Why do Hollywood stars never go on a bulk/cut cycle but still make gains?

Why do Hollywood stars never go on a bulk/cut cycle but still make gains?

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    UHHH UHHHH... CHICKEN AND UHHH BROCOLLI. YEP THATS RIGHT. CHICKEN AND BROCOLLI, NO ROIDS HERE NO SIREE.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can you prove your inference of roids? Wouldn't modern Hollywood be too scared to pedal illegal substances to their employees?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        The cabal of pedos, garden gnomes and agenda pushing occult creatures wouldn't dream of abusing humans to suit their end.
        Oh no
        Never

        Spastic

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >the people who use every illeval drug under the sjn to party wouldn't touch illegal drugs to get jacked

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            HEH, Deus Ex was all made up events you know..

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            A list actors talk about taking drugs constantly. Samuel l jackson did acid before a shoot, robert downey junior had a cocaine problem and seth rogan smokes more weed than snoop dog just to name a few

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              I think the openness and prevalence around the use of cosmetic surgery in Hollywood creates an extremely strong presumption that they are on drugs to help them look better too.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://drugabuse.com/blog/30-famous-actors-and-actresses-who-have-battled-drug-addiction-and-alcoholism/

              Actors doing recreational drugs is one thing, I think Hollywood actively chooses people who are prone to addiction because it makes them easier to control.

              But that's an entirely different thing to studios actually giving their assets illegal drugs. Are the agents, actors, studios, trainers, guilds and lawyers all in on it? Doubtful.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's not the studios, but the circle of celebrity personal trainers in hollywood is notorious for giving out roids like candy

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                You think the studios don't appoint the personal trainers? You think they'll let their stars just use any personal trainer off the street, to potentially pry them with hazardous substances that could jeopardize their multi-million dollar investment?

                The trainers are studio appointed.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://drugabuse.com/blog/30-famous-actors-and-actresses-who-have-battled-drug-addiction-and-alcoholism/

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            My vision is augmented

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Weinstein

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the people who use every illeval drug under the sjn to party wouldn't touch illegal drugs to get jacked

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Wouldn't modern Hollywood be too scared to pedal illegal substances to their employees?
        Paying a ((doctor)) to give you TRT because of ((low-test)) is surprisingly easy and legal

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Must be their superhuman dedication to the craft of acting.

        >Wouldn't modern Hollywood be too scared to [illegal thing]?
        No, they wouldn't. Thanks for playing.

        It's almost like you don't need to bulk and that it's a stupid meme.
        HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

        >Caloric surplus to build mass?
        >Preposterous! Everyone knows thermodynamics is the mad ramblings of a virgin!

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >implying they are actually "building mass"
          What do you think fat is? It's stored energy. You don't need to be in a caloric surplus to build muscle unless you are a literal twink.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >unless you are a literal twink.
            Have you seen modern movie stars? They oscillate between twink and hunk.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              They actually don't, and this is the thing so many normies get stuck on because they believe other dipshit DYELs on this subreddit.

              The average Hollywood transformation is from skinnyfat to ripped. You absolutely should not be in a caloric surplus if this is you, and statistically, it probably is because this is where most of the Western population sits at. We are not starving, we do not need to weigh more to look jacked, it's just a case of having enough protein, sufficient stimulus, and sufficient rest.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Do you have a single fact to back that up?

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Do you have a single fact to back that up?
                I do, but let me know what level to pitch it at.

                You mentioned thermodynamics, so I assume you're familiar with the first law.

                You need:
                >growth stimulus
                >amino acids
                >

                [...]


                >rest

                That's it. Do you understand what reverse cholesterol transport and gluconeogenesis are? Do you understand what the functions of fat are? You'd only need to be in a caloric surplus if you were underweight. Most people are not.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                That last guy was a different anon. I'm the one that mentioned thermodynamics. Pic related is my body. I do need more calories to pack on muscle mass. Maybe it's different for the big actors, I don't really follow the "TMZ caught Justin Bieber on vacation in the Bahamas!" pictures so maybe you're right to an extent. I will say that muscle is much more dense than fat, though, so the people in question would need to start out like Chris Pratt in Parks & Rec to get to Brad Pitt in Fight Club. A lot of these transformations DO involve a large energy surplus.

                Anyway, actors are juicing like crazy, and you can tell by the speed at which they put on muscle.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know what your goals are but you are carrying a lot more fat than you realize.

                Let us say you weigh 180. You want to look jacked, bigger than Pitt. You can absolutely do that at 170 without being in a surplus EASILY.

                >I will say that muscle is much more dense than fat
                You mentioned thermodynamics - why don't you consider how much energy is stored in the bonds of a triacylglycerol molecule vs how much is needed to bond a sequence of amino acids? That's exactly why fat is the medium your body stores energy in. I'm not saying you can increase your body mass without exogenous input; I'm also not disputing that you need protein, you need a lot more than most people are comfortable eating. You just don't need to be in a surplus to do the standard Hollywood transformation.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                >i'm a skinnyfat piece of shit, so I need to get fat to be muscular
                Loser.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                did you just call a board a subreddit?

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Locked cause y'all can't behave

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >i need to pack on fat in order to build muscle
          Yes. That is preposterous. Thermodynamics not involved.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Mass monsters go overboard, they do both cuts/bulks to insane degrees that aren't necessary.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Every single action movie actor has a physique that is unachievable without steroids.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Are you just trying to be wrong for its own sake? Is that what makes your bottom nice and warm and moist and sharts to dribble out?

          Obviously not "every single action movie actor" does roids, lots of guys in action movies are not meant to be fat or weak or old, etc. So that's the dumbest problem 1st with your statement.

          Take a look at Clint Walker, that was before steroids and he was an actual non heightfrauding 6' 6 so he wasn't perspectivefrauding like manlets like Stallone and Brad Pitt.

          I was going to put his picture up but I have to go with this one. Also eat a dick you fat fuck.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >M-muh movie heroes would NEVER roid t-they're just heightfrauding
            Yeah, whatever, nerd gay.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not saying that Hugh Jackman and The Rock haven't taken steroids for their movie roles, I am saying it's different for every actor and every action movie. And fwiw when they do roid, it doesn't mean they are going hard on tren, they could get a valid prescription for T sometimes.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Are you too autistic to understand what a hyperbole is?
                >it doesn't mean they are going hard on tren
                I never said anything about tren.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >dude, hollywood does not roid
            >here, I can name exactly one example from only 70 years ago.
            >what do you mean he is not ripped? He is completely massive. And tall.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Wouldn't modern Hollywood be too scared to pedal illegal substances
        retard

      • 4 months ago
        Giddy

        trt/hrt isn't illegal

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stallone admited he was on roids for Balboa. I work as a writer in film and tv. Many small time actors get their shit from local dealers while the bigger named actors just get doctors to do it because of privacy laws

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Can you prove your inference of roids?
        No anon, only you, the receiver of information can infer meaning, someone else can imply it.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think he wanted the word allusion. It's a much better fit than implication in this sense. Plus it doesn't fit in the sentence to simply say imply or >implying so you can't really refer to the shiggy diggy meme unless he were to reformat the whole construction. Btw I'm just replying to you cause I'm sitting on a shitter waiting to figure out if I need to shit. I like thinking about words. 🙂

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        > Wouldn't modern Hollywood be too scared to pedal illegal substances to their employees?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        The 3 major branches of government are Corporate, Banking, and Hollywood. Unironically. They're untouchable. In otherwords garden gnomes, garden gnomes, and garden gnomes.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Wouldn't modern Hollywood be too scared to pedal illegal substances to their employees?
        Haaaahahahaha!

        https://i.imgur.com/2O9sLrn.jpg

        [...]

        You naive goof

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Reminds me of this

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    They go to the gym instead of shitposting.

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's almost like you don't need to bulk and that it's a stupid meme.
    HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hollywood actors do copious amounts of cocaine, do you really think they draw the line at steroids.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Doing drugs in your own time is one thing, your employer giving you drugs is something completely else.

      The actors could sue for millions of any complications arose. The studios wouldn't risk it.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        you think theyre doing it all sketchy under the table? That would be completely retarded. They have doctors who prescribe them testosterone, consistently doing blood work.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The studios wouldn't risk it.
        You're nuts, man.

        you think theyre doing it all sketchy under the table? That would be completely retarded. They have doctors who prescribe them testosterone, consistently doing blood work.

        This. A lot more than test can be legally prescribed as well.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's not the studios. The average producer doesn't have a fucking scooby about fitness - as long as their production isn't brought into disrepute, they don't give a fuck.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bro these people literally sell their souls to get their foot in the door. Taking some shit some Hollywood doc gives them doesn't even bump the radar on going too far.

        Notoriously vain people who make their living (millions of dollars) looking good. Of course they are on shit kek it blows my mind people don't think they arent all on some sort of pharmaceutical aid. Pretty much anyone who has a high paying profession career which depends on physical performance or looking good is on some shit and have extremely sophisticated sources for getting it- probably medical doctors.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    For the anon who wanted spoon-feeding - we can extract 9kcal/gram from fatty acids. The activation energy required to produce a peptide bond is estimated at ~18kcal/mole. If we take the lowest molar weight amino acid - glycine - and create a monoamino peptide chain, we've spent 2 grams of fat to link 150.2 grams of amino acids.

    Granted, there will be energy wastage via the reaction/reaction-coupling chain to get from fatty acid > acetyl coa > glucose > atp > peptide bond + ADP, but this is also the least efficient possible combination of amino acids in the human body by mass, as any conventional protein would have a molar mass of closer to 200g.

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is that homelander? The actor actually put on the mass now instead of wearing a muscle suit?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's the guy who got bullied off of Twitter because everyone called him "ugly".

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Face blindness is a sign of autism

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Someone resembles a character from a show I watched two years ago and I recognize it and make a joke
        A sign of a high IQ.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    This bro looks so weird, some people should stay natty

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    save your self the guessing and START A CYCLE ALREADY!

    You know exactly what's going on. Stop wasting everyone's time.

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Am psycho
      >81kg
      Bullshit. more like 71kg.

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    kek angles and lighting really does a number on perception. Dude looks regular.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Fucking hell this is the real readpill. His bis look huge in OPs pic you would think he was natty here

      https://i.imgur.com/dsdB4o3.jpg

      Exact same pose in the exact same clothes lol

      Guys it's not a camera angle, it's shooped. Reminder that 90% of the bullshit posted here originates from mentally ill weirdos.

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Exact same pose in the exact same clothes lol

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/sSXYuda.png

      kek angles and lighting really does a number on perception. Dude looks regular.

      Fucking hell this is the real readpill. His bis look huge in OPs pic you would think he was natty here

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Genetics. Hollywood stars look better than everyone else so they have better gain genes than everyone else too. Assortative mating. That and more like a metric ton of steroids.

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Hollywood star
    I don't think I know who that is

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      he was the annoying guy in midsommar and he was in one of the narnia movies, that's all i know him from

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Legitimately impressed by his bis. Real question is how do they get such good arms despite having subpar physiques pre cycle? They tend to be lacking in most areas besides abs and sometimes chest but their arms are usually on point

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hollywood actors literally have studios pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into getting them the best personal trainers, dieticians, chefs and roids they can to make them as physically perfect as possible

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      their trainers are dog shit tier, cant understand why they dont hire real trainers

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Roids, personal trainers and personal chefs.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *