Your skin is already starting to sag bro. You should cut and not bulk too much or you’ll get loose skin and you’ll hate it even if you got buff you’ll be flabby
You're basically a skeleton, just slow bulk, try to gain a lb a week by eating about 500 extra calories on top of what you need to eat to maintain your current weight. and lift fricking weights
comparisons like that are mostly useless because individual variation in fat deposition is massive.
for example if person a stores mostly visceral fat and very little sub cutaneous fat, you can appear very lean , where as person b can look flabby , and have little visceral fat. both individuals may have similar body fat percentages but look vastly different.
its better to focus on how you actually look rather than what number you have attained, as its not very useful for comparisons between people.
Nowhere close to 15%, probably like 20% if you were white. If you’re asian like 25-30% since your race stores a lot more fat on your organs first aka visceral fat. Really why most asian people look slim.
>Is a cartoon of a male torso accurate to science
No moron
>Should I bulk or cut if I'm skinny fat
Figure out your goals for yourself homosexual
nah
I have a very visible 4 pack. but i have love handles and fat on my face
I'm 20% by that picture
you could say it's all soft
post body for accurate assessment
5'9 128lbs
Skelly mode ass
homie you should bulk for a year before you start thinking about body fat percentage
Your skin is already starting to sag bro. You should cut and not bulk too much or you’ll get loose skin and you’ll hate it even if you got buff you’ll be flabby
>You should cut and not bulk too much
???
you mean the opposite
Your bf% is irrelevant becauae you have no muscles. You need to do shit
Bulk and lift you are actually sub 15% just that you lack muscle mass
You're basically a skeleton, just slow bulk, try to gain a lb a week by eating about 500 extra calories on top of what you need to eat to maintain your current weight. and lift fricking weights
>I have a very visible 4pack
comparisons like that are mostly useless because individual variation in fat deposition is massive.
for example if person a stores mostly visceral fat and very little sub cutaneous fat, you can appear very lean , where as person b can look flabby , and have little visceral fat. both individuals may have similar body fat percentages but look vastly different.
its better to focus on how you actually look rather than what number you have attained, as its not very useful for comparisons between people.
according to this i'm 9-12% but I know i'm ~20
>tfw %100 body fat
It's over
Can I get a bf estimate? I'm thinking 12-15?
Pic rel
Unflexed
Flexed
I'd say gay%
0% gay? Cool cool
There's no way...
27%
Nowhere close to 15%, probably like 20% if you were white. If you’re asian like 25-30% since your race stores a lot more fat on your organs first aka visceral fat. Really why most asian people look slim.
i feel like trying to put an exact number on your physique is wrong
our body genetics are too different for a universal number
Real answer is it depends.
Your muscles will show through if they're big enough and the fat distribution in the area isn't horrendous.
I have fairly visible abs but I'm at 17-18%bf.
Trying to get down to <15%
No, bump everything up by 3%, also it depends on your fat distribution.