LA by a big margin. The city is packed psychotically vain young men and women who would do anything for that 0.0001% chance of making it as an entertainer. These people work out obsessively because they have to look good in that casting room and keep the dream going as long as possible. It's a city full of people who look and think like Kinobody or some gigastacy female fitness influencer except basically none of them are going to make it. New York has those types as well but they make up a much smaller percentage of the populace. Furthermore, New Yorkers actually do time consuming jobs in finance/law/consulting etc so a lot of them just ease up on exercise so they can focus on work. They won't get fat (loads of walking + expensive diets) but at the same time you rarely see a jacked guy walking around Manhattan. Furthermore, LA is a beach city so that gives people an added incentive to be fit.
NY by a big margin, the city is full of people actually working hard both at their jobs and on themselves. The city demands the best of everyone, and if being IST is what puts you over the rest, the little bit of valuable time you have will be spent getting the edge over others. It's a city full of people who are IST whether you're a richgay utilizing the elite gyms or a poorgay walking everywhere and climbing dozens of staircases daily. LA is full of homosexuals and "instagram influencers" aka a few people photoshopping their bodies while 90% are a bunch of fat spics. NY most of us are IST but we don't have time being homosexuals on social media since we're actually contributing to society.
Perth is very comfy. Generally i would suggest avoiding cities as they're all globohomo. Try smaller centres like newcastle or waggawagga. Coastal towns like gerroa and gerringong are amazing and majority white.
>sydney is bad because it just is okay!
Cringe. Best city is actually Canberra but its unfair to consider it in the city rankings.
Perth is very comfy. Generally i would suggest avoiding cities as they're all globohomo. Try smaller centres like newcastle or waggawagga. Coastal towns like gerroa and gerringong are amazing and majority white.
>suggest places full of methheads and brain dead bogans
Cringe.
NYC is full of frumpy people tbh, most people aren’t fit, and it’s cold most of the year so they just hide their bodies under puffy jackets anyway. Plus there’s a bunch of frumpy lookin foreigners too.
I’d still rather deal with New Yorkers than Californians though.
What the frick are you talking about?
There are some patches of shitty parts around Columbia Heights and maybe a good portion of NE; East of the Anacostia is bad too, sure, but that’s MD. Most of the rest of DC is marbled bureaucracy and museums and everything else is the service sector that entertain employees and tourists of the former two, all of it surrounded with countries that are among the wealthiest and most educated in the country.
It’s one of the cleanest cities in America. Granted, it doesn’t compare favorably with, say, Tokyo, but it’s a whole lot better than Paris or London.
LA by a big margin. The city is packed psychotically vain young men and women who would do anything for that 0.0001% chance of making it as an entertainer. These people work out obsessively because they have to look good in that casting room and keep the dream going as long as possible. It's a city full of people who look and think like Kinobody or some gigastacy female fitness influencer except basically none of them are going to make it. New York has those types as well but they make up a much smaller percentage of the populace. Furthermore, New Yorkers actually do time consuming jobs in finance/law/consulting etc so a lot of them just ease up on exercise so they can focus on work. They won't get fat (loads of walking + expensive diets) but at the same time you rarely see a jacked guy walking around Manhattan. Furthermore, LA is a beach city so that gives people an added incentive to be fit.
both have poop and homeless, so neither mogs, both shitholes
Philly and Detroit are much worse.
moot question. it's like asking which is better in this picture. Both should be immediately nuked
Kibble poop mogs. Imagine the smell
Both are absolute shit places, America is a poison to this Earth.
NY by a big margin, the city is full of people actually working hard both at their jobs and on themselves. The city demands the best of everyone, and if being IST is what puts you over the rest, the little bit of valuable time you have will be spent getting the edge over others. It's a city full of people who are IST whether you're a richgay utilizing the elite gyms or a poorgay walking everywhere and climbing dozens of staircases daily. LA is full of homosexuals and "instagram influencers" aka a few people photoshopping their bodies while 90% are a bunch of fat spics. NY most of us are IST but we don't have time being homosexuals on social media since we're actually contributing to society.
Which one of these cities mogs?
Perth and it's not even a contest
If I wanted to visit Australia what cities should I go to? I've heard Sydney is ass and to be avoided.
sydney > all
sydney is the only city worth visiting if you were to visit only one city
Sydney is cancer and needs to be nuked. The only more poz city is melbourne.
t. Lived in sydney for 35 years
Ok, which one should I go to then anon.
Perth is very comfy. Generally i would suggest avoiding cities as they're all globohomo. Try smaller centres like newcastle or waggawagga. Coastal towns like gerroa and gerringong are amazing and majority white.
Hobart
Launceston > homobart
>sydney is bad because it just is okay!
Cringe. Best city is actually Canberra but its unfair to consider it in the city rankings.
>suggest places full of methheads and brain dead bogans
Cringe.
As someone who travels a lot. Las Vegas mogs everyone. That city is runs off aesthetics.
As a New Yorker, I assume LA.
NYC is full of frumpy people tbh, most people aren’t fit, and it’s cold most of the year so they just hide their bodies under puffy jackets anyway. Plus there’s a bunch of frumpy lookin foreigners too.
I’d still rather deal with New Yorkers than Californians though.
you sound like a SIgay
I have a penthouse in the Financial District and a modest 6000 sqft chateau in the Hamptons when I want to get away from it all.
Which one mogs?
San Diego > LA
Washington DC > NYC
Found the microbrewery and kombucha enjoyer
DC is a ghetto outside of the cluster of government buildings and monuments in the middle.
What the frick are you talking about?
There are some patches of shitty parts around Columbia Heights and maybe a good portion of NE; East of the Anacostia is bad too, sure, but that’s MD. Most of the rest of DC is marbled bureaucracy and museums and everything else is the service sector that entertain employees and tourists of the former two, all of it surrounded with countries that are among the wealthiest and most educated in the country.
It’s one of the cleanest cities in America. Granted, it doesn’t compare favorably with, say, Tokyo, but it’s a whole lot better than Paris or London.
>countries
Counties, I meant.
>mogs both in every way possible