Someone who lifts as a hobby doesn't need more than 3-4 days of high intensity training a week

Someone who lifts as a hobby doesn't need more than 3-4 days of high intensity training a week

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Dumb
    I go insane if I do no physical activity for even one day. I have to either lift or go running. 4 days a week I do both, one in the morning one in the afternoon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Do you shower twice a day those 4 days?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Not him but in the same situation.
        Gym in the morning, running with the dogs in the afternoon.
        Since gym is closed in sundays, I run in the morning and do a 1 hour bodyweight workout in my veranda so that the housewife next door mires me from the other side of the street.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          But those days where u gym in morning and run in afternoon, u shower twice a day?

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Pic is based, post is cringe. Wait till you hear about neutrinos.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I fricking hate Abrahamic homosexuals so much its unreal. All of you have a nice day. There will be no salvation, respectfully.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bitter behavior reflects on the soul, don't despair, you will find salvation through faith and prayer and It will change your life should you walk down this path, Jesus is king.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Damn I hadn’t thought about that way thanks

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Based

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >"all matter has to interact with the electro-magnetic field because..... uh because it does!"
    why does dark matter trigger pseud contrarians so much

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Explain it then pseud woman

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I have no evidence of dark matter
      >I cannot measure it, cannot see it, and I don't know what it would even look like
      >but my formulas don't work
      >so this thing I have no evidence for simply must exist
      Science is all about proving things, yet no proof is needed when it suits certain people

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>I have no evidence of dark matter

        https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1516944112
        https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2021.576034
        Hell you could even read wikipedia for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter#Observational_evidence
        or this video that one anon posted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAhWLN2qHGs&t=7
        >>I cannot measure it, cannot see it, and I don't know what it would even look like

        https://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2006/1e0657/media/paper.pdf. for the measurement
        but why exactly does something have to be seen can't you just study its effect to know it's there like planets and bacteria before they were scene in telescopes and microscopes respectively?
        >>but my formulas don't work
        >so this thing I have no evidence for simply might exist
        There is nothing wrong with this, this is how you theorize something for an explanation of phenomena just like how the existence of Luminiferous aether was theorized to explain the perihelion precession of Mercury but remaining dogmatic to it when evidence indicates otherwise is watch is bad that being said like above dark matter has evidence for itself.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Cope.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't even respond to my points

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I didn't even read em lmao

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I need more threads like this KEK

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                lmao

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Hello particle seller. I am going into theoretical physics, and I need your most esoteric particles.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think we humans just don't have the perceptive tools to be able to fully comprehend the universe and any attempt to understand the true nature and scope of the universe is futile. Which is why atheists and arrogant physcialists are so insufferable.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So because something is hard we shouldnt attempt it?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Attempting is fine. Fricking it up and calling our frick ups "meh close enough" so you can have your imprecise frick ups called a "law of x" and to get your name in some shitty text books is not fine. Cash and kudos is what drives "science", not precision. Scientism is insufferable by it's very nature and it attracts the most irritating types.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Them attempting is fine. I'd said its more the r/ifrickinglovescience group that takes their word as gospel everytime that bugs me. Additionally, it creates this positive feedback loop by which the public praises their work, the scientist's ego balloons, the scientist continues to either dumb down his research or make wilder and wilder accusations in order to bring in the praise of the public.

        No different to evangelical priests of old

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You can try but it doesn't seem like we're making much progress, does it?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Another thing is that if string theory is correct, there exists higher dimensions that we cannot observe now will ever due to our limited cortex. So if this is the case, that we cannot even use the first step in the scientific method, that of observation, then the conclusion to these studies is either two things:
        1) To attempt to understand our university any more than we do now is futile and we'll will never be able to observe our theories due to our limited brain only being able to perceive 3 spatial dimensions and 1 temporal.
        2) Our models are wrong and must be challenged.

        Both are unprofitable and would see the physics community lose all credibility.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Our models are wrong and must be challenged.
          http://milesmathis.com/

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >be white civilization
    >whites invent practically all modern physics and math
    >whites are christian during this period
    >physicists r christian

    its like pottery

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm pretty sure i started these memes along with dinosaurs never existed and now is all cool because zoomers will eat everything up for content kek and you say a single man can't influence the world

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yeah it was you.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yes but unironically

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Correct. You need one per week for each muscle group. I split it into 3-4 days per week.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    post pic of your 3-4x week physique

    spoiler: you wont because youre a fat dyel queer

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw living in the reality where FF Versus XIII was bastardized into XV instead of the one where Versus actually came out.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *