>to women, a 6'6 man earning $0 annually is as desirable as 6'0 $60K, 5'9 $140K, 5'6 $235K, and 5'2 $330K

>to women, a 6'6 man earning $0 annually is as desirable as 6'0 $60K, 5'9 $140K, 5'6 $235K, and 5'2 $330K

Grim.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I make 150k per year and I'm a virgin with no interested women in sight

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, you must be like 3 feet tall

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I’m broke and did quite well for myself with women all my life
      6’0

    • 2 weeks ago
      I hate women

      if you gold digging bitches then you need to join sugar daddy websites

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why god was I born to be 5'6. Just 4 inches more and my life would have been normal

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why tf is 5 ft 11.5 in and 62K a year set as the default. where is this study from? thats way above average in america. is that like the base levels you need to make it in the modern world?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's the default starting character for the movie like lower-middle basically yeah - fresh grad, early twenties, because it is only a start after all
      enough to rent in most cities and be comfortable enough

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >a 5'9 """"man""""
    >a 5'6 """"man""""
    >a 5'2 """"man""""

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this, if you're under 6'1 you're a manlet

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >t. 6'1 giga coper
        Anything below 6'5 is instantly sissy tier

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          6'5" guys are weak. due to shit leverages. 6'3" is the maximum mogger height. 6' is the minimum. outside of this men are dysgenic especially on the upper limits

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            have you ever been around 6'5" dudes? i'd definitely take those extra inches, can still have a great frame
            t. 6'3"

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Same, although I sort of agree with the other guy. 6’5 guys usually aren’t big but when they are it’s like heroic mode. Above that tends to look a little freakish but a well proportioned 6’5 looks like a superhero compared to normal guys

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Same, although I sort of agree with the other guy. 6’5 guys usually aren’t big but when they are it’s like heroic mode. Above that tends to look a little freakish but a well proportioned 6’5 looks like a superhero compared to normal guys

              yes and all of them squat with 50kg at the gym without exception

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Euronymous

    could've not used the retard units -.-

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Get off the fucking internet, no one cares, this is self defeating incel speak

    Even if heights a deal breaker, who would want anyone that superficial

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > who would want anyone that superficial
      we want women because we're not gay so we're kind of stuck with that

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >5'8 needs to earn $100,000 more than 5'10

    >you can literally just be 6'5 NEET, and that is equivalent in womens eyes to a highly educated 5'6 pediatrician/FAANG software engineer/ successful business owner/good lawyer

    It's over.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The big joke is that mr. 6'6 probably is earning like 50-100k, so you need to add THAT to your number to actually compete with him. At 5'9, I need to earn ~200-250k just to compete.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Women used to pick me up in their vehicles for tinder dates. I never paid for their meals we paid for our own meals.
      6'7" guy.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Also my parents were too poor to put me in hockey. I'd probably be rich as fuck right now!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Theres 6'2 lanklets posting here that have never touched a woman

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >6'2 lanklet who's never been with a woman
        Hey that's me

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        6'2" is just normie tall guy. it's not a circus specimen that gets special treatment. you need to be over 2meters tall to get that height halo effect

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you think women have the spatial reasoning to tell the difference between 5'8 and 5'10...
      >just be taller than them, they're stupid animals

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the point is the statistics show what the reality is

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is there that huge gap between 5'8 to 5'10? Is this the official manlet cutoff?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      5'9" is the actual average. Being "below average", even by a very small amount, is a much harder sell.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >5’10
    >110k
    I’m so close to making it

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm 6'2" making 125k a year and I still don't get bitches.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ugly personality and/or face

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Baby faced and extremely introverted so yeah

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dawg I’m a manlet and I was getting bitches at 30k lmao. They would unironically fuck me on my blow up air mattress, you need to fix your brain or face

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Post the one if the man is Asian

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895442

      It contains even more, like ethnicity and facial attractiveness.

      Ethnicity

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >asian women let white guys earn 24K less than asian me and are the only group o do this with any group of men

        >white women need 200k from a black man and 300k from an asian man to be equivalent to a white man with 60k

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          surely you didn't need a study to observe the nature of your women

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wtf is all this “not feasible” shit

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they think that women literally cant make enough money to make up the difference

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ah yes, a white man would never even consider dating a 5’8” Asian woman.
            Did they have a sample of like fifteen students at a bible college in a flat state or

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Not Feasible" was that it would never occur; the women wouldn't date them in the first place & that asking for more money is irrelevent, because the relationship isn't feasible.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah that means that this study is 100% invalid.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Lol, what? No it doesn't. Stop seething, manlet.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > no man wants to date Asian women
                > no man wants to date a woman over 5’6”
                The minimum height to be a model is 5’9” with most agencies and most men have an Asian woman preference lol

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >most men have an Asian woman preference lol
                spend less time in online tranime incel circles

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you’re telling me that it’s “infeasible” for you to date a woman who’s 5’8”+

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so you're telling me you can't read? didn't say anything about that. also infeasible doesn't mean you wouldn't date it means no amount of whatever measure would make up the difference. ie you could be willing to date a 5/10 girl while simultaneously believing no amount of income in reason (saying she's a multi millionaire or something would be an irrelevant outlier in gen pop) would make up the difference to make her as desirable as a 10/10

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol there’s no way. Height doesn’t even matter for men when it comes to women, and when it does, most of them prefer women who are 5’7”-5’9”.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol yes it does and no they do not. just stop posting you clearly have zero sense of what actual men like and no reading comprehension or critical thinking skills

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What makes you think I’m not a man?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                holy fuck are you ESL?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How could I not know what an actual man likes if i am one?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you're not claiming personal preference you're claiming what most men like. men and man are different words. you are a retard.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you're not claiming personal preference you're claiming what most men like. men and man are different words. you are a retard.

                seeeeethe

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It just means that the relationship never happened.

          5’10 ugly neet and still have a gf.

          It’s all luck

          It's "to be as successful as", not "this is bare minimum requirements for a wet vagina to ever touch your erect dick"

          It is interesting, because you could take all of this data and come up with a decent answer to "what does it take for average 5'9 me to compete with 6'2 Chad?" and the answer is:

          https://i.imgur.com/OUEI9V2.png

          >to women, a 6'6 man earning $0 annually is as desirable as 6'0 $60K, 5'9 $140K, 5'6 $235K, and 5'2 $330K

          Grim.

          6'2 = 30k less, 5'9 = 80k more == i need to earn 110k more than Mr. 6'2 just beong alive, and assuming he has normal job/60k income, i need to earn 170k just to compete with a 6'2 guy with typical job.

          Then, what if he's a 10/10 slayer Chad?

          https://i.imgur.com/LSTOrOt.png

          Nope. They controlled for that too. 1/2

          Assuming i'm 5/10 anon, I THEN need to earn ANOTHER 140k.

          Assuming we're both white - for a 5/10 5'9 anon to compete with a 6'2 10/10 chad with a normal 60k income job, I need to earn $310,000+

          ALSO, this was 2006 dollars, so add like 30-50% inflation to these numbers, so $400,000-$460,000 to compete with Chad in 2022, assuming things aren't even worse now.

          Done.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            checks out. If i were a girl, i'm not picking some average guy over Chad™ unless he is earning so much more that I can't ignore it, like 500K+. this is even assuming that i like the average guys personality. he still needs to make a lot of money for me to not pick chad anyway.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >A moron needs to make $154k extra in order to get a White woman
        oh so all those trashy mudsharks are really running with black doctors and engineers

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >black doctors and engineers
          More like drug dealers and no-talent aspiring rappers, and the women themselves have Stockholm syndrome from the regular beatings or are addicted to the drugs they sell.
          There literally are women who will sell their asses for an eighth of some potent weed, and it's decriminalized in my state. I'm not even talking crackwhores, just good girl university students who will gladly hop on a dick for some weed. Wish I knew about this a long time ago, would have saved myself a ton of grief and wasted effort.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >source: my ass

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895442

      It contains even more, like ethnicity and facial attractiveness.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >online dating
        >2006
        would be interested in seeing an updated study and how things have changed (presumably even more extreme)

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this study is so outdated its no longer relevant. online dating has changed drastically since 2006. back in 06 it was mostly weirdos and boomer divorcees who'd bother with online dating, so the pool was limited and the boomers were after money especially. now theres a lot more young people with different motivations, looking for more casual flings and less stability etc

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    6'6 is rare enough already, their income is probably skewed by pro athletes and shit

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This wasn't a straight comparison though.
    Study asked women to rate attractiveness based on height (written not visual models, so you get those weird breaks around 5'9, 6', 6'2 because those are numbers people recognize from media). They also asked to rate attractiveness based on income (again, numbers not the way other studies did it of showing different lifestyles associated with wealth like number of vacations, how many kids go private school, etc... basically a collection of materialist measurements of wealth instead of $X/year number that's hard to contextualize properly). Finally they just centered everything on their average parameters and subtracted.

    At no point did a woman get asked whether she'd prefer jobless 6'6 man over 140k 5'9 man, which to me invalidates this nonsense even more than the fact that it is sociology.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This,everyone knows more money is better or that taller is better but you are going to get cucked by a guy with a better face always no matter if he is poor and/or short

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I just read the study and was about to post something like this. Women were never asked this directly, they just rated the profiles and put what was correlated together.

      It's also from a single dating service in 2006. Make of that what you will.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >At no point did a woman get asked whether she'd prefer jobless 6'6 man over 140k 5'9 man, which to me invalidates this nonsense even more than the fact that it is sociology.
      >IST: women don't understand what they actually want and certainly won't do what they claim
      >IST coping and seething: they should've asked the women a comparison they could virtue signal with! not tricked them into actual data!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this jfl. it's like everyone starts dropping IQ points just to cope and deflect

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >6'4
    >make $150k a year
    >7in dick
    >bench 300
    >aspergers
    Body count is 10 tho

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    False,face,end of discussion.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope. They controlled for that too. 1/2

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >average anon needs to be a doctor to compete with unemployed Chad

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >6’3
    >60k
    >virgin
    Kek can’t have it all

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would like to see the responses by weight/BMI.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    5’10 ugly neet and still have a gf.

    It’s all luck

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Where do I meet loser women who are just as pathetic as I am?

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’m 6’4, make 400k a year. I’ve fucked 3 dozen college girls off seeking because I’m too lazy to cold approach at bars.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why men like womenlets so much? that's really depressing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sexual dimorphism is attractive to both sexes. height is dimorphic. short women are cute and feminine. taller women almost always have worse more masculine bodies, and worse faces.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You guys are unbelievably stupid. You know they didn't wheel these guys out in front of the women, right? Pic related. Also,
    >Tens of thousands of dollars to go up 2 inches in height
    >$20,000 extra a year can completely change your life situation
    >The 2 inches being far less perceptible to an (on average) much shorter woman
    >They are somehow equivalent
    It's the output of multiple regression from profile ratings - nobody was ever asked this directly.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >coping
      k

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just stop, man. Accept reality. We didn't make it. It's over. We will never be as successful as Chad if we don't earn far more than him.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can do that. I won't.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope and seethe, gay.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >median heights in our dating population
    So self-reported stats that are obviously inflated
    It's no wonder women say they want a 6'4'' mountain when every guy claims to be two inches taller

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >it's another garden gnomemerican numbers to undermine men

    wake up, sheeps.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It’s not feasible for over 5’8” to make enough money to be considered attractive.

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    who gives a shit what women want?
    9/10 of those women will end up with no man.

    meanwhile i'm a 5'9'' manlet who only makes 60k USD a year with a big breasted skinny goth asian korean girlfriend with the tightest pussy i've ever felt who was a virgin when i met her.
    most women are shit m8, you have to sift through the low quality females.
    Which most women are low quality as men tend to find out after dating them. which is why every man is trying to move onto the next woman.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Claim to not care about women
    >Women's opinions live in your head rent free
    You people need to grow up already. You've been at this charade for 10+ years now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      unfortunately for us women are liberated and therefore if we don't want to be incels like you we need to care or at least pretend to care

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This whole height shit is way overblown and mostly perpetuated by shallow tiktok dwelling zoomer whores and insecure incels. I'm out and about on pretty much a daily basis (It's part of my job) and I see plenty of manlets walking with decent looking women on their arms. Some of you really need to go outside and touch some grass.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >study from 2006 when zoomers were barely alive
      yeah women caring about height is just new tiktok bs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/2A3MwGY.jpg

      Gay thread made to demoralize people. How about you go workout. Rolling

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >6'0"
    >182k
    feels good, brehs

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gay thread made to demoralize people. How about you go workout. Rolling

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why haven't you guys learned that what women say and what they do aren't the same? If this was a meta analysis of marriages or something the fact is it's more likely that manlets are more likely to overcompensate with income.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sure, but that's like talking about how much a woman is worth based on her ass and tit size
    Just because she wants something, doesnt mean shes hot enough to pull those guys.
    femaledatingstrategy is full of bitter lonely 40 year olds that think they deserve the world

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares what roasties think

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >women value Chad far higher than even a Brad
    >men value women rationally

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn i'm surprised the bottom half isn't even lower though

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Am I reading this right? So women are kind of blasé about even the best looking guys while if a man sees a top 5% woman they absolutely lose it?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >10/10 gets 3x as much as a 9/10

      https://i.imgur.com/LRT6mAl.jpg

      It just means that the relationship never happened.
      [...]
      It's "to be as successful as", not "this is bare minimum requirements for a wet vagina to ever touch your erect dick"

      It is interesting, because you could take all of this data and come up with a decent answer to "what does it take for average 5'9 me to compete with 6'2 Chad?" and the answer is:

      [...]

      6'2 = 30k less, 5'9 = 80k more == i need to earn 110k more than Mr. 6'2 just beong alive, and assuming he has normal job/60k income, i need to earn 170k just to compete with a 6'2 guy with typical job.

      Then, what if he's a 10/10 slayer Chad?
      [...] Assuming i'm 5/10 anon, I THEN need to earn ANOTHER 140k.

      Assuming we're both white - for a 5/10 5'9 anon to compete with a 6'2 10/10 chad with a normal 60k income job, I need to earn $310,000+

      ALSO, this was 2006 dollars, so add like 30-50% inflation to these numbers, so $400,000-$460,000 to compete with Chad in 2022, assuming things aren't even worse now.

      Done.

      >average guy needs to earn 500 THOUSAND to compete with 10/10 who earns nothing

      It's over.

      Am I reading this right? So women are kind of blasé about even the best looking guys while if a man sees a top 5% woman they absolutely lose it?

      You have it backwards. Women cream themselves over 10/10 while men rate women in normal linear way.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn that is a huge jump. I guess on the plus side is top tier guys seem to be pretty rare these days since everyone is getting fat (at least in the US)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      brutal blackpill right here

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    brutal blackpill. watch IST cope

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes and to a woman a man who inherited 2 million dollars from his father is worth more than most poor men. Who cares? Some people are fortunate and become exceptional with little effort. That’s just how life works.

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Tfw 6'1", 6 figures

Your email address will not be published.