Ok, let's say their are 2 subjects, A&B and they run 5km 10 times. Subject A never smoked a cigarette before running and on the 10th run hits "X" time. Subject B smokes a cigarette before the first 9 5km runs, on the 10th he doesn't. Who gets the better time?
No idea. I do think people overestimate how much smoking impacts your ability to run. Mostly smokers can't run because they're in terrible shape. Runners who smoke don't seem hugely hindered by it.
I smoked for years and ran. I don't smoke now and still run. The difference I think is huge. I am so much a better athelete now I don't smoke. Just so much lighter on my feet.
I get that smoking hinders your capabilities but does that hindrance benefit. You're a specimen now but could that be down to all the years you exercised with a handicap
You'd simply harm your lungs. It would be easier to run without it later, but only in relation to when you were smoking. It would be equal or (probably) worse than if you never smoked before, so no point.
I used to do that, because I'd go for a run and use this as an excuse to have a cigarette away from my parents. Smoking is harmful, but a cigarette just before running makes it even worse. You simply can't breath properly.
But the worst thing is the addiction. I'd like to have a cigarette every once in a while just for the buzz, but I can't or I'd relapse. Don't joke around with it, you'll regret it, and spend lots of money.
>if I ran 5km with no cigarette it would be easier?
What do you think dipshit.
Ok, let's say their are 2 subjects, A&B and they run 5km 10 times. Subject A never smoked a cigarette before running and on the 10th run hits "X" time. Subject B smokes a cigarette before the first 9 5km runs, on the 10th he doesn't. Who gets the better time?
No idea. I do think people overestimate how much smoking impacts your ability to run. Mostly smokers can't run because they're in terrible shape. Runners who smoke don't seem hugely hindered by it.
almost as if smoking is completely healthy and fat fricks who are out of shape blame their lack of stamina on cigarettes ?
>Who gets the better time?
Who the frick cares.
Me because I like a cigarette when I wake up but also to run, so I'm debating cigarette before or after run
Well after the run.
I smoked for years and ran. I don't smoke now and still run. The difference I think is huge. I am so much a better athelete now I don't smoke. Just so much lighter on my feet.
I get that smoking hinders your capabilities but does that hindrance benefit. You're a specimen now but could that be down to all the years you exercised with a handicap
>run for a long period of time
>get better at it
>cigarettes somehow have to do anything with this
?
if you want nicotine so damn bad chew gum or use a spray or other NRT
No I'm not a homosexual
I vape too but I like the cigarellos because they look like cigars and I feel like a top G
a wine black and mild will make u feel rich my dude. smoking is bad tho.
Thanks for the elevation brother may God bless you for bringing your brethren up and not putting them down
You'd simply harm your lungs. It would be easier to run without it later, but only in relation to when you were smoking. It would be equal or (probably) worse than if you never smoked before, so no point.
I used to do that, because I'd go for a run and use this as an excuse to have a cigarette away from my parents. Smoking is harmful, but a cigarette just before running makes it even worse. You simply can't breath properly.
But the worst thing is the addiction. I'd like to have a cigarette every once in a while just for the buzz, but I can't or I'd relapse. Don't joke around with it, you'll regret it, and spend lots of money.
So you'd conclude that smoking doesn't help to condition the lungs?
only sensible post ITT
You could just get an altitude mask or move to a higher elevation.
There ar eno mountains near me but you are implying it will have same affect?