is this natty or juicing? one year and half of lifting

is this natty or juicing?
one year and half of lifting

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming he started for a skinny/skinny fat baseline, he's roiding.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      His arms aren't even that big, is his chest really that impressive?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >h-he's not that big

        being on steroids isn't about being big, it's about being cut. natural lifters cannot be that big and that cut without years and years and years of effort

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          also, the vascularity at his size is a dead giveaway. your body does not naturally construct giant blood vessels at that size.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      How long would it take natty to achieve this? (Minus de roid delts) assuming perfect rest/diet

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        most people can't ever achieve that naturally. it's genetically limited.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Those delts are 100% roided.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    this one is from february 2021 he says after a pair of weeks only doing push ups, pull ups and squats

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wasnt 100% sure but if this is his before then it's 100% roids kek

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    bro needs to address that black mold issue in his bathroom

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Natty. He's tiny. If you saw him with a shirt on he'd look like a starving 3rd worlder.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >broccoli hair
    100% sarms goblin

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks better than 95% gym goers
    So either he is a 5%er gigachad
    or 90%er roiderfag

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    dunno, too little mass so could be natty with very good genes.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Juicing without a doubt

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >IST kids can't spot extremely obvious roiders, episode #46837

    Next you will post a picture of a woman and next to it...a picture of her...WITHOUT MAKEUP! *gasp*

    I guess age is part of it. Let me explain something to you as a 40 year old: Absolutely nobody, ever, used to look this way. If your body looked like this, you were famous because of it, or your body looked like that because you were famous to begin with.

    NOBODY looked like this in the 90s. it's steroids and sarms. period.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah nobody looked like that because you boomers were mid af frfr

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        yeah turn into a rectangle more bc you listened to mark rippetoe instead of guys who look like theyre made of bubbles

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's achievable natty, also really good lighting. But as with every "natty or not" question, that doesn't preclude that someone could be taking steroids. You could have a morbidly obese walmartian on a rascal scoot and that still wouldn't rule out the possibility they're taking roids.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.