It literally doesnt.
https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m513 >In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake >In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1720108 participants, 139195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk >Conclusions Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations.
https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1246 >Serum cholesterol lowering diet that replaced saturated fat with linoleic acid (from corn oil and corn oil polyunsaturated margarine). Control diet was high in saturated fat from animal fats, common margarines, and shortenings. >The intervention group had significant reduction in serum cholesterol compared with controls (mean change from baseline −13.8% v −1.0%; P<0.001). Kaplan Meier graphs showed no mortality benefit for the intervention group in the full randomized cohort or for any prespecified subgroup. There was a 22% higher risk of death for each 30 mg/dL (0.78 mmol/L) reduction in serum cholesterol in covariate adjusted Cox regression models (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.32; P<0.001). There was no evidence of benefit in the intervention group for coronary atherosclerosis or myocardial infarcts. >Available evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes
2 years ago
Anonymous
>we replaced fat with fat and this is our proof
The jokes write themselves
2 years ago
Anonymous
Dietary cholesterol does not cause heart disease.
Prove otherwise.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You have submitted faulty studies to prove your point. Sounds like you just have no actual evidence and want to keep eating bacon you do you I'm not here to satisfy your falsehoods with improper retorts so you can small me a homosexual or whatever
2 years ago
Anonymous
Call me* >haha he made a booboo he's wrong bacon good
I do not care whatever
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Sounds like you just have no actual evidence
The burden of proof is one the person presenting the positive claim (ie dietary cholesterol causes heart disease).
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
HOWEVER
What kind of evidence would you accept? What nature of study would you concede as evidence against your claim?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are the one who is presenting faulty studies to back up your claim. I don't care what you think, you are the one trying to prove me wrong. I'm not debating you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>What kind of evidence would you accept? What nature of study would you concede as evidence against your claim?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I'm not debating you
2 years ago
Anonymous
Then why do you keep replying?
2 years ago
Anonymous
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024687/ >Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. For years, dietary cholesterol was implicated in increasing blood cholesterol levels leading to the elevated risk of CVD. To date, extensive research did not show evidence to support a role of dietary cholesterol in the development of CVD. As a result, the 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans removed the recommendations of restricting dietary cholesterol to 300 mg/day
2 years ago
Anonymous
I didnt claim it caused CVD so idk what you are trying to do here
2 years ago
Anonymous
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11111098/
>Analysis of the available epidemiological and clinical data indicates that for the general population, dietary cholesterol makes no significant contribution to atherosclerosis and risk of cardiovascular disease.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>half an eggs worth of cholesterol doesn't change much therefore its benign >also maybe they weren't eating fruit
Hahahaha try again
2 years ago
Anonymous
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11111098/
>Analysis of the available epidemiological and clinical data indicates that for the general population, dietary cholesterol makes no significant contribution to atherosclerosis and risk of cardiovascular disease.
Lol are you just googling studies without reading them? This is pathetic. Lol half an egg as the measurement.
2 years ago
Anonymous
[...]
Lol are you just googling studies without reading them? This is pathetic. Lol half an egg as the measurement.
I thought you weren't debating me?
You realise that all the "evidence" that implied dietary cholesterol may cause heart disease / atherosclerosis was even weaker than these studies, right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>EVERYONE ON IST IS THE SAME PERSON
2 years ago
Anonymous
Now you're pretending that you're a different poster, absolutely pathetic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>fails to prove his point via studies he didnt read >u same man so sad
2 years ago
Anonymous
Prove what? That dietary cholesterol DOESN'T cause heart disease? Do you even empiricism?
I can't PROVE dietary cholesterol doesn't cause heart disease because its impossible to prove a negative, but I've posted multiple studies that have failed to find a link between the two.
All you need to do is post one study that finds a link between dietary cholesterol and heart disease, a link that cannot be explained by confounding factors.
You cant do it because such a study doesn't exist.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I just don't see why you keep posting studies with irrelevant metrics and methods and then put the blame on whatever anon you are arguing with to prove their point. You re attempting to prove a point and all you have shown is that you need to manipulate methods to get the results you want to show. If you were trying to prove the loch ness monster existed and then provided faked fossils or doctored photos, its not up to the skeptic to endure an expedition to satisfy his skepticism.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You re attempting to prove a point
But I'm not. The other anon claimed that dietary cholesterol causes atherosclerosis.
There is no evidence to support this position. >If you were trying to prove the loch ness monster existed and then provided faked fossils or doctored photos, its not up to the skeptic to endure an expedition to satisfy his skepticism
In this metaphor, the other anon is the one claiming the loch Ness monster exists. He is making the positive claim, that X causes Y. The burden of proof is on him.
Post just one piece of evidence that dietary cholesterol causes atherosclerosis. Just one single study.
You're a gigantic homosexual who doesn't understand falsifiability, empiricism, or the scientific method.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are posting studies to debunk that anon, and the studies do not debunk the claim. A skeptic has to provide no proof, you have to prove to him your point is correct. The traditional narrative is that cholesterol which is dietary increases blood cholesterol and thus caused problems. You have given no reason to doubt this, and you have provided studies which use manipulated data and methods to prove your point
https://i.imgur.com/6gUVbcR.jpg
Irrelevant and not reading a comic
2 years ago
Anonymous
>and the studies do not debunk the claim
Why not? What's wrong with them? >The traditional narrative is that cholesterol which is dietary increases blood cholesterol and thus caused problems.
What is the evidence that supports the traditional narrative? >and you have provided studies which use manipulated data and methods to prove your point
LMAO OK so anything that actually shows dietary cholesterol doesn't increase the risk of atherosclerosis must be manipulated somehow.
You/the other anon have not debunked the studies that I've posted, you've simply said "those don't count, those aren't valid", you've not justified your dismissal of contrary evidence in any way.
I'll ask again.
What kind of evidence would you accept? What would be a valid form of evidence against the dietary cholesterol hypothesis for atherosclerosis/CVD?
Tell me what kind of evidence you would accept, and I will produce it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
[...]
Lol are you just googling studies without reading them? This is pathetic. Lol half an egg as the measurement.
>>I'm not debating you
Lmao seething
Hasn't posted a single study against dietary cholesterol, just nitpicks any evidence posted against his bullshit belief
>one single egg >multivariable >this is my proof
Hahahahahahahhaha
2 years ago
Anonymous
>multi variable
Trash
>eggs and dietary cholesterol causes heart disease because I say it does >i don't care if observational and interventional studies disagree with my beliefs
Yikes
Boiled potatoes, nothing added, goat on a cut. Filling because of the fiber and water content. If you don't frick with them, it's hard to get fat eating just potatoes.
Yes, they're empty calories. There are much better sides out there.
I love how ketards always spout "empty calories" but never actually explain what empty calories are
Potatoes have excellent micros and keep you full for a long time, a very good carb
And no, carbs are not poison
Yes, they're empty calories. There are much better sides out there.
>Contains every mineral and nutrient a human body needs for survival save for vitamin A and calcium. >Scientifically proven to keep you fuller for longer compared to any other source of complex carbohydrates. >Goddamn delicious. >"empty"
Get fricked, queer.
You can literally eat as many potatoes are you want while cutting. How in the world are you eating enough potato to gain weight? You'd literally have to force feed yourself buckets of mashed potato and sit on the shitter to vacate your bowels as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Once you add other food to that potato, you're still full and not gaining weight unless you're a moron that adds fat to your meal. Never mix fat and carbs. There. Problem solved.
I grew some sweet potatoes this year, and it was the most fulfilling thing I've done outside in ages. Getting to eat your own food is so satisfying because you know that it's completely organic and grown with TLC. Potatoes will also be the first thing to go when food shortages hit, because they're such a staple and so difficult to grow compared to seed crops (you are completely fricked for potatoes if you don't have slips.) Going to invest in an overwinter setup so I can grow them all year long.
hating ass b***h let that man grow his on shit and take pride on it
I grew some sweet potatoes this year, and it was the most fulfilling thing I've done outside in ages. Getting to eat your own food is so satisfying because you know that it's completely organic and grown with TLC. Potatoes will also be the first thing to go when food shortages hit, because they're such a staple and so difficult to grow compared to seed crops (you are completely fricked for potatoes if you don't have slips.) Going to invest in an overwinter setup so I can grow them all year long.
lets fricking go bro
no better meal after a post workout
I am letting him grow his own shit, potatoes are easiest fricking thing to grow even in shitty conditions, we had a little patch of "regular" suburban backyard turned into a potato patch and we had a successful harvest every single fricking summer, with little next to no work involved after planting them.
Congrats, you grew easiest plant to grow in human history.
To your credit, I phrased things in a semi-confusing way. The point I'm trying to make is that they are going to be hard to RENEW once SHTF, because of the aforementioned problems of not growing from seed and being a nutritious staple crop high in calories... Not that they're hard to grow per se.
hating ass b***h let that man grow his on shit and take pride on it
[...]
lets fricking go bro
no better meal after a post workout
Thanks brother! My gf didn't like sweet potatoes until she started eating mine, now she loves them and we eat them together after our workouts.
OP is a veganschizo who's been spamming IST with vaguely vegan positive posts veiled with recommendations of plant foods instead of coming out with "you need to start eating like a vegan!!! JOIN MY CULT! its easy to see through if you are a veteran of the image boards. There's always a bias in their posts towards PLANT foods and they hate testosterone and masculine things cuz they are a vegan troony or someshit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You sound mad
2 years ago
Anonymous
Post body
2 years ago
Anonymous
You first
2 years ago
Anonymous
I love pork stew with potatoes and vegetables (and bread to sop up all the liquid).
Just relax bro, don't feel threatened by potatoes.
If you bake potatoes and then stick 'em in the fridge overnight, you'll nearly double the amount of resistant starches present in them. This is very good for gut health.
>vitamin c
You do know that as soon as you cook it, it gets absolutely destroyed. Right? Saying potatoes have vit c is stupid and rwtarded simply because of how volatile vitamin c is
Take the Irish peasant pill >5 kilos of potato a day >buttermilk >dried herrings
What else do you need?
>The potato is the most versatile food known to man. Modern dietary analysis suggests that the Irishman's gargantuan meals of potatoes and buttermilk provided all the proteins, calories and minerals he needed. Table 1.3, based on a comparison of the typical labourers' diet in 1839 with a modern Canadian estimate of dietary requirements, makes the point. In strictly nutritional terms the simple Irish fare was fine, being deficient only in vitamins A and D. A boon of the humble potato was that it shielded the Irish poor from afflictions such as scurvy - 'the very rarest of diseases in Ireland' [Crawford, 1984, 155] - and xerophthalmia. Pellagra, too, endemie long after in those parts of the southern United States and Europe in which maize was the staple, was rare in Ireland. The most careful assessment to date of Irish diets on the eve of the Famine suggests that they were 'excellent, not merely when measured by "recommended daily intake" of the nutritionist, but also when set against the historical reality ofthe later nineteenth century' [Clarkson and Crawford, 1988, 191].
>134g protein >over 1kg carbs >4720kcal
Jesus what the frick.
Did the Irish do super bulk competitions? That's completely nuts considering the amount of work they need to perform to not get fat. We really live in luxurious times.
Peasantry were doing manual labor from sun up to sun down just to fricking eat. I was reading about the French peasantry of the late 18th century/early 19th and they were chronically malnourished. For example, being 5 foot tall was considered the minimum required to handle a musket properly - and during the mass conscriptions for Napoleon's armies, fully a quarter of conscripts were rejected for being too short. They barely ate any animal protein and just couldn't get enough calories.
I am the dumb.
I store my potatoes in the lower part of my fridge, which is slightly warmer than the upper half. It doesn't take long for the potatoes to start growing stalks or sprouts or whatever it's called.
Am i doing it wrong? Are the potatoes still good? I've heard it can alter the calories in them, is that what's happening?
Well no, but it is older than i am, and i'm 30. It still works but it's probably not as cool as it should be, and the lower half is supposed to be warmer.
I'm going to buy a new one, but i'm going to renovate the house before that.
I'm not going to read this thread because it's undoubtedly full of ketoschizos, dyels, people who don't even cook or prepare their own food from whole ingredients. Potatoes are God's perfect companion to meat. They are literally portable, long lasting, easy to grow in large amounts, tasty, nutritious, versatile.
Anyone who disagrees must post body. Actually don't bother, I will not be reading responses.
do potatos have more potassium than bananas?
most people say bananas are good for potassium but they have frickall
yes they do, make sure you eat the skins
i like potato
>yes they do, make sure you eat the skins
based, will do
Something that isn't bland famine food for peasants?
Eer....
Inject salt into the potato like all the factory meat you suck on ketolard.
no, the famine is when you have no potatoes
BTFO
This post has the same energy as "I don't drink water b/c it doesn't taste like anything"
>eat like a king bro
>but kings died early and were fat
>shh
>why would I eat peasant food
Why would I eat the food of royalty?
Because you can be fit and eat the food of royalty, just control your portions and hunger, you b***h breasts.
>cut em in half
>skins left on
>butter and oil in a dish and oven roasted with salt, pepper, garlic and rosemary
Simple as
Look up chef johns recipe thats very similar to this its great
> Perfect food presented to you in a delicious manner.
Its def not potatoes, look at pic related, protein, calcium, vitamin D, increases cholesterol which promotes MASCULINE features, get wrecked.
Masculine features such as heart attack
> Can't take a bit of cholesterol.
Your endocrine system must be fricked up homosexual.
Dietary cholesterol does not cause cardiovascular disease.
It causes atherosclerosis
It literally doesnt.
https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m513
>In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake
>In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1720108 participants, 139195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk
>Conclusions Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations.
>multi variable
Trash
https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1246
>Serum cholesterol lowering diet that replaced saturated fat with linoleic acid (from corn oil and corn oil polyunsaturated margarine). Control diet was high in saturated fat from animal fats, common margarines, and shortenings.
>The intervention group had significant reduction in serum cholesterol compared with controls (mean change from baseline −13.8% v −1.0%; P<0.001). Kaplan Meier graphs showed no mortality benefit for the intervention group in the full randomized cohort or for any prespecified subgroup. There was a 22% higher risk of death for each 30 mg/dL (0.78 mmol/L) reduction in serum cholesterol in covariate adjusted Cox regression models (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.32; P<0.001). There was no evidence of benefit in the intervention group for coronary atherosclerosis or myocardial infarcts.
>Available evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes
>we replaced fat with fat and this is our proof
The jokes write themselves
Dietary cholesterol does not cause heart disease.
Prove otherwise.
You have submitted faulty studies to prove your point. Sounds like you just have no actual evidence and want to keep eating bacon you do you I'm not here to satisfy your falsehoods with improper retorts so you can small me a homosexual or whatever
Call me*
>haha he made a booboo he's wrong bacon good
I do not care whatever
>Sounds like you just have no actual evidence
The burden of proof is one the person presenting the positive claim (ie dietary cholesterol causes heart disease).
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
HOWEVER
What kind of evidence would you accept? What nature of study would you concede as evidence against your claim?
You are the one who is presenting faulty studies to back up your claim. I don't care what you think, you are the one trying to prove me wrong. I'm not debating you.
>What kind of evidence would you accept? What nature of study would you concede as evidence against your claim?
>I'm not debating you
Then why do you keep replying?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6024687/
>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. For years, dietary cholesterol was implicated in increasing blood cholesterol levels leading to the elevated risk of CVD. To date, extensive research did not show evidence to support a role of dietary cholesterol in the development of CVD. As a result, the 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans removed the recommendations of restricting dietary cholesterol to 300 mg/day
I didnt claim it caused CVD so idk what you are trying to do here
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11111098/
>Analysis of the available epidemiological and clinical data indicates that for the general population, dietary cholesterol makes no significant contribution to atherosclerosis and risk of cardiovascular disease.
>half an eggs worth of cholesterol doesn't change much therefore its benign
>also maybe they weren't eating fruit
Hahahaha try again
Lol are you just googling studies without reading them? This is pathetic. Lol half an egg as the measurement.
I thought you weren't debating me?
You realise that all the "evidence" that implied dietary cholesterol may cause heart disease / atherosclerosis was even weaker than these studies, right?
>EVERYONE ON IST IS THE SAME PERSON
Now you're pretending that you're a different poster, absolutely pathetic.
>fails to prove his point via studies he didnt read
>u same man so sad
Prove what? That dietary cholesterol DOESN'T cause heart disease? Do you even empiricism?
I can't PROVE dietary cholesterol doesn't cause heart disease because its impossible to prove a negative, but I've posted multiple studies that have failed to find a link between the two.
All you need to do is post one study that finds a link between dietary cholesterol and heart disease, a link that cannot be explained by confounding factors.
You cant do it because such a study doesn't exist.
I just don't see why you keep posting studies with irrelevant metrics and methods and then put the blame on whatever anon you are arguing with to prove their point. You re attempting to prove a point and all you have shown is that you need to manipulate methods to get the results you want to show. If you were trying to prove the loch ness monster existed and then provided faked fossils or doctored photos, its not up to the skeptic to endure an expedition to satisfy his skepticism.
>You re attempting to prove a point
But I'm not. The other anon claimed that dietary cholesterol causes atherosclerosis.
There is no evidence to support this position.
>If you were trying to prove the loch ness monster existed and then provided faked fossils or doctored photos, its not up to the skeptic to endure an expedition to satisfy his skepticism
In this metaphor, the other anon is the one claiming the loch Ness monster exists. He is making the positive claim, that X causes Y. The burden of proof is on him.
Post just one piece of evidence that dietary cholesterol causes atherosclerosis. Just one single study.
You're a gigantic homosexual who doesn't understand falsifiability, empiricism, or the scientific method.
You are posting studies to debunk that anon, and the studies do not debunk the claim. A skeptic has to provide no proof, you have to prove to him your point is correct. The traditional narrative is that cholesterol which is dietary increases blood cholesterol and thus caused problems. You have given no reason to doubt this, and you have provided studies which use manipulated data and methods to prove your point
Irrelevant and not reading a comic
>and the studies do not debunk the claim
Why not? What's wrong with them?
>The traditional narrative is that cholesterol which is dietary increases blood cholesterol and thus caused problems.
What is the evidence that supports the traditional narrative?
>and you have provided studies which use manipulated data and methods to prove your point
LMAO OK so anything that actually shows dietary cholesterol doesn't increase the risk of atherosclerosis must be manipulated somehow.
You/the other anon have not debunked the studies that I've posted, you've simply said "those don't count, those aren't valid", you've not justified your dismissal of contrary evidence in any way.
I'll ask again.
What kind of evidence would you accept? What would be a valid form of evidence against the dietary cholesterol hypothesis for atherosclerosis/CVD?
Tell me what kind of evidence you would accept, and I will produce it.
>>I'm not debating you
Lmao seething
Hasn't posted a single study against dietary cholesterol, just nitpicks any evidence posted against his bullshit belief
>one single egg
>multivariable
>this is my proof
Hahahahahahahhaha
>eggs and dietary cholesterol causes heart disease because I say it does
>i don't care if observational and interventional studies disagree with my beliefs
Yikes
It’s like you read health news from the late 80’s and took a homosexual time machine here. It’s called the lipid hypothesis for a reason
vegan propaganda
I will eat the eggs
I will not eat your plant based slop
get lost
Do what you want I don't care
Cutting?
Potatoes.
Oh yeah?
Makes you fat-er.
Boiled potatoes, nothing added, goat on a cut. Filling because of the fiber and water content. If you don't frick with them, it's hard to get fat eating just potatoes.
This is a vegan shill thread. Potatoes are to be avoided in a cut because they're virtually empty calories. Eat more nutritious food.
>potatoes
>empty calories
moron
Yup, pretty much empty.
I love how ketards always spout "empty calories" but never actually explain what empty calories are
Potatoes have excellent micros and keep you full for a long time, a very good carb
And no, carbs are not poison
Yes, they're empty calories. There are much better sides out there.
>Contains every mineral and nutrient a human body needs for survival save for vitamin A and calcium.
>Scientifically proven to keep you fuller for longer compared to any other source of complex carbohydrates.
>Goddamn delicious.
>"empty"
Get fricked, queer.
>for survival
I'm eating for fitness, not for being a malnourished peasant. Post body, vegan potato eater.
OP must be Irish, I hear they love potatoes.
Found the moron
Found the DYEL.
You can literally eat as many potatoes are you want while cutting. How in the world are you eating enough potato to gain weight? You'd literally have to force feed yourself buckets of mashed potato and sit on the shitter to vacate your bowels as quickly and efficiently as possible.
No one said you have to only eat potatoes anon….the idea is to incorporate it with other foods…
Once you add other food to that potato, you're still full and not gaining weight unless you're a moron that adds fat to your meal. Never mix fat and carbs. There. Problem solved.
XD
I grew some sweet potatoes this year, and it was the most fulfilling thing I've done outside in ages. Getting to eat your own food is so satisfying because you know that it's completely organic and grown with TLC. Potatoes will also be the first thing to go when food shortages hit, because they're such a staple and so difficult to grow compared to seed crops (you are completely fricked for potatoes if you don't have slips.) Going to invest in an overwinter setup so I can grow them all year long.
Not really, they sell them for 1€ per kilo out here, they are the cheapest with carrots to grow and sell. Maybe Ameritards can't into potato farming?
hating ass b***h let that man grow his on shit and take pride on it
lets fricking go bro
no better meal after a post workout
I am letting him grow his own shit, potatoes are easiest fricking thing to grow even in shitty conditions, we had a little patch of "regular" suburban backyard turned into a potato patch and we had a successful harvest every single fricking summer, with little next to no work involved after planting them.
Congrats, you grew easiest plant to grow in human history.
To your credit, I phrased things in a semi-confusing way. The point I'm trying to make is that they are going to be hard to RENEW once SHTF, because of the aforementioned problems of not growing from seed and being a nutritious staple crop high in calories... Not that they're hard to grow per se.
Thanks brother! My gf didn't like sweet potatoes until she started eating mine, now she loves them and we eat them together after our workouts.
>Bulking
>Potatoes
At 80 cal for a 100g? Nope.
So boil + mash 500g of potatoes and mix in generous quantities of butter + cream.
then it would be the butter that was the bulking food not the potatoes dummy
Noone said you were ONLY allowed to eat potatoes you stupid c**t.
Then why does OP homosexual complain about other forms of "perfect" food? Oh righhhtt because he's moronic vegan schizo.
You have no idea who OP is
OP is a veganschizo who's been spamming IST with vaguely vegan positive posts veiled with recommendations of plant foods instead of coming out with "you need to start eating like a vegan!!! JOIN MY CULT! its easy to see through if you are a veteran of the image boards. There's always a bias in their posts towards PLANT foods and they hate testosterone and masculine things cuz they are a vegan troony or someshit.
You sound mad
Post body
You first
I love pork stew with potatoes and vegetables (and bread to sop up all the liquid).
Just relax bro, don't feel threatened by potatoes.
Ketoschizo can't meme
If you bake potatoes and then stick 'em in the fridge overnight, you'll nearly double the amount of resistant starches present in them. This is very good for gut health.
This works even better with sweet potatoes.
False. It works hardly at all with sweet potatoes
Starch retrogradation happens in sweet potato. The starch granules in sweet potatoes are absolutely suitable for forming resistant starch.
t. Food scientist
>food scientist
Having an ED doesn't make you a scientist of food
Having a bachelor's degree in food technology does, though.
Yes it does
Maybe. But then you have to deal with the inferior taste and flexibility associated with sweet potatoes.
You DID eat your potatoes with iodized salt today didn’t you?
Literal food of the Mesoamerican gods. Throw in some yuca and platains.
potatoes taste good
wanna pelt OP for being a homosexual?
Potatoes
Radishes are better for cutting, you can cook them like potatoes and they have 16cal/100g
Cool
>vitamin c
You do know that as soon as you cook it, it gets absolutely destroyed. Right? Saying potatoes have vit c is stupid and rwtarded simply because of how volatile vitamin c is
The amount of vitamin C in the USDA database for potatoes reflects a 50% decrease in C from boiling. There is still plenty of it
Take the Irish peasant pill
>5 kilos of potato a day
>buttermilk
>dried herrings
What else do you need?
>The potato is the most versatile food known to man. Modern dietary analysis suggests that the Irishman's gargantuan meals of potatoes and buttermilk provided all the proteins, calories and minerals he needed. Table 1.3, based on a comparison of the typical labourers' diet in 1839 with a modern Canadian estimate of dietary requirements, makes the point. In strictly nutritional terms the simple Irish fare was fine, being deficient only in vitamins A and D. A boon of the humble potato was that it shielded the Irish poor from afflictions such as scurvy - 'the very rarest of diseases in Ireland' [Crawford, 1984, 155] - and xerophthalmia. Pellagra, too, endemie long after in those parts of the southern United States and Europe in which maize was the staple, was rare in Ireland. The most careful assessment to date of Irish diets on the eve of the Famine suggests that they were 'excellent, not merely when measured by "recommended daily intake" of the nutritionist, but also when set against the historical reality ofthe later nineteenth century' [Clarkson and Crawford, 1988, 191].
>134g protein
>over 1kg carbs
>4720kcal
Jesus what the frick.
Did the Irish do super bulk competitions? That's completely nuts considering the amount of work they need to perform to not get fat. We really live in luxurious times.
Premodern diets with one big stable tended to be pretty ridiculous by modern standards.
Peasantry were doing manual labor from sun up to sun down just to fricking eat. I was reading about the French peasantry of the late 18th century/early 19th and they were chronically malnourished. For example, being 5 foot tall was considered the minimum required to handle a musket properly - and during the mass conscriptions for Napoleon's armies, fully a quarter of conscripts were rejected for being too short. They barely ate any animal protein and just couldn't get enough calories.
I read the exact opposite because I'm not a ketoBlack person
I am the dumb.
I store my potatoes in the lower part of my fridge, which is slightly warmer than the upper half. It doesn't take long for the potatoes to start growing stalks or sprouts or whatever it's called.
Am i doing it wrong? Are the potatoes still good? I've heard it can alter the calories in them, is that what's happening?
How the frick are the potatoes in your fridge sprouting? Is it broken?
Well no, but it is older than i am, and i'm 30. It still works but it's probably not as cool as it should be, and the lower half is supposed to be warmer.
I'm going to buy a new one, but i'm going to renovate the house before that.
I'm not going to read this thread because it's undoubtedly full of ketoschizos, dyels, people who don't even cook or prepare their own food from whole ingredients. Potatoes are God's perfect companion to meat. They are literally portable, long lasting, easy to grow in large amounts, tasty, nutritious, versatile.
Anyone who disagrees must post body. Actually don't bother, I will not be reading responses.
Ketoschizo is one person. He's the deranged schizophrenic who calls everyone who disagrees with him a vegan and spams the board 16 hours per day.
I love them all. Potatoes, sweet potatoes, eggs, etc. Everything the globalhomosexual and israelites fear and scorn.