milk is a psyop. they boil all the nutrience out then sell it to you. its full of calcium which is actually bad for you, if you dont have enough k2 or vitamin d, the calcium will build up in your arteries and you'll die.
>milk is a psyop. they boil all the nutrience out then sell it to you.
That doesn't really make sense. That sounds like it would be an expensive process, what would they gain by doing that?
>That sounds like it would be an expensive process
the they i am talking about dont foot the bill, you do. they just make the rules and regulations. and they gain a weak, flabby, docile, populace that is more likely to die before pension kicks in
the e coli etc they say is in raw milk is propaganda. if you put any in liquid in a bucket that had feces in it, drinking the liquid would give you e coli.
What he's probably attempting to think of is pasteurization, which is the process of rapidly heating and cooling to kill off microbes and extend shelf life. Shit tons of studies have found it has little effect on the nutritional value of milk. Also, fortified milk has far more vitamin D than raw milk, so his concern with Hypercalcemia is more a problem with raw milk, if it was a problem at all (it's not).
Even if all his tinfoil hat conspiracies were true, you could just buy unpasteurized/raw milk anyway, unless you live in Canada.
>milk is a psyop. they boil all the nutrience out then sell it to you.
That doesn't really make sense. That sounds like it would be an expensive process, what would they gain by doing that?
>Shittons of studies
Yes and safe and effective. Reality is its a matter of cost effectiveness at the cost of quality. If you pasteurize milk you don't have to make sure the cows are producing it are healthy and the actual bar for producing it is much lower. Raw milk requires you to be on top of the health of the cow and have them regularly tested.
It's unequivocally better raw as even lactose intolerants can drink it >But muh study says no it doesn't
Bullshit studies purely for the purpose of justifying a cost saving measure and nothing more. It's just industry propaganda 101 >Institute cost saving measure that results in a worse product >Actually the thing we did is good for you and is much better than how it was and it may seem worse but its actually better as it gets rid of all those nasty contaminants that were in the milk that exist because we are a lazy and greedy corporation
All of that said I would skip raw milk and just skip to kefir and other fermented foods
>Kcal
>Good for muh bulk
>Sex
Uh cause you can easily drink a liter with each meal?
Is it bad to drink more than one liter per day ? I love milk but I'm scared to go beyond a bottle a day. I'm a pussy
I drink at least a quart per day. 2-3 gallons/wk
I hope not, I drink 1.25 L every day; still no adverse effects thus far
What about the farts?
theyre good
I don’t really notice any difference in farts
how to spot a lactose intolerant subhuman
No acne?
No acne
>scared to drink milk
wtf is wrong with you?
Once you surpass the half gallon a day mark you risk hypercalcemia.
It's high quality protein, good to bulk, and makes non-whites seethe
You're moronic, whites are the lactose-intolerant ones.
what?
Huh?
This is demonstrably false lol but that's what a public education gets you
>abundant
>cheap
Unless you live in the most unpleasant of third world countries even the poorest person can afford to drink like 8 pints a week
cheers!
The milk I buy has 60g of protein in 1 litre.
fricking post it then what kind of fricking milk is that
Come get it, it's fresh and made daily
dude i was sincere just post the milk i've never seen such milk where i live
I think he's talking about semen
oh
The stuff I have in Japan is 50g protein for 1L too anon. Low fat milk is best.
milk is a psyop. they boil all the nutrience out then sell it to you. its full of calcium which is actually bad for you, if you dont have enough k2 or vitamin d, the calcium will build up in your arteries and you'll die.
>milk is a psyop. they boil all the nutrience out then sell it to you.
That doesn't really make sense. That sounds like it would be an expensive process, what would they gain by doing that?
it's heat treated to make it "safe"
>Dr Axe
>co-founder, Ancient Nutrition
>commercial site attempting to shill off every moronic hipster diet fad known to man
Yup, totally legit.
do you drink raw milk?
>That sounds like it would be an expensive process
the they i am talking about dont foot the bill, you do. they just make the rules and regulations. and they gain a weak, flabby, docile, populace that is more likely to die before pension kicks in
the e coli etc they say is in raw milk is propaganda. if you put any in liquid in a bucket that had feces in it, drinking the liquid would give you e coli.
It's seriously meds time for you man, holy shit
the more schizo i get the better my life becomes. i am really optimistic, this is going to be a great decade for me
He psyop'd himself.
What he's probably attempting to think of is pasteurization, which is the process of rapidly heating and cooling to kill off microbes and extend shelf life. Shit tons of studies have found it has little effect on the nutritional value of milk. Also, fortified milk has far more vitamin D than raw milk, so his concern with Hypercalcemia is more a problem with raw milk, if it was a problem at all (it's not).
Even if all his tinfoil hat conspiracies were true, you could just buy unpasteurized/raw milk anyway, unless you live in Canada.
>unless you live in Canada.
I do. In america they use corporations to poison the people, but in the common wealth the government just does it.
Can you share the study
>Shittons of studies
Yes and safe and effective. Reality is its a matter of cost effectiveness at the cost of quality. If you pasteurize milk you don't have to make sure the cows are producing it are healthy and the actual bar for producing it is much lower. Raw milk requires you to be on top of the health of the cow and have them regularly tested.
It's unequivocally better raw as even lactose intolerants can drink it
>But muh study says no it doesn't
Bullshit studies purely for the purpose of justifying a cost saving measure and nothing more. It's just industry propaganda 101
>Institute cost saving measure that results in a worse product
>Actually the thing we did is good for you and is much better than how it was and it may seem worse but its actually better as it gets rid of all those nasty contaminants that were in the milk that exist because we are a lazy and greedy corporation
All of that said I would skip raw milk and just skip to kefir and other fermented foods
>dies of listeria
>calcium bad
if you are k2 deficient (which you are unless you are japanese) your body wont direct it to where it needs to go. thats bad
Now do 1% and skim
100ml is like a shot. Drink a 16oz glass and you're getting 16g. Drink two and you're getting 32g.