Population level decline in female testosterone levels

If you search “testosterone levels in men” you get thousands of articles and studies about population level decline in mens testosterone levels over time. All sorts of explanations like micro plastics, estrogens in water, climate change blah blah.

But search for the same thing in women and you get nothing except talk of menopause and declining levels as they age. Absolutely nothing about population level statistics on test levels in women over time.

Why is this question seemingly not ask by anyone, ever? If environmental factors are impacting mens test levels then you’d expect similar impacts on current generations of women compared to earlier generations, but I can’t even find a single instance of anyone asking this question, let alone studying it. Why?

  1. 6 days ago
    nutefag

    interesting

    also way more of a stigma around steroids then estrogen supplements

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Look into DES FROM the 50s

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Estrogen supplements just don’t do as much. Same reason why ftm trannies can often pull it off but mtf trannies just look pitiful.

  2. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    It would be harder to measure in women since on average they have 15x less testosterone than men
    You are going down an interesting path however

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Yes if read that several places now, that because the levels are so low they don’t/can’t/won’t measure it. It’s bullshit and I’m not sure why they even bother with such an excuse. On a mL per mL basis an woman’s body produces more testosterone than estrogen. Measuring this is not a technological barrier.

  3. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD SEX WITH HWD

  4. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    It is asked. Women are menstruating (aka entering puberty) earlier than ever, and the environmental estrogen is largely the culprit.

    The issue is population decline is a much bigger issue to the health of a society. Look at Japan and China. Both are facing social and economic crisis due to the lack of people having babies.

    If I am and only child and I marry an only child that means right off the bat we together have four elderly parents to take care of. Let alone if we have kids of our own. Also with people living longer and longer that means me and my wife are on the hook for hundreds of thousands in potential health care costs of the govt doesn’t help.

    Problem is the tax base has now shrunk and isn’t pulling in as much as the elderly generation which is larger. So what do you do? Raise taxes? That’s going to make it even more intenable for the current generation to be able to have a family:

    The two only kids who got married will now have to account for four elderly grandparents that can’t care for themselves for who knows how long and at what cost. Children and their needs, including education, and in top of that you want to raise taxes on them?

    It’s a powder keg waiting to blow.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >estrogen
      I’m talking specifically about testosterone in women, over time, on a population level. The internet, which has everything, has absolutely nothing on this specific question.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Women are menstruating (aka entering puberty) earlier than ever
      us unclebros are suffering

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Did you find any papers suggesting environmental estrogen as the culprit? As fas as I know the trigger for puberty in girls is leptin, produced primarily by fat cells. You need GnRH release over a longer period of time, not just temporaroly elevated levels from environmental exposure.

      A more likely culprit is the obesity epidemic, increased leptin levels due to excess fat.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Stop falling for the “need more working age people or economy will die” gnomish tricks. That shit is only pushed to get more brainless immigrants.

      The truth is getting a kid to 25 when he actually starts paying real taxes costs the state more money than taking care of some old fart. Less kids outweigh the cost of the old people.

  5. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I think it’s already accepted that the results are going to be awful considering most women are intentionally making themselves temporarily infertile by taking daily hormones

  6. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    They're women.
    Nobody's doing medical research on them.
    Science has just about gotten started on the menopause, and on breast cancer that threatens tits.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao, breast cancer research recieves more funding than any other type.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        As it should, it benefits everyone

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Science has just about gotten started on the menopause, and on breast cancer that threatens tits.
      Bullshit.
      The survival rate in my country for breast cancer was already 87% 10 years ago. It's above 95% now. I know because my mother had it.
      On the other hand no one is even mentioning testicular cancer which is the most common in men between the age of 15 and 30.
      I know because I got it. I didn't even know I should have worried about cancer until later in life and now I'm fucking sterile.
      Fuck women bitching about their useless ass udders.

      >"ABLOBLO MY BOOBA IS UNEVEN NOOWWWWW!"
      At least you can still produce with one you fucking COW

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        wew. you can completely focus on ascending now. turn your curse into a blessing

  7. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Testoterone in women isnt as much of a concern as test in men. The equivalent would be looking at estrogen levels in women, which seem to be rising and has had more research done about it

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      The answer is pretty simple. Sexual revolution released women into the workforce with made up jobs that drive down your wages and since they're not skilled they just get management roles so most men have a woman as a boss/supervisor. Testosterone is produced on a "as needed" basis which is why you shutdown if you inject. If you spend most of the day getting brow beat by a woman, spending your days in a feminine office, your test lowers.

      I think the microplastics are probably more responsible for heart disease and cancer, like how a pesticide was responsible for polio by literally rotting a hole in your gut, which lead to infection of the spine and then paralysis.

      We already know that rise is because of birth control.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        God damn you are delusional. Do a study comparing test levels in men who work for a woman to men who work for a man and see how big the difference is. Don’t think your theory is gonna hold up.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Seething office cuck

  8. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Well to start with it's a lot more PC for scientists to study and talk about the emasculation of men and their "declining behavior". More PC basically = more funding, interest, etc. For some reason modern society is uncomfortable talking about things that influence female behavior.

    Also, when it comes to declining procreation and birthrates it's 99% due to the behaviors of men (not women). That is, we're having less sex because MEN aren't "hunting" for sex (for whatever reason). Women have the power to accept or decline advances by men, but it's up to men to make those advances in the first place. There are exceptions but that's usually how it works. So when scientists and sociologists study declining sex/birth rates (like in Japan or Nordic countries), they usually "blame" the behavior of men.

    Just my 2 cents

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      imagine hunting for sex in 2022, you kill dragons, slays chads accomplish the impossible only to be told by sub 4 women that you are not tall and manly enough.
      Fuck that shit with a big F.

      I am 30 and a virgin and old enough to see a bad deal when I see one. No fucking way am I going to dance monkey only to waste my time.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >I am 30 and a virgin
        how did this happen?

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Bro he just told you, he's a supreme gentleman whose mommy told him he's better than a sub-4 woman

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine being a genetic dead end and not even being able to get pussy

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >I am 30 and a virgin
        Your post said that loud enough

  9. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Because they haven't found any changes in hormones other than girls starting puberty earlier like another poster said, and that seems to be caused by a lot of fat in modern diets. If you aren't finding any evidence of something, then that probably means there isn't an issue.

  10. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    This might be the most beautiful girl I’ve ever seen. I can’t stop staring. I might actually leave my wife and just try to find this creature who I’m not sure can even exist on this plane. Fug.

Your email address will not be published.