how to tell if your diet is a meme

are you allowed to drink milk on it?
if not, then your diet is a meme.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It does a body good.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But I'm lactose intolerant. Does almond milk still count?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You sound like a gay.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      have you tried removing all bacteria from your intestines?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What if I drink rice milk?

      those aren't milk. they're flavored water.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kefir, yoghurt and hard cheeses.
      You're welcome.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      90% of US almonds come from california, which spray a toxic pesticide that's not having to be divulged, ziram. Also of note is glyphosphate.
      You can counter this by drinking organic, but it was one of the worst things I was doing without realizing it.

      Switch to vegetable oil free oatmilk*, or just take lactase with milk.
      Make sure the oatmilk is glyphosphate tested or organic.
      Oatly has a fat free version that's great.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        *glyphosate
        don't mind me just from another timeline

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >But I'm lactose intolerant
      that's impossible, we're MAMMALS

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The vast majority of mammals can only tolerate lactose in infancy. This includes humans: adult lactose tolerance is enabled by a genetic mutation which only about 30ish% of modern humans have.

        Most Europeans have the mutation, but weirdly most Greeks don’t, hence all the yogurt, which doesn’t contain lactose.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This. The amount of fricking sctizos in this thread convinced that either human lactose intolerance is some modern disease cause by israelites, or that dairy is some modern disease caused by israelites, is fricking grim.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the schizo is you
            "lactose intolerance" is an incel conspiracy theory
            we're mammals

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm asian and lactose tolerance, seeing how common it is around here, I don't think the 30% number is correct
          maybe a bit higher

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            30/35% is a global estimate, it’s like 95% is some places and 5% in others.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's because you're a brown skinned aryan, rajesh

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The vast majority of mammals can only tolerate lactose in infancy
          complete lie

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Go keto, bro. Since my gut bacteria don't get substrate my intolerancy is gone.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      try goat milk
      Today's cows through a mutation give milk w A1 beta-casein, apparently what gives people a lot of problems (intolerances & stuff). Every other mammal gives A2 including goats, sheep, etc

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >lactose intolerant
      >mammal
      Like a fish with no gills. You sure about that buddy? Your mom's tit milk had even more lactose than cow milk. Might want try real milk raw and not the burnt processed shit from the supergoy.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        fish with no gills don't exist
        mammals with lactose intolerance are the norm
        even baby mammals experience lactose intolerance and that includes actual babies, lactose tolerance is a spectrum not a binary state because it depends on the amount of lactase you have in your stomach which is genetically determined and there is a wild variance in humans
        raw milk offers no advantage at all to pasteurised milk for those who suffer from lactose intolerance, like none

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >even baby mammals experience lactose intolerance and that includes actual babies
          Man, big pharma really did a number on humanity if true. Only antibiotics could have done that. All doctors must die.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >mammals with lactose intolerance are the norm
          why do you lie?

          https://i.imgur.com/fhqMaqi.jpeg

          I wonder ~~*who*~~ is behind this post

          https://i.imgur.com/U5iWwn6.png

          it's not just about that
          it's about the fact that literal Rothschild is so afraid of raw milk for the goyim
          in his mind it's even on par with Israel

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          conspiracy theory

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Reprogram your gut.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Have you tried to stop being brown?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Like most people over 30. Don't listen to those morons calling you brown, even among Whites lactose tolerance usually goes away with age.

      OP, we're not baby cows or baby goats. Their milk is not for us.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >even among Whites lactose tolerance usually goes away with age.
        Lactose intolerance is a hoax.

        Real milk (raw milk) does not cause intolerance and can be consumed throughout a person's entire life, well into old age.
        If you do not have experience drinking raw milk, do not reply to this post with your worthless opinion.

        NO EXPERIENCE = NO OPINION

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I do, actually. My grandmothers and uncles farms, they both keep cows, I sometimes indulge in the milk, straight from the evening milking, because its delicious. But I always fart up a storm for hours on end after that. It's a price I'm willing to pay, from time to time. But lactose intolerance is absolutely a thing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well, how much milk?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What if I drink rice milk?

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is goat milk ok?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I accept your proposition.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Digits grants you access

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        LET ME IN

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gimme them quads boi

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If it's raw milk, then it's one of the best things you could possibly drink.
      If it's burned fake milk (pasteurized, UHT, etc.) then it's a waste of money, and you should pour it down the drain.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's fine, but I don't get the appeal.
      >doesn't taste better or worse than normal milk
      >more expensive
      >more calories
      What's the point? Just get some milk.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        same reason people eat organic or raw. their orthorexia is their personality.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My gf's father is a farmer and we get free goat milk because no one but him in her family likes it lol

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    canitards, vegtards, ketolards, cannot accept this reality.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If your diet doesn't teach you the difference between real milk and pasteurized milk then it's a meme.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If it's raw milk, then it's one of the best things you could possibly drink.
      If it's burned fake milk (pasteurized, UHT, etc.) then it's a waste of money, and you should pour it down the drain.

      raw milk is a meme.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder ~~*who*~~ is behind this post

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >heat treatment lowers the vitamin C content of foods
          we already knew this

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's not just about that
            it's about the fact that literal Rothschild is so afraid of raw milk for the goyim
            in his mind it's even on par with Israel

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You have no idea what health standards were like 100 years ago. Raw milk from modern farms with climate control and pathogen testing has nothing to do with the shit people were drinking in the 1940s. Milk is an excellent medium for all kinds of microbes to grow and it was a significant source of both disease and death during the period after widespread urbanization but prior to pasteurization.
              >between 1912 and 1937, some 65,000 people died of tuberculosis contracted from consuming milk in England and Wales alone

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >65,000 people
                now show the amount that didn't die from raw milk
                now show the amount of other things that a commoner was exposed to at the time that could have been the source

                >defending the ~~*Rothschild*~~ this hard
                so it is true that israelites are afraid of raw milk for the goyim

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >now show the amount that didn't die from raw milk
                lolwut? are you moronic?
                imagine believing that there's a massive global israeli (because it always has to be about israelites with you people) conspiracy to pasteurize milk because, what, drinking raw milk will free you from the israeli mind control?

                health standards in the early 20th century were incredibly poor and lots of people, mostly children and the elderly, died as a result of various diseases contracted from raw milk which, as a result of the inefficient supply chains at the time, was generally days old by the time it reached the consumer
                countries around the world adopted pasteurization of milk because it kept their children from getting sick
                no conspiracy needed

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >imagine believing that there's a massive global israeli
                I don't have to imagine

                https://i.imgur.com/fhqMaqi.jpeg

                I wonder ~~*who*~~ is behind this post

                https://i.imgur.com/U5iWwn6.png

                it's not just about that
                it's about the fact that literal Rothschild is so afraid of raw milk for the goyim
                in his mind it's even on par with Israel

                >because it always has to be about israelites with you people
                yes, the parasitic people who have infiltrated the western world does indeed dip their toe into everything

                >believe me goyim, it's our medicine that will save you, just like the covid vaccine!!!
                >now take your booster

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >countries around the world adopted pasteurization of milk because it kept their children from getting sick
                the japanese doesn't seem to think so

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the japanese doesn't seem to think so
                weebs confirmed for once again not knowing a single thing about the country they idolize

                >https://getrawmilk.com/content/the-only-raw-milk-in-japan-omoiyari-farm
                >Coming straight from the udder, Omoiyari Seinyu, as it’s called, is the only unprocessed cow’s milk legally available in Japan. Only a handful of Tokyo locations stock it–among them the posh Isetan department store in Shinjuku–in tiny quantities.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              pasteurised milk itself was literally a white european invention that vastly improved the nutrient status of white europeans
              I don't care if a rothschild pushed pasteurised milk decades after its invention, just like I don't care if a rothschild pushed for people breathing or drinking water, just because a israelite promotes something doesn't make it inherently bad

              https://i.imgur.com/QWN36pO.jpeg

              >mammals with lactose intolerance are the norm
              why do you lie? [...] [...]

              mammals don't digest lactose perfectly, it's always a matter of degree
              even calves have runny shits and get fevers from drinking raw milk
              have you guys never been around babies or baby mammals? it's like you don't have a clue

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >improved the nutrient status
                pasteurizing milk quite literally reduce its nutritional value

                >Louis Pasteur
                >the same guy who invented vaccine
                yep, raw milk is confirmed to be superior

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how come pic is completely unrelated to the topic at hand?
                we have the studies looking at the nutrient content of raw milk and pasteurised milk, anyone can simply look at the data and see that the only thing that gets negatively impacted to a significant degree is vitamin C
                >vaccines
                I don't care

                >have you guys never been around babies or baby mammals? it's like you don't have a clue
                nooooo you don't understand, this food that literally no animal on the planet consumes after infancy is actually the perfect food for humans
                but not human milk, of course
                the milk from an entirely different species is what humans should be drinking every day

                I actually like milk and it's very nutritious but yeah this fetishization of single foods is getting out of hand

                >mammals don't digest lactose perfectly
                what's breast milk?
                seem more like a problem with A1 beta-casein
                Today's cows through a mutation give milk w A1 beta-casein, apparently what gives people a lot of problems (intolerances & stuff). Every other mammal gives A2 including goats, sheep, etc

                even calves get problems digesting their mothers' milk, I've seen it happen and there is an enormous amount of research on the topic and no matter what type of milk is used whether or not it is pasteurised or raw or some sort of milk replacer baby cows get digestive problems, just like human babies get digestive problems drinking raw breastmilk

                >mammals don't digest lactose perfectly
                what's breast milk?
                seem more like a problem with A1 beta-casein
                Today's cows through a mutation give milk w A1 beta-casein, apparently what gives people a lot of problems (intolerances & stuff). Every other mammal gives A2 including goats, sheep, etc

                >Today's cows through a mutation give milk w A1 beta-casein
                that would potentially cause allergic reactions not the same thing as lactose intolerance related digestion problems

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >have you guys never been around babies or baby mammals? it's like you don't have a clue
                nooooo you don't understand, this food that literally no animal on the planet consumes after infancy is actually the perfect food for humans
                but not human milk, of course
                the milk from an entirely different species is what humans should be drinking every day

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >mammals don't digest lactose perfectly
                what's breast milk?
                seem more like a problem with A1 beta-casein
                Today's cows through a mutation give milk w A1 beta-casein, apparently what gives people a lot of problems (intolerances & stuff). Every other mammal gives A2 including goats, sheep, etc

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              what's your diet and where do you get your food from, gatekeeper?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it's me. I'm behind that post.
          and you're a moron.
          stop gatekeeping milk, and other foods.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      are you implying pasteurized milk isn't real milk?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pasteurized milk isn't real milk.

        steppe nomads boiled and prepared dairy thoroughly

        I will never be this brainwashed.

        funny, considering it's rather common for babies to suffer digestive problems from consuming raw breastmilk lol

        No, they don't. Kys vegan tard.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >boiled milk isn't real milk
          ok champ.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      steppe nomads boiled and prepared dairy thoroughly

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Did your mom boil her breasts for you too?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          funny, considering it's rather common for babies to suffer digestive problems from consuming raw breastmilk lol

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm allowed to drink it, but it's a lot of calories for not enough macros. Water is King.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Aside from milk, what else can help me replenish my VRIL?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      who is VRIL?

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’m vegan and I didn’t really like the taste of regular milk anyway so *shrug*

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so you're on a meme diet.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah I was just vegetarian for years anyway and gradually didn’t really feel the need for dairy etc, I was basically de facto vegan for about 6 months before I ever really realised that’s basically what I was. It’s not like I was trying to emulate some Instagram mongoloid trying to convince me that it’d give me superpowers.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you can't drink milk on a vegan diet. you are on a vegan diet. therefore you are on a meme diet.
          it's as shrimple as that.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ok

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          post body

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      tho the schitzovegans who spout bullshit about it being cow titty juice that’s poison to humans or whatever shit are as bad as the full carnivore people

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why are you on fit? you don't lift, you don't do any sport or activity
      why starve yourself in the first place, just jump off a bridge for a quicker suicide method

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you don't lift, you don't do any sport or activity
        I lift, run long distance, and am on my college rowing team

        >just jump off a bridge for a quicker suicide method

        https://i.imgur.com/WDU1ddL.jpeg

        why are you on a pill diet?

        https://i.imgur.com/z7vY7Es.jpeg

        post body

        >pill diet
        I take a single multivitamin and omega-3, and after that get everything from whole foods, incl. 150g of protein a day. I’m doing fine.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          and where do you get your B12 from?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It’s in the multivitamin.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I lift, run long distance, and am on my college rowing team
          nope lol
          wanna know how I know you're lying?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I take a single multivitamin
          translates to
          >I am a slave to big pharma and need synthetic drugs only to stay alive
          you're not making it to 50

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            wot

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why are you on a pill diet?

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >walk by fridge
    >sip some milk from the jug
    >walk by fridge
    >sip some milk from the jug
    >walk by fridge
    >sip some milk from the jug
    >walk by fridge
    >sip some milk from the jug

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yea

    missing an entire macro nutrient is the biggest red flag for meme diets though

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >drinking milk
    Are you a literal baby?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am literally someone's baby.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post body

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >unsweetened Sugar juice
    No thanks, I will get my dairy from cheese

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Milk is just as recent an addition to the human diet as grains and it's just as damaging. I know your immediate urge after hearing this is to insult me but it won't change the facts. If you're eating anything that would have been unknown to a human living 20,000 years ago then you're fricking up.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You are brown

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As I said, insulting me won't change the facts. I accept your concession.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      milk isn't inherently damaging and neither are grains
      there is benefit in consuming both

      >even baby mammals experience lactose intolerance and that includes actual babies
      Man, big pharma really did a number on humanity if true. Only antibiotics could have done that. All doctors must die.

      it is the norm for babies to have digestive problems, everyone knows this

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >billions of years of "evolution"
        >mammal can't digest milk
        >this is... "normal"

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >evolution is when every single stage of adaptation in which everything works perfectly with no contradiction or compensation mechanisms involved whatsoever

          also, who said anything about mammals not being able to digest milk?
          lactose intolerance just means you can't breakdown at least some of the lactose you consume
          you still digest fats, proteins, vitamins and minerals in milk if you're lactose intolerant
          whether or not the milk you consume is raw or cooked makes no difference in that regard

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      homie we can adapt in less than a single lifetime to something, and you want to b***h and moan about what your supposed ancestors did?
      I live in current year, not past year.
      nice meme diet btw.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >homie we can adapt in less than a single lifetime to something
        So if we took a child and forced him to eat nothing but leaves and grass, he would adapt to be able to digest them? If we found a baby deer and fed it nothing but beef, it would adapt to being a carnivore?

        >I live in current year, not past year.
        No, you live in a fantasy in your head where you imagine that humans aren't animals just like any other animal, with a preferred diet just like any other animal. You CAN eat a very wide range of foods and survive - the sort of shit processed, nutritionally empty shit people eat today proves that - but you won't thrive.

        It's kind of sad. You've been eating garbage and poisoning yourself for so long that your baseline is fricked and you don't even know what it would feel like to be healthy.

        >meme diet
        My "diet" is what literally all humans ate for 99% of our existence.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yes somebody who eats more of a food is going to digest that food better than somebody who doesn't eat it.
          do you have a point or do you just like being moronic?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >do you have a point
            No, I think your assertion that humans could live by eating nothing but leaves and grass if we just tried harder is more than enough to prove my point for me.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              so no point, just like being a moron, got it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know why you guys even bother coming to these threads when all you know how to do is respond like a bot. You could be replaced by an insignificant fraction of chatGPT's processing power and no one would be able to tell the difference.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if you're the person that started the comments in the chain, maybe you should try promoting conversation instead of spouting moronic theories with no evidence to support them as facts and then spazzing out when people call you on your bullshit.
                junk in, junk out.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >spouting moronic theories with no evidence to support them as facts
                Like your "theory" that a human baby fed nothing but grass would quickly adapt and thrive? I'm sorry, was I mistaken and you actually had evidence backing that claim? I'd love to see it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao, I think we all saw that story about the vegans feeding their kid grass and fruit, and the baby fricking starving to death. It's not even a debate at this point, veganism is child abuse. Human infants need to nurse for at least 2 years, and after that they need to eat red meat and fat, end of. I probably wouldn't go so far as to prohibit them from eating any and all fruit, tbh. But they'd probably do just fine without them, as long as they got all the beef, eggs and bacon they needed.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Human milk is 1% protein, 4% fat, and 7% carbs. And you think that while this is the absolutely necessary, optimal diet for a baby up to 2 years old, after that they should cut out carbs entirely? If carbs are so unnecessary then why does milk contain more carbs than anything else?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's your theory. you're forming a strawman because you're so fragile that you can only fight against fake opponents.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >that's your theory. you're forming a strawman
                I'm literally just repeating what was said. Why lie about this when the evidence is right there for anyone to read?

                >homie we can adapt in less than a single lifetime to something
                So if we took a child and forced him to eat nothing but leaves and grass, he would adapt to be able to digest them? If we found a baby deer and fed it nothing but beef, it would adapt to being a carnivore?

                >I live in current year, not past year.
                No, you live in a fantasy in your head where you imagine that humans aren't animals just like any other animal, with a preferred diet just like any other animal. You CAN eat a very wide range of foods and survive - the sort of shit processed, nutritionally empty shit people eat today proves that - but you won't thrive.

                It's kind of sad. You've been eating garbage and poisoning yourself for so long that your baseline is fricked and you don't even know what it would feel like to be healthy.

                >meme diet
                My "diet" is what literally all humans ate for 99% of our existence.

                >So if we took a child and forced him to eat nothing but leaves and grass, he would adapt to be able to digest them?

                yes somebody who eats more of a food is going to digest that food better than somebody who doesn't eat it.
                do you have a point or do you just like being moronic?

                >yes somebody who eats more of a food is going to digest that food better than somebody who doesn't eat it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes if somebody ate grass regularly they would be able to digest grass better than somebody who doesn't eat grass.
                again, what is your point?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No human alive can digest grass, you fricking moron. Humans have no caecum, no hindgut, no rumen. Humans cannot digest cellulose, period fricking dot. We get nothing from grass, will never get anything from grass, its impossible for us to get any nutrition from grass.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so somebody who eats grass regularly will have the same reaction as somebody who doesn't eat grass regularly when consuming grass?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Essentially, yes, as in he'll get exactly the same amount of nutrition from it- which is absolutely zero. He might get less stomach upset after a time. But get it through your head, we have NO adaptations, no equipment for digesting cellulose. It is impossible for us, we can't do it. We have no caecum, we have no rumen. We're not gorillas, we're not cows, we're not chimps even. All of those animals have guts vastly different from our own, so they can digest cellulose to varying degrees. We cannot.

                Is it getting through at all?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >He might get less stomach upset after a time.
                so you agree with me.
                thank you for dragging out this conversation for so long to not have a point to it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He'll still get ZERO nutrition out of it. Because we cannot digest cellulose. You fricking moron. It doesn't matter at all how upset his stomach will be.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >again, what is your point?
                That you repeating this shows that you don't have even the most basic understanding of how digestive systems work and as such, any opinion you have on the things being discussed in this thread can be safely dismissed.

                Animals that eat grass have very complex digestive systems that are specialized to break down cellulose and you could eat nothing but grass from today until you died (wouldn't take very long) and at no point would you get any better at digesting it. You could start eating a couple handfuls of grass every day in addition to your normal diet and 30 years from now, you would still be completely unable to digest it. Ruminants have extra organs that you do not possess and no amount of practice will cause you to develop a rumen.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this is in no way relevant to the original discussion.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So you're eating meat raw, right?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >So you're eating meat raw, right?
        Evidence for the controlled use of fire at the absolute earliest is at least 300,000 years old, with recent discoveries and estimates pushing the date back to a million years ago or even more. Our ancestors were using fire and cooking their foods much, much longer than 20,000 years ago.

        That said, yes, the vast majority of what I eat is raw. I cook meat because I don't trust modern supply chains, even for the very high quality meat I buy, but whenever it's possible - eggs, for instance - I don't cook my food.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >300 000
          Wrong. Pic related

          We've evolved into humans thanks to cooking. Cooking let us outsource a big part of our digestion to the campfire, you could say. Which let us save metabolic resources which otherwise would've been taken up by a larger gut. We're facultative hypercarnivores, sure, but even more than that we're "cookevores". As a species, one of our definitions could be "the apes that learned how to cook".

          Raw foodists are fricking morons.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >when you just want to start a fight
            Son, read my post again. You're agreeing with me.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Not quite, cook your damned eggs. The whites especially need to be cooked, yolks less so.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Cooking egg yolks is a great way to both degrade their micronutrients and oxidize their cholesterol. There are some benefits to cooking meat but absolutely none for cooking egg yolks.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Idk about the oxidising cholesterol bit, got any articles? Genuinely curious.

                I usually cook my eggs lightly. If I boil them, its only until the whites are cooked, yolk runny. Same with sunny side up. Or I just scramble them, idgaf.

                Human milk is 1% protein, 4% fat, and 7% carbs. And you think that while this is the absolutely necessary, optimal diet for a baby up to 2 years old, after that they should cut out carbs entirely? If carbs are so unnecessary then why does milk contain more carbs than anything else?

                Yes, and milk is designed to turn a very small mammal into a large mammal as quickly as possible. Different developmental stages, different needs. Fact of the matter is, for over a million years of our evolution we'd get almost no access to carbs after being weaned off milk. No, primeval fruit varieties weren't a substantial source of carbs after we got off tropical trees, and that happened many millions of years in the past. No, honey wasn't a big source either, we'd eat it when available, but it wasn't often.

                We are adapted to performing gluconeogenesis for our carb needs. As evidenced by the fact that gluconeogenesis NEVER STOPS in our livers, no matter how many carbs you pour down your neck. All mammals drink milk as infants, its in the name. It's an evolutionary path that's incredibly old, of course human infants drink milk, and milk of all mammals is relatively similar in composition.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                recorded history is based on civilizations that only exist due to agriculture.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                8 thousand years or so. That's an eyeblink in our evolutionary history. We have plenty of data, and the definitive proof is bone isotope scoring- we ate pretty much only meat for over a million years of our recent history, right up to 20 thousand years ago, when we presumably killed off and ate all of Earths megafauna. The eggheads talk about "climate change", but I suspect that's bullshit. We just murdered everything, and had to turn to agriculture to survive. And sure, it resulted in civilization. But we're steal adapted to eating meat, 20 thousand years is not a lot of time. The main adaptation we got over that time is a degree of lactose tolerance, some attenuation of gluten intolerance, that's pretty much it.

                You have no argument.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >steal
                it doesn't take that many generations for adaptations to occur btw.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >We just murdered everything, and had to turn to agriculture to survive.
                The estimated buffalo population of the U.S. 500 years ago was around 60 million. That's just buffalo, not all of the other potential game animals.

                You're just using an ignorant misunderstanding of evolutionary history to support your meme diet. You didn't decide to eat nothing but meat based on the evidence; you decided your diet first and then started looking backwards for justification. There are no modern hunter-gatherer tribes that eat more meat than plants and these are tribes using things like bows and arrows which would have been space age technology for humanoids living a million years ago.

                Humans have always eaten a wide range of foods and even societies like the Inuit who were driven to extreme diets due to the extreme climate they lived in would still go far out of their way to forage for carb-heavy plant foods like berries and tubers. There no no evidence, not from the fossil record nor from studies of modern hunter-gatherer tribes, to support the idea of a meat-only diet. You should absolutely reject the products of agriculture but humans have always eaten fruit and tubers and other foraged foods in addition to meat and you're moronic if you avoid them.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                muh heckin' ancsertinos doe

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Idk about the oxidising cholesterol bit
                It's common knowledge that cholesterol oxidizes in the presence of heat and, as I frequently find myself saying in these threads, you really have no business handing out nutrition advice when you clearly don't have an education in even the most basic nutrition science. Please, spend some time educating yourself, preferably from a better source than your favorite keto blogger.

                >https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=heat+oxidize+cholesterol+eggs

                >honey wasn't a big source either, we'd eat it when available, but it wasn't often.
                Honey is always available and hunter-gatherers with access to it eat it as frequently as possible. Some of the oldest cave paintings show humans collecting honey.
                >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadza_people
                >During the wet season, the diet is composed mostly of honey
                >Honey represents a substantial portion of the Hadza diet (~10-20% of calories)

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >allowed to
    lol what are you people, 5 years old? b-b-but momma said but momma said

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine thinking boiling water to kill germs is a conspiracy LMAO

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >boiling water to kill germs
      >mandate boiling milk and reduce its nutritional value with no option to drink raw milk
      you took the clotshot didn't you?
      don't you need some boosters?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >lmao goyim, don't you love it when I setup a strawman that is in no way equivalence to the actual argument? El Oh El
      so it is true that shills can't post redpill and memes at all

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gives me acne (I think)

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    galactose is one of the most proaging molecules. milk drinkers will die and early death
    https://novoslabs.com/why-milk-accelerates-aging/

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >https://novoslabs.com/why-milk-accelerates-aging/
      >don't drink animal milk, drink plant milks instead
      interesting theory though. would like to see more about milk stimulating overgrowth if it's real.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        basically anything that spikes MTOR has the same effects, galactose is just the worst for that. Other dairy products such as Cheese are somewhat better since having less of that

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          well protein spikes mtor as well. I think the mtor theory of being the pathway to aging is incorrect. so is the telomere length theory.
          I saw the article mentioned protein restriction, but the same benefits of caloric restriction and protein restriction in longevity of animals has been achieved by reducing specific amino acids, like methionine.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            telomere length is unsubstantiated, but mtor is fairly well supported now. if you thought it was incorrect, then why did methionine reduction show benefits?

            [...]
            From the link you've sent:
            >We recommend replacing animal milk (cow milk, goat milk, camel milk) with plant-based milk, such as almond milk, coconut milk, cashew milk, etc.

            They just lost all credibility after shilling plant based 'milk'.

            theyre not shilling it moron, theyre just saying if you have to drink milk its better to drink something thats mostly water as opposed to something that had galactose. They also didnt advocate against other dairy products like cheese which has lower galactose.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              leucine triggers mtor but there's no correlation with longevity for reducing leucine. it's the most important BCAA in the sports/bodybuilding community as it's the main signal for muscle protein synthesis.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                interesting.. i think it is only when going above the recommended amount for protein intake when the problems occurs. But it is contradictory when having muscle is positive correlation to longevity, but the process of building it/having mps (MTOR) is not.. and the opposed pathway of AMPK is what the caloric restriction/fasting attempts to activate

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                elevated protein intake causes lots of it to be converted to glucose, lots of lactic acid and ammonia. probably a bigger factor than mtor.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        galactose is one of the most proaging molecules. milk drinkers will die and early death
        https://novoslabs.com/why-milk-accelerates-aging/

        From the link you've sent:
        >We recommend replacing animal milk (cow milk, goat milk, camel milk) with plant-based milk, such as almond milk, coconut milk, cashew milk, etc.

        They just lost all credibility after shilling plant based 'milk'.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At least give an argument anon. Why is my diet a meme? I eat meat, rice, bread and tons of eggs. Do i need more? Also low fat ray peat style or normal one/?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      are you allowed to drink milk but choose to abstain for some reason?
      or are you not allowed to drink milk hence your diet is a meme?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        of course im allowed except wed and friday because of Orthodox lent. I think 5 days a week is enough milk.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I always put dairy on meat for.. cultural reasons.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *