Is he right, fit?

Is he right, fit?

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      can you read?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        What?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why don't you tell us

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Tell you what?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Chicken butt

          Is he right, fit?

          >if you eat something that your body can't digest, you'll avoid cell damage
          My intuition says: no.
          Idc what "science" says. My intuition has been wrong fewer times than "science"

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            "your body" can't digest fiber, but your gut bacteria can and does feed on it
            However, you don't need to eat much fiber for that to happen

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, frick those little shits. They're living in MY body, eating MY food. How would that stop cancer?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The gut microbiota exchanges substances with your digestive system. Some of these are hormones that go in contact with your nervous system and give positive reinforcement to the consumption of certain foods. Eating healthy promote the growth of gut bacteria that will give you positive reinforcement for eating healthy. Vice versa with eating junk food. It's a feedback loop, so much so that there have been experiments involving fecal transplants from athletes to obese people in order to study the effect on diet tolerance.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Slaps a turd
                Yep, this is high grade athlete shit right here. Won't find nothing better out there. This'll get yer gut flyin right in no time. How many loafs should I put you down for?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >How would that stop cancer?
                Think about what cancer is. In the simplest terms possible, cancer is a cell that 'gets confused' and starts replicating out of control. Every time a cell divides, there's a chance that one of the 'children' is cancerous. That explains why basically everything increases cancer risk. Why does buttsex increase colon cancer? Because you're damaging the cells in the ass and they have to replicate more often, thus increasing the chances. Similarly, fiber helps your intestines work better. Easier work means fewer deaths and fewer cell replications are required. It's that simple.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >.gov
    I want a reputable lab replicable trustworthy source not some government funded slop. When doctors are trying to heal people from bowel conditions they put them on low fiber diets. Our stomach acid is that of a vulture's and our appendix shrank and became defunct over millions of years for a reason.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lol so none of them?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        t. doesn't know what PubMed is.
        No surprise there.

        >no reputable lab replicable independently funded study presented

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >independently funded
          You mean funded by a megacorporation with an agenda (and of course the constant threat of cut funding if the study doesn't show the results they want.)

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >megacorporation
            oh so just like a government then or does Fauci the most well paid bureaucrat and face of Americas healthcare system not have shares in the patents of numerous pharmaceutical companies. Cheers.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Correct. So either all studies except those done by internet schizos on their free time are invalid, or all of them are okay.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well we know some studies are not ok because they aren't replicable. You are in a cult.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                trust your guts. nothing more you can do.
                studies are now tool to push or justify something. its not science anymore.
                I trust things that I can replicate and that simply make sense way more than some bogus study that a dumbfrick diversity hire science actor on pfizers payroll made.
                are internet shizos a trustworthy source? hell no. but at least they dont have a financial incentive to lie to you. which, and that isnt controversial at all, is the number one driving factor of any industry.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Shares ... In the patents? Dubious.

              Of course corruption exists, but you've over generalized. It's difficult to realize this but there is a great deal you don't know. You have to learn more and fill in gaps. And you won't learn it here

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      t. doesn't know what PubMed is.
      No surprise there.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      everyone who went to college knows about pubmed

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >college
        You mean indoctrination farms?!

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >You mean indoctrination farms?!
          Nah, college is job tool. If you were too dumb to figure that out, you shouldnt have gone

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >i dont want government involved
      you might as well start buying your food, drugs, and literally any product from some schmoe on the road that doesn't care about any sort of regulations on quality of said products

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Regulations are only so mandatory because there's no accountability with faceless corporations. What happens if Monsanto releases a batch of poison corn? A fine. Maybe. What happens if my neighbor gave me food poisoning because he grew poison corn? He's probably sick from eating it too, so you can be damn sure it won't happen again.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >What happens if my neighbor gave me food poisoning because he grew poison corn?
          is your neighbor trying to sell you something? there is a difference between trying to make profit and sharing. you seem a bit too dumb to realize how many products are actually tested for quality before making it to the shelf of any retail store

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >is your neighbor trying to sell you something?
            Do you not know what a farmer's market is?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I do buy from local farms, it's better for the environment which you pretend to care about whilst supporting scorched earth monocropping and I don't get sick that often but when I do I just get on with it, I don't have the urge to be locked in my home for two years in a state of hysteria.

              >Do you not know what a farmer's market is?
              >It has everything I need!
              have you ever been to one? they don't sell everything. of course buy their product, its local and fresh but don't act like you buy literally everything from joe schmoe down the road. you still bought your computer from companies that have to go through regulations. you are using the internet that went through regulations. literally everything in your home had to go through some government regulation you dip

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I get it useless malformed bureaucrats make rules in order to keep themselves in employment and prosperity, very cool.

                How do you have the time to drive to eight different farms anytime you want food?

                Sometimes they can be fairly close to each other, sometimes they stock produce from each other and other local businesses in the farm shops. Do better, quit coffee and you will have more energy.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're missing the point. Over-regulation exists because giant corporations are filled with bad-faith actors who have no one's interest in mind and no stake in the community they're selling to, and this over-regulation, like gun control, only harms the good people. It's so fricking frustrating arguing with you people because you never seem to understand nuances. I'm not allowed to just be against some regulations, if I'm against it, I have to be against all regulations and I'm in favor of total anarchy according to people like you.

                I'm asking for people to stop acting like fricking robots and to stop hiding behind the letter of the law and the exact wording of definitions. Yes, you should not make sweeping societal changes based on kneejerk emotional responses, but you absolutely need to take some emotional and contextual nuance into account when looking at individual scenarios.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Over-regulation exists because giant corporations are filled with bad-faith actors who have no one's interest in mind and no stake in the community they're selling to
                You can't generalize every product like this though, you are missing the point too

                Yeah I get it useless malformed bureaucrats make rules in order to keep themselves in employment and prosperity, very cool.
                [...]
                Sometimes they can be fairly close to each other, sometimes they stock produce from each other and other local businesses in the farm shops. Do better, quit coffee and you will have more energy.

                >Yeah I get it useless malformed bureaucrats make rules blah blah blah
                yea, just run those red lights. who care? just create buildings randomly in your neighborhood without any sort of safety regulations put in place to make sure it doesnt fall over, why not?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >govern me harder daddy
                who fricking cares if someone puts a tent and sleeps inside? I know who greedy frickers who want to tax everything and karens like you
                >muuuuh neighbourhood, HE AIN'T CUTTING HIS GRASS IMAGINE THIS HORROR
                just stfu and calm your breasts commie

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >if i bought goods and services from random people, 100% of them would be trust worthy
                lmaooooo i guess scamming is a myth?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Over-regulation exists because giant corporations are filled with bad-faith actors who have no one's interest in mind and no stake in the community they're selling to
                You can't generalize every product like this though, you are missing the point too

                [...]
                >Yeah I get it useless malformed bureaucrats make rules blah blah blah
                yea, just run those red lights. who care? just create buildings randomly in your neighborhood without any sort of safety regulations put in place to make sure it doesnt fall over, why not?

                >You can't generalize every product like this though, you are missing the point too
                At least now I have one hundred percent confirmed proof that you homosexuals just don't read the posts you're replying to.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >corporations scam, people dont!
                >you DINT READ IT!!!!
                you just want to be right so go ahead and feel you are right or whatever you want

                >govern me harder daddy
                who fricking cares if someone puts a tent and sleeps inside? I know who greedy frickers who want to tax everything and karens like you
                >muuuuh neighbourhood, HE AIN'T CUTTING HIS GRASS IMAGINE THIS HORROR
                just stfu and calm your breasts commie

                >i dont mind if homeless people sleep inside my home, who needs laws?
                >who cares if someone starts digging holes in my yard?
                >who cares if some fisherman is tryign to sell me rancid crabs and is tryign to convince me its fresh?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                if you are supid and weak you have a problem, no wonder you want big strong policeman to cover your ass.
                The problem is you frickers always push it.
                >kids riding bmx
                >REEEEE 911 WE HAVE AN EMERGENCY

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >i cant refute your statements but ill just project something that happens to me and act like its also a problem you are facing
                who said anything about skater gays destroying property? which it seems like you are fine with. I was talkign about squatters living in your home, which you seem to be fine with too actually

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                like I said that would be a problem only for a weak lame ass looser like you, anybody else would just kick the fricker out and kick his ass.
                >who said anything about skaters
                >DON'T USE ANY EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHETICAL SITUATIONS AS YOUR ARGUMENT THAT IS F O R B I D D E N
                >ONLY I CAN DO THAT
                >YOU DON'T WANT ANY BULLSHIT RULES TO TRAMPLE OVER YOU!? YOU DUMBASS ANARCHIST YOU'LL GET HOMELESS TO SQUAT INSIDE YOUR HOME IN NO TIME
                fences and guns exist for a reason moron, but you probably would love to ban them so only state bots could use them

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >trying this hard
                lmao, did i touch a nerve?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                nerve of hating commie morons? yes bullseye congratulations homosexual, you won extra dilation for tonight as a reward

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              To be fair, there's been a number of investigation into farmers markets, a large portion of them are just food resellers selling the same shit you'd get otherwise

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                b...but....muh people are incapable of scamming like corporations!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                ?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                People who care about where their food comes from and are willing to spend more for food. It's not surprising that seller will want to take advantage of that. At your next market, ask people which of their produce they haven't grown. These people will brag about it

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Are*, not and

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >government... le cares
        Sure thing, why don't you step out of your religion for a moment and read about the approval process that aspartame went through in order to get a sense of the integrity of the FDA for example. You will be much better off buying your produce from Amish farmers as opposed to the government and corporations which are basically interchangeable now, it really is that simple.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >why don't you step out of your religion
          why don't you start buying everything from some randos down the street? you sick? go to that witch doctor that just sprays you with smoke and spreads it around with some leaves, it should work right?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I do buy from local farms, it's better for the environment which you pretend to care about whilst supporting scorched earth monocropping and I don't get sick that often but when I do I just get on with it, I don't have the urge to be locked in my home for two years in a state of hysteria.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              How do you have the time to drive to eight different farms anytime you want food?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      you fricking moron pubmed is just a repository. i have papers you can access on pubmed and have never received a dollar of us government funding

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >doesn't know how PubMed works
      >has no higher education
      >thinks salad is bad for you

      The state of this fricking board.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being a salad dodger.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I find salad unappealing tbh. I’d rather just eat broccoli and other cooked veggies.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean more generally, imagine complaining that you have to eat fruit and vegetables.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >phd
    still doesn't understand correlation != causation

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know about cancer, but I know that a diet with a lot of high-fiber foods helps me feel "cleaner" and "lighter". Helps with gay sex as well. I recommend it.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Carnivore is the weirdest cult. Imagine thinking the veggies that help you poop are bad.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I would help her poop, that's for sure

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        She could use my mouth

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The rare fatty with a cute face.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      veggies doesn't help you poop
      nor do you need fiber to poop

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        See what I mean? Utterly insane

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not him but I don't eay veggies because, well, their just awful, taste like shit, and a waste of time and money. When will I begin to start having problems taking a shit? I haven't eaten meaningful amounts since 2021. When can I expect this constipation problem?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            How's your diarrhea?

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Something tells me that its not the fiber itself, but that foods rich in nutrition tends to have fiber.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what is the healthy user bias

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is obviously because of processed food. Processed foods contain all sort of shit that irritate the gut and intestines. If it stays around longer, it causes more irritation. Fiber pushes more shit through yhr colon so it the increases number of shits so if you eat processed foods and fiber the irritants leave the body quicker. If you eat healthy non irritating foods, fiber does not give this benefit.

    Basically: if you eat goyslop its better to get fiber, if not, it doesnt matter.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This.
      Fiber is only good for pushing out slop faster.
      But if you are eating high quality food then it's a negative in terms of nutrients absorbed.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Probably,

    But it's worth noting that these epidemiological studies don't really control for food/diet quality - i.e when studies are 'red meat eaters do X', well most people who eat lots of red meat eat a lot of it as processed meat and fast/convenience food as opposed to eating lean steaks - and in fiber studies most of them eat more fruit+veg, and people who eat more fruit and veg tend to eat less junk in their diet.

    That said there is no real downside to increasing fiber intake so you can see how you feel doing it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >But it's worth noting that these epidemiological studies don't really control for food/diet quality
      I always sound like an edgelord when I say it, but I truly believe serious advances in psychology or medicine are slowed to a crawl because unethical experiments aren't allowed.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        True, but a lot of it is just plain money and time. Surveys are cheap, clinical trials are expensive - especially if you're doing metabolic ward stuff i.e putting people in food jail.

        For instance, telling 1,000 people to eat red meat but make 90% of that unprocessed and lean, and eat a generally high quality diet , and then tracking them against a control group for 20 or 30 years is a hell of a fricking project. The best alternative is to try and find people who self report eating like that and see their outcomes, but as you can imagine there are a hundred variables that could frick with the data.

        You probably get it - but most normies have no idea that every time they see "Eggs kill you!" or "Eggs make you live longer!" it's not because they did some controlled long term experiment on people. It's just researchers data-mining and looking for broad trends.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          There are lots of ways various cheap experiments could be done, but ethics committees make them basically impossible. It's not necessarily that anything extensive has to be done to get useful results, but any remote possibility of causing harm to participants narrows possibilities down to the level of surveys.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Studies are now simply bible pages of a new religion and have absolutely no bearing on truth. They will be forced to have safe and socially acceptable answers always. No one on this board has been alive to see scientific studies in a time when it wasn't corrupted, we don't know what that looks like and we never will.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >picture of a tweet
    Thanks for the links I guess?
    Fricking moron.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hello anon, I’m a surgeon gay, just a month ago I replaced my friend’s shoulder and most of his upper arm after he developed a cartilage sarcoma. Another patient of mine had the same thing but at the ankle.
    My friend is a chain smoker who eats junk and very low fiber. The other patient never smoked and is very health conscious and salad consuming.
    My point is of your fricked your fricked, sure living in extremes will raise chances of things going badly, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that they will. There is no point wasting time worrying about these things from what I have seen.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A quick googling tells me smoking has frick all to do with the development of sarcoma.

      You should get your medical license revoked immediately. Holy frick.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not him but way to completely miss the point of his post. You should have your brain revoked immediately. Kek.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >reading comprehension this low
        Take a cyanide pill, moron.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Studies! The thtudieth thay it you chthud! No thtudy ith ever incorrect!

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fiber is a meaningless term when constructing a diet. Should someone be eating shitty grains all day? 10 bananas? Metamucil?

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The question is how much fiber? I would imagine that too much roughage would be harsh on your intestinal lining and an extra need for regeneration might actually speed cancer along.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    just drink kefir
    another vegan schizo thread
    dyels eat 10 pounds of cabbage everyday and still can't lift shit

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tiktok meat diet is more legitimate than so called "science" they taught me how to be an alpha male too

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17635889/
    >diet that was very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat did not reduce additional breast cancer events or mortality during a 7.3-year follow-up period.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17855692/
    >This study failed to show any effect of a low-fat, high-fiber, high-fruit and -vegetable eating pattern on adenoma recurrence even with 8 years of follow-up.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16467232/
    >did not result in a statistically significant reduction in invasive breast cancer risk over an 8.1-year average follow-up period

    imagine testing your hypothesis and then just ignoring the fact that it fails
    muh epidemonology

    picture unrelated

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *