okay all jokes aside

is this naturally achivable? what exercise or routine he did to maintain this much mass?

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Knee drops to failure (of your gym mat)

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      what did he mean by this?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I have no idea.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    peak moron lynching form

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Under the knee!

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      jej

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black people look like that naturally due to their superior athletic genes

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw you’ll never kneel on George’s neck until he’s dead
    I want to do it so bad

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      W-wait
      4chan told me he died from drugs...?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you watch the actual 30nminute footage (it's on youtube from 2 different angles) it's very obvious he was fucked on drugs and did absolutely everything he possibly could to force the officer to restrain him in incrementally forceful ways. He was saying "I can't breafe" long before the officer ever pinned him to the floor, among half a dozen other semi coherent mutterings.

        Watch it and be your own judge.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Surely a criminal drug addict wouldn't use steroids, right?

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Be tall and have a large frame
    Be 40ish years old

    That’s it. He probably never seriously lifted in his life

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stealing TVs is mad gains

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    this racist thread is actually thinly veiled this time, good job OP

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Def not natty

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Meth
      >Fent
      >Caffeine
      >AND weed
      He was jus having a good day
      Why the popo gotta ruin dat shit?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Def not natty
      wow, no shit the cop didn't leg go of this 300 pound drugged gorilla, what if the cop had let him go and he attacked someone, morons can't control their savage instincts like the whites..

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's not very nice to say

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    My arms look better than that natty and not a moron.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Post arms

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It could go either way. He lifted weights and worked in security. Plus, he’s black and doing meth. However, a lot of people do gear and don’t look like it. IMO I think he was on gear. Good riddence

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >drug addict is also a roid chud
    only in America where the moron is the sacred cow could this shock people

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can we appreciate for a minute that the only theory of the crime put forward by the prosecution is a theory-in-spite-of-evidence, requiring the defense to disprove the unprovable? A total inversion of the standard of proof.

    Facts:
    >There was no physical evidence of any potentially lethal harm done to George Floyd whatsoever
    >Every possible physical indicator of lethal harm was provably not present (no petechial hemorrhaging, no bruising, no broken bones, no trauma of any kind)
    >Every possible indicator of a drug overdose was present, including the drugs in system and partially digested drugs and the drug dealer at the scene
    >Every possible indicator of a predisposition to drug overdoses was present, from an oversized heart to 90% block artery to history of near death overdoses on the same drug

    Thus the theory brought forward by the prosecution was that Derek Chauvin used enough force with his knee to choke out George Floyd, but not enough that it would leave a mark. A goldilocks scenario where its just enough to kill but leave zero evidence
    This is like Russell's Teapot, an unprovable claim. It exists only to construct a scenario that can't be disprove by available evidence. No amount of evidence put forward by the defense could contradict the claim, because its based on no evidence and cannot be challenged by evidence.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The prosecutor also said that Floyd didn't look like someone who would OD on drugs so therefore he couldn't have OD'd

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The prosecutor during the trial pointed to the fact George Floyd had a ratio of fentanyl : norafentanyl metabolized in his system much different than most overdoses. This is because in most overdoses, they die before they can metabolize most of the fentanyl and thus have little metabolized.

        George Floyd was seen obviously high on fentanyl than morning and had polysubstance abuse markers from the night before, caffeine, THC, meth & fentanyl all at the same time. Then the police recovered partially digested fentanyl pills from the car he was handcuffed in, which could only have come from him spitting them back up. And he had an entire bag of fentanyl pills prior to being arrested.
        In order for george floyd to have the ratio of metabolized fentanyl found in his blood, the only two explanations are he either initially had something like 100x the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system and enough to instantly kill an elephant, a dose completely impossible for a human to take, OR he had an earlier dose of fentanyl and followed it with another one just prior to his death, consistent with the evidence.

        The prosecutors pointed to this ratio in order to say george floyd didn't overdose because it wasn't the same as single-usage deaths. They fully knew that george floyd took drugs more than once that day and chose to mislead the jury and try to bamboozle them with this irrelevant detail.
        And that's what defense lawyers normally do, try to confuse jurors and get them to latch onto meaningless details. Because the prosecution had inverted the standard of proof, all they had to do was get the jury misled into a bit of confusion and they would convict based on their prejudices, instead of acquitting for reasonable doubt.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yep I just didn't want to type all that out. Just a fucking joke and murder? Not even manslaughter? Like does no one see how stupid that is?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Same conviction as if he walked up to George Floyd, pulled out his gun and shot him in the head

            was no physical evidence of any potentially lethal harm done to George Floyd whatsoever
            Other than the 10 minute video of the cop kneeling on his neck.

            which shows George Floyd able to turn his head and speak because no pressure is being exerted on his neck

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      was no physical evidence of any potentially lethal harm done to George Floyd whatsoever
      Other than the 10 minute video of the cop kneeling on his neck.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        That is a move that has been used around the world in tons of different countries for probably 50 years. Fucking retards man. Also you can even see them use it in pretty much any movie where someone violent gets arrested going back decades.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          and it was specifically adopted because its a less risky way to restrain someone, because it doesn't impair their breathing.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Other than the 10 minute video of the cop kneeling on his neck.
        Which you obviously haven't seen

        If you watch the actual 30nminute footage (it's on youtube from 2 different angles) it's very obvious he was fucked on drugs and did absolutely everything he possibly could to force the officer to restrain him in incrementally forceful ways. He was saying "I can't breafe" long before the officer ever pinned him to the floor, among half a dozen other semi coherent mutterings.

        Watch it and be your own judge.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        A properly applied airchoke renders the victim unconscious in 2-5 minutes. A properly applied blood choke renders the victim unconscious in 10-30 seconds.

        Both render the victim unable speak immediately.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          and also leave marks

          George Floyd had no bruising, no abrasions, no petechial hemorrhaging, no subdermal trauma, no arterial wall damage, no nothing. Literally not a single mark upon him from the restraint.

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    So much zogbot ITT, unironically FUCK THE COPS.

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Given all the drugs he took he was probably a roidchud as well. Some over the counter dbol pills along with a shitty routine that he half-assedly did

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Okay explain to me how this 300 jacked up gymrat looking fella was completely and utterly powerless against some skinnyfat whitey that's shorter than him?
    How did he get overpowered physically so easily? Despite resisting arrest. I think it's something to do with genetics.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >90% blocked coronal arteries
      >3:1 left ventricular hypertrophy
      >2 std deviations abnormal heart size
      >extreme hypertension

      All the muscle mass in the world won't do jack shit if you have zero cardio

Your email address will not be published.