why aren't you eating bugs?

why aren't you eating bugs?

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why aren't you eating my dick?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      fag

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    YOU WILL EAT THE BUGS GOY!!!

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >rain falls on an open grass field
      OMG WATER USAGE, BAD FOR ENVIRONMENT

      You know damn well the real problem is the waste that the agro-industrial complex produces, seeing as it won't sell its products at a loss...

      So how about instead, we provide each and every household with a plot of land, and enough livestock to self-sustain themselves, at no waste?

      Oh that's right, you garden gnomes depend on other people remaining without the tools to become self-sustainable, actually truly so.
      You'd rather turn this earth into concrete megacities of pods with soulless cricket farms as far as the eye can see, if it means you get to keep power over others...
      So no. We could save the Earth and all own an orchard, a veggie patch, a few poultries and dairy cows. What we can't do, is have the same billion industries the garden gnome owns, keep pumping out billions of chickens and cows with not even 25% getting turned into products that will be consumed.
      Talk about sustainability once again gay. I dare you.

      >genuinely caring about our future is le joos!

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fuck you pussy. We need a culling. Obliterate 90% of the Chinese, 90% of the Africans, 60% of the Americans (north and south) and about 50% of Europe.
        We need war, war, war, for decades. We need a war that costs the lives of several billion.
        If there are so many people we are forced to eat insects, there are too many. Time for a culling.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          kys glowie

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Seethe, fag.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          IST degends calling for global genocide like they wouldn't be the first to the noose, lol

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Why would I be? I'm a physically fit 20 something. Not high on the chopping block.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              actually you are if you look at in terms of
              most likely to reproduce
              most years left to live and consume
              not saying you should be but if you want to curb growth you have to look for the areas most likely to cause growth next rather than trying to correct after the fact. Also you're a white man (theoretically) so like if something bad is going to be allowed to happen to a group of people by the governments "for the good of the whole" it's going to be your cross section of society.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Millions must die, anhilate everything that exists

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >If there are so many people we are forced to eat insects, there are too many. Time for a culling.
          The same people who'd force you to eat bugs would love for you to wage war against others they'd force to eat bugs, might be best to turn your attention elsewhere.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Caring about your future means letting subhumans keep breeding even if it means untold suffering

        Shalom rabbi

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you care about the future, then you want to see developing countries' agribusiness become just as economical as the west in raising and slaughtering beef and pork.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >raising and slaughtering beef and pork.
          i hate ketolards so much

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Moron, you don't have to be a ketogay to eat beef and pork, commercial or otherwise.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Humans are supposed to eat meat
        A future where humans are not allowed to eat meat is a future not worth living in
        I would much rather keep eating cows and have the world end in 10,000 years than "save the planet" and have 100,000,000 years where humans sit in pods all day and eat bugs

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Humans are supposed to eat meat
          die ketolard die

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >le pork is... le bad because child eating pedophiles say so

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >yeah that's why we should keep importing stupid brown people!!!!!
        >yeah that's why we should keep feeding idiot blacks in africa artificially inflating their population
        >yeah that's why we ignore that China and India do the majority of environmental polution!!!!
        >it's because we care about le future!!!!

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        if you genuinely cared about the future you would nuke africa and asia. they're gonna consume as much as the west and outnumber us 8 to 1.

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >rain falls on an open grass field
    OMG WATER USAGE, BAD FOR ENVIRONMENT

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    You know damn well the real problem is the waste that the agro-industrial complex produces, seeing as it won't sell its products at a loss...

    So how about instead, we provide each and every household with a plot of land, and enough livestock to self-sustain themselves, at no waste?

    Oh that's right, you garden gnomes depend on other people remaining without the tools to become self-sustainable, actually truly so.
    You'd rather turn this earth into concrete megacities of pods with soulless cricket farms as far as the eye can see, if it means you get to keep power over others...
    So no. We could save the Earth and all own an orchard, a veggie patch, a few poultries and dairy cows. What we can't do, is have the same billion industries the garden gnome owns, keep pumping out billions of chickens and cows with not even 25% getting turned into products that will be consumed.
    Talk about sustainability once again gay. I dare you.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      why aren't you eating goats?

      >You know damn well the real problem is the waste that the agro-industrial complex produces, seeing as it won't sell its products at a loss...
      they sell/produce at a loss all the time and time and difference is made up in subsidies

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        [...]
        >genuinely caring about our future is le joos!

        You're so dishonest. It's how most of the human population knows that you are being misguided about your approach. You are not benevolent at all and your true intentions show in the methods with which you choose to approach the notion of sustainability for our Earth itself.
        You know that its the corporations of the food and drug industry which generate the most food waste, and food waste is not even 5% of the total equation when it comes to GHG emissions, or our global ecologic footprint.
        Until you refuse to acknowledge that the only way to reduce food based carbon emissions is to reduce transport/logistics of import/exports, which means to provide people locally with both the space, and meager infrastructure needed to begin sustainable local farms for family households, you have not, and you will not solve the issue of the food industry's impact on the environment.
        The only culprit here is the systematic, corporatist approach to food production, and changing people over to a diet of crickets will not solve 1% of our world's environmental problem.
        If anything, it will also have countless environmental impacts and aspects such as can be caused by insect borne diseases (mosquitos, larvae) as well as actual true plagues of locusts, crickets which can decimate crops.
        If anything we should not be introducing billions of new insects onto our Earth.

        Don't be dishonest. You know the true way to reduce waste is to give back to people the means to be self-sustainable themselves. If people had to slaughter their own poultry, gather their own eggs, or make their own veggie/fruit harvests. We would consume less, we would waste less. And gather a true understanding of actually ecologically conscious practices.
        Going one step further into cement dystopias is not the answer. Anyone who defends going even further into corporate food industry strategies is actually mentally ill. Nature is easy, and simple.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          this might be the dumbest thing I've read on this board
          >humans are benevolent
          >schizo prose all over it
          >not realizing a less regulated more dispersed food supply means more pests not less
          >not realizing agrarian societies need to eat more
          >any excuse to avoid naming the common denominator of overpopulation + internationally dependent trade.
          >nature is easy, and simple

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          this

          this might be the dumbest thing I've read on this board
          >humans are benevolent
          >schizo prose all over it
          >not realizing a less regulated more dispersed food supply means more pests not less
          >not realizing agrarian societies need to eat more
          >any excuse to avoid naming the common denominator of overpopulation + internationally dependent trade.
          >nature is easy, and simple

          everything you said is wrong except
          >internationally dependent trade
          Which anon adressed with
          >give back to people the means to be self-sustainable themselves

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            if you want to live in the agrarian era you can literally go do with the probably less than $500 dollars you have in your bank right now. Oh wait you don't want to, and no one else wants to, and the only way you could possibly have your way is with some kind authoritarianism that requires some kind global military and economic disarmament to work so your country doesn't get snatched up by your first mildly ambitious and not stupid neighbor or better yet all the people who don't want to live that way. So just keep spewing your impotent hippy masturbation on the internet. The degree of fantasy is so laughable you mise well be talking literally becoming druids.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          mucho texto, kys

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Still the biggest contributor to climate change is the energy sector. Coal industry is solely sponsoring this shit. Carbon footprint is astroturfed to guilt trip consuuuuumers when the real blame lies in the coalgarden gnome.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Still the biggest contributor to climate change is the energy sector
      energy is necessary, beef isn't necessary, simple as

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        private jets and yachts aren't necessary. Let's start with those before we decide on removing food sources off people who don't have the privilege to choose.
        Oh that's right...you'd rather we begin with turning people's tap water and heat off than with you not taking a 30min private plane ride from your daughter's school to your private property.
        Fucking losers. Lose the holier than thou attitude.
        I sincerely hope all y'all mother theresa billionaires don't hope on ever showing your faces again in public. With me, and probably 50% of the world population, it'll be ON SIGHT. I mean that.

        A dude like Bill Gates probably is ON SIGHT with 90% of people, and pays off the remaining 10% not to be/to defend him from it.

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >51 m^2 for a gram of chicken protein
    I'm calling bullshit

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eat the boogs.
    It's for the planet
    It's good for you

    I would if it tasted good and didn't look like this shit.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    wow chicken isn't even that bad from an environmental point of view and I imagine it is definitely much easier to convince people to make the switch

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    "We" as in you will eat ze bugs and you will be happy.

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Caring for the environment means ensuring the survival of traditional farming and diets and resisting the environmental destruction of monocrop farming, global shipping, processed goyslop, and plant-based propaganda.

    We need regenerative livestock farming NOW.

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    chicken looks superior to me; not much difference in water consumption, they eat other bugs and fertilise the land, while giving you eggs and meat.
    And they fun to chase around.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    does wef do anything other than say stuff on media

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      sadly yes
      they are training/brainwashing many future presidents/country leaders
      look it up

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I dont find asians attractive, let alone eat their pussies

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    The nice thing about chickens, you don't need much land. Every family can have a bunch of chickens and get free eggs too. Finally they are promoting some good ideas.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >eat a bunch of chicken
      >test levels pumlet
      >eat a bunch of cow
      >test levels soaring
      yea chicken is an estrogen trap
      it's a ladies food

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why eat the bugs when we can get chickens to do that for us and turn it into food actually made for humans?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can't make 50% protein carnivore flour from chicken and other animals.
      Eat crickets instead of grains.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        No. I'm going to eat food I actually enjoy instead of powdered goyslop with a billion additives to make it not taste like the absolute shit it is.

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Id rather be a dyel vegetarian than eat bugs
    which begs the question why are they so obsessed with making people eat bugs if they could make people vegetarians instead?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's more dehumanizing so it helps them to power trip and feel more superior to the masses.

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    chinks doing that for milenia and look how they are
    thanks but I prefer eating raw cow

  18. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >51 miles squared worth of land required to raise a single chicken
    How do the chicken farms do it, lads

  19. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What is lies
    Why are you heating your home instead of putting on more clothes?
    Why do you waste water by not reusing bath water for 2-3 days?
    Why don't you drink your own piss?
    Why do you waste money and rare metals on useless trinklets like phones and laptops instead of sticking to a minimally designed small pc with as small a footprint as possible?
    Why do you waste your time and effort lifting weights when working in a high activity place would achieve close results whilst even getting paid for it?
    Why ask useless or troll questions on a Lemurian muscle-weaving forum instead of doing anything else?

    The answer is the same.
    I do what I want to, for I'm not cattle, but the master

  20. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Also need to ask: did they de-shell the bugs before coming up with the retarded "/grams of protein" figure, or did they count in the weight of the bones and hide of animals as "protein" in all other cases as well?

  21. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because I don't want cithin induced bowel cancer

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      cithin lowers your cholesterol
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11838268/

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous
  22. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Humans of the past starved to death before eating bugs

  23. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do normies reading this have schizophrenia or what? This is a total horseshit.

    You can keep two pigs quite comfortably in 20m^2, let's say you get 200kg of meat from that, and let's say on average it has 20g of protein per 100g, that's 40000g of protein. Divide 20 by 40000, that's 0.0005m^2 required per gram of protein.

    For chicken too, you can keep 20 chickens quite comfortably on 100m^2 area. Egg has 7g of protein, and let's say 10 out of 20 chickens lay eggs daily, that's 70 g of protein, divide 100 by 70, that's 1.4m^2.
    Even if you calculate in the wheat you buy, let's say you feed 1kg of wheat to them (gross overestimate but still, for the sake of argument), that raises your required area by 365, so 465/70 = 5.7m^2 per gram.

  24. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    im a human not an npc

  25. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're either unironically shilling for wef or you're actually working for wef... Either way I really want you to fucking die screaming.

  26. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    ~~*They*~~ always go for the bullshit issues like cows

  27. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can't eat beef but can have entire countries full of morons. WEF is a joke

  28. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just give the crickets to chicken since there is almost no difference

  29. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >We
    No WEF crook will be eating bugs, it's what they plan for you, the proles.

  30. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Show me those gays in the WEC eating bugs, and I might consider it. Those leeches complain about greenhouse gasses from cars when they have fucking private jets shitting up the atmosphere. Eat my asshole, garden gnomes.

Your email address will not be published.