It really is just that simple

It really is just that simple

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    actually some folks have bodies that are metabolically moronic so they don't process calories well

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would we care about morons?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The principle applies. The calories out is smaller. Adjust for it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but the variance isn't that big

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if only there as a way to adjust the number of calories in some way

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am trans btw

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What does it change except the fact that you absorb less calories per meal?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      true, but cico is still relevant. their tdee and bmr will just be lower until they fix their metabolism.

      https://i.imgur.com/qErNGdR.png

      It really is just that simple

      yea. anyone who has bulked, cut and counted calories would know this.

      https://i.imgur.com/Lzq9vtU.jpg

      Imagine trying to lose weight, you get to your goal weight and all you are is a puffy blob. It is so much more than calories in calories out.

      so cico worked, except you didn't lift and you didn't eat clean nutritious food to help you recover properly.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all that changes in op is the angle of inclination. the general trend holds, which is all cico purports.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >they don't process calories well
      Whatever that means.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What about the other way around? I am pretty sure I would get fat on 1200 cals a day considering how slow paced my weight loss is on 500. My body seems to take every calorie and add it to my weight without any waste. Communists must want to get hold of my DNA to replicate it.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Turns out the quality of your food matters more

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no it isn't, and I wonder why so many people fall for this shit.
    Yes, if you have a calory deficit, you will lose weight. But nothing guarantees that everything you eat will stay on your body. People have different metabolisms, and people digest different food differently. Some people have difficulties digesting fat, some have food intolerances. You might just shit everything out and gain zero.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ketoschizo take

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      eat 200 donuts a day and report back

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How is this supposed to disprove CICO ?
      If your body ignores some calories then you need to remove them from your maths
      It's your job to know what works for your body dawg

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Least “health at every size” deluded poster

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why is it so hard to understand that CICO works, I've lost 14lbs since Jan 1st just counting calories, yeah I don't eat like a slob anymore but ill still have the ocassional bakery treat or pizza slice.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I run 10 hours a week and count calories and have put on weight. Cico does not work for me.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >People have different metabolisms
      calories out
      >and people digest different food differently
      calories in
      your point..?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stop posting your opinion on any matter.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine trying to lose weight, you get to your goal weight and all you are is a puffy blob. It is so much more than calories in calories out.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post someone who lost a lot of weight and was a puffy blob.

      inb4 the goal weight was still them being fat lmao aka puffy blob.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        meh buddeh

        >I am still fat at my goal weight
        >Therefore cico doesnt work

        Solid reasoning

        invalid, reread my post.

        you shouldn't have a goal weight, you should have a goal physique and keep cutting until you reach it or go past it

        reread my post.

        This is just entry level body hacking..
        >Clone one homie so it makes two
        >Feed both a diet of 3K cals over their TDEE
        >One gets TDEE+3K cals with some generic state-sponsored seed oil HFCS american diet
        >Feed the other one their TDEE+3K cals with sweets from refined sugar/honey/fruits, coffee, GOMAD (w/ a couple tbsp of coconut oil on every drink), fried tendies/potatos with coconut oil. Add a bit of DNP/Anavar. Cut all seed oils.
        Watch how the former gets obese while the latter somehow turns shredded with their fighter jet engine metabolism. Both eating what normies consider "junk food" but you give the second one a spin by replacing seed oils w coconut oil. Both eat insane amounts of sugar so normies have no idea wtf is the difference aside from the oil switch.

        unironically both would be fat, but one would be metabolically challenged while the other one wouldn't.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >reread my post.
          have a nice day
          you said when you got to your goal weight you were still a puffy blob
          BECAUSE YOU'RE DELUSIONAL AND CHOSE THE WRONG NUMBER TO CUT TO
          Keep cutting until you're skinny or stay fat

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can't explain why I just increased by caloric intake, but am seeing my waist size go down, and my weight go up.

            Get fricked.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              because you started working out/ actually eating protein ?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well, it definitely wouldn't happen if I drank 2000cal of soda. Common knowledge: balanced diet; proteins necessary; carbs preferential; fats noninsulinogenic.

                Then calories in/calories out doesn't explain the mechanism in fine enough detail. But, it wasn't protein, I just ate more of my calories from vegetables.

                https://i.imgur.com/U4khbw7.png

                >unironically both would be fat, but one would be metabolically challenged while the other one wouldn't.
                No. You are going to lose weight well above your TDEE cutting seed oils and eating a lot of coconut oil. Roiders have known this for ages, those that take DNP/Anavar/T3 will always be hungry and stuff food in their mouths all day long and still be shredded. Their boddies running at high gear and temperatures all day like LMH2 cars.
                CICO is just part of the equation and assumes everyone has the same efficiency.
                Somehow fat fricks are right but they are the lower end of metabolism and they think CICO is bullshit and unjust.
                I bet you must be in the middle so it works for you eating chicken breast and veggies, you probably think sugar is le bad in 2024.
                Roiders are on the higher end of metabolism decoupling their mitochondria and shit.
                tl;dr CICO is some midwit bullshit

                Well, no, the person eating HFCS SAD diet would be metabolically challenged, no doubt. The person on roids, different story.
                >sugar
                sugar?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                CICO is good if it's just for losing weight (your total weight will have to go further down as you won't have more muscle to compensate) but I agree that if you want to be healthy and gain muscle it's not enough.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >unironically both would be fat, but one would be metabolically challenged while the other one wouldn't.
          No. You are going to lose weight well above your TDEE cutting seed oils and eating a lot of coconut oil. Roiders have known this for ages, those that take DNP/Anavar/T3 will always be hungry and stuff food in their mouths all day long and still be shredded. Their boddies running at high gear and temperatures all day like LMH2 cars.
          CICO is just part of the equation and assumes everyone has the same efficiency.
          Somehow fat fricks are right but they are the lower end of metabolism and they think CICO is bullshit and unjust.
          I bet you must be in the middle so it works for you eating chicken breast and veggies, you probably think sugar is le bad in 2024.
          Roiders are on the higher end of metabolism decoupling their mitochondria and shit.
          tl;dr CICO is some midwit bullshit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I am still fat at my goal weight
      >Therefore cico doesnt work

      Solid reasoning

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you shouldn't have a goal weight, you should have a goal physique and keep cutting until you reach it or go past it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine trying to lose weight
      Okay
      >you get to your goal weight
      Uh huh
      >and all you are is a puffy blob
      No you said I just lost the weight

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the difference between quantitative and qualitative...

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "but muh metabolism" is just an excuse that fat fricks give so that they can continue stuffing their face. i guarantee you that those same people who are dieting and saying that shit aren't even in deficits and are secretly eating in surpluses/dont know it, which, shocker, is a large contributor to why fatties don't lose weight.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is just entry level body hacking..
    >Clone one homie so it makes two
    >Feed both a diet of 3K cals over their TDEE
    >One gets TDEE+3K cals with some generic state-sponsored seed oil HFCS american diet
    >Feed the other one their TDEE+3K cals with sweets from refined sugar/honey/fruits, coffee, GOMAD (w/ a couple tbsp of coconut oil on every drink), fried tendies/potatos with coconut oil. Add a bit of DNP/Anavar. Cut all seed oils.
    Watch how the former gets obese while the latter somehow turns shredded with their fighter jet engine metabolism. Both eating what normies consider "junk food" but you give the second one a spin by replacing seed oils w coconut oil. Both eat insane amounts of sugar so normies have no idea wtf is the difference aside from the oil switch.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Alright CICO gays

    Explain this then: https://youtu.be/WcOmlpYyUt4?feature=shared&t=5014

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody's gonna refute this?

      Take a look at it

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    CICO is about as useful as telling someone the key to wealth is to make more money than you spend. Totally reductive and unhelpful.

    What's more relevant is your body's hormones.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What's moronic is implying someone having 2000 calories of sugar will have the same body composition as someone having 2000 calories of protein.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fair play to you. But you’re assuming that the general population has more than a vague idea of how a balanced budget works, let alone what the relationship of calories and food vis-à-vis TDEE is.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If someone is spending more money than they need to spend, telling them to spend less is the advice they need just like eating less is the advice most people need to lose weight.
      You could almost call this cash in cash out.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      CICO should be reductive and unhelpful but people are completely moronic so it isn't. Same as your cash in cash out metaphor. Lots of poor people say they're so poor that they're just going to spend all the money they have on bullshit in the same way fatties pretend eating normally is impossible and pointless.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well, its almost that simple. When you have a calorie imbalance your metabolism adjusts
    Calorie deficit: your metabolism drops
    Calorie surplus: your metabolism increases
    So its more like theres a range where you have weight maintenance. Depending on your genetics, of course

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ex-fatty here, unfortunately it really is.

    T. Gained 5 kg in 3 months the moment I stopped tracking my calories.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You cannot eat the modern diet as an ex-fatty.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Figured that out the hard way. I miss drinking booze so much.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >can’t gain weight
    Eat moar
    >can’t lose weight
    Eat less

    Simple. As.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes but the CO part doesn't stay the same. If you eat below maintenance for a prolonged period of time your metabolism will slow down and you'll lose less (or no more) weight. Then when you start eating your goal weight maintenance calories you'll still get fat because of the slowed metabolism (yo-yo effect).

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Then when you start eating your goal weight maintenance calories you'll still get fat because of the slowed metabolism (yo-yo effect).
      That's not technically true, otherwise nobody would be able to sustain weight loss. I get where you are coning from though, but if you diet sustainably and the right way and then eat your new weights Maintenance calories you should be perfectly fine, unless you ate a low protein diet and lost a bunch of muscle and are now skinnyfat or whatever

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is jst not true
        every time a "500 calorie deficit" dieter hits a plateau their diet must suddenly become a 700 calorie deficit or 1000 calorie deficit
        rinse and repeat until they are eating 500 calories a day just to lose the same amount of weight as beforw

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Go have refuted nothing I said

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The yo yo effect is people snacking on the things they didn't during the diet. The second people stop their diets they're back to eating candy bars and ice cream and eating full meals at restaurants while exercising less. It's just an example of how people can't cope with the modern diet, it's designed to make you overeat by default and most people don't want to commit to whole foods forever.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The yo yo effect is people snacking on the things they didn't during the diet
        Think about what a yoyo is. What you are saying in no way firs the metaphor

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The metaphor is you lose weight then gain weight back then lose then gain it back. The cycle is always the game, you gain by eating the shit that made you fat the first time. All the CICO eaters think ice cream is okay as long as it fits your calories. And it's their downfall.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This also applies to every single diet btw.
    It doesn't matter if you do carnivore, vegan, keto, fasting or whatever fad diet you prefer, if you eat more than you need you gain weight and if you eat less you lose weight.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >It really is just that simple

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The body is not a closed system.
    The body is not a bomb calorimeter.

    The body craves nutrition and will seek it out to satisfy itself. This is called hunger.

    Why would someone consume more than they should to survive? That's the question you should be answering.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why would someone consume more than they should to survive?
      Because humans needed to have fat storages for winter, dummy.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My wife wanted to lose weight and started looking at the calories of the food she was eating. She was shocked at how much some things had, so she just kept an eye on it and tried to get under her target.
    She's lost 10kg so far without changing her exercise habits (none)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Good for her. Happy to hear.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is no such thing as calories out unless you count your shit.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're trying to reason with addicts. If they don't address the underlying cause of the food addiction they won't change

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You and the addicts are trying to hold weightloss back because you are deathly afraid of not being able to control yourself if you get an excuse. First fat people ruined healthcare by making it all tailored to their issues now they are ruining weightloss by refusing any conversation about extra things you can do besides fork put downs

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >bro I know you binge on sweets but have you considered just eating less sweets?
        >I, a well adjusted person, don't have this binging problem, so why can't you?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *