Good insertions, great symmetry both in insertions and size, reasonable body fat so no chewing gum striations, great proportions despite being 5ft7, good shoulder to waist ratio
he's fairly proportionate overall, good taper with decent inserts. i think having a a gap like marky mark between the pecs is aesthetic, others may not. some people may believe his overall size is too small, you probably don't. some of it is going to be psychological. he's famous, you know his name, he's being presented as a model, etc.
the most important aspect is having a proportionate neck.
because it looks good and natural
doesnt matter if he roided for that but the point is that it looks natural
the ripped bodybuilder look is fricking ugly, too big and bulky and veiny and grainy, it's just not aestethic at all
the no gear look is literally the perfect physique but it's just incredibly hard to achieve naturally and 99,999% will never look like the true natural max
The logic we all know and Accept >Achievable 100% natty
The reality >most natties dont even come close maybe 1/50 looks as good or bigger,as for roiders maybe 1/3 look as good or bigger
i think you meant to say >why is this physique so dyel looking?
Cause his abs are not proportional to the rest of his physique, they look very blurry and washed out.
Probably fell for the "abs are made in the kitchen" meme and neglected ab training.
his charming good looks and dope swag
V silhouette, big biceps and pecs with small waist
pretty much. nice delts too and well proportioned traps
>lean
>muscular
>abs and shoulders
>chest is proportionate
is this really that confusing
looks better than other ripped guys
why?
Good insertions, great symmetry both in insertions and size, reasonable body fat so no chewing gum striations, great proportions despite being 5ft7, good shoulder to waist ratio
he's fairly proportionate overall, good taper with decent inserts. i think having a a gap like marky mark between the pecs is aesthetic, others may not. some people may believe his overall size is too small, you probably don't. some of it is going to be psychological. he's famous, you know his name, he's being presented as a model, etc.
the most important aspect is having a proportionate neck.
because it looks good and natural
doesnt matter if he roided for that but the point is that it looks natural
the ripped bodybuilder look is fricking ugly, too big and bulky and veiny and grainy, it's just not aestethic at all
the no gear look is literally the perfect physique but it's just incredibly hard to achieve naturally and 99,999% will never look like the true natural max
Op being a massive gay
why’d you just samegay your own thread haha
The logic we all know and Accept
>Achievable 100% natty
The reality
>most natties dont even come close maybe 1/50 looks as good or bigger,as for roiders maybe 1/3 look as good or bigger
i think you meant to say
>why is this physique so dyel looking?
Cause his abs are not proportional to the rest of his physique, they look very blurry and washed out.
Probably fell for the "abs are made in the kitchen" meme and neglected ab training.
No-lats pill
This guy def has lats. If he had no lats he would look like a rectangle.
moron
Its his face
this physique is what females find most attractive.
Is he natty tho? I know he uses gear now obviously
Triceps.
insertions
>low bodyfat
>not skelly
>tan (optional)