Has anyone found that that old advertising that is supposed to be hilariously wrong is actually true, at least for you? Pic related, and there are plenty of examples just like it.
If I haven't eaten since breakfast, can't be bothered cooking, and want to avoid eating out, I'll seriously just crack open a soft drink, 150 calories and I'm fine until breakfast.
Still OP: The science is pretty clear that table sugar (sucrose) is not satiating at all, I understand that, but I'm talking about my own experience and I'm not lying.
When I was younger I distinctly remember getting full from drinking Dr.Pepper, although that was an export from America so it might've been fructose rather than sucrose.
I don't know if this is some parody troll, a schizo ketard or a genuinely clueless person but "the science" is not clear at all on any of this stuff. "the science" on nutrition says everything.
While eating candy is not good for you, people who like eating candy are not likely to be fat and people who eat fruit or have fruit juice or dried fruit are definitely not likely to be fat.
(You)
sorry I should have added that the profile of a fat person typically is like this
* Eats lots of fast food - chips, burgers, fried stuff - lots of fat, carbs, but not sugar.
* Lots and lots of soda - ok here yes it's true, however is HFCS that is used, not the sort of white sugar in OP's pic.
* Beer - beer belly.
* Fats like creamy cakes, peanut butter, ice cream.
So no, sugar does not make you fat and in particular, only an insane person like the most well-respected and esteemed person that advocates a keto diet like Dr. Lustig would say that the sugar in fruit is bad for you and makes you fat - white table sugar and candy can go to hell sure, but I'm not going to sit here and nod that the science is settled that they don't satiate you and that the claim they satiate you is laughable - they do and they give you energy.
Your personal experience doesn't matter
Personal experience is the only thing that matters. Statistics are useless.
Ok
>The science is pretty clear that table sugar (sucrose) is not satiating at all, I understand that, but I'm talking about my own experience and I'm not lying.
Scientific facts are subjective. They change every decade or so. Go with what works for you.
>36 grams of pure sugar in the middle of a fast
In what world (other than that of a projecting lard lord) is that the middle of a fast?
>I haven't eaten since breakfast [...] I'll seriously just crack open a soft drink, 150 calories and I'm fine until breakfast.
How long is your day?
>since breakfast
>already ate food that day
>this is fasting
stop caring about what u eat so much gays i can tell none of u had fathers
actually as kids we had a rule in eastern europe "no desert/sweets before lunch cause it will ruin your appetite" so it might be onto something
>East europe
Similar in Australia, which I'm assuming my family got from the UK
I always get sleepy after eating something with sugers... do I have debiettes?
no, just dibateetus
Maybe. Hows your urine output and thirst level?
I pee a lot, but I drink a lot of water too (1-2 liters a day).
Is it bad?
NOOOOOOO!!!!
No, thats probably just a sugar crash. Diabetes can go undetected for years. If you're obese and over 40 maybe go get yourself checked though.
It should be immediately obvious to anyone with a brain that sugar is good for you
1) 99% of the time when something is good for you there's some kind of hate campaign and/or restrictions on it, a great example being raw dairy
2) It tastes great, for the most part this is another way you can tell something is good for you 99% of the time, especially if it's in whole foods form. Example: chicken tastes ok (low nutrition), but beef and other red meat which is significantly more nutritious tastes better.
3) It lowers cortisol which raises testosterone and makes you feel good while being easily used as ENERGY. Need I say more?
>it lowers coetisol which raises testosterone
Why would you want lower testosterone as a man?
cortisol and test are inversely related
He just worded it poorly
What he means is cortisol lowers testosterone, and sugar lowers cortisol
I knew tide pods unlocked our third eye
Interesting... according to you lead powder is good for you.
1) There are restrictions on consuming lead.
2) Lead powder was used as a sweetener, meaning it tastes good.
3) it probably lowers cortisol as well
>when you're hungry it means your energy's down
No it doesn't
Glucose good, fructose bad.
totally not commissioned by some soda or icecream company
>18 calories and it's all energy
This is completely true. It is 18 calories of energy. Just like 18 calories of anything else.
What about 18 calories of my foot in your ass?
When I stop eating things that are almost pure sugar (chocolates, sweets in general, cakes, ice cream, etc.) my weight drops instantly. I did the experiment twice, first I went a month without eating any of that stuff and my weight went from 100kg to 95kg and I started working 2x more (I time my work).
I thought it was a placebo effect but now I am doing the same experiment, I am already 2 weeks without eating the mentioned things, my weight went from 102kg to 99kg for now and I am working almost 3x more than before.
glucose is stored temporarily as muscle glycogen. you are probably just running out of that making it seem like you lose weight. we can also make you lose weight by chopping off your arm or your head. there is probably a good 10-20 pounds for each of them.
pic related looks like a blowjob. nice
It looks retarded in current year, but I'm willing to entertain the idea that in the world where food wasn't constantly sweetened and people were more active that this might have been true