskin isn't an "useless piece of skin", you are either a female with no dick or a retard (or a mutt, the same thing)

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          People like you make my blood boil. Chopping off your arm would also be a very safe and easy procedure, for me. If there was any justice in this world every single degenerate who performed this operation would be publicly executed.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Comparing a whole limb to a foreskin is not the best way to prove your point which is pointless. The only reason why you say this is because of the ideological views and has nothing to do with medicine itself.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because circumcision is not medicine. It destroyed my life and if I can save even one person from getting mutilated by irresponsible scum like you, I would gladly do anything.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Don't forget the people that promote it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >easy and safe procedure
          Where have I heard that similar garden gnomery from?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >25% of the sensibility of your dick is not alot
      Kek, imagine taking 25% off your life, or your money, or your strength

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >comparing foreskin to money and lifespan years
        Strawman argument, you also must be over 18 to post on IST, go through puberty, finish high school, come back and then we'll talk

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're right. A highly important piece of your body and your life is not even comparable to lifespan and money. People would pay everything they own to get their penis back. Foreskin is priceless

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >to get their own penis back
            Foreskin makes up a very small percentage of the overall size of the dick and your whole penis isn't being cut off, stop being such a drama queen and go cry about it somewhere else

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Your penis makes up a very small percentage of your body, why don't you cut yours off? You don't need it to survive, and there's no significant difference in lifespans in countries with developed hygiene practices

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Because a penis plays a huge rule in sex and overall urinating and so many thing, that the foreskin does not. That is why I don't. The amount of false comparisons in this thread mounts the amount of actual arguments made. Getting old..

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Oh? So your penis serves a purpose that even if you could survive without it, it's a largely unnecessary surgery that could cause more problems than it's worth?

                Thanks for proving my point

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >with more problems
                If you scroll up and see the pros and cons of the circumcision surgery that we're talking about you'll see that there are more benefits than "problems". Stop being a schizo

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >pros: nothing
                >cons: loss in mass, loss in sensitivity, hardening of the glans, scarring, mental and psychological distress
                Wow ur so right just cut it off

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >loss in mass
                OY VEY I LOST 0.0001 GR. of my mass! What a TRAGEDY! WOW!!
                Drama queen tier shit.

                >loss in sensitivity
                Again, this might be a pro or a con to some people, there are lots of the clients that are looking for way to last longer in sex and on top of that, it does not have that much is a significant rate in sensitivity loss, you are overexagarating

                >hardening of the glans
                Bullshit.

                >scarring
                The picrel is the "scar" that you are talking about in a succesfully and properly done circumcision surgery. I don't consider that a big medical problem, but since there are gays who obsess over the image of a penis they might find it disturbing to their aesthetic views.

                >mental and psychological distress
                A lion's share of people feel no difference in their daily life after getting circumcised due to the doctor's prescription.

                And also, why are you lying?? here are the pros:
                >decreases risk of urinary tract infections in infancy
                >decreases risk of sexually transmitted diseases, including female-to-male transmission of HIV
                >decreases risk of cervical cancer and some infections in female partners
                >prevents balanitis, balanoposthitis, paraphimosis, and phimosis
                >makes it easier to maintain good genital hygiene

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >pros
                >infancy
                OP is not an infant
                >HIV
                Epidemiological in AFRICA.
                >cancer for women
                Who cares
                >prevents hygiene deficiencies
                Maybe wash your fucking penis
                >phimosis
                creams
                >easier to clean
                what a retard. Why don't we just cut off women's labia to prevent yeast infections and make it easier to clean. Fucking tards.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >implying HIV is a problem only in Africa
                >who cares
                Show stopping and spectacular, low IQ retard who is throwing a tantrum over a piece of skin, what should be my reply, hmm??...

                Yes, you can perfectly live fine without a circumcision, it's not a life saving tool or a necessity, but even if he gets it nothing bad is going to happen.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >piece of skin
                Shut the fuck up with your pound of flesh shylock.
                >implying HIV is only a problem in Africa
                1. Yes it is.
                2. The only ONLY study that concludes circumcision reduces HIV rates was conducted with sub saharan africans.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                HIV also exists in Europe...

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Breast cancer exists in europe. Women should cut them off to prevent breast cancer.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                At much lower rates than in Africa. And the circumcision rates are much lower too - boom, rekt'um!

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                A boy's overall risk of contracting a UTI is about 1%. And according to the AAP report, it takes over 100 circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI. UTIs can be treated if and when they occur by using less invasive means like antibiotics. One case of UTI may be prevented at the cost of 2 cases of hemorrhage, infection, or, in rare instances, more severe outcomes or even death.

                The studies which claim circumcision prevents STDs often confuse correlation with causation. In fact, circumcision might increase the risk of contracting STDs, because it can cause pain and bleeding during intercourse due to increased friction, opening pores for pathogens to exchange between partners. Use of condoms, regardless of circumcision status, will provide close to 100% reduction in risk for many STDs. Rates of STDs in the United States, where 75% of the non-gnomish, non-Muslim male population are circumcised, are higher than rates in Europe, where ≤10% of the male population is circumcised. This shows that circumcision is not a primary STD deterrent. Not to mention, we are living in an era where the majority of sexually transmitted infections are readily treatable with a short term course of antibiotics.

                Are you seriously so misinformed you believe you have to retract the foreskin of an infant? You've never had a foreskin or learned about one or cared for one I can tell. You wipe off the outside like a finger, there is no space inside the foreskin for anything to build up. It's like an extension of the urethra at that stage until puberty.

                I cannot keep up with so many gays who are this pressed over a foreskin, it's unreal. I ain't gon reply to all that, Lord...

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Good. Fuck off. Stop hurting people for your sick fetish. You're just as bad as trannies

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                When faced with facts, the garden gnome retreats without admitting defeat.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >oy vey you didn't read a whole wall of text most of which would have probably been another retarded take like the 287283 of those that you already answered to, hahahaha we bullied him to the point of retreat guys yoohooo

                Fuck you honestly

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                have a nice day. You are defending mutilation which has proven detrimental effects which have been presented to you. And now you run away because there are no sane reasons to cut your foreskin off.

                gay.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >oy vey you didn't read a whole wall of text most of which would have probably been another retarded take like the 287283 of those that you already answered to, hahahaha we bullied him to the point of retreat guys yoohooo

                Fuck you honestly

                i want my foreskin back you fucking shifty garden gnome. imagine mutilating newborns and having that be their first experience on Earth. always blood sacrifices with you people

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >1. Yes it is.
                >1995
                Check the current WHO map.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                A boy's overall risk of contracting a UTI is about 1%. And according to the AAP report, it takes over 100 circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI. UTIs can be treated if and when they occur by using less invasive means like antibiotics. One case of UTI may be prevented at the cost of 2 cases of hemorrhage, infection, or, in rare instances, more severe outcomes or even death.

                The studies which claim circumcision prevents STDs often confuse correlation with causation. In fact, circumcision might increase the risk of contracting STDs, because it can cause pain and bleeding during intercourse due to increased friction, opening pores for pathogens to exchange between partners. Use of condoms, regardless of circumcision status, will provide close to 100% reduction in risk for many STDs. Rates of STDs in the United States, where 75% of the non-gnomish, non-Muslim male population are circumcised, are higher than rates in Europe, where ≤10% of the male population is circumcised. This shows that circumcision is not a primary STD deterrent. Not to mention, we are living in an era where the majority of sexually transmitted infections are readily treatable with a short term course of antibiotics.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                A boy's overall risk of contracting a UTI is about 1%. And according to the AAP report, it takes over 100 circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI. UTIs can be treated if and when they occur by using less invasive means like antibiotics. One case of UTI may be prevented at the cost of 2 cases of hemorrhage, infection, or, in rare instances, more severe outcomes or even death.

                The studies which claim circumcision prevents STDs often confuse correlation with causation. In fact, circumcision might increase the risk of contracting STDs, because it can cause pain and bleeding during intercourse due to increased friction, opening pores for pathogens to exchange between partners. Use of condoms, regardless of circumcision status, will provide close to 100% reduction in risk for many STDs. Rates of STDs in the United States, where 75% of the non-gnomish, non-Muslim male population are circumcised, are higher than rates in Europe, where ≤10% of the male population is circumcised. This shows that circumcision is not a primary STD deterrent. Not to mention, we are living in an era where the majority of sexually transmitted infections are readily treatable with a short term course of antibiotics.

                There were several methodological errors in the African HIV trials, including but not limited to:
                -The circumcised experimental group got more medical care, including education on the proper use of condoms
                -In one study, circumcised men's infection rates were increasing faster than the intact men's until the study was terminated early
                -The circumcised group could not have sex for 4-6 weeks after the circumcision; this was excluded from the analysis and distorts the results
                -HIV was contracted through means other than sex (e.g. contaminated needles)
                -The trials were terminated early when statistical significance was reached. Though they did reach statistical significance, they never reached clinical significance
                -Significantly more men were lost to the studies than tested positive for HIV
                -Also, many of the researchers had cultural and religious biases. Many of the investigators had written papers advocating for male circumcision to prevent HIV infection prior to undertaking these RCTs
                There is no histological evidence which supports the hypothesis that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS infections. It is probable that circumcision doesn’t help at all, or potentially even makes things worse. For example, the overstated protective effects of circumcision may promote more unsafe sex practices (e.g. not using condoms, which do protect against HIV).

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                Inflanmation of the glans (balanitis) is not common in men and rare in babies. Having a surgical incision in a dirty diaper likely increases the risk of balanitis. Balanitis can occur in both circumcised and intact (uncircumcised) males. This study reported significantly more balanitis in circumcised boys as compared with intact non-circumcised boys. This risk decreases in all males drastically after puberty. It is easily preventable with good hygiene and most cases respond to treatment in under a week.

                Posthitis and Balanoposthitis. These are inflammation of the prepuce and the prepuce/glans combined respectively. These are both uncommon, unserious, and easily treatable if and when they occur. Circumcision obviously prevents inflammation of the foreskin the same way removing the appendix prevents appendicitis. These arguments use the same fallacious logic as pointed out above for cancer. Removing a body part to prevent the possible future inflammation of said body part is a ludicrous proposal.

                The possibility of phimosis (tight or non-retractable foreskin) does not warrant circumcision. Pathologic phimosis is rare. It can be cured by stretching the foreskin gently at regular intervals. For faster results, topical steroids can also be used. In the unlikely event that theses methods don’t work, surgery like Y-V plasty, Z-plasty, and preputioplasty can be done as a last resort. None of these treatments result in the loss of tissue. Moreover, some doctors misdiagnose phimosis in young children, when they're supposed to have foreskins which can't retract, until puberty, though in some cases the foreskin becomes retractable earlier or later. Improper handling of the foreskins of children can cause phimosis due to scarring leading to inelasticity.

                Finally an actual argument in hours, this was an interesting read, really.
                I believe what you said about the HIV researches in Africa, however it's still an undeniable fact that circumcision does, not 100%, but to some point reduce the chances of catching it. Not saying you should do it to for this purpose alone. And if your foreskin does not cause any harm to you it's useless to cut it off, I agree. I do not promote that either.

                However, I think that my point was distorted by the amount of shills in this thread that tried to make me look like someone who obsesses over circumcised dicks like the way they do with the uncircumcised ones.
                I want to make it clear that, circumcision is not a necessary practice and it being done on babies for no reason whatsoever is actually useless. There are still pros but they are not minimal and can be avoided with no further loss of anything. If you read my answers before, you'd already notice that. In the OP's case he tried to heal his disease for over 2 years and if it's been going on for that long and nothing yet worked, maybe the best decision IS to circumcise, it seems like an option with a good safety and he won't even remember it a month after the surgery like it often happens. Circumcision is not a magic thing that has full blown medical benefits and should be done on everyone in line, no. But it's not dangerous at all. Yes, there have been cases the outcome and the procedure itself was disturbing and didn't have the good results, but that's the fault of surgeons, it just wasn't done in the right way and it can be applied to everything else out there. So my point is that it's not a necessity, but it's not dangerous either.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the HIV researches in Africa, however it's still an undeniable fact that circumcision does, not 100%
                >There are still pro
                There are no benefits to circumcision. There is no evidence for any claim, and all correlations we see on a global level show that.
                You can spin anything to be positive, like losing your legs and replacing them with prosthetics that have a mechanical advantage in durability or sprint speed. This is all turning benefits to use, which is distinct to true benefit. OP can solve balantis without circumcision.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why does everything comes down to people on this board comparing foreskin to legs or something else that definitely has much higher worse than a little bit of skin on the tip of your genitalia. It's seriously a stupid comparison, like comparing a mosquito to an elephant and calling them both animals. It doesn't make as much sense and the way you think it does.

                And about the benefits, I am not going to repeat myself again, you already know what I meant and I agreed 728262 times that it's not a magical treatment full of golden benefits, go back to my older answer and read again if you want to, i'm not fighting a strawman.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a little bit of skin on the tip of your genitalia.
                If this were true you'd be right. But we're dealing with almost ALL the nerves in the penis and all the fine touch nerves in the penis. Without them one does not properly function sexually, in my case it's been akin to a vasectomy.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >in my case
                Again, your case would not be the same for literally everyone out there. There are lots of men who did get circumcised and did not report any significant change in their sexual life. You can't just make every statement depending on your own experience.

                Also about balantis. Most men with balanitis recover with treatment. For men who are not circumcised, it is common for balanitis to return after treatment. And it's chance of return increases even more if you don't practice proper hygiene, which is obvious I guess. If this has been going on for 2 years which is long enough to figure it out, IN MY OPINION (and doctors opinions too) the easiest and best way to get rid of it is circumcision. Again, we haven't hold a candle next to his penis and did not see the case with our own eyes. He should trust the doctors imo rather than a bunch of random people on the internet. And spreading myths & lies about the negativity of circumcision is not the best thing to do imo (even tho there are no particular benefits to it)

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                How long after did they survey the men regarding their sexual function? I’d wager if they asked them years later when the glans gets all dry and crusty they’d say differently.

                Anyway, op, get a second opinion. If you are so easily trusting to lose a piece of your body, I think you’re insane.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >years later
                >glans get all dry and crusty
                There are billions if circumcised men in world that do not report any cracking on their penis, I don't know where this comes from.
                And even if that was the case, they'd see that the penis inevitably needs the foreskin to prevent it from drying out and preventing diseases, but no such thing was ever witnessed or co-related to circumcision. It also makes 0 sense, because the penis would dry and get "crusty" as you said even before 1 year, way sooner than that. I don't know where this comes from honestly.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The glans is no longer shiny and healthy. It gets toughened, rough, dry, and covered with a layer of keratin. This is well known.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                garden gnome wants you to provide some source for something so common sense and well-known. Typical.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Your skin has keratin everywhere lol, it's how the skin is structured. On the epidermis layer of the skin. INCLUDING your penis.

                >We found that the keratin of the inner foreskin was thicker than that of the outer foreskin of seven donors; the outer foreskin was more thickly keratinized than the inner foreskin of three donors; and no significant difference was seen between the two aspects of six donor foreskins
                >Keratin layers alone are unlikely to explain why uncircumcised men are at higher risk for HIV infection.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951978/#:~:text=We%20found%20that%20the%20keratin,donor%20foreskins%20(table%201).

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Continues to intentionally redirect and reference something entirely irrelevant to the conversation, while linking a gnomish study.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Has the word "gnomish" in his mouth as its the only thing he can use because science debunks all of his made up takes with the source of "TRUST ME BRO!!"

                I hate IST, I really do

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Post nose.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Only the garden gnomes consistently advocate for a surgery as damaging as circumcision, which has no benefits. Sorry for getting you confused.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >b-b-but genital mutilation is okay because this anon is anti-semitic
                bruh

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You ignored the glans. Who cares if it’s already there. The point is that it increases it to the point that the glans becomes dry, cracked, and loses a lot of sensitivity. You’re such a fucking garden gnome.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You ignored the glans. Who cares if it’s already there. The point is that it increases it to the point that the glans becomes dry, cracked, and loses a lot of sensitivity. You’re such a fucking garden gnome.

                Also foreskinrestore.com for before and after glans keratinization/covered

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don’t know what you’re talking about if you don’t even acknowledge keratinization.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I believe
                >I think
                >I want
                Yeah, I'm thinking medfag got BTFO, swapped facts for feefees.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                This looks like a chud sausage dick kek

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                There were several methodological errors in the African HIV trials, including but not limited to:
                -The circumcised experimental group got more medical care, including education on the proper use of condoms
                -In one study, circumcised men's infection rates were increasing faster than the intact men's until the study was terminated early
                -The circumcised group could not have sex for 4-6 weeks after the circumcision; this was excluded from the analysis and distorts the results
                -HIV was contracted through means other than sex (e.g. contaminated needles)
                -The trials were terminated early when statistical significance was reached. Though they did reach statistical significance, they never reached clinical significance
                -Significantly more men were lost to the studies than tested positive for HIV
                -Also, many of the researchers had cultural and religious biases. Many of the investigators had written papers advocating for male circumcision to prevent HIV infection prior to undertaking these RCTs
                There is no histological evidence which supports the hypothesis that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS infections. It is probable that circumcision doesn’t help at all, or potentially even makes things worse. For example, the overstated protective effects of circumcision may promote more unsafe sex practices (e.g. not using condoms, which do protect against HIV).

                Inflanmation of the glans (balanitis) is not common in men and rare in babies. Having a surgical incision in a dirty diaper likely increases the risk of balanitis. Balanitis can occur in both circumcised and intact (uncircumcised) males. This study reported significantly more balanitis in circumcised boys as compared with intact non-circumcised boys. This risk decreases in all males drastically after puberty. It is easily preventable with good hygiene and most cases respond to treatment in under a week.

                Posthitis and Balanoposthitis. These are inflammation of the prepuce and the prepuce/glans combined respectively. These are both uncommon, unserious, and easily treatable if and when they occur. Circumcision obviously prevents inflammation of the foreskin the same way removing the appendix prevents appendicitis. These arguments use the same fallacious logic as pointed out above for cancer. Removing a body part to prevent the possible future inflammation of said body part is a ludicrous proposal.

                The possibility of phimosis (tight or non-retractable foreskin) does not warrant circumcision. Pathologic phimosis is rare. It can be cured by stretching the foreskin gently at regular intervals. For faster results, topical steroids can also be used. In the unlikely event that theses methods don’t work, surgery like Y-V plasty, Z-plasty, and preputioplasty can be done as a last resort. None of these treatments result in the loss of tissue. Moreover, some doctors misdiagnose phimosis in young children, when they're supposed to have foreskins which can't retract, until puberty, though in some cases the foreskin becomes retractable earlier or later. Improper handling of the foreskins of children can cause phimosis due to scarring leading to inelasticity.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                There were several methodological errors in the African HIV trials, including but not limited to:
                -The circumcised experimental group got more medical care, including education on the proper use of condoms
                -In one study, circumcised men's infection rates were increasing faster than the intact men's until the study was terminated early
                -The circumcised group could not have sex for 4-6 weeks after the circumcision; this was excluded from the analysis and distorts the results
                -HIV was contracted through means other than sex (e.g. contaminated needles)
                -The trials were terminated early when statistical significance was reached. Though they did reach statistical significance, they never reached clinical significance
                -Significantly more men were lost to the studies than tested positive for HIV
                -Also, many of the researchers had cultural and religious biases. Many of the investigators had written papers advocating for male circumcision to prevent HIV infection prior to undertaking these RCTs
                There is no histological evidence which supports the hypothesis that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS infections. It is probable that circumcision doesn’t help at all, or potentially even makes things worse. For example, the overstated protective effects of circumcision may promote more unsafe sex practices (e.g. not using condoms, which do protect against HIV).

                Shylock anon utterly BTFO

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'll add, doctors who damage young children's foreskins by forcibly retracting them causing scar tissue are often the cause of phimosis.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >cutting your dick up just to last longer instead of just having more practice
                Lmao, literal incel tier shit.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The "lasting longer" cope isn't even real. Cut guys have less control and are subject to premature ejaculation without warning. Sometimes I feel that I'm not even close then I coom a drop or two and the horny feeling goes away immediately. No satisfaction whatsoever as a cut guy with no sensitivity.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >nobody besides third tier shitholes like america or africa perform circumcision on a mass scale
                >no problems with muh infections muh cancer
                >"yeah dude it's easier to just cut off part of your cock instead of rolling your foreskin back to wash it"
                Kek, med students are just prescription machines at this point.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                See I'm at a point now where I'm utterly convinced people who write shit like this are actually in favor of the thing they're arguing against and just argue for it in bad faith to highlight how fucked up and stupid people who believe these things are

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            This. I'd honestly pay millions to have never been circumcised.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you care that much about something so trivial as 25% SENSITIVITY then you’re ngmi

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's like 80-90% though so let's not poison the well.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Source? (Trust me bro)
            Wouldn’t want to drink the water from your well retard

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      uncut virgin seething at cut chads!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >goy

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I was just playing lol i'm not gnomish, nothing to see here, goy!

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You expended much effort in your gnomishness

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Whatever helps you to sleep at night

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Whatever helps you to sleep at night
              It's identifying gnomishness

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Okay whatever floats your boat

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day digusting garden gnome

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Doctor here, you're either indoctrinated or an actual garden gnome/muzzie, in either case you need to kys.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well fuck off boomer, ik exactly what i'm doing

        have a nice day digusting garden gnome

        Move along, goy

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >P.P.S. the sensitivity of the foreskin is valued around 20-25% of the whole dick, nothing much to lose here either, like a quarter or even less than that. That's literally it
          This statement alone proves you do not.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're right, it's what the goys that were making more or less of a sense and were against circumcision have told me. I don't know what their source was, but even if there are a loss of sensitivity (which is again, disputed, because there are some researches that prove that there isn't, take a look), it's nothing big.

            >The 1++, 2++, and 2+ studies uniformly found that circumcision had no overall adverse effect on penile sensitivity, sexual arousal, sexual sensation, erectile function, premature ejaculation, ejaculatory latency, orgasm difficulties, sexual satisfaction, pleasure, or pain during penetration.

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23937309/#:~:text=The%201%2B%2B%2C%202%2B%2B,pleasure%2C%20or%20pain%20during%20penetration.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Links a garden gnome run study
              Yeah I don't care. I'll take the word of people who have had it both ways who say their sex has been ruined.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >IT'S DA J00S!!!
                Pathetic attempt at making an actual argument.
                Now go back to 4chan and never come back please xx :3

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >citing Brian Morris
              You outed yourself. It was obvious from the beginning you are concern trolling with the fake benefits that you are now trying to walk back on and downplay the importance of the innervation and functions of the foreskin. And the ~~*doctors opinions*~~. I dismantled the validity of circumcision and your replies are ineffective, that's why I stopped replying.
              For anyone who isn't aware, Brian Morris is a legitimate, real-life, confirmed pedophile and circumcision fetishist. He writes propoganda and heavily contributes to fetish sites. Anyone who cites him either isn't familiar with circumcision at all, or (in this case obviously) knows what he does and tries to swindle other people into believing this pedophile. Sorry anon, you outed yourself.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Always do the opposite of what garden gnomes say.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        garden gnomes tell you to drink water, get enough sleep and don't do drugs, now what?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >comparing foreskin to money and lifespan years
      Strawman argument, you also must be over 18 to post on IST, go through puberty, finish high school, come back and then we'll talk

      Then cut 25% of your hand off.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Med student here
      Stopped reading there, most med students are retards.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Someone announcing their affiliation with one of the big ~~*institutions*~~ only reveals their indoctrination and predictable talking points to follow.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Pakistan School of Medical Sciences

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Med student here.
      Didn't read

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don’t know why a lot of people are disagreeing with you. Removing your foreskin lowers your chances of STD because of the decreased surface area (ie: you’re as high as 50% protected against HIV). A large majority of these anons don’t know what they’re talking about.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        maybe dont fuck whores you degenerate garden gnome worshipper

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actual doctor here, this guy is a herb gay. Med students know fuck all and yet have the ego to give people medical advice.
      Don't cut off your foreskin OP. Post the names of the doctors advising you and we'll see how legit they are. A surgeon is always going to recommend surgery man.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >herb
        *heeb
        that's what I get for phoneposting on the shitter

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >actual doctor here
        I don’t know why but I doubt this. What’s your speciality?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          anaesthesia (anesthesiology as amerifats call it)

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            So not a real doctor

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              You probably aren't a real garden gnome but you act like one

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Med student here.
      >P.S no i'm nit gnomish, I was just joking using their "accent" (garden gnomes don't talk like that)

      100% a garden gnome

      Also
      >25%
      >nothing much to lose
      How are you a med student if you failed math
      ¼ is a lot to lose

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Don’t worry after the surgery you will only lose 25% of your eyesight.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I had it done as an adult and didnt really notice a difference.. idk if im lucky or everyone else is just a schizo

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No. Cancel it NOW.
    Get some steroid cream and slowly stretch your dick skin back every week.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Using steroid creams is not the best idea to begin with and majority of them are restricted to use on genitals. This is a very dangerous idea, OP do not listen

      t. i took prescribed steroid topical creams for many years and it fucked up my organism a bit and caused me heart issues.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        t. i took perscribed steroid topical cream for a month and fixed my dick

        you're just retarded

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This, I woke up one day about 4 or 5 years ago and my foreskin had sealed and tightened seemingly overnight, it was like when I had severe phimosis as a child. I went to the doctor and he gave me some steroid cream and it works. It's like stretching any muscle it will take time also try to squeeze the cream under your foreskin as well as on top I think it works better that way, also I can recommend a warm bath and submerged stretching it's probably gonna take a few weeks to a month but you won't have to chop half your dick off

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    so wait ur ognna cut ur foreskin off because you got a single yeast infection?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He made it clear that he tried to cure it for 2 years and it didn't work, what's there not to get? You guys are making such a huge deal out of it

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck guys my son is uncut, but I AM (thanks dad), i don't know the first thing about protecting him from shit like OP? Maybe finding a competent urologist is the first step? Maybe preventing the kid from over cleaning his skin?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just tell him how to do it when he turns 12 or 13. Have him use body soaps with moisturizers like Dove men.
      Tell him to SLOWLY pull it back when he takes a warm bath.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tell your son it's fine and natural to play with his dick, it'll unfuse the glans from the foreskin and make it retractable. That's literally how it's supposed to work.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP you desperately need the opinion of a doctor who isn’t a fucking garden gnome. I went through the same thing and I was completely fine

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I know a guy who had the tip of his dick cutted off due to cancer

    I heard about guys who dont wash their dicks before... I wash mine very good and also spray alcohol on my feet and rub every night

    I heard europeans dont bath everyday...

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Post surname

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Some guy on leddit had it done as an adult and lost 3 inches due to scar tissue.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anyways, this board is fucking dumb and I didn't find a single normal person that would say something actually smart (only ome actually). I hope you won't make surgery decisions based on random webweebs on this website. Good luck to you with your surgery, anon, don't worry it'll be alright. Even if you won't decide to do it, I hope your disease heals in any other way and it gets better. I'm leaving this thread

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine willingly getting garden gnomeed

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    For the love of god don't do it anon. You never know what you have until it's gone

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    My foreskin started breaking 1 year ago and i can't even pull it back anymore without it breaking up and bleed.

    The doctors have tried everything on me for 8 months, most creams and shit people talk about in this thread doesn't work for the more severe cases like mine. For me the creams only made it worse. After a while i couldn't even pee without my foreskin just collecting all the pee in the foreskin and i had to press it out.

    The doctors told me that we need surgery and it's either slicing it up to stretch it out but the chances for it to come back is very high even after that, and the end result will just make your dick look fucked up.

    I will be cutting it all off, who the fuck cares, i hate this shit.. bleeding everytime i take a piss, the open wounds "heal" and get stuck in my underwear during work, hurts like hell when im walking.

    I don't know how you feel op but I'd say most people in this thread don't know shit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are the exception, not the rule. Most people get emotionally charged about the issue because ~~*they*~~ are still cutting foreskin off hundreds of thousands of unconsenting babies every year in the US. There is no benefit to circumcision as a preventative action, and a whole host of detriments, chief among those are the human rights violations. It's done for profit for the hospitals and biotech companies that harvest the infant foreskin for sale anyway.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Most steroid creams will fuck your skin up even more.
      The only right step was to moisturize your shit constantly, take anti-fungals and stretch that shit for hours.
      You do you, though, it's not my dick that'll turn into frankendick after all.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Look, it's been a year with this shit. Do you really think i wouldn't have tried that before going for the stronger stuff? I'm not from America so my doctor's tries everything there is before they move on with the heavy stuff.

        This is the end result now, either i live with my foreskin being permanently smaller than my dickhead forever or cut it off.
        I'm 35 with wife and kids.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Your own fault for using steroid creams on ya dick, retard.
          Stretch that shit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Read

      There is an easy solution your doctor isn’t telling you and that other people aren’t recommending. There are some products you can buy called a foreskin corrector, they will pull your foreskin to be retracted. If will function the same way as a circumcision to get rid of balantitis, but is cheaper, faster, and doesn’t cause any damage. If you wear it constantly it will dry out the head of your penis and cause some loss in sensitivity (just like if you get circumcised) but this will be reversible where a circumcision is not. When wearing it, it WILL make the balantitis go away 100% just as a circumcising would, you can then a couple weeks after it’s cured try to stop wearing it and see if it returns (not so likely if you keep good hygiene). Even if it does return and you ultimately decide you want to get the circumcision, this will effectively solve the problem beforehand and give you some sense of the difference between being circumcised and not (by having a dry head but there are still more negatives to being circumcised).

      I suspect if you use this method, you will find that you will no longer consider having a circumcision. But either way it’s better to do this before jumping into a serious surgery, when this has a 100% success rate as well, and while there can be the ability for it to return if you discontinue use, you always have that choice, where for circumcision you don’t.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hmm

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'll never forgive them for what they took from me.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sorry, boss. I hope you can stop the cycle and not let your sons suffer the same fate.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm going to make sure no foreskin thieves get anywhere near my potential sons guaranteed. I will protect them at all cost.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Same here, it's a mine field out here in American hospitals though. I swear when someone asks me the question I'll tell them I'll hurt them very badly if they hurt my son, and tell them they're insane for selling cosmetic surgeries for infants.
          Once you make it out of the hospital unscathed you have to make sure everyone who changes his diaper ever knows not to retract, since the damage and scar tissue that can form from ripping it off the glans can cause uncurable phimosis.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's actually mental how little know about male infant biology and don't know the foreskin is fused for quite a while on babies

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It's actually mental
              It is. Makes me wonder, since most of the world just seems to know this, why has this knowledge been lost in America? Literal doctors don't even know this.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why learn about the anatomy of a foot if you cut it off at birth.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP is using hand soap to wash his dick, I guarantee it. Use shower gel you mong.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Use warm water and no soap... Your natural biome will keep itself in check. First rinse with urine by pinching the end of the foreskin and trapping the urine inside when you shower, release, then rise with warm water.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Shut the fuck up stinky dick

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm cut. Currently restoring.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            And you're going to unironically end up with smegma if you just use water. Use soap dumb fuck.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I've literally never had smegma in my life, I shower 2-3 times a day so unlikely.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              That's like saying use soap inside a vagina. No. Spray it with water, scrub it gently with your hand. Good to go.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not at all seeing as a vagina is not a penis and has an entirely different cleaning mechanism

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The glans penis is an internal organ, as is the glans clitoris and vagina. Rubbing chemicals on your mucous membranes is not a good idea.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >He thinks the clit is the vaginal canal
                >He thinks the labia is the vaginal canal
                Penises don't discharge. Penises secrete oils that build up. Water can't clean oil (basic fucking science) because it can't break it down. The labia is cleaned by women, like the penis is cleaned by men, using soap. Dumb fuck cut fags

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Penises don't discharge.
                Urine.
                >Water can't clean oil (basic fucking science) because it can't break it down.
                Why the fuck would you want to be stripping your body oils off? What the fuck? Are you showering with dish soap?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't know how women pee do you anon

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I do. That shit splatters and sprays all the fuck over. Your point?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You think they pee from their vagina don't you lol

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No. Why is this relevant again? Their pisshole sprays all over the meat flaps.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You decided to bring up urine for literally no reason. Unless you're actually implying you should be washing yourself with water and urine lmfao.
                Stinky dick you're so funny

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You could just use water if you want. Urine is the natural liquid that would be used for cleaning the interior though.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The vagina is like a reverse penis
                So the pee comes from their deepest point, where the pee hole is

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >mutt education

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You do not want to strip your body oils off. The objective should be to remove dead skin and excess oil.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You don't want to strip your body of oils
                >The purpose of cleaning is to remove excess oils
                I'll take contradictions for 400

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Excess oils will come off using high pressure water only. Next.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Cutfags trying to give advice
    Bunch of stinky dicks lmfao

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >.gov
      Stopped reading right there. Taking the "use water only" advice from intact and restored guys who have shit to clean under there.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Dad wanted to give me the snip
    >Mom told him to wait till I'm older and let me choose
    Thanks mom.
    I'm not even a garden gnome or burger. No idea why my dad has a mutilated cock and wanted to spread the cock mutilation tradition.
    Fucking sicko.

    Anybody who says mothers raising their sons is a problem, fuck you. My mother was nothing but a positive on my life, and my father was always a compulsive liar deadbeat loser

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck you. I hope you burn. You're subhuman Filth if you get cut voluntarily.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus Christ he actually washes himself with urine lmao

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Christ just wash it off????
      Are you living with water rations or something? I know things are collapsing over there in Europe big time because of your cucked governments throwing on purpose, but I didn't know it was that bad.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    67150722
    You use it for shampoo and mouthwash too? Lmao stinky dick

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No... Just my dick. You know the thing that's already in contact with it.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >He doesn't know what a bladder is
    >He doesn't know what the urinary track is
    >He washes himself with urine
    Lmfao stinky dick

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is an easy solution your doctor isn’t telling you and that other people aren’t recommending. There are some products you can buy called a foreskin corrector, they will pull your foreskin to be retracted. If will function the same way as a circumcision to get rid of balantitis, but is cheaper, faster, and doesn’t cause any damage. If you wear it constantly it will dry out the head of your penis and cause some loss in sensitivity (just like if you get circumcised) but this will be reversible where a circumcision is not. When wearing it, it WILL make the balantitis go away 100% just as a circumcising would, you can then a couple weeks after it’s cured try to stop wearing it and see if it returns (not so likely if you keep good hygiene). Even if it does return and you ultimately decide you want to get the circumcision, this will effectively solve the problem beforehand and give you some sense of the difference between being circumcised and not (by having a dry head but there are still more negatives to being circumcised).

    I suspect if you use this method, you will find that you will no longer consider having a circumcision. But either way it’s better to do this before jumping into a serious surgery, when this has a 100% success rate as well, and while there can be the ability for it to return if you discontinue use, you always have that choice, where for circumcision you don’t.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This recommendation was here

      [...]
      THIS OP. https://foreskinrestore.com/BXO.html
      [...]
      Fuck off garden gnome stop lying. Circumcising infants is always wrong as they did not consent.

      Just without the retractor device

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Interesting how all the people with the alleged issue happen to ignore the posts with actual solutions and just respond about the posts which have solutions they already tried…

        It’s almost as if this is a bait thread.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      hmm thanks a lot anon
      also, you know this from experience?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Friend who is a urologist, this is the common method to solve the issue nowadays, just keeping the foreskin constantly retracted shows to always resolve the issue, whereas fungal creams and other solutions while they sometimes work are less effective and have higher rates of relapse. It’s better to continue to keep it retracted even after it seems resolved, as the symptoms may be gone but the underlying issue may still be lingering. I would recommend speaking to a urologist and not a regular doctor to ask about this, find one that is knowledgeable and already knows to keep it retracted as a solution. Unfortunately doctors can’t keep up to date with the best practices with everything and often rely on outdated information from other experts.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Doctors just want to make money selling surgery and prescriptions. Literally just retracting it makes their job irrelevant.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Balanitis is some weird shit, I got it like a year ago, it's on and off for me now, pulling back your foreskin a couple of times every day improved it significantly. Still sometimes I get a flare up. Went to the doctor and dermatologist like 5 times antifungal all that shit, they even did a swab test, was pretty much useless tbh. Apparently that shit can be caused by the most abstract things, from mental health to certain foods. Some guys have gone to 30 different doctors and still haven't cured theirs, really makes you wonder what the fuck is going on with this.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah I thought about this puling the sing back, been trying to do it everytime I go to the bathroom

      but yeah, don't know why this shit happened to me, but it seems like is just something I have to live with
      that said, you didn't consider having the foreskin taken off?

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    When I started jerking off my foreskin was like fused to my dick
    I pulled it back little by little traumatically by jerking off
    OMG it hurt
    But I'm glad I didn't let some hook nosed doc snip me

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >When I started jerking off my foreskin was like fused to my dick
      As with every human male.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Really?
        What is this, some kind of male hymen?
        I legitimately thought there was something wrong with me

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It keeps shit from getting on the mucous membrane as a child. It's nature's way of keeping you safe from infection. I mentioned it here

          Same here, it's a mine field out here in American hospitals though. I swear when someone asks me the question I'll tell them I'll hurt them very badly if they hurt my son, and tell them they're insane for selling cosmetic surgeries for infants.
          Once you make it out of the hospital unscathed you have to make sure everyone who changes his diaper ever knows not to retract, since the damage and scar tissue that can form from ripping it off the glans can cause uncurable phimosis.

          >Once you make it out of the hospital unscathed you have to make sure everyone who changes his diaper ever knows not to retract, since the damage and scar tissue that can form from ripping it off the glans can cause uncurable phimosis.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not really a hymen, it's just not developed yet. You started being sexual far too young

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            > it's just not developed yet.
            I wouldn't say that. It's just a protection mechanism. Some guys can work it apart at a younger age than others. Requires effort and usually happens from boys realizing their dick feels good to touch.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's a protection mechanism sure but it's not in the state that it should be used to do the other purpose it serves. So it isn't fully developed and he started jerking it too young for the stage his body was in

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's true. The exposed glans is overtly sexual and the Greeks knew that.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's a protection mechanism sure but it's not in the state that it should be used to do the other purpose it serves. So it isn't fully developed and he started jerking it too young for the stage his body was in

              Why does jerking off feel good before you're "ready"?
              If anything I feel like I did it late

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The nerves are still there. Little boys touch their dicks. What age?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I was about 11 I think.
                Late 11. Just before I went to highschool

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've always thought the sensitivity of the band at the end of the foreskin also serves to make sure you play with it enough to un-fuse it from the glans, beyond the sexual function later. It's all perfectly orchestrated evolutionarily and makes sense to me.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've always thought the sensitivity of the band at the end of the foreskin also serves to make sure you play with it enough to un-fuse it from the glans, beyond the sexual function later. It's all perfectly orchestrated evolutionarily and makes sense to me.

                And this natural phenomena is what caused the religious zealots to pursue the cutting of this healthy, vital organ in children to prevent perceived "sin" or something. It's the original reasoning behind the extreme gnomish ritual circumcision which goes beyond the cutting of just the overhang as it was in ancient times. Instead removing the entire piece of skin so as to expose the glans and desensitize the penis as much as possible. Puritans bought into this in America as well in the 19th century.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >two doctors recomended me to take my skin off. I'm probably gonna be circuncised in one month
    Did it at 33 and I regret it since

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what went wrong??

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fucking became useless as I did not get used to the loss of sensitivity
        Even faping became useless
        Also thé woman who knzw me before/after the cut said my behaviour changed
        I don't feel anymore & my dick is callous

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't get fucking tricked.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being a foreskinlet, absolute plebs
    https://imgur.com/a/ya5fyNx

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    my dad had it done as an adult and he jizzed me into my ma afterwards, so I reckon you shouldn't do it unless you want retarded useless children.

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    cutfag here, I have sensitivity issues. Wish uncut was normalized, wish I had my foreskin. I used to cope by saying foreskin was gross but I admit now that I was just coping. If I were you I would do everything I could to try not to get cut. Sucks making love to a woman and not being able to cum. I stopped beating off completely because it fucks up my sensitivity enough that I have no chance of cumming during sex with a condom on.

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    please OP for the love of god do not listen to those doctors...

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP I hope you are not retarded enough to listen to 2022 ISTners for a serious permanent medical advice. Nofuckingbody here has a diploma and I can call myself a "doctor" and fake it too. We haven't seen your cock or your case in real life and neither have anyone except your doctors, whom you should actually trust more???
    It's your choice after all to make whatever you want to, but if I was you I wouldn't be asking here such things and making decisions based on the opinions of people on an incel website. Take care

  38. 2 months ago
    Fat Indian Bully

    Don't listen to those garden gnomes, I used a steroid cream/antifungal combo and it cured all my problems

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't wash your glans with soap wtf? just use some water, you only have excessive oils because you keep removing them that much. Uncut dicks are relatively self-cleaning. Washing the glans and/or labia with soap is also an instant ticket to a fungal infection or balanitis.

    Only parts of your body that should be washed with soap are arm pits, crack, balls and taint. Even headhair can be optional if you take good enough care to maintain it, and when you use soap use it sparingly. (of course, do use soap for your whole body if you are actually dirty from like falling in shit or something.

    tldr: using (too much) soap on your skin is like taking antibiotics cuz it kills your good skin bacteria

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    people who get circumcised in the uk don't seem to complain about it. so it might be ok. but then, people who have it done in america always seem to be very unhappy with the results... so maybe it might not
    if you want some actual advice: if you are worried about the surgery, cancel it
    of course, this won't fix your problem, but now you will only have one thing to worry about rather than two

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't. The guy in the linked video had the same problem and regrets it. It takes away most of the fine touch receptors. You are left with shit that will only get worse with time.

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    For a few months, yes months, my foreskin simply wouldn't retract. The head was covered in white, smelly discharge and my head was extremely sore so cleaning it like that was an exercise in daily agony. I used creams and stuff, I always kept good hygiene so I dunno why it happened but blessedly it disappeared and I've been pain free since then with my dick back to the old form, only problem is I cannot cum if I fully retract my foreskin but I don't mind, I'm a virgin so I just got another excuse to keep it in my pants as I'll definitely tear myself if I penetrate a girl. I too considered circumcision because it was taking forever to heal but it worked out by itself after a while. Give it time OP. It's not like you've always had problems like these, right? It'll go away.

Your email address will not be published.