# >long torso. >short legs. >mogged by women

>long torso
>short legs
>mogged by women

Is it over for me?

https://anthro.cs.uni-freiburg.de/#colx=100&coly=39

1. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

2. 2 weeks ago
SwedishBrorsan

I'm too stupid to understand that graph, please explain

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It literally says it below. Y-axis is crotch height, X-axis is overall height.
If your crotch height is low, you have a long torso and stubby legs. And if your crotch height is high, you have long legs and short torso.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

But if you're tall then obviously you're going to have longer legs. Isn't that graph just stating the obvious.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

There is a middle beam on the chart going upwards. If you under that you have short legs, if you above you got long legs. Learn2chart.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>There is a middle beam on the chart going upwards
What's a middle beam?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>What's a middle beam?
The meat pole I insert in your mom's scrotum.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

https://i.imgur.com/fQJKjmW.gif

Yes, and those diagonal yellow, green, and blue areas represent what a normal crotch-height ratio is.
See the red dot? That's where OP falls. He's a gobblin freak with baby legs and normal sized torso.

So it's saying men have shorter legs than women

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

On avg a lil bit yes. According to this chart its only a couple cms difference at most. Add a hanging dick and balls and that you can't pull up your pants into your ass like whores and it gives the Flase illusion that women have longer legs. The difference is even smaller than I thought.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Yes, and those diagonal yellow, green, and blue areas represent what a normal crotch-height ratio is.
See the red dot? That's where OP falls. He's a gobblin freak with baby legs and normal sized torso.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>diagonal yellow, green, and blue areas
?

3. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Damn thx for posting this finally it's clear what's wrong with me.
Short legs, giant torso, short arms kinda long thin neck and I'm a manlet.

This is why most clothes, especially shorts look bad on me. Fuck.

4. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>still mogs 95% of women
you're being melodramatic for (You)s
kys

5. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

This is based on data from 1988.
All the important measurements ie related to bone (eg height, biacromial, wrist etc) will be much greater if it used current data.
Still cool but it would be more useful that way

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>will be much greater if it used current data.
Why would that be you idiot? You think people have magically longer limbs now 30 years later?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Yes, men are statistically taller and larger on average today conpared to 30+ years ago.
Take just height as example, the avg then was closer to 175 whereas young european men today avg between 180 and 183 depending on country.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

There are 180+ on that list....
Or do you think 180+ people nowadays got longer limbs magically? Are you spec Ed?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

ok
hope you feel better about yourself chud

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

chud is an offensive derogatory term. Stop using it you incel.

6. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I lift for them.

7. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>mfw 6 foot tall, but 30 inch inseam
wtf bros i didn't ask for this shit all my clothes look fucking goofy like i'm wearing xl pants and a small t-shirt despite it being the opposite.

8. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Absolute shoulderlet