>tfw advanced

>tfw advanced

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Now get to 100kg bodyweight.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you know symmetric strength accounts for bw right?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But not for height. It's made for 5'6 manlets.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The weights are lowballed as fuck, stop coping

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            WHO SAID THAT? Oh, you're down there

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I am so tall
              >Being very tall is so great haha, fucking manlets when will they learn
              >nooo lift doesn't count because manlet
              >nooo the aesthetics doesn't count because manlet
              >nooo the formula on a site that calculates weight/lifts and gives a colour doesn't count because heckin' manlets
              the duality of the lanklet

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, but you manlets massively devalue the extra amount of effort it costs proper length people to lift shit.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I am 5'10".
                My reach is 6'0.5". Long torso, short femurs.
                I am mediocre at pressing, and fantastic at pulling. My squat is shit to mediocre but it's mostly because my quads are weak compared to posterior chain and not inherent to my build.

                If you scaled everything up by whatever factor, it would be the same. I would weight more, but also theoretically have a bigger bone structure/frame that could accommodate more mass and stress, so in turn I would lift more.
                It's a cope saying you are too tall, people will have different ratios that give them different strengths and weaknesses.
                I understand there are extreme cases of very short people with very peculiar arm/leg lengths that when combined with "optimal" technique gives them a very short ROM in a lift, but that is the exception.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you scaled everything up by whatever factor, it would be the same.
                Except if you had basic understanding of physics you'd know that
                >Your ROM is smaller = less energy used/needed
                >Easier leverages
                Nice plebspacing btw

                Yeah right. What about the amount of effort it takes to be a manlet and lean. Try cutting on 1200 calories and still lifting more than you. Stfu the grass is always greener gay. You know nothing but excuses and whining

                >What about the amount of effort it takes to be a manlet and learn.
                Lmao, when will they learn

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Your ROM is smaller = less energy used/needed
                >Basic understanding of physics
                It's specifically less power, less distance times equal force. With strength you are mainly concerned about force production.
                I also addressed that with a bigger frame you should have bigger muscles which equals more work and force which equals more power, but because you filled your frame with fat in stead you have to cope about the heckin' manlets.
                World record holder in the deadlift is 6'9" lmao

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're contradicting yourself in the same post lmao.
                >World record holder in the deadlift is 6'9" lmao
                Yes because big frame = more space for muscles, but I'll tell you a secret - they use steroids to get there. You first have to get to that level of power as you say
                >I also addressed that with a bigger frame you should have bigger muscles which equals more work and force which equals more power
                To fill your frame is significantly harder for a tall person and more energy-consuming, too. You're the type of guy that thinks pullups for someone at 5'7 and 6'2 only should have a 3 rep difference lmao. It's okay little man, you'll never reach the top 1%.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >cries and whines about how he is too tall to not put up dogshit numbers
                >haha little man
                kek stay mad
                >3 rep difference
                You can't actually do pullups, can you? REEEEE MANLETS
                100kg BW? I am currently at 10 reps adding enough weight to match that :^)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >small rom cope
                >easier leverages cope
                Lankets when will they learn. Youre body isn't made for lifting weights. Stop trying. You'll always cope. You'll always look dyel. You'll always get outlifted by us. Tall fags need roids to cope. Either stay dyel or turn into a roidchud, the lanklet dilemma

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah right. What about the amount of effort it takes to be a manlet and lean. Try cutting on 1200 calories and still lifting more than you. Stfu the grass is always greener gay. You know nothing but excuses and whining

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope. Being a fat fuck means nothing. Women like ottermode more than powershitter mode. You can't do 1 pull up. Gg

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is there a version of this for calisthenics?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They let you put in weighted dips and weighted chinups/pull ups

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      feats of calisthenics is mostly limited by technique, not strength.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Vertical press: [not entered]

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lol, it's low. I haven't pressed recently because it was causing shoulder pain but I might get back to it after the current program. Chin/Pull ups were also low (78 or something in their value) relative to my row (and I find row form hard to judge so theyre probably more accurate)

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t understand how people like you can have such shitty benches, yet such high sq/dl numbers. I can bench 135kg, but only have a 150kg squat and a 180kg dl. Is it really just leverages?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I did 180kg deadlifts for reps before I hit 2pl bench. My squat was garbage though.
      >Is it really just leverages?
      Yes and no. If you do something more, you get better at it. If you're coincidentally naturally good at something, you tend to do it more.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I have pectus excavatum which might make my bench weaker, I also haven't hit a bench max recently. It will probably be at least 125, hopefully 130 but I won't test till next week.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does symmetric strength rate OHP so harshly. I never see guys OHPing more than 95 yet this website says my 105 OHP is novice. Is everyone really bad at OHP or is symmetric strength inaccurate when it comes to OHP

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah I just checked, to match my lower lifts I need to be pressing nearly 2pl8.

      https://i.imgur.com/tpILI85.jpg

      >tfw weak as fuck
      >tfw subpar in everything
      How do I get stronger?
      t. fatass

      train

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw weak as fuck
    >tfw subpar in everything
    How do I get stronger?
    t. fatass

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lift weight
      return in 2-7 days, attempt to lift more weight
      repeat

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    all my weakest muscles are the most developed and all my strongest muscles are the least developed.

    it's beyond over.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My current body vs my ultimate goal body. Long way to go, but I'll get there

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      let me guess, sumo?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Fuck no. Conventional double overhand. I do use straps, no belt

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *