Only whites are natty

>black women roid 2x more
>Asian women roid 33% more
Than white men.

What do you make of this, fitizens?

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sample 5,000
    lol come back when you're sample size is 8,000,000,000 these results mean NOTHING

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Correct.
      You can know shit unless you've studied every shit in reality.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Brave Indian wisdom

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he's not a Bayesian
      >he's not a frequentist
      >he's a moron

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine if they just surveyed/interviewed high school and college athletes. How accurate would this be?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >imagine if they just surveyed [100% of the gymbro population]

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don’t imagine the number would decrease
          3% is the going rate for average people using anabolics, and that includes old people and toddlers.
          5-7% for younger people is a reasonable estimate.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            NTA but wrong about what? the study could be inaccurate in either direction. can you address the actual findings instead of sperging out about statistical theory? like this anon said (me)

            Please explain why you expect the result to be different with more people

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              meant for (You)

              Kid, if you're ignoring several key factors: you'll never even understand why you're wrong.

              Not my fault no one taught you the relevance of scale. You typically learn that just after high school. It's also known as scope. Feel free to tunnel vision on cherry picked stats, from an incomplete study.

              >n-no I'm right an-anon
              Sure ya are, lil buddy. Sure ya are. It's not your fault you're a dyel, you're just not through with puberty yet

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              As I said, homie. This sample size is far from large enough to accurately depict any relevant trend. It needs more data.

              An equivalent scenario would be as follows:
              Scientist takes 8oz glass of water from ocean to examine breakdown of life forms. During examination, scientist finds 1000 plankton, and 4 clusters of algae. Scientist now concludes that all water life consists of the exact breakdown of 4 clusters of algae to 1000 plankton.

              Obviously, common sense would dictate thst a much grander scope would be required to accurately depict the variety of life in the oceans. Meaning that a larger sample size would have to be gathered. Further study required would be the final outcome. As I have been saying to the morons in this thread (not you)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                okay but can you explain why you expect the results to be different with a larger sample

                just because it has a 5% chance to be inaccurate in either direction doesn't mean it's wrong.

                There are larger studies that confirm 3% is the going rate for steroid usage including the elderly and toddlers in that statistic, why do you so strongly believe the result is INCORRECT.
                INACCURATE and INCORRECT are two different matters. Please explain why you believe the conclusion to be inaccurate irrespective of the study's accuracy.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Please explain why you believe the conclusion to be INCORRECT**** irrespective of the study's statistical accuracy.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                For the sake of this conversation, let's ignore all medical necessity, and the tr00ns. And we focus solely on recreational usage of anabolic steroids/peds

                Where is the sample being taken from, is it an affluent area? Is it a more criminal area? Proximity to/availability of strength sports? How readily accessible are they? All of those directly inflence usage of peds (there are far more). There are varying differences in frequency of the above, as that will skew in either direction. In order to gather an accurate and account for any deviations, you require an average of the entire scope. This creates a trend (localizing in areas with certain influences) in order to get the average, you need to calculate the entirety of the area you are studying or trying to profile. After that, you establish a baseline (which can be broken down further into demographics if you so choose) which then Is influenced (up or down) by your trend.

                It's the same reasoning behind drug usage. Meth is really more often found in rural areas, heroin in cities/suburbs.

                When we start factoring for medical necessities (trt, and the others) you establish an entirely different average and trend. Those are two topics of the same category.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                umm.. can you please answer the question.

                3% use steroids, world wide. as in, probably hundreds of millions of records were used to estimate this figure.

                none of the shit you said matters at all.
                3% is the baseline and considering that this statistic, again, uses the elderly and children, it's not unreasonable to assume steroid-ready aged children on the cusp of their future have a higher incentive to use anabolics than some old man on his deathbed or a literal baby. It is a completely reasonable finding to say 5-7% of kids are using steroids, minimum.

                please explain why you believe this is INCORRECT, and elaborate no further on accuracies and variables nobody cares about.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Everything I said went over your head. It's OK lil buddy. You were answered, not my fault you didn't comprehend it.

                Here's a slightly larger sample size. Note how much different the numbers are.
                >you cannot accurately apply micro to macro
                Pic rel
                https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Weighted-Descriptive-Statistics-by-Anabolic-Steroid-Use_tbl2_232581475

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                can you even explain what those numbers mean on your chart

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Black person. Can you read? It's right there

                >Oh wait he's being serious

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                please explain your chart if it's so obvious smart guy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lmfao

                Step 1: read

                Everything is labeled. If you cannot figure it out, it's clear that you're outclassed. Just tap out and stop responding. You're making yourself look mighty foolish here.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he can't even read his own chart so he deflects
                lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh I can read it. I even explained it when I posted it.

                You're probably the dumbest person I've had the displeasure of talking with today.

                How old are you

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh I can read it. I even explained it when I posted it.

                You're probably the dumbest person I've had the displeasure of talking with today.

                How old are you

                >year 1997
                >survey
                >women are 30% of steroid users
                ... yeah nothing wrong with the stats there

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                5x the sample size of whatever outdated study op posts.

                Regardless, scale changed quite a bit.
                >micro cannot be applied to macro, this is common knowledge

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >outdated
                >2002
                >you post a 1997 study
                >it's valid
                ok.
                just admit you're a butthurt Black person

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                2002 was 22 years ago (longer than you have been alive)

                That is just as outdated as what I've posted. However, larger scope stats show tighter margin of error. Not my fault you cannot read.

                I'm stronger than you, and I'm clearly smarter. Where's your mensa membership again?

                Womp womp

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >i-it's outdated
                >2002
                This one blackanon has been jumping through hoops the entire thread

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Dude spent 2 days coping

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are you sure they didn't misinterpret higher test levels in black males as "steroid usage"?

      Why is every statistic
      >whites good
      >non-whites trashy subhumans
      I’m starting to think maybe the white natsoc chuds are on to something

      https://i.imgur.com/O5vqbrl.jpeg

      >asian sample size = 4

      A study done in what looks to be one school.
      >quick let's say it applies to 8 billion people!!

      Op is a dyel

      ayo bix nood

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We wuz natty n sheeeit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope troony

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are you sure they didn't misinterpret higher test levels in black males as "steroid usage"?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nice cope
      im sure you'll convince your fellow 80IQs

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't they then also register their higher estrogen levels as HRT usage?

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What do you make of this, fitizens?
    That I need to find an asian muscle mommy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This JFC

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is every statistic
    >whites good
    >non-whites trashy subhumans
    I’m starting to think maybe the white natsoc chuds are on to something

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its more like
      >95% of whites good
      >only 85% of non-whites good
      which means most people in the world are great people and other races are being brought down by a minority of frickheads.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >asian sample size = 4

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >cannot read statistics
      are you fricking moronic? if the sample size was 4, how would the percent be 3? lmao dumbass.

      google 'chi square' and educate yourself.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >p-value = sample size
      >this is the guy that tells you to roid

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        P value = person value
        Meaning the number of persons

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          god bless you anon

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I hope you’re joking, but on the off chance you’re not, see pic related

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Injections go in arm, not head.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks for reminding me the people on this website have never completed any higher education or high level math.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    everyone who's not white or native american suffers from an inferiority complex i guess

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is only 1 black natty in my gym
    If black boys roid 3x more and 30% of men in the gym already roid that would mean only 10% of black boys in the gym are natty. There about about 10 black boys in my gym and only 1 is natty. The stats play out too well, is the CIA behind this? Who am I kidding lmao ofc they are.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > The stats play out too well, is the CIA behind this? Who am I kidding lmao ofc they are.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The CIA ISN’T responsible for the voices in my head

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >high schoolers are blasting roids
    >middle schoolers are blasting MORE roids
    this is bullshit right? I'm reminded of those questionnaires we had to do in school that no one took seriously (every third kid saying "yes" to every "have you taken this drug" Q and such).
    Sauce, OP?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this is bullshit right?
      no, i knew 4 kids in middle school that were confirmed using steroids because police were involved, they had crazy parents that wanted their kids to be NFL or NBA stars

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        damn that sucks

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >they smoke cities
    Truee
    >they drank that sheeeit
    Amen sista
    >they got that PACK
    Haaa! Yeeeah
    >smoking crack
    We out here
    >fenty
    Got them 30s
    >steroids
    LOL NO BLACKS DONT USE STEROIDS COPE

    What causes this reaction from dark skinned individuals?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Same as everything else. They are insecure and delusional with fragile egos. They are a ver vicarious people if you haven’t noticed. I’ll provide several examples of what I mean
      >nig sees Mike Tyson being an amaizng boxer and genetic phenom
      >DAS RITE WE DA BES WE NATURALLY SKILLED FIGHTERS *has to sucker punch, has worse than the average untrained persons fighting stance and punching form, usually has to fight with friends, will pull out a gun if he loses*
      Or
      >nig sees [literally any movie where they make any black character cool]
      >I KNOW DAS RITE WE DA BES HES JUST LIKE ME :O
      Or
      >all this garbage nonsense woke soi level media trying to coddle black people just to keep them hypnotized
      >I KNOW DAS DITE WE DA BES
      They, largely due to being fed bullshit media, believe they are oppressed and victimized and they think may minor accomplishment in life took 10x the effort for them than white counterparts. Even though as of the last 15 years the reverse is true. They unironically believe an individual black persona success, or more to your point wrong doing and failures, directly translates to them as a whole in some way. So them being told they have it harder (in reality no they don’t) they see any random black whether fictional or IRL doing well and it makes them think some bullshit along the lines of “SEE I CAN DO IT I CAN OVERCOME ADVERSITY IM THE SHIT IM SUPERIOR” as sad as this may sound I’m not even exaggerating. Also it’s a form of mental masturbation for the lazy Black to stay complacent and not actually work for the things they claim to want lol

      Tell a black so&so athletes popped for gear and they’ll lose their shit saying it’s a lie meant to keep the black man down and racist. Tell them Ryan Garcia popped for a pussy sarm with zero benefit and it’s “SEE THATS HOW HE BEAT HANEY NO WAY A NON BLACK COULD TRULY WIN AGAINST A BLACK BOXER”.

      TL;DR: coping, emotional, weak mind

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Same as everything else. They are insecure and delusional with fragile egos. They are a ver vicarious people if you haven’t noticed. I’ll provide several examples of what I mean
      >nig sees Mike Tyson being an amaizng boxer and genetic phenom
      >DAS RITE WE DA BES WE NATURALLY SKILLED FIGHTERS *has to sucker punch, has worse than the average untrained persons fighting stance and punching form, usually has to fight with friends, will pull out a gun if he loses*
      Or
      >nig sees [literally any movie where they make any black character cool]
      >I KNOW DAS RITE WE DA BES HES JUST LIKE ME :O
      Or
      >all this garbage nonsense woke soi level media trying to coddle black people just to keep them hypnotized
      >I KNOW DAS DITE WE DA BES
      They, largely due to being fed bullshit media, believe they are oppressed and victimized and they think may minor accomplishment in life took 10x the effort for them than white counterparts. Even though as of the last 15 years the reverse is true. They unironically believe an individual black persona success, or more to your point wrong doing and failures, directly translates to them as a whole in some way. So them being told they have it harder (in reality no they don’t) they see any random black whether fictional or IRL doing well and it makes them think some bullshit along the lines of “SEE I CAN DO IT I CAN OVERCOME ADVERSITY IM THE SHIT IM SUPERIOR” as sad as this may sound I’m not even exaggerating. Also it’s a form of mental masturbation for the lazy Black to stay complacent and not actually work for the things they claim to want lol

      Tell a black so&so athletes popped for gear and they’ll lose their shit saying it’s a lie meant to keep the black man down and racist. Tell them Ryan Garcia popped for a pussy sarm with zero benefit and it’s “SEE THATS HOW HE BEAT HANEY NO WAY A NON BLACK COULD TRULY WIN AGAINST A BLACK BOXER”.

      TL;DR: coping, emotional, weak mind

      Oh and just to make one last point on the thread topic. This is why blacks use steroids. Media portrays them as these super humans, or it’ll show big naturally swole and strong black guy, when the reality is most are not that. Most are fat or scrawny and shorter. So they feel they don’t measure up despite being the average member of their race. Porn does the same shit. They’re just insecure sheeps. Keep this in mind whenever you see random black people and watch how they act and you won’t be able to handle how insecure they are

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yup. They’re so insecure they’ll fight you for looking at them lmao. Wild animals are more polite than the average black guy

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >They’re so insecure they’ll fight you for looking at them lmao.
          I've seen this before and yet I can't imagine how it's possible.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I cannot think of anything more moronic than an Asian woman taking steroids.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not like they can build an ass otherwise.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >taking var for an ass
        what a moronic trade off

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Im pretty sure my gym receptionist took it or something else because she had a massive dumper and a few months later she had a Hank Hill ass lmao.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They don't need to.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you think they stay skinny forever by nature or what?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. They just don't shovel down enormous amounts of goy slop every second of the day.
        And besides, steroids aren't exactly known for keeping you skinny. That's kind of the exact opposite of what they do.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Blacks and asians are inherently dishonest

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A study done in what looks to be one school.
    >quick let's say it applies to 8 billion people!!

    Op is a dyel

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >4000 people
      >1 school
      what fricking school did you attend

      a sample size of 30 is the minimum to be statistically significant

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        operation warpspeed conducted vaccine research on less than 30 people for the first iterations of the covid vaccine

        Half of medicine science is based on smaller sample sizes before it becomes mainstream

        a bunch of hypertrophy science is based on less than 30 people.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lol and look at what a clusterfrick the covid vaccine has been. Don't tell us thst you're quadruple vaxxed and boosted now

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lemme guess you're an ultra virile pureblood with 10 kids imbued with divine wisdom from god

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yes. My blood is pure, continue to seethe.
              Yes. My God says "don't be afraid", so I trusted... still here and unscathed. Continue to seethe

              You capitulated and gave into fear, and the lightest of pressure. Your choices in life label you as nothing more than cattle. I could not imagine being such a pushover.

              >he got an experimental clot shot for a cold with a 99.98% survival rate, all because he was bribed with a cheeseburger

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                God bless you anon

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                God bless you too

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A sample size that small is only significant for formulating a theory which ultimately fails when tested against any sample size larger than .000000001% of a population. Top kek

        >went to school in the suburbs.

        >op is still a dyel homosexual

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >sample size that smal
          >4000
          >small

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            4000 is a huge sample, Anon.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            When applied to a population numbering in the billions, its a worthless sample size. Still so in the millions range, hundreds of thousands, MAYBE in the tens of thousands range.

            Go ahead and crunch the numbers....
            >when establishing a trend, you need more than a .0003% instance to establish correlation, you absolute Mongoloid

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Please explain why you expect the result to be different with more people

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's not how statistics work.
                4000 is more than sufficient to make accurate statements, assuming they made a mostly random selection.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6970301/#:~:text=A%20sample%20that%20is%20larger,hence%20provide%20more%20accurate%20results.

                You're both fricking moronic.

                >larger sample sizes establish accuracy, and actually create a standard deviation, as well as a trend that's relevant (anything below .01-0.5 is irrelevant)

                You would have known that if you graduated high school
                Pic rel, feel free to search it yourself and scroll down

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Would work better if you weren't too dumb to read what your quoting. To quote the same article as you:
                >So how large should a sample be?
                >In hypothesis testing studies, this is mathematically calculated, conventionally, as the sample size necessary to be 80% certain of identifying a statistically significant outcome should the hypothesis be true for the population, with P for statistical significance set at 0.05.
                >Some investigators power their studies for 90% instead of 80%, and some set the threshold for significance at 0.01 rather than 0.05.
                Now why don't you check the p-value in OP's pic?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I read the whole thing lil guy. It backs up what I said. However I can tell you stopped reading right where I placed my bait numbers.... read further down the page, homosexual
                >the sample size is too small, as are the findings. Simple as.
                Continue to cope

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You could have just admitted that you have neither reading comprehension nor argument, instead of proving your cerebral disfunction.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lol go ahead and explain to the class how a sample size of 4 thousand, applies to a population of the USA (the only relevant country)

                Come on now lil guy, you can do it

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He already explained that, but given blacks have an average IQ of 80 you clearly won't understand it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not black, and my iq is 140. What's yours? Drop your mensa membership info, and I'll drop mine

                As I've proved several times before, this study is irrelevant, until it's done on a larger sample size. For now, all it proves is "more study required"

                Continue to seethe, or drop your mensa membership info, so you can be taken seriously. I'll provide mine, when you do.
                >you can't, and you're beneath me.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're black and your IQ is 80 which is why you don't understand how these studies work and why you need to cope by larping that you're white.

                Another anon already debunked your cope here

                Would work better if you weren't too dumb to read what your quoting. To quote the same article as you:
                >So how large should a sample be?
                >In hypothesis testing studies, this is mathematically calculated, conventionally, as the sample size necessary to be 80% certain of identifying a statistically significant outcome should the hypothesis be true for the population, with P for statistical significance set at 0.05.
                >Some investigators power their studies for 90% instead of 80%, and some set the threshold for significance at 0.01 rather than 0.05.
                Now why don't you check the p-value in OP's pic?

                which you ignored because youre a moron and can't read

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Top kek. Never said I was white either, shrimp. You're seething. I'm waiting for you to drop your mensa membership info, I'll drop mine.

                >there is a reason why the global standard is multiple studies on the same phenomenon, which encompasses on average 10x the number of people in this "study"

                You're still inferior to me. Post your physique with timestamp, I want to see how flabby you are

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                We know you're not white, you don't have the intelligence. And you still haven't responded to the post that debunked your claims you moronic ape.

                Maybe stick to figuring out what the beeping in the hallway is instead of larping as white on the internet.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's already been responded to. You're still seething. Clearly you don't understand scale. I'm part of mensa, you can't even get in AHAHAHAHA
                >I'm smarter than you.
                >I'm stronger than you.
                >I frick hotter women than you.
                >my house is bigger than yours.

                I'd recommend you hit 315 on bench before you start taking testosterone.

                Continue to seethe, I already know you're a manlet. Let's see that male pattern baldness, along with your flabby lil arms

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're baiting now because you know I'm right

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Kid, if you're ignoring several key factors: you'll never even understand why you're wrong.

                Not my fault no one taught you the relevance of scale. You typically learn that just after high school. It's also known as scope. Feel free to tunnel vision on cherry picked stats, from an incomplete study.

                >n-no I'm right an-anon
                Sure ya are, lil buddy. Sure ya are. It's not your fault you're a dyel, you're just not through with puberty yet

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Top kek. Never said I was white either, shrimp. You're seething. I'm waiting for you to drop your mensa membership info, I'll drop mine.

                >there is a reason why the global standard is multiple studies on the same phenomenon, which encompasses on average 10x the number of people in this "study"

                You're still inferior to me. Post your physique with timestamp, I want to see how flabby you are

                Now adjust for SCALE, you Mongoloid

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >my iq is 140. What's yours? Drop your mensa membership info, and I'll drop mine

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                what color is your mensa membership??

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              That's not how statistics work.
              4000 is more than sufficient to make accurate statements, assuming they made a mostly random selection.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Teachergay here. We have around 3500 students K-12. In the senior school year groups range from 300-350. It is, however, a notably large school population. I think there are around 450 full time staff

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >whites are only people with souls
    >rarely roid

    I believe it.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yeah because minorities have nothing else to offer than their bodies, kind of sad when you think about it.

    Be me
    >White
    >Ripped
    >Wealthy
    >Charming
    >Described as extremely attractive
    >A good man with morals and values
    >Natty

    If I posted a pic of my white GF 0 out of 6.000.000 ISTners would believe it was true.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Post face with timestamp. You know the rules kid,

      Cute larp though

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nice try homo

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Larper detected.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >and world record lifts went up 100lbs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >squat suit
      >bench shirt
      >belt
      >wraps
      >chalk

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >7% of middle schoolers roid

    im going to get mogged by gen alpha

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >7.6% of middle schoolers
      I guess they explain the nuts physiques on 19 year old nowadays.

      I wanna know where the Chinese varbies are tho.

      you guys didn't know that kid, football team, looked old for his age, got held back a year or two?

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >7.6% of middle schoolers
    I guess they explain the nuts physiques on 19 year old nowadays.

    I wanna know where the Chinese varbies are tho.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOO BLACK WOMEN CAN'T TAKE STEROIDS!!! NOOOO!!!
    Wyd now whiteboy??? she gon clap your cheeks reverse pile drive, Amazon style

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >please ma’am no… I have a girlfriend
      >>yeah but yo gf white, you single to me, frick Emily gon do to me ytboi?
      >this isn’t right
      >>stfu and unzip yo pants I’m gonna frick you silly whiteboy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Read every word

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Black women roid 2x more than white men
    LOL what the hell

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WYPIPO DONT SEASON DEY MUSCLES

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    white men dont need to roid, i choose to be 195 but i could be 220 and still be low bf %

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You look like you struggle with 225.
      >no rear delts
      >shoulders not capped
      >scrawny arms
      >not much fat (good shit dude)

      You're still a dyel

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Powershitter lardass

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nah, I'm just past puberty

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >White people value truth and honesty
    >Other races value cheating and lying
    Seems accurate

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah it's basically this. anyone ever trusting someone from the lesser races is morally and legally an absolute idiot

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it left out most races in the world though, and included two 'artificial' races (american black and hispanic)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sample size is far too small to hold relevance towards extrapolation. Doesn't factor in reasoning for usage (growth hormones for kids that won't get taller, various endocrinology disorders presenting in puberty/prepubescence, troons, other medical necessities)

        As you said, it doesn't include all ethnicities. This sample size is probably from one school system in the boonies.
        Op stumbled upon this and immediately takes it out of context, thinking he "blew the case wide open"
        >too bad he lacked the ability to factor for causality.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >this study would TOTALLY be different if it sampled everybody!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We know this is hard for you to understand, that is why you're here. You don't understand that accuracy is required. To you, accuracy=different=not comprehensible to your preconceived notion based off incomplete data.

            I can tell you're not a researcher. It's OK though, lil guy 🙂 daddy's got ya

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Literally the entire world operates outside of your standards for accuracy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. As I live in the real world of objective reality, it follows the same data trend. You're just letting emotion cloud your judgement. It's OK though, happens.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It makes sense. Whitey is historically the only race that tries to play fair.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Whitey is historically the only race that tries to play fair.
      And we still win more than 50% of the time

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's because playing fair actually pays off in the long run

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do Hmong people use so much steroids

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Powerlifting is their sport of choice and they’re more honest than other ethnicities + volatile sample size I imagine but idk

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Powerlifting is their sport of choice
        Big if true

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The Hmong people are an indigenous group in East Asia and Southeast Asia.
    >H mong is a real term
    Holy frick

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don’t make fun of Hmongoloids!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick is a hmong?

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol why do white people on here cope so hard?
    >muh roids
    Stop being weak and fricking lift you moggable losers

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I just CANT lift without roids but YOURE insecure!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >implying I roid
        Nice strawman you weak homosexual. Post body so I can laugh.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your skin is the color of poop on your best day and your worst day. I could have jaundice and still mog you. Commit suicide and end your unnecessary suffering.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Post body so I can laugh.
        That goes for you too. I bet you won't

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What do you mean?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Whites already dominate strength competitions. We have higher grip strength. Cope.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can tell who’s a Black person because they can never do math or know how charts work or what per capita lol it’s funny af

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wtf is Hmong, lol

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      a branch of the chinese ethnicity, southern variation
      like Jackie Chan and Bruce lee phenotypes

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Someone had a stroke in this thread what the hell is all this bickering and arguing, you didn't even need OP to post this, it's obvious

    non-whites use more drugs, duh.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >low class Black folk and mountain asiatics most likely to use steroids
    Water is wet, huh?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *