Hypothetically, what would happen if I only trained chest, shoulders and back? Something like

Hypothetically, what would happen if I only trained chest, shoulders and back? Something like

>benchpress and/or DB press or cable flyes
>DB OHP
>pullups

Two or three times a week?
I know I'd be imbalanced but would I be able to progress in those areas until I achieve a decent body (meaning ottermode or athletic)?

>inb4 "Why not do a normal routine?"
I'm very lazy and I know I wouldn't follow consistently anything more complex or that requires more time. Doing 50% is better than doing 0%.

>"Nooo you need to squat!"
Don't wanna.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you would progress those areas. If you trained them right. Wild huh?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But some people say that if you don't train your whole body then you plateau very easily in the areas you do train.

      Is that true?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >But some people say that if you don't train your whole body then you plateau very easily in the areas you do train.

        It's true

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you would progress those areas. If you trained them right. Wild huh?

          You two get your shit together. Which is it?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Nooo i dont want to squat

        I dont see arm wrestlers not getting sick fucking arms from only training arms. i dont see derek not getting sick shoulders while skipping leg day. I see lots of calisthenic bros with sick backs that only do pull ups and skip legs etc and so on. Kys

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This guy says otherwise:

          >But some people say that if you don't train your whole body then you plateau very easily in the areas you do train.

          It's true

          And he's not the only one. Hence my worry.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I achieve a decent body (meaning ottermode or athletic)?
    >"hey fit, I can look like a person that does full body workouts by only doing chest, right?"

    Do you take special classes, anon? All that's gonna happen is you looking like an idiot with a dorito torso and legs like a toddler.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      literally most normies do this
      i've seen plenty of people with decent chest, arms, and shoulders but their backs and legs are pitiful.
      Most people probably won't notice as long as you don't wear 5 inch shorts
      you're not a bodybuilder so don't act as one

      Goddammit you keep giving conflicting advice.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    literally most normies do this
    i've seen plenty of people with decent chest, arms, and shoulders but their backs and legs are pitiful.
    Most people probably won't notice as long as you don't wear 5 inch shorts
    you're not a bodybuilder so don't act as one

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Most ppl who lift will notice, its very easy to tell if you dont train legs. I agree though most normies barely train legs/back

      But some people say that if you don't train your whole body then you plateau very easily in the areas you do train.

      Is that true?

      depends on what lifts you doing but i think that statement applies to the big lifts (bench, squat, dead, OHP) cause their is a lot of overlapping muscle groups

      >Nooo i dont want to squat

      I dont see arm wrestlers not getting sick fucking arms from only training arms. i dont see derek not getting sick shoulders while skipping leg day. I see lots of calisthenic bros with sick backs that only do pull ups and skip legs etc and so on. Kys

      most arm wrestlers are former bodybuilders/powerlifters, i doubt any just train arms

      https://i.imgur.com/5ewBxrt.png

      Hypothetically, what would happen if I only trained chest, shoulders and back? Something like

      >benchpress and/or DB press or cable flyes
      >DB OHP
      >pullups

      Two or three times a week?
      I know I'd be imbalanced but would I be able to progress in those areas until I achieve a decent body (meaning ottermode or athletic)?

      >inb4 "Why not do a normal routine?"
      I'm very lazy and I know I wouldn't follow consistently anything more complex or that requires more time. Doing 50% is better than doing 0%.

      >"Nooo you need to squat!"
      Don't wanna.

      OP u will fail within 3 months because u are lazy so doesnt matter what advice we give u

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think I can keep doing it if the routine doesn't take too much time. It's fine if it's intense, but if it takes too much I'm gonna start dreading it and stop entirely.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        by most people i meant normies.
        I know a guy at work who also lifts, but he isn't a bodybuilder because he's perusing modeling.
        Very lean, 6'2 170lbs. Decent arms, chest, and shoulders. Pitiful legs and back, but i've never seen him wear shorts.
        His legs and back aren't obvious to others. Meanwhile I walk around in 5 inch shorts that get swallowed up by my thighs.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Guess who gets more pussy between you and him.
          >but... but I train legs
          Nobody cares. Much less women.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            never said anyone cares; infarct i said only i noticed
            >Nobody cares. Much less women.
            virgin detected
            plenty of girls ask to feel my legs
            and some have said they envied my legs and ass
            it's not my fault you're a skinnyfat dyel

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Kek. The cope. You spent years squatting like a gay to get what I get with 1/50th of the effort simply by biking a bit once a week. Women are retarded, just a bit of definition is enough for them to go all "wow ur buff". I've had multiple women feel my legs too.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Kek. The cope. You spent years squatting like a gay to get what I get with 1/50th of the effort simply by biking a bit once a week
                Weakling cope

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're definitely a fat virgin.

                Stop. Learn to understand when you're embarassing yourself.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're definitely a fat virgin.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/hhNwk2Q.jpg

              >Kek. The cope. You spent years squatting like a gay to get what I get with 1/50th of the effort simply by biking a bit once a week
              Weakling cope

              >that t-rex cope
              Yeah I'm sure women love your manlet swollen ass...

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >working out your legs just to have women envy you
              >wanting to have a woman's ideal body
              LMAO better not skip leg day homie

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this bro really thinks his bicep wont grow if he does bicep curls but does not do calf raises

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Switch chest with arms.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arms are gonna get hit by pullups/chinups. Not primarily but they're gonna get hit.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Best case scenario, you look like picrel
    Worst case scenario you fuck your lower back trying to ohp more weight than it can handle

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He would look a lot better with smaller delts and bigger quads/calves

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm very lazy and know I wouldn't follow consistently anything more complex or that requires more time. Doing 50% is better than doing 0%.

    There are many minimalistic routines that will not make you look like a one piece villain, GZCLP comes to my mind

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *