Why are lanklets stronger than manlets?

Why are lanklets stronger than manlets?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    give them pointy sticks and they arent you absolute chimp

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      nah, you still have shorter reach and shorter muscles. That means your maxinum hit range is shorter so unless you´re some buff midget, goliath is gonna whip david´s pussy on the stage with a sucker punch and there´s nothing you can do about it, except post your shitty novel online for free.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    bit gay, innit?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A lanklet is a manlet. The "-let" suffix implies the person in question is devoid of that quality. Manlets aren´t men. Wristlets have no wrist. Chinlets have no chin, etc. Also, "lank" is an adjective and the "-let" suffix is always attached to a noun so grammatically it´s incorrect. But anyways even with that error in mind, by saying "lanklet" you´re suggesting the person is missing "lank" ie height, which would mean they´re a manlet.

    So time to use a new word. However, you will all struggle to find one, because there is nothing you can say about tall people that insults them lol. Us tall chads can´t stop winning. What are you gonna call me? Yeah can´t think of anything, can you, gay?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Manletlet

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's still manlet. Tall people devoid of other qualities are still not met, hence manlets. Those that don't lack such qualities have no -lets, they are men. Same goes for short people. If they are ocercompensating because of their height related insecurity are manlets. Those who don't let their height get in the way and go on with their life are not manlets. Manletism is not always physical, it manifests in other ways too

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        manlet cope

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I'm 1.92m keep rustling

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      actually the -let suffix is diminutive, Like pig and piglet.
      "manlet" just means "small man". The fact that -let then gets applied to other things (lanklet, hairlet, etc) is just by analogy to manlet rather than proper use of the -let suffix

      https://i.imgur.com/sWOv8Nt.jpg

      Why are lanklets stronger than manlets?

      the second guy hanging off the shoulders of the first guy actually makes this easier for the first guy since it serves as a counter-balance

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bigger things are capable of more power.

    Also, don't disparage your fellow man.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Also, don't disparage your fellow man.
      Shut up incel.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    leverage
    higher ratio of muscle mass

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bigger muscles = more force

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Strength is just leverage x torque. Longer arms = more leverage, longer arms also means slightly longer muscles = more torque.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    constant cope threads from lanklets about
    >I lift less but my ROM is bigger so it should count too!
    say otherwise

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they weigh more

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they're objectively not

Your email address will not be published.