>staple of the human diet
how much fruit was there when muh hg were living in permafrost (by choice because they were following megafauna around) for hundreds of years at a time?
learn to fricking read and argue the point, if it was a "staple" of our diet, why does fossil record show people moving into iced over land and staying there to hunt, and what kinds of fruits were there.
pears? bananas? apples?
what
kind
of
fruits
were
there
I wonder if, much like PoC and milk, Caucasoids cannot properly process fructose. Also why did you two go so far back in time? There's are thousands of years of human existence in which fruit was probably available - at least for humans that fricked off to the Americas or stayed in lower Asia. Either way this beaner is gonna enjoy his fruit and milk.
that's interesting but humans are humans, there is not a case in nature in which two members of the same species have two different diets, but that's a whole other wasp nest.
anyway my point is that most fruit was most definetly not the balls of sugar we are used to today, and still, most of them are inedible and hgs would not rely on them, the only thing that makes sense is to eat some to get avoid starvation untill the next kill.
also people migrated to follow animal herds, not fruit.
If you really wanna see how not eating fruits works out for populations living in cold wastelands, you should look up inuits and all the health issues they have.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28561302/
>study tldr: we don't know lol >It is hypothesized that the accelerated bone loss among the Inuit and Inupiat reflects higher production and utilization of the thyroid hormones, T4 and T3 , as a mechanism of cold adaptation through enhanced nonshivering thermogenesis.
what does fructose have to do with thyroid function anyway, if anything diabeetus people have almost always also thyroid problems
no; cutting carbs HIDES it. a body's insulin resistance won't show if it doesn't need to handle blood glucose.
treating != curing
the only thing that causes a reversal of type 2 diabetes is weight loss below a threshold that removes the fat in the pancreas.
so LOSING WEIGHT reverses it, of which one method of weight loss may be cutting calories from sugar (or fat or protein or starch or whatever you'd like; just cut calories)
doctors have reversed diabetes on a 100% white table sugar diet, 100% white rice diets. it isn't the macronutrient breakdown that matters for reversing diabetes, simply lose weight
2 years ago
Anonymous
>a body's insulin resistance won't show if it doesn't need to handle blood glucose
no cutting sugar literally improves inuslin resistance. and no one doctor a hundred years ago with a few cherry picked cases of a starvation diet of sugar and rice doesnt outweigh all the clinical trial evidence.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>doctors have reversed diabetes on a 100% white table sugar diet, 100% white rice diets
I'd believe you if people on heavy carb diets haven't gotten diabetes on low bodyweight like athletes for example.
Type 2 Diabetes appears as a result of triglyceride penetration of the liver and, subsequently and most importantly, the pancreas.
Propensity for T2D is hereditary. Each person has a capacity for subcutaneous fat storage after which fat begins depositing in the organs (liver and pancreas, most importantly for our topic).
This is why people of certain ancestry can get MASSIVE before diabetes appears, but people of Japanese ancestry, for example, become diabetic at much lower body fat levels.
Once you pass that body fat threshold, the body begins depositing triglycerides in the liver and pancreas.
This is the ultimate cause of diabetes. You can become T2Diabetic on a zero carb diet if you consume excess calories and reach a body weight beyond that threshold.
It is obviously far more unlikely if you are, for example, only consuming meat, but with high enough caloric consumption from protein and fat, you absolutely can end up type 2 diabetic.
This is why we see type 2 diabetes reversal is caused by adequate weight loss, regardless of the diet used to achieve that weight loss: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29221645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399621/
2 years ago
Anonymous
your body is wasting away
2 years ago
Anonymous
Bro I just housed 4 eggies for a snack.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>doctors have reversed diabetes on a 100% white table sugar diet, 100% white rice diets
I'd believe you if people on heavy carb diets haven't gotten diabetes on low bodyweight like athletes for example.
does too~
if you think these images show different things in relation to cell metabolism, especially regarding mitocondria, gtfo this thread before you get raped in basic fricking chemistry
A little too much alcohol is bad for him
Some kratom is also bad for him
Madafinil the day after drinking, also bad for him
Phenibut with modafinil also not very good for him
And also steroids
When the frick are we going to get artificial livers?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE FRUTCTERINO NOOO NO THE BORKIN FORKIN FRUIT-SUGARINO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
This is your brain on fructose.
show me the benis on fructose
i'm going to post your ass on fructose if you don't behave
>He consumes a foods that have been a staple of the human diet since hunter-gatherer times
>staple of the human diet
how much fruit was there when muh hg were living in permafrost (by choice because they were following megafauna around) for hundreds of years at a time?
Not all of the planet was frozen over morono. The majority of humans were eating whatever fruit was in season
learn to fricking read and argue the point, if it was a "staple" of our diet, why does fossil record show people moving into iced over land and staying there to hunt, and what kinds of fruits were there.
pears? bananas? apples?
what
kind
of
fruits
were
there
I wonder if, much like PoC and milk, Caucasoids cannot properly process fructose. Also why did you two go so far back in time? There's are thousands of years of human existence in which fruit was probably available - at least for humans that fricked off to the Americas or stayed in lower Asia. Either way this beaner is gonna enjoy his fruit and milk.
that's interesting but humans are humans, there is not a case in nature in which two members of the same species have two different diets, but that's a whole other wasp nest.
anyway my point is that most fruit was most definetly not the balls of sugar we are used to today, and still, most of them are inedible and hgs would not rely on them, the only thing that makes sense is to eat some to get avoid starvation untill the next kill.
also people migrated to follow animal herds, not fruit.
>The majority of humans were eating whatever fruit was in season
lol
If you really wanna see how not eating fruits works out for populations living in cold wastelands, you should look up inuits and all the health issues they have.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28561302/
>study tldr: we don't know lol
>It is hypothesized that the accelerated bone loss among the Inuit and Inupiat reflects higher production and utilization of the thyroid hormones, T4 and T3 , as a mechanism of cold adaptation through enhanced nonshivering thermogenesis.
what does fructose have to do with thyroid function anyway, if anything diabeetus people have almost always also thyroid problems
>he still thinks sugar causes diabetus
lmao the absolute state of morons
cutting sugar reverses it
no; cutting carbs HIDES it. a body's insulin resistance won't show if it doesn't need to handle blood glucose.
treating != curing
the only thing that causes a reversal of type 2 diabetes is weight loss below a threshold that removes the fat in the pancreas.
so LOSING WEIGHT reverses it, of which one method of weight loss may be cutting calories from sugar (or fat or protein or starch or whatever you'd like; just cut calories)
doctors have reversed diabetes on a 100% white table sugar diet, 100% white rice diets. it isn't the macronutrient breakdown that matters for reversing diabetes, simply lose weight
>a body's insulin resistance won't show if it doesn't need to handle blood glucose
no cutting sugar literally improves inuslin resistance. and no one doctor a hundred years ago with a few cherry picked cases of a starvation diet of sugar and rice doesnt outweigh all the clinical trial evidence.
Type 2 Diabetes appears as a result of triglyceride penetration of the liver and, subsequently and most importantly, the pancreas.
Propensity for T2D is hereditary. Each person has a capacity for subcutaneous fat storage after which fat begins depositing in the organs (liver and pancreas, most importantly for our topic).
This is why people of certain ancestry can get MASSIVE before diabetes appears, but people of Japanese ancestry, for example, become diabetic at much lower body fat levels.
Once you pass that body fat threshold, the body begins depositing triglycerides in the liver and pancreas.
This is the ultimate cause of diabetes. You can become T2Diabetic on a zero carb diet if you consume excess calories and reach a body weight beyond that threshold.
It is obviously far more unlikely if you are, for example, only consuming meat, but with high enough caloric consumption from protein and fat, you absolutely can end up type 2 diabetic.
This is why we see type 2 diabetes reversal is caused by adequate weight loss, regardless of the diet used to achieve that weight loss: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29221645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399621/
your body is wasting away
Bro I just housed 4 eggies for a snack.
>doctors have reversed diabetes on a 100% white table sugar diet, 100% white rice diets
I'd believe you if people on heavy carb diets haven't gotten diabetes on low bodyweight like athletes for example.
cutting sugar and increasing exercise literally cures it
The Inuit didn't eat a high protein diet. This paper is nonsense
It even notes most of the populations studied had normal bone density. It was only one sample that didn't. Either way this paper is probably junk
>>He consumes a foods that have been a staple of the human diet since hunter-gatherer times
since forever really, our ape ancestors ate a lot of fruit
The fruits we have now are not the fruits of the past. The same with vegetables. Humans have heavily selected for the current traits of fruits and veg
>He consumes staple foods that are genetically modified to be 1000 times sweeter than the hunter-gatherer times
I'm trans btw
Then die!
Top tier shitposting
Dude could have put in high alcohol consumption in the greentext yet chose to be filtered by an apple and 2 bananas
fructose metabolizes into the same byproducts of alcohol
It doesn't you mongoloid
does too~
if you think these images show different things in relation to cell metabolism, especially regarding mitocondria, gtfo this thread before you get raped in basic fricking chemistry
I eat tons of fruit and my liver panel is perfect
>Cue the ketard reddit img
powerful, Drumpf is finished
A little too much alcohol is bad for him
Some kratom is also bad for him
Madafinil the day after drinking, also bad for him
Phenibut with modafinil also not very good for him
And also steroids
When the frick are we going to get artificial livers?