>Objectively better than standing lateral raise

>Objectively better than standing lateral raise

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck Lateral raises.

    /thread
    /fpbp

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      worst take Ive ever read on IST.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post delts

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          bro why would you post that

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            leave paddy alone

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Objectively better than standing lateral raise
    Name one reason

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Can't cheat by bouncing your legs/swinging your torso (with back support)

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        cheat reps have a time and place

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > Not using cheat reps to squeeze out last bit of energy at end of set.

        NGMI

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >not doing cheat reps for a muscle that responds really well to high rep PAMP work
        retard. go post about how you look dyel in a t shirt with your nonexistent delt

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          whats better, time under tension with controlled eccentric or high rep with cheats?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the answer is literally both, you start with strict, controlled reps and begin to cheat as you approach/push past failure.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              hmm. ill have to try that. adding some accessory work into a non lifting routine and i have concluded my delts/shoulders are weak af. thanks

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                blast the shit out of your rear delts, that's what people most often neglect and they're incredibly important at making sure you don't look lopsided and retarded from the side

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                idk. i boulder and climb a lot. my push has always dogshit compared to my pulls even when i was lifting. seems to me that my weakest point is lateral/front and its affecting my overall shoulder stability. sad state of affairs tbqh.

                either way though, ill take a look and see where i need to improve.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Harder to cheat

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    every seated lift with a standing variation is just wasting free stabilizer/core/general strength gains for no reason
    >muh increased overload
    overload these nuts in your mouth while you're sitting down like you do when you pee bitch

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why the FUCK do i need stabilizer/core gains on fucking lateral raises? Im trying to grow the side delts not get some minimal strength gains on the core you idiot. Now the lift is being slightly limited by stabilizing instead of focusing on just the delts.

      If I want core gains i work out the fucking core

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If your delt stimulus is suffering because of your core during standing lat raises, you are the exact person that should be doing standing lat raises. Your core is weak. Wasted trips

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        bruh just do them one arm at a time lol it’s easier

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >while you're sitting down like you do when you pee bitch

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine sitting down for a workout
    Bwahahahahahahahaha
    What gay

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks OP, I'm a big fan of lateral raises but this never occurred to me. I'll be sure to replace my standing raises with sitting ones tomorrow.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >not doing your set sitting with good form and then "supersetting" it with standing lateral raises
    NGMI

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Only because you have shit posture and alignment. Probably a weak core too.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You just have bad form when standing and cheat

Your email address will not be published.