>I’m ripped so I’m now an authority on bodybuilding and science
It’s all so tiresome. I wanna hear from a fat fuck that studies lifting and nutrition
>Im ripped so Im now an authority on bodybuilding and science
>I’m ripped so I’m now an authority on bodybuilding and science
It’s all so tiresome. I wanna hear from a fat fuck that studies lifting and nutrition
so is that the goal? he looks like shit on left.. do I need to bulkmax and cut?
You can just ask yourself questions.
bastard!
>(Using Science)
Why is he so hateable and irritating?
He's a liberal atheist so he's naturally arrogant despite never seeing the full picture.
> Such is my phenominal insight that I, Nobody McWhogivesafuck, have had my third eyes and chakras opened fully so as to behold the --full picture--
> It turns out that the full picture entails blithely believing the established metaphysical delusions in the time and place of my upbringing
> Lord give me the strength to withstand the arrogance of my peers
Most reddit thing I've seen in months.
Most IST thing I've seen in years
But the place of your upbringing was the internet. You spend your formative years in front of the computer, of course you're gonna adopt atheism
they hated (You) because (You) spoke the truth
Liberal atheists are literally the best possible archetype of person.
>uh dude morality and culture are subjective
>now listen to my baseless morality and culture Norms that I want to impose!
Great, they’re Christian’s without believing in god, making their horseshit even more baseless lol.
>Just don't be an asshole
>HUR DUR YOU'RE JUST LIKE CHRISTIANS WITHOUT BELIEVING IN GOD!
How much of a fucking psychopath do you have to be to only have compassion for others if some ancient gnomish book tells you to?
Killing your enemies (people you disagree with) is the highest good a person can do.
Yeah but you’re presupposing what being an asshole is, cuckboy. There is no basis for any of your beliefs other than it makes you feel good. With no objective morality ethics is the closest thing you can create, and ethics without morality is a useless outside of enforcing a status quo (which atheists hate Christians for doing). Sorry garden gnome boy, people who believe that an omniscient God handed down moral law makes more sense than atheist people who trust other people to create and enforce subjective morality. There is no good and evil without God, or rather anything and everything can be good or evil, which is fine with me as long as the people who decide are based, unlike you, as you are (reddit).
>There is no basis for any of your beliefs other than it makes you feel good. With no objective morality ethics is the closest thing you can create, and ethics without morality is a useless outside of enforcing a status quo (which atheists hate Christians for doing). Sorry garden gnome boy, people who believe that an omniscient God handed down moral law makes more sense than atheist people who trust other people to create and enforce subjective morality. There is no good and evil without God
Anon, this is absolutely retarded. There is no objective morality and there never has been. Christians themselves can't even agree on which divine laws are truely the word of God. Back in the real world, people have created entire legal systems and philosophical frameworks without your magic sky garden gnome to determine correct moral behavior between people within society. The basis of these frameworks is to maximize happiness, fairness and order as determined by the collective; not whatever "makes you feel good".
You are arguing with a turbo-retard, don't bother. The thought that "stealing that loaf of bread is wrong" for any other reason that its one of the negative points that will cause him to burn in eternity in the most torturous way imaginable - is inconceivable to him.
>my morality comes from the bible
>no that part about slavery doesn't count since I'm morally opposed to slavery
Daily reminder that if you're against slavery, you're a blasphemous heathen
you're a goy slave of the garden gnomes tho
athiesm is literally gnomish.
What is the origin of matter. Where does it come from?
>Liberal atheism: for when being a regular pretentious gay just doesn't cut it anymore
Make then seeth anon!
Ha ha ha. More educated. Yeah, colleges these days are putting out great people. Less than .2% of incarcerated, source: my ass. More scientific. Except when someone shows them intact red blood cells in dinosaur fossils, then they shut up and ignore it. More tolerant. Yeah, thanks for letting all the Mexican cartels in and for letting blacks take over chicago. Married longer. They rarely marry in the first place. Happier. Not that I've seen, they're all miserable and hopeless about the future. Top influencers. Suckerberg and Seth twat mcfarlane. Wow, what an argument. Truly, people who don't believe they're ancestors were fish have been btfo'd.
liberal atheist here
broadly speaking, nations aren't more prosperous because they're more atheist, they're more atheist because they're more prosperous
religion tends to be adaptive in places that need a lot of hope and structure to keep people feeling human
being a jesus enthusiast doesn't mean you're stupid, usually it means you're coping
except the ones on IST they're dumb as shit
Good take
>more educated
just means spent more time in the goy propoganda chamber
Agreeable people do better in school, hence why woman get better grades
>Less criminal
see above
>More scientific
see above
>More tolerant
see above
>married longer
see above
>Happier
atheist countries report the highest rate of suicide. That means more than a "happiness" survey
>Top influencers
All garden gnomes and slave goys
Imagine not being a right wing atheist
>inb4 right wing atheists are psychopaths
Yes. We are better than you
And why would I trust some Abrahamic death cult loser?
Every religion fetishized either death or suffering, you are all fools believing to fully understand this realm we exist in!
His last name is nipple tard
Because he's short, like micro height
I think it really comes down to the fact that he's incredibly short. There's just something off putting about it and it makes it seem like he's larping.
>oh my science look at this 202X meta analysis showing that sucking dicks has 4.20% more muscle activation
How are religion and science compatible? Do we just ignore the parts of religion that contradict science? Or the other way around???
He's a manlet. He even sounds like a manlet
high pitched voice and hes 4'11
swole manlet's are always comical for some reason, they gotta be kpop lean otherwise it seems like overcompensation
he tries to act like a nice and reasonable guy but we all know that he's an arrogant egotistical prick
>hey guys i'm a 5'3" roidchud with a high pitched voice
>listen to me as the voice of reason and use me as a pillar of knowledge for all lifting topics
>why? because i read studies done by DYEL biology majors performed on 35 year old soccer moms
>now go do your jpeg rows 🙂
He is a turbomanlet with a large social media following, a great physique, probably decent lifts and a romantic partner.
This confuses and terrifies terminally online lanklets who have overdosed on looksmax cultism, and in stead of dealing with the living contradiction presenting itself head on the psyche of these individuals must protect itself through various coping mechanisms.
I don't watch him much and I think his reliance on quoting studies all the time to bamboozle midwits is a bit tedious and annoying, but the info from his videos tend to be decent.
Because he looks average even with "science".
He's successful despite your belief of an inherit superiority based on height. His existence directly contradicts your worldview and you're unable to cope. So you react with your primal instinct, anger.
hes literally 5'4 he could literally bulk on 3 kilos of broccoli a day
Why would anyone listen to a fatfuck who preaches fitness and nutrition and exercise? His regiments either dont work, or hes too lazy and stupid to follow through with them, or he just doesnt care to do either. None of which are inspiring
Watching a fat fuck talk about it is soul, and a chiseled science nerd is soulless
>Why would anyone listen to a fatfuck who preaches fitness and nutrition and exercise?
...because he might be right?
That's what always stuns me about you retards. It's like you're not even AWARE of the existence of truth. It's like you believe that science is a fandom and you get to pick and choose what science you want to believe like you're picking your favourite Marvel superhero.
Things are true or false regardless of who says them. If you're actually interested in the truth, rather than just a performative display of righteousness, then who says it doesn't matter.
>because he might be right?
There's a million fitness people that are ripped and attractive. They almost certainly have it figured out more than some fatass that's training in some dilapidated basement.
Irrelevant, but it's a great example of how you people think. To you people, the truth is unknowable. You just have to pick someone you think is trustworthy and then do everything they say. The idea of evaluating their advice so that you can know what is true never even occurs to you. And I think that's probably because you're not capable of doing that - the truth really is, literally, unknowable to you.
Anyway, you're wrong. People who grow up fit and active their whole life give absolutely fucking retarded weight loss advice. Of course they do, they've never done it. Their advice is insipid and reductive and of very little practical help.
The point isn't that fat people know more about fitness than fit people. The point is simply that things are true or false regardless of who says them and if you had half a brain you wouldn't need that explained to you, have a nice day.
The optimal fitness plans aren't even close to a settled science. The reality is that this fat fuck is lazy in every aspect of his life including his fitness "research." He's a lazy fat disgusting slob and his appearance proves that.
>The optimal fitness plans aren't even close to a settled science.
Unironically yes they are because the settled science is that it doesn't fucking matter. Literally everything works, and all of it works pretty much the same.
You are correct but your words are like pearls before swine.
The truth is quite literally unknowable, the philosophy of empiricism is all about getting to an answer that has a high probability of being the truth. No matter how many experiments you run, no matter what your personal experience is, you can never actually "know" that something is true.
Besides, when you're not going to do intensive research yourself, and decide to listen to an authority figure, how do you pick one to follow? You look for heuristics to evaluate the authorities themselves. A fat fuck with some paper credentials or an actually fit individual? Sure, the fit individual may not have the authority but why would you trust claims made by someone who can't even stop being fat? Being fit is strictly superior to being fat, it is entirely reasonable to expect that someone who knows how to be fit would have a high probability of being fit himself. So your gut instinct in not trusting the fat fuck is entirely justified, being fat really is a predictor of being wrong on fitness.
if you're actually interested in truth you'll be interested in the experimental verification of that truth and not just "an expert said it". a good body is experimental verification.
>USING SCIENCE
Jeff could give me a blowjob and he wouldn't even need to kneel
Basado
Christ is king
Reply to this post or you will burn in hell for eternity
Christ is king
christ was a weak disgusting garden gnome
Yo christ
He has a biology degree, coaches people in fitness and actually exercises etc, sounds pretty experienced to me, I trust his advice.
Sounds like a gay manlet to me.
He mogs you
>b-but
Post body
That little gnome said being fat isn't a choice, I immediately ignore someone after they say something like that. I did the same with the Bioneer.
Jason Blaha then?
Just come to eastern europe, every health minister smokes and is a fat fuck
>I wanna hear from a fat fuck that studies lifting and nutrition
What's wrong with his fucking belly??
I like his videos
>*gets btfo'd by hubberChac*
qrd? love me some uberman
isn't huberman on roids? oh I'm sorry, """TRT""".
What makes you say that?
I seem to recall him talking about it. maybe when he was on Rogan, or maybe when he had the anti-age doctor on his own podcast.
About being on steroids? Admitting to being on TRT while over 40 is not the same thing as being on roids
>muh over 50, uh over 40, uh 35 is almost 40, right?
no, that's the lie the """men's clinics""" push and your dumbass along with the entire social media "fitness" community fell for it. testosterone does not drop with age in a healthy man. roiding over 40 is the same as roiding under 40.
literally just don't get fat or chronically ill and your test will NEVER drop.
source:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109346
>testosterone does not drop with age in a healthy man.
I actually completely agree with this without having to check your source. Testosterone drops in older men because of a lifetime of a shit diet and goyslop, but I don't begrudge older men for replacing their dwindling test even if it is a result of poor lifestyle choices, and I don't consider it the same as steroids although I agree it should be unnecessary
1. it literally IS steroids so why the fuck would you consider it anything else?
2.
>I don't begrudge older men for replacing their dwindling test even if it is a result of poor lifestyle choices
why do you see it this way for older men specifically? what about a 20 year old who got fat as a teen?
point being, the real solution is JUST GET HEALTHY AGAIN in both cases. age is NOT A FACTOR.
You're right. Honestly the reason I mentioned the age in the first place was because I thought you were implying he was on something heavier like tren and I dishonestly justified it with age to try and bait out what you were actually implying.
Where I disagree is that replacing a hormone you're lacking for whatever reason to bring it back to what should be base-line isn't the same as juicing to reach superhuman levels of muscle, but I agree the first and foremost solution should be to get healthy again.
The exception for age would be if after a lifetime of goyslop exposure the damage is done to the point where hormone replacement is the only option to see baseline again, but on reflection I honestly don't know if that's the case so I won't argue that. If baseline test levels are recoverable as a 40+yo by changing lifestyle then yes you are right, that is 100% the way to go rather than TRT.
As for fat teens I don't know how permanent the hormone damage is from being a young fatty for a few years, but they get zero sympathy from me regardless.
>I thought you were implying he was on something heavier like tren
I don't know enough about the different types of steroids to tell if a high dosage of test prescribed from a male enhancement "clinic" can rival a typical tren dosage. but isn't tren something you only do for short periods of time? never heard of anyone (functional, sane) being on it permanently.
>Where I disagree is that replacing a hormone you're lacking for whatever reason to bring it back to what should be base-line isn't the same as juicing
except there is absolutely zero reason to assume anything was ever wrong with the T levels of guys like Rogan or Huberman. they just wanna self-optimize and they have the means to go in all kinds of directions including hormone therapy.
the R stands for REPLACEMENT. what Rogan and pals are doing isn't replacement, it's supplementation for the sake of enhancement. they roid for same reason any bodybuilder roids, just with extra layers of mental gymnastics.
>As for fat teens I don't know how permanent the hormone damage is from being a young fatty for a few years, but they get zero sympathy from me regardless.
they do from me. I grew up skinny but if my parents had fed me goyslop the entire time who the hell knows. I certainly made no good decisions in any other area of life as a child, and I was one of the kids that constantly get told they're so mature and smart for their age. children cannot be in charge of their nutrition, that's asking way too much.
I like seeing people clarify their points and agree with each other wtf is wrong with me?
nothin
Just cycle salbutamol and primobolan. Great stack for getting RIPPED. You'll make Jeff Nip's Hard (from gyno) right pic look like a bloatlord
F
dude i watched this video and it's literally the most milquetoast, normie friendly advice imaginable. it's literally just him saying "take it really slowly, and don't be afraid to take maintenance breaks, consistency over a long period of time is what's important"
you cannot make a more simple, idiotproof, video.
Thats why I listen exclusively to Greg Nuckols
kek... only zoomers take a 4.1' seriously...
that tiny thing can be attached to a key chain... any advice from him applied to midgets not fully developed adult males...
kek.