is chris evans natty?

i think its attainable

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He took super serum you dipshit, that is not natty

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Absolutely. It would be obvious if he was roiding, but he's got a totally reasonable amount of muscle for an actor of his age.

      That's respectable as hell that he is natty but plays a character that is on fantasy-roids

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is attainable, but it's naive to think that actors aren't on ridiculous amounts of juice. They probably have access to the real good stuff too.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's an attainable physique natty, but the amount of muscle he put on as quickly as he did screams Hollywood roids

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think Evans and Cavill are the only two capeshit actors who are natty.

    Both consistently in shape and naturally evolve into the shape they need to be for roles (unlike for example Hemsworth). And where they land is very realistic for people who have been consistently athletic and have the best pump and lighting possible.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pratt is definitely natty

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Natty in the amount they put in (you have to realize these images are with optimal lighting and editing as well as a pump). But they're not natty due to how quickly they put on said mass. Knives out Chris Evans is the most natty we've seen him in a movie for a while.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's 41
    he was probably natty early on, but likely started trt
    that is more innocent since it actually makes sense to take trt when you're old and basically in the process of slowly dying

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Even if it is, it doesn't mean that he attained it natty.
    All Hollywood stars blast gear.
    Movie production schedules give them no choice.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >is [person who's making money off their body] natty?
    The answer is always no. You're welcome.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's achievable natty, but he probably isn't

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how come Captain A doesn't have that "I used to roid" look that Zac Efron or Thor do? Does genetics have anything to do with that?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because if he did roid he probably didn't go as hard as Hemsworth or Evans did, probably just light TRT or something

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it attainable natty? Definitely. Is he natty? Possible, but personally I doubt it. Why would he be? He's getting paid millions to put on a bunch of muscle in a very short time. The only muscular Marvel hero I really believe is natty is Chris Pratt.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pratt is definitely natty

      >Pratt
      Fatt

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        which is why it's obvious he's natty, he's not fucking huge but still 8% bodyfat like hemsworth or something, when he's big he has some fat with it, and when he's leaner he has noticably less muscle. it also took him like a year to do it

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No way in hell. If its hollywood he's on gear and adrenachrome, end of story.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I believe so, he was in great shape before this movie, and he’s really not that huge really when you factor in:
    >has a post-workout pump
    >is dehydrated
    >oiled up with extremely harsh overhead lighting
    I’m not saying he’s 100% natty, the other anons are right that most actors certaily aren’t, but he’s been in good shape all his life, and his physique isn’t unattainable for somebody who has worked out for years. I think he’d be bigger if he was juicing.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    early definitely he was a dyel
    which means no later cos you dont go from what he was to captain america without help

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *