In defence of fake natties:

Which is better for young zoomers to hear?
>yeah bro im big and strong because i eat my veggies, train hard, go to bed on time and dont drink or smoke
>yeah bro im big and strong because of LE EPIK TRENBOLONY SANDWICHES HURR DURR
Never forget that the whole "natty or not" thing is done by seething roiders with shit genetics/shit response to gear. Jason Blaha started the whole thing and he takes enough roids to turn a mosquito into a pterodactyl and yet the fricker basically just looks like any random average fat guy youd see at a mall in america.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Fake natties give bad advice and set unrealistic expectations. Many people my age believe that they will get ripped by doing unweighted calisthetics (including myself for a short period of time) because e-celebs do it, and when it doesn't happen they get demoralized or become roidtrannies themselves.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fake natties help filter morons

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        True, but fake natties themselves are morons. They are causing extreme permanent damage to their bodies and future generations of their bloodline while pretending to be fit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Doing unweighted calisthenics long enough and with more volume will get you ripped. You just won't be big.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there's way too "if"s to that. At that point your ability to get lean is more important than gaining muscle. Also it's largely a product of increasing muscle tone (yes this is a real term with a medical definition) which is different from hypertrophy even though they usually coincide. If getting lean and sinewy is your definition of getting "ripped" walking will get you "ripped" if you do enough of it.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why would eating veggies make anyone big and strong? Why can't people just tell the truth? That they're big and strong because they take drugs and eat a whole lot of nutritious animal foods?

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    wow it's almost like Jason Blaha trained for STRENGTH not for looks like a closeted homo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He injected synthol into his biceps and Mike O'Hearn is way stronger than he is and ever was.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        merely rumours, I've never seen a pic of him with synthol bis

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          how do you think he lost a chunk of his bicep?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you dont want to look good?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        not for men, no

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          so you're not a man?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            wut

            how do you think he lost a chunk of his bicep?

            combat injury

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Combat injury
              This is bait but holy frick I want to believe that there are people out there that actually believe Blahas bullshit

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                we need to go back to the good old days my friend

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >hah jokes on you, I don't even want to look good!

      fatty powershitter cope

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >If they're over 25ffmi they're not natty.
    >If what they do makes them bigger and stronger it will make you bigger and stronger too.
    >If you don't use roids you won't be able to do it to the magnitude which makes you bigger than 25ffmi.
    There you go. You're immune to fake natties. They can't hurt you now.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Truth
    >Lies
    Which one do you think is better?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lies are more profitable for longer. If they get what they want right away they have no reason to listen to you anymore. Not saying they plan on this but like the meta of fitness influencers doesn't come from offering accurate information they come from attention tactics, telling you everyone else is wrong because you're bigger*, and maintaining a constant social media presence and content creation cycle. Eventually they'll realize what's true and not and probably resent you for it by then they've probably followed you for years, hung on your every word, shared your videos and advice with other people. The fitness industry in general is based around presenting bullshit we kind of know works as hard "science" and getting people to believe it.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Which is better for young zoomers to hear?

    there are a couple of problems with fake natties

    1. they give people unrealistic expectations on how far they can progress and what causes progress.
    2. They discourage people from getting healthy.
    3. They muddy the whole conversation on lifting and being healthy.

    I remember in one of Arnold's books he was talking about how wonderful Chinese buffets were for building muscle. At face value a normie is going to hear that and go lift and eat Chinese buffet everyday and get really fat.

    It would probably be better if roids were unbanned and we could have a better conversation around what roiders do to build mass and what nonroiders do to build mass.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I really don't give a shit, since anyone that's been training for >2 year already kmows what's realistic or unrealistic
    The "natty" argument works only on normies or absolute begginers

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *