>he isn't drinking 1 gallon of horseshoe crab milk per day

>he isn't drinking 1 gallon of horseshoe crab milk per day
NGMI

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i show women this image and tell them this is where blue clothes dye comes from

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Vaxxcattle have no idea how much suffering the made up industry they idolize does

      They are just milking them, they are fine

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        half their torso is gone and they are kept alive to continuously produce blood

        Pretty sure these guys are dead

        They are fine. They let them go when they are finished. Then catch them again a year later

        They release them but upwards of 30% succumb to the blood loss.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I mean its not like we are going to run out

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            most of them are found around asia and asians keep annihilating their beaches and rendering local populations extinct, some of them are already endangered

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        anon their faces are cut off

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They're not. They are just folded over and cracked slightly. The front of the crab is facing the same direction as its rear. Just some major spinal damage to heal through.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They’re invertebrates you moron

            Also nobody ITT on a supposed health & fitness board has said that that the blood is used to test for the presence of endotoxins in general. It’s not just the Fricking vax you dweebs.

            We are the top of the food chain and these crabs make sure your Granny doesn’t die from sepsis because production line Black folk didn’t wash their hands after making her pacemaker.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >crack open spine
              >take picture
              >claim they don't have a spine
              >spine is visibly cracked

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        milking ≠ exsanguinating

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You don't actually, but I still like and upvote your post and would consider it based if you now started doing this in earnest.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And that man's name? Gigachad.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Vaxxcattle have no idea how much suffering the made up industry they idolize does

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This stuff is because they have an antibody in their blood that reacts to bacterial endotoxin, it's used to test for contamination and such

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bro what the frick am I actually looking at

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're looking at hell. They do this to living human beings too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >fundamentally no difference from my life

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Horseshoe blood is used to test vaccines to make sure there's no toxic bacteria in it so they can make sure it's the vaccine thats killing you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >le vaccine is kill youuuu

        grow up

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but
          >In response to a potential pandemic strain of a flu virus in 1976, there was a national campaign for people to get the swine flu vaccination. Over 45 million people were vaccinated and there were increased reports of GBS following vaccination. Those who received the 1976 swine flu vaccine had a slight increased risk for developing GBS of approximately 10 additional cases of GBS for every 1 Million people who got the swine flu vaccine.
          Result: The vaccine was withdrawn under the precautionary principle and the healthcare ethos of "first, do no harm"
          > Incidence of myocarditis after Covid-19 mRNA vaccines was highest in male adolescents and male young adults (age 12-17 years, range 50-139 cases per million (low certainty); 18-29 years, 28-147 per million (moderate certainty)). For girls and boys aged 5-11 years and women aged 18-29 years, incidence of myocarditis after vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) could be fewer than 20 cases per million (low certainty)
          Result: Widespread mockery and censorship of anyone suggesting that the vaccines are potentially harmful: Vaccines still promoted by governments around the world. You are a schizophrenic conspiracy theorist if you think that the rate of harm is concerning.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            wall of text
            summarize in 1 sentence

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              old jab hurt people, bad jab, no give people
              new jab hurt people more, good jab, give jab all people

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >You are a schizophrenic conspiracy theorist
            yep

            How is that heart doing ? Feel dem jitters ?

            no i am completely healthy and do not have paranoid delusions

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              vaxxie cope

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            how what's the incidence of myocarditis after covid-19 infection in those same groups. i bet it's at least an order of magnitude higher

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >how what's the incidence of myocarditis after covid-19 infection in those same groups. i bet it's at least an order of magnitude higher
              Wrong again
              https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/

              >The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients-A Large Population-Based Study
              >Myocarditis and pericarditis are potential post-acute cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 infection, arising from adaptive immune responses. We aimed to study the incidence of post-acute COVID-19 myocarditis and pericarditis. Retrospective cohort study of 196,992 adults after COVID-19 infection in Clalit Health Services members in Israel between March 2020 and January 2021. Inpatient myocarditis and pericarditis diagnoses were retrieved from day 10 after positive PCR. Follow-up was censored on 28 February 2021, with minimum observation of 18 days. The control cohort of 590,976 adults with at least one negative PCR and no positive PCR were age- and sex-matched. Since the Israeli vaccination program was initiated on 20 December 2020, the time-period matching of the control cohort was calculated backward from 15 December 2020. Nine post-COVID-19 patients developed myocarditis (0.0046%), and eleven patients were diagnosed with pericarditis (0.0056%). In the control cohort, 27 patients had myocarditis (0.0046%) and 52 had pericarditis (0.0088%). Age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.93 to 1.00) and male sex (aHR 4.42; 95% CI, 1.64 to 11.96) were associated with myocarditis. Male sex (aHR 1.93; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.41) and peripheral vascular disease (aHR 4.20; 95% CI 1.50 to 11.72) were associated with pericarditis.

              >Post COVID-19 infection was not associated with either myocarditis (aHR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.56) or pericarditis (aHR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.13).

              >We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                interesting, still:

                post-vax adult mc incidence: 28-147 per million

                post-covid adult mc incidence: 45 per million

                so perfectly in range. no difference. nothingburger. less than 0.01% of myocarditis in either case. move on with your life.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >so perfectly in range. no difference.
                The difference is that one is the result of a natural disease, and one is the result of a medical intervention marketed as safe & effective and virtually risk-free. Patients cannot make informed consent if this information is not presented to them, and if they are induced by government propaganda.
                This isn't even getting to the efficacy (or lack thereof) of the vaccines.

                The point of the israel study is that the risk of myocarditis was equal between those who contracted covid-19 and those who didn't. THAT is your "no difference".

                28-147 cases per million of myocarditis is NOT normal for the 18-29 age bracket.
                A separate study from Israel found a rate of slightly over 100 cases per million of myocarditis for the 18-29 age bracket
                https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110737

                The salient point is that historical medical treatments have been rightly withdrawn from the market at much lower thresholds of harm.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The salient point is that historical medical treatments have been rightly withdrawn from the market at much lower thresholds of harm
                name one

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >In response to a potential pandemic strain of a flu virus in 1976, there was a national campaign for people to get the swine flu vaccination. Over 45 million people were vaccinated and there were increased reports of GBS following vaccination. Those who received the 1976 swine flu vaccine had a slight increased risk for developing GBS of approximately 10 additional cases of GBS for every 1 Million people who got the swine flu vaccine.
                > On December 16, a one-month suspension of the vaccination program was announced by Sencer. William Foege of the CDC estimated that the incidence of GBS was four times higher in vaccinated people than in those not receiving the swine flu vaccine. President Ford told reporters that he agreed with the suspension.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >four times higher
                Incidences of myocarditis among vaccinated is not 4x higher than incidences among non-vaccinated.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Myocarditis is not the only adverse reaction attributed to mRNA jabs

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/
                >Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

                >In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We adapted the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials.

                > Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on Brighton Collaboration adverse events of special interest.

                > Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI -23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI -3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).

                Have two

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What adverse reactions? And now you are changing the goal posts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >? And now you are changing the goal posts.
                This isn't an abstract philosphical debate, the point is that the vaccines are causing HARM. Myocarditis is the best-reported event and one of the single most common, but it is far from the only one.
                >What adverse reactions?
                Read the study

                Read the full study you propaganda-slurping brainlet
                https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283?via%3Dihub
                >The definition of a serious adverse event (SAE) was provided in each trial’s study protocol and included in the supplemental material of the trial’s publication. [2], [3], [4] Pfizer and Moderna used nearly identical definitions, consistent with regulatory expectations. An SAE was defined as an adverse event that results in any of the following conditions: death; life-threatening at the time of the event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; medically important event, based on medical judgment.
                DEATH is an adverse reaction, but until Pfizer + Moderna etc publish their full participant level data sets, we won't know how many died during their trials. They refuse to publish the full data, they only report the number of serious adverse events, not the type of adverse event or the demographic breakdown of who it was happening to.

                You cannot make informed consent if you don't have the information. Stop bootlicking pharmaceutical corporations who do not have your best interests at heart, and have a perverse incentive NOT to report honestly.

                >In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants). [3] In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have two

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/
                >Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

                >In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We adapted the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials.

                > Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on Brighton Collaboration adverse events of special interest.

                > Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI -23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI -3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cocaine.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >virtually risk-free
                less than 0.01% suffering from myocarditis sounds "virtually risk-free" to me. literally every single medical intervention conceived will cause some sort of adverse effect in 0.01% of people.
                now consider this is in line with the effect of COVID-19, so by this narrow metric it's neither better nor worse. now consider covid comes with a slew of other much more common risks leading to a fatality rate 5-10 times higher in 20 and 30 year olds and "long covid" symptoms in another significant percentage of people. nevermind older groups. It's obvious the vax is a huge net-benefit.

                >The salient point is that historical medical treatments have been rightly withdrawn from the market at much lower thresholds of harm.

                i would need a LOT more context on these cases to make an honest and accurate comparison.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >now consider covid comes with a slew of other much more common risks leading to a fatality rate 5-10 times higher in 20 and 30 year olds and "long covid" symptoms in another significant percentage of people. nevermind older groups. It's obvious the vax is a huge net-benefit.
                The alpha variant, maybe, when the population had no natural immunity. But the risk benefit analysis of TODAY is different. The circulating omicron strains of covid are far less harmful than original strains, and the majority of the population has a degree of (superior) natural immunity from previous infection.
                https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971222002284
                >Its infection fatality ratio reduced by 78.7% (95% confidence interval: 66.9%, 85.0%) with respect to previous variants.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                cool
                it's worth noting my figure for a fatality rate of 0.05-0.1% among 20 and 30 yos was actually low ball to further demonstrate the point. alpha variant rate of 0.2% is widely cited for those age groups. but let's stick with 0.1% and drop that by 80% to 0.02%, that leaves you with 2x the chance of dying from covid than your heart feeling funny from the vaxx. risk benefit analysis still points strongly in vaxx's favour.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >that leaves you with 2x the chance of dying from covid than your heart feeling funny from the vaxx
                Myocarditis is not the only adverse reaction caused by the mRNA jabs.

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/
                >Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

                >In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We adapted the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials.

                > Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on Brighton Collaboration adverse events of special interest.

                > Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI -23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI -3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).

                Have two

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and death is not the only adverse reaction caused by covid. the various risks associated with covid are FAR more likely than any vaxx risk you have cited.

                i'm not going to go back and forth thru each one with you because we already covered death which is the worst and unequivocally a much greater risk with covid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Read the full study you propaganda-slurping brainlet
                https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283?via%3Dihub
                >The definition of a serious adverse event (SAE) was provided in each trial’s study protocol and included in the supplemental material of the trial’s publication. [2], [3], [4] Pfizer and Moderna used nearly identical definitions, consistent with regulatory expectations. An SAE was defined as an adverse event that results in any of the following conditions: death; life-threatening at the time of the event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; medically important event, based on medical judgment.
                DEATH is an adverse reaction, but until Pfizer + Moderna etc publish their full participant level data sets, we won't know how many died during their trials. They refuse to publish the full data, they only report the number of serious adverse events, not the type of adverse event or the demographic breakdown of who it was happening to.

                You cannot make informed consent if you don't have the information. Stop bootlicking pharmaceutical corporations who do not have your best interests at heart, and have a perverse incentive NOT to report honestly.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >propaganda slurping bootlicking
                buzzword coping

                >DEATH is an adverse reaction
                if it killed at any rate even remotely close to covid we would see it in the excess deaths of countries all across the world. just as we saw covid deaths. we don't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                let me rephrase:
                if it killed at a rate of even 10% of covid's rate we would see it in the excess deaths of countries all across the world.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >if it killed at a rate of even 10% of covid's rate we would see it in the excess deaths of countries all across the world.
                Where have you been? Non-covid excess deaths are at record levels in nations across the world.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >take vaccine
                >still catch Covid
                Now you’ve doubled your risk, no?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You don't really understand how vaccines work, do you?
                You can still get the illness, your body is just more apt to fight it because it knows what it's dealing with from square 1, and it can target it earlier. It's the difference between being in a crowd and getting attacked by a group of people that are spray painted red vs being in a crowd and getting attacked by a group of people which look exactly like any regular person. Guess which ones you'll spot and destroy sooner.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How does that not double the risk of you can still get really sick? I know plenty of vaxxed people who got hit hard with Covid.

                Seems like a pointless vaccine. You don’t see polio, smallpox, rhubella, measles and mumps anymore because those vaccines actually worked

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >How does that not double the risk of you can still get really sick?
                In theory, you shouldn't risk to get really sick if you're vaccinated as long as you don't have a bunch of other health issues.
                >I know plenty of vaxxed people who got hit hard with Covid.
                I also know a few, but the people in question also already had some pretty serious health problems.
                >Seems like a pointless vaccine. You don’t see polio, smallpox, rhubella, measles and mumps anymore because those vaccines actually worked
                That is true.
                I'm not gonna discuss whether or not the coof vax was intended to do damage or not, because I don't have enough legitimate information to pick any side. I mean, pozzed media (who could secretly be lizards) telling you that men are women and to eat ze bugs VS some guys on the internet (who could secretly be dogs) who also believe that microwaves give you cancer and that the earth is flat. Not exactly great choices.
                All I can say is that, whatever the intention was, the whole thing was poorly executed and the result was a shitshow.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                From my anecdotal experience it’s been mostly vaxxed people who keep catching Covid. I had it once and I have taken absolutely zero precautions since this began (was sick for a day, lost smell for a couple weeks).

                The vaccine was shilled as being an effective solution to the problem but it turns out that was a total lie. Pointless at best, damaging to long term health at worst. No thanks.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            this is what the incels in this thread do not understand. There is inherent harm in ALL interventions, even drawing blood for a simple test. We constantly learn from those and try to minimize that, but likely the complication rate in evert medical intervention is never 0%.
            The eejits here blabbering about how for example that amebocyte lysate is "for the covid vaccine" are so moronic that there is likely no saving them anymore. The ship has sailed. Of course it's for that and over9000 other indications. Still, its nice to feel one can spout turds about whatever as long as it benefits the drooling narrative how "vaccines are a form of governmental control" or some even more moronic 5G shit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          How is that heart doing ? Feel dem jitters ?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >person makes obvious joke
          >autist shits themselves over it
          lol
          lmao

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no refunds

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no u

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >NOOOO NOT THE HECKING VACCINERINOOO
        >IT'S SO DANGEROUS NOOOOOOO NO NO

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >NOOOO NOT THE HECKING VACCINERINOOO
          >IT'S SO DANGEROUS NOOOOOOO NO NO

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he saved the thumbnail
            >of a troonjak

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >OOOH EWW WHAT ARE THEY DOING TO THEM THATS SO CREEPY AND WEIRD EWWWW
      >oh yeah cows? thats perfectly normal

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Cows do like being milked, since it relieves the pressure caused by excess milk building up in their udders. Some cows love being milked so much that they line up outside the milking parlor in anticipation.
        >Cows like being milked because it’s the only way they can relieve the pressure caused by the buildup of milk in their udders without having a calf to feed.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >raping a cow and stealing it’s baby so it can’t drink its milk.
          >putting the cow in pain just so we can “relieve” it of its symptoms.
          Aaaaah yes. So much better.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            you have to go back vegan troony

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It would still be in the same position if it's calf was around you moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limulus_amebocyte_lysate

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ftfy

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    half their torso is gone and they are kept alive to continuously produce blood

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are fine. They let them go when they are finished. Then catch them again a year later

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Who gives a frick?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >half their torso is gone
      No they're just folded.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there has to be a jav featuring blue crab cum

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty sure these guys are dead

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I lift to free horseshoe crabs.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's blood not milk

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Blood is red

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        its crab sperm

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not if you are a crab that has been around for a couple hundred million years before hemoglobin was a thing. Their blood is copper- not iron-based like ours.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t understand the purpose of feeding these crabs this blue water. They are hooked up and being force fed. Not only does this seem cruel but useless as well. Plus the crabs look weird. What is this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limulus_amebocyte_lysate

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Crazy. So why are they drinking the blue stuff?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's being drained from them.

          It's the color of their blood.

          It is then used in the COVID-19 vaccine.

          Not even joking.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Oh I get it. So how come some of them produce a lot more blue juice
            it’s as if there’s blue juicelets among this species of crab lol

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >It is then used in the COVID-19 vaccine.
            Wrong, it is used to test a wide spectra of vaccines and other medical products for contamination.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    These things are way too prolific anyway.
    No natural predators, and even Chinese people don't eat them, so that tells you a lot.
    There's a reason why they've survived for hundreds of millions of years.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      we should genocide them, nothing from the early triassic deserves to live in the modern world, it ain't right

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    we are a fricking menace

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm currently reading fabius bile. This is pretty much up there with his fleshcraft shit.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How come you're all "this is cruel" "how could they do this" "we have to free the animals" when it comes to your hated vaccines but when it comes to chickens and pigs all of a sudden it's "apex predator" "animals can't feel pain" "they'd be worse off in the wild"?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I would literally eat a person if i could get away with it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Vegans be like "nooooooo not the heckin porkers and cows farming is torture" but then they would force you to take the globohomosexual syringe juice despite these crabby bois literally being tied up and bled alive.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is a false equivalence. One is necessary for the safety of medical products while the other is a life-style choice. Also I know plenty of people who recognize the need to replace the horseshoe crab blood with a artificial product. Doesn't matter if they are vegan or meat-eaters.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This is a false equivalance. One is necessary for affordable and highly nutritious food. The other is an optional medical product with doubtful efficacy,

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >One is necessary for the safety of medical products while the other is a life-style choice.
          Cruelty is not necessary for the safety of medical products you moron.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >meat-eaters
          They are called humans with normal balanced diet. If I catch any vegan calling me a meat eater in real life instead of an omnivore I belt them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Suck a dick. As long as it's done sustainably and it makes my life better, I don't give a frick about either.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >As long as it's done sustainably
        Drop it you bag of c**ts. You don't actually have morals, so don't pretend like some facet of it is an element to you. It's pathetic you try to gain sympathy from strangers that way.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw no dom gf to milk me daily

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    crabs have milk?
    do they have breasts too?

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >MUHH SINGULARITY TECH UTOPIA IMMORTALITY SPACE EXP-
    kek literal embodiment of "I LOVE SCIENCE!"
    have a nice day homosexual. your israelite leaders will rape your children and drink their blood while you live in the pod

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i'm sorry that your life happened in such a way that you have to see evil and malice everywhere and every time, constantly living in fear of the imagined and yet unimagined horrors that tomorrow might hold.
      I hope that one day you can turn your life around and see the beauty, happines and wonder in the world.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'd wish I was as naive as you

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN CRABERINO

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Vaxxies are really coping in every thread about their bad decisions.
    No refunds, that's why you will always be a small dyel

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >every major biotech breakthrough in the last 70 years has been because of blue horseshoe crab blood
    >we humans are fricking moronic and are hunting them to extinction

    At some point they're gonna be gone, there'll be a super virus, and we'll all be doomed. Rightfully deserved at that point.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >every major biotech breakthrough in the last 70 years has been because of blue horseshoe crab blood
      Is it because they been around for a few hundred million years without any major mutation and pretty much immune to anything at this point?

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The medical harvest of horseshoe crabs is about 500,000 crabs per year.
    Frick America. Frick israelites. Frick Black folk. Frick the vaccinated. FREE THE CRABS.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I know a couple streets where you can get free crabs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Do tell

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >the forbidden gatorade

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When did you realize humans are the villains of the planet?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When Cain killed Abel.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How much do you know about crabs or spiders? Have you seen them cannibalize their young after giving birth?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      when i read up on the history of europeans exporting israelites and Black folk all over the world

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off homosexual
      Earth belongs to BIG HUMAN wiener

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's not milk. That's their blood.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I got the 2 shots but no boosters and never will.. will I be ok bros? 🙁

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WHAT THE FRICK kind of satanistic shit is this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_crab#Blood_harvesting

      >Blood harvesting
      >Horseshoe crabs use hemocyanin to carry oxygen through their blood. Because of the copper present in hemocyanin, their blood is blue.[46] Their blood contains amebocytes, which play a similar role to the white blood cells of vertebrates in defending the organism against pathogens. Amebocytes from the blood of L. polyphemus are used to make Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL), which is used for the detection of bacterial endotoxins in medical applications.[47] There is a high demand for the blood, the harvest of which involves collecting and bleeding the animals, and then releasing them back into the sea. Most of the animals survive the process; mortality is correlated with both the amount of blood extracted from an individual animal, and the stress experienced during handling and transportation.[48] Estimates of mortality rates following blood harvesting vary from 3–15%[49] to 10–30%.[50][51][52] Approximately 500,000 Limulus are harvested annually for this purpose.[53]

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Brutal. I'm a voracious carnivorous mammal, all my hobbies include killing and eating in some capacity, but this scientismic torturism is ghastly and perverse. And it's all for making a few bucks. We should not fear a robot uprising or swarms of alien insects, they are already here. None of the people who do this would have any qualms about doing this to a man, woman, or child but for the red tape.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          We should not fear a robot uprising or swarms of alien insects because we are already every bit as brutal as they could be, and we were here first.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >people don't have qualms about doing this to women or children
          If it was legal and I was much older I would buy stem cells taken from the hypothalamus of children in situations much like these crabs. It would make my life longer and better and it wouldn't be bad because the children are there for ethical human consumption, just like cattle.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >the horror
    >the horror

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *