Should I just stop running like a retard and do some sprinting to be jacked af?

Should I just stop running like a moron and do some sprinting to be jacked af?

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yes, humans aren't meant to run long distances, there is no naturally occurring situation in which you would

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Chasing prey dumbass

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you're a dumbass Black person prey were chased by throwing rocks, spears, or with bows, or walking them down to exhaustion in some climates
        imagine thinking you can run under the sun for hours when the water bottle wasn't even invented oh no no no

        humans aren't meant to run long distances

        post skeleton

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >water bottle
          You dumb fricking Black person, they used water pouches made out of animal skins.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'd make a retort about lifting not even being practical but you don't even lift. Also, different anon

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You can make water bottles from animal: skins, intestines, bladders, etc.

          Humans also store water in them better than animals so the animal will die of thirst long before you do.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >You can make water bottles from animal: skins, intestines, bladders, etc.
            No you cant

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >imagine thinking you can run under the sun for hours when the water bottle wasn't even invented
          Holy kek, my sides

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >needing water while you run
            Hydration is a battle that was decided before you began.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >imagine thinking you can run under the sun for hours when the water bottle wasn't even invented
          Peak bugman statement right there

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >You can make water bottles from animal: skins, intestines, bladders, etc.
          No you cant

          You can, you can even make water bottles from VEGGIES
          >picrel is a Calabash, used as a water bottle for centuries

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          im 6ft 220 Black person, i never run because i dont need to run from anything
          that being said, humans are the most endurant species on the planet, with a few exceptions
          we can outrun, outwalk, outswim most other species and if we could fly we would outfly the birds too
          >humans arent top of the food chain
          cope seethe dilate feed sneed hwd

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Human evolved hairless skin and sweating SPECIFICALLY to run under hot conditions for long periods of time. The other animals cannot even breathe with their mouths while running, while we can. This means we can outlast our prey and it will die from heat or exhaustion

          I really think you barked at the wrong tree here

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Thing is, we have this thread every week. The same greasy pajeet creates the same thread and posts the same garbage in it. Then anons try to post same reasonable things, like

            >It's another episode of "anon discovers overspecialization"
            You can easily look jacked (for normie standards) and run a marathon in 3-something hours. You just have to make sure you eat enough and get good sleep.
            >"m-muh physique"
            Sprinters are no different. How do you think Usain Bolt looks? The sprinters that do look jacked do so because their approach is to max out all the muscles needed to propel them forward in a short time.
            The reason why marathoners look like this is because they dedicate all of their time to said sport and achieve times that are in the upper regions of any competition. You likely don't. And you likely never will. Hence, you can perfectly try longer distances without sacrificing aesthetics (with the caveat of never being competitive).

            , the pajeet fricks off, and the following week this repeats. This board is a joke.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              They should just rangeban the entire 3rd world. Even with VPNs, imagine how much post quality would go up on literally every board

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              stop visiting this board

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >The same greasy pajeet
              I am pretty sure it's Jaffar, a poster from IST. I'm seeing a lot of similar patterns there.
              He also did a lot of defeatism threads before they were bannable.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao. Literally the oldest hunting method is chasing prey without using any tools or weapons. Just chasing them until they die from exhaustion.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No anthropologist says this, or has for all of history. Only some moron journalists who read a paper that said “we sometimes would run for short periods inbetween walking hunting prey in a long chase” started promoting the idea that humans ran long distances. They didn’t.

        You know the story of Pheidippides? Where the idea of a marathon comes from? Yea he ran it and died. That’s the story, everyone for all time knew you aren’t supposed to run long distances until the moronic ROONERs came about.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          A literal fricking myth

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, there is a reason why myths exist moron. What do you think they want you to think from it? Guys you need to start ROONING a marathon so you don’t become like him when you need to ROON. No it’s realism added to the math because you aren’t supposed to roon long distances and they knew it.

            We have the most efficient way of cooling our bodies of all mammals. Talking about usefulness in no situation the ability to lift EXTREMELY heavy weights would be useful because our bodies arent meant for that.

            I’m not saying lifting extremely heavy weights is something normal, it’s not clearly. The issue is rooners want everyone to believe that long distance rooning is the most natural thing and only thing everyone needs to do. Instead of accepting that they are just freaks who can’t stop rooning. If you want to room long distances because you like it go ahead, but stop trying to tell everyone it’s natural and healthier than other forms of cardio.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          We have the most efficient way of cooling our bodies of all mammals. Talking about usefulness in no situation the ability to lift EXTREMELY heavy weights would be useful because our bodies arent meant for that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Humans never ran their pray to exhaustion. Zero evidence.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      humans aren't meant to run long distances

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They arent though. There literally isnt a single indigenous tribe that hunts by running long distances, nor is there any evidence that our ancestors did so. Tribes frequently chase prey by WALKING long distances, but never RUNNING long distances. This is an incredibly important distinction that seems to be causing a lot of confusion.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Appeal to nature
      Dropped.
      Humans are also not supposed to
      >Fly (planes)
      >Be super fast (trains)
      >Communicate over long distances (internet)
      >Live to over a hundred years (modern medicine)
      Take your dumb shit elsewhere, fatty.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the only thing I got out of this is that trains are fast but planes are not
        good to know

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Appeal to nature is not a fallacy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The reason the average age used to be lower was due to infant mortality, infectious diseases, war, etc. People have always had the ability to grow to 100 years, you need to learn what an average means. Modern medicine is only useful for treating problems caused by a modern lifestyle, that our ancestors would have in the first place.

          The appeal to nature is the best appeal. Frick modernity

          Then please turn off your internet and get typhus because this is obviously more natural.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Actually, typhus primarily thrives in post agricultural communities where lots of people are packed together with low hygiene. This disease would practically be non existant to indigenous people.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The reason the average age used to be lower was due to infant mortality, infectious diseases, war, etc. People have always had the ability to grow to 100 years, you need to learn what an average means. Modern medicine is only useful for treating problems caused by a modern lifestyle, that our ancestors would have in the first place.

        The appeal to nature is the best appeal. Frick modernity

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >There have always been infectious deiseases that kill people
          >NOOO most of these only exist in modern times
          Please decide.

          Actually, typhus primarily thrives in post agricultural communities where lots of people are packed together with low hygiene. This disease would practically be non existant to indigenous people.

          >Acktchyually
          Don't care, didn't read.

          They should just rangeban the entire 3rd world. Even with VPNs, imagine how much post quality would go up on literally every board

          >Shitposters on IST are all third-worlders
          Weird, I had the same idea, just don't know why.
          Anyway, seconding this.

          stay mad

          Stay without arguments.
          >inb4 "cope/seethe/dilate/..."

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            i have an argument, the argument is that 5 and 10k events arent mid distance. the person who doesnt have the argument is the one that said ">inb4 wikipedia definition" which shows everyone that he has no idea what hes talking about and is just pulling shit from his ass

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >i have an argument
              You don't. You would have one if you gave a proper reasoning for it. You just have an opinion. And a pretty lame one at that.

              I have 2 indirect 'friends' that are into long distance running and both of them do the s0iface in their profile pic. This is the only argument we need, brahs. Dont waste your time arguing with skinny s0iboys in this thread.

              >That thing totally happened
              >Guilt by association
              Here's your (You), now frick back off to

              [...]

              and read its sticky some damn time.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                middle distance is a colloquial term, and at best a marketing term, but it turns out the 800m and 1500m events are in fact physiologically speaking middle distance events as far as aerobic and anaerobic energy, using a blend of both for their energy requirements

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Good, now it's an argument and I'm perfectly willing to accept that.
                To me personally, I made this decision because I started my "running career" with C25k and went all the way to marathon. Everything below 10 k just *feels* short distance to me, even if the underlying physiology disagrees.
                Cheers.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I mean, it's all relative. When I ran track at school we thought of 800m as long distance and 1600m as crazy distance. When you run those at proper pace you feel every fricking second of that.

                But then I've also cycled in excess of 100 miles in a day without more than a 10 minute lunch stop and it didn't even feel that long.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Absolute midwit post

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Obvious bait

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Humans are literally made to run long distances. almost every animal on earth can outsprint any human, but no animal can run for as long as a long distance runner.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >no animal
        Kys moron

        >At the 2015 Mumbai Marathon in India, a stray dog found its way onto the course and ran alongside competitors for the final 10K.

        >At a half-marathon in Alabama in 2016, a bloodhound named Ludivine joined runners at the start line. When the gun sounded and the race began, she took off with the leaders. While she did stop every now and then to sniff around, she always got back to the race, ultimately finishing in seventh place

        >When Australian ultrarunner Dion Leonard noticed a little dog following him in the middle of the Gobi March, a 250K stage race in China, he didn’t think much of it. “I started to think, ‘this dog isn’t going to last the whole day,'” he told the BBC after the run. Leonard was wrong about that, and the dog, which he would eventually name Gobi, ran by his side for four of the six stages of the race, covering 125K.

        >At the 2019 Marathon des Sables, one of the most brutal running events in the world, a dog named Cactus joined the race. Cactus (which is a name he was given after he started running) started running near the end of the race’s second stage, and he stayed with the group for the rest of the event. He ended up crossing the finish line ahead of the first-place human, but he wasn’t given an official time because he started the race later than everyone else.

        Best marathoners in the world got mogged by a random dog called Cactus, and that's just dogs, not even camels or horses or whatever. 99% of runners get mogged by picrel (Gobi). All that crap about being LE BORN TO RUN is just adidas trying to sell your overpriced sneakers. Though running is fine, I run in chucks and have no problems.

        The ONLY physical activity humans do better than animals is THROWING, which is NOT an endurance event.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I think running just sucks. I prefer to just do 15 minutes of cardio a couple times per day, rather than "run". It's some kind of torture for me to run. I hate every second of it. I hate looking at the uneven sidewalks, the pounding of my feet on the sidewalk, the sound of my own breath, I hate remembering how much time and distance is left, I hate the burning in my legs, I hate the song looping in my head, and I hate the cars driving by. There is not a single enjoyable aspect of running. I like HIIT and calisthenics.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Learn to run. Technique and tempo. There's some brit with a running school on youtube who has decent tutorials, basically you do sort of a rolling motion with the leg. Sorta like you're falling forward and your leg is sort of a wheel, hard to explain. Easier to figure this out with thin soles. Then you go slow as frick with a goal to just move for 60 minutes at any speed. Then pretend you're a some kind of cool animal running in the wild and lose yourself in that magical dream. Then it feels good.

            But as far as I know hiit is better at improving distance running than actual distance running.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Most people run at the wrong intensity which is pretty much what you're describing. You either want to run at a chill pace so you don't feel like you're "burning", or you want to do hard intervals that are closer to HIIT.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >marathons and babbys first long distance races split into stages
          Come back when they run for days while carrying their own food and drink with them. Or hunting for it while running.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            a) refer to

            https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260135266_Persistence_Hunting_by_Modern_Hunter-Gatherers

            moron, most of their average speeds are 4-6kmph. When they run they normally run for period of 5-15 minutes.

            Just face it you never read the research.

            b) canids are persistence hunters you megamoron
            c) a basic chihuahua would btfo any human in endurance running simply by virtue of the cellular makeup of its chihuahua muscles (tons of mitochondria which is what actually makes endurance)

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          is that the best you've got furry? these dogs either didn't finish or didn't complete the course, so their times are irrelevant. no animal can beat a trained human over long distance

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Did you get a stroke from oxidative damage from your runs and are now brain damaged? My second example has a bloodhound starting and finishing with the runners, a fricking tiny legged bloodhound, that kept fricking off to sniff trees, coming in seventh.

            https://www.runnersworld.com/news/a22602008/stray-dog-runs-half-marathon-gets-medal/

            1 year puppy beats half marathon

            https://tuoitrenews.vn/news/sports/20200118/dog-awarded-medal-after-accidentally-finishing-42k-marathon-in-northern-vietnam/52640.html

            >Cam crossed the finish line at 4:30 pm on the same day after racing for 11.5 hours. “Cam looked tired after the race but he was quickly back on his feet on the next day as if he had never joined the tough run,” Thai said.

            Infinite examples.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yep, the best animal at long distance running on the planet was not made to run long distances

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      moron. Humans are literally the best long distance runners in the entire animal kingdom. You are stupid.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Horses beat humans more often than not in the human vs horse marathon, and that's with the handicap of a human rider on the horse's back.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      As a connoisseur I declare this bait the highest quality.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    HWD

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the sprinters aren't jacked because they sprint they're jacked because they lift weights alot of sports involve some form of resistance training even long distance running does albeit much lower volume

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        exactly thats why they have lumps like thay where their muscles are

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Aren't slow twitch muscles actually better for hypertrophy?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Powerlifters have the same combination of slow/fast fibres as the population average.
          It doesn't matter.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's only Ethiopian and Southern African bushmen who used persistence hunting
    Everywhere else long distance running was unnatural

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      In persistence hunting they don’t run long distances, they average a speed of 3-5mph. They mostly walk and occasionally run for short distances. No one ran for long distances.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I mean the thing is sprinters aren't built because they sprint, they sprint because they're built for sprinting

    do what you wanna op, but if you really want muscle lift or something

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do normal rooning but add some tempo running and interval training.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    People claiming long distance running was never a thing have never hunted in their whole life.
    Animals don’t just drop dead. Even with guns, depending on where you hit them they can run for miles and you have to track them down. And now imagine spears or bows

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >imagine being such a brainlet you need to run to track a wounded animal down.

      You realize tracking is meant to be following the path of the animal, using signs from the surroundings of their movement to go to the place it rested. Someone would only run after it if they are impatient or too stupid to actually know how to track.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Our ancestors still needed to be pretty quick with it or otherwise they would’ve risked scavengers getting to the prey first

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It’s called running short distances, not long distances. Just running mindlessly for long distances would be ineffective. Anthropologists say this, it’s a mix of walking and running short distances, no one was running 5 miles straight. If you hunt, tell me how often do you run 5 miles straight chasing a wounded animal?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but it’s still much closer to jogging than sprinting. Also, hunterers still needed to cover long distances rather quickly to even get to their prey, and also needed to hunt down more than one animal a day. Probably added up to at least 10 miles of slow running throughout the day

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      learn to aim, homosexual

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Persistence hunters didn't even have bows. They needed to run the animal down until it cannot fight back. That's the theory.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >People claiming long distance running was never a thing have never hunted in their whole life.
      >proceeds to describe exactly why persistence hunting was so effective

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >People claiming long distance running was never a thing have never hunted in their whole life.
      >proceeds to describe exactly why persistence hunting was so effective

      Read

      They arent though. There literally isnt a single indigenous tribe that hunts by running long distances, nor is there any evidence that our ancestors did so. Tribes frequently chase prey by WALKING long distances, but never RUNNING long distances. This is an incredibly important distinction that seems to be causing a lot of confusion.

      Yes, persistence hunting is a thing, but that doesnt mean that actually ran. They walked.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Neither. Run mid distances like 5 or 10k. As long as you keep it under 13 miles you’re good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      5 and 10k are not mid distances

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > Much further than a sprint
        > Much shorter than a marathon

        Literally the definition is mid distance

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ≤ 10 k short distance
        10 k to half is mid distance
        ≥ half is long distance
        C25k is a fricking ten week program. Just like babby's first gym program.
        5k to 10 k is another ten.
        This shit is short-distance, simple as. Doesn't mean they're worthless distances you shouldn't care about, a sub-20:00 5 k is definitely impressive. But the classification is definitely wrong.
        >inb4 some Wikipedia definition
        Get fukd nerd

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          > Much further than a sprint
          > Much shorter than a marathon

          Literally the definition is mid distance

          at least you figured out that you are a moron all on your own

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not even one and the same anon, you daft c**t.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              stay mad

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >anaerobic exercise
    >high brotein diet
    >large muscle mass
    = warrior aristocracy
    >cardio (labour)
    >high carbs
    = peasantry

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Kek, butthurt fatsos are now in running threads as well. Anyway, here you go.
    > Persistence hunting is a scientific theory backed by anthropologists. It was popularized by a journalist, yes
    > Persistence hunting implies moving faster than a threshold that allows the animal to cool down and rest, which is faster than walking.
    > Persistence hunting was supposed to pre-date weapons and occurred when homosexual sapiens and their ancestors lived in African savannas.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >tl;dr it's for toolless Black person tribesmen

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Where did you get your anthropology degree from.

      The average pace of persistence hunting is 3-5 mph. Well documented in the literature.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You're just lying because seeing people run makes your fat ass uncomfortable. Go and read about modern persistence hunts. They get to higher average speed, maybe 10km/h and alternate shorter walks with longer periods of running.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260135266_Persistence_Hunting_by_Modern_Hunter-Gatherers

          moron, most of their average speeds are 4-6kmph. When they run they normally run for period of 5-15 minutes.

          Just face it you never read the research.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't you stop spamming slide threads on /fit and just do what makes you feel good? Want to sprint - sprint, want to run - run, want to be jacked - train appropriately and pin.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Take the 5K pill, literally the ideal running distance.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >It's another episode of "anon discovers overspecialization"
    You can easily look jacked (for normie standards) and run a marathon in 3-something hours. You just have to make sure you eat enough and get good sleep.
    >"m-muh physique"
    Sprinters are no different. How do you think Usain Bolt looks? The sprinters that do look jacked do so because their approach is to max out all the muscles needed to propel them forward in a short time.
    The reason why marathoners look like this is because they dedicate all of their time to said sport and achieve times that are in the upper regions of any competition. You likely don't. And you likely never will. Hence, you can perfectly try longer distances without sacrificing aesthetics (with the caveat of never being competitive).

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I have 2 indirect 'friends' that are into long distance running and both of them do the s0iface in their profile pic. This is the only argument we need, brahs. Dont waste your time arguing with skinny s0iboys in this thread.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Eh, this is getting exhausting.
    Point is
    I will continue running
    I will continue lifting
    I will continue to mog your b***h ass
    And you will continue to cope

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    sprinter: hand-crafted for HWD
    marathoner: hand-crafted for HWD

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      imo the marathooner is HWD (hardly worth dicking>

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do biking or swimming instead of either.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    you dont look like either and both still mogs the living shit out of you despite being women
    stop being an insecure turbo homosexual

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *