Why do people bother with low-carb diets when they consistently feel miserable on them?

Why do people bother with low-carb diets when they consistently feel miserable on them?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how is it grooming when they should be intellectual equals at those ages

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If she can’t get men her own age she must be mega fricked up. But she probably just really likes little boys.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    GIWTWM

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What are you talking about? It's way more miserable to eat starches and carbs and constantly hunger for more. omg 2 measly slices of toast wohooo! meanwhile i can just pound ground beef and eggs and not feel like I need to eat anything else and stay lean af

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Enjoy atherosclerosis

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Enjoy the diabeetus

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        atherosclerosis is literally caused by the inflammation from carbohydrates creating microtears in the cell wall, which the body is forced to repair with fats.

        It is further caused by combining carbs and fats/proteins in the same meal which causes glucose molecules to gob together with them and glycate and create plaqueing.

        Heart disease nonexistent in populations subsisting almost entirely on protein and fat such as the inuit. You're welcome

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Your doing it wrong if you carb max you should eat 4-6 times a day and drink juice in-between

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You are talking about thyroidmaxxing to a caloriecel, his sugar depleted brain lacks the power to process this information brother.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nice

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Somehow people think eating fat the most dense macro that they are actively trying to get rid of somehow causes them to burn more of it on balance (it doesn't)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it does. Changing carbs for fat or protein increases expenditure

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Keto lowers bmr

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Only transiently if at all

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >transiently
            So for the entire multiple years you are doing keto you are going to be living your life low energy?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Its slightly lower for a week or two then its increased.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe if your have diabetes messing up your metabolism but in that case you would have been better off switching to very low fat so you can use the better fuel carbs effectively without high blood lipids blocking glucose metabolism

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They only really suck when you start to get lean enough to run into bodyfat mobility issues at which point you have to increase fat intake to compensate. Assuming you weren't doing high-fat keto to begin with. Before then it's pretty easy. I'm like 13% bodyfat right now and up to about 150g-250g carbs a day to just compensate for activity. But in general any composition change while also losing weight is going to feel more rough than doing it slower.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Athletes that eat keto or even reduced carbs diets have near universal inferior performance to guys eat a lot of starch which is proof enough that fat cannot be metabolised at the same rate as carbs and should not be viewed as your primary energy macro

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think anyone is arguing that keto is an ideal diet for living on or athletic performance because of its effect on glycogen storage.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There's no effect on muscle glycogen in the longer term

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sure but in the short term it poses a significant obstacle to "athletic performance" not that anyone here really gives a frick or is out doing anything actually competitive with their body.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Athletic performance is a proxy for good metabolism so it does matter even if you never even exercise

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Matter to whom or in what regard? We're now having 3 diffent conversations.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not eating carbs definitely hurts your performance in any kind of physical expenditure. But it does make you lose weight. I think the whole American diet is just glitched and you basically have to choose between low carb and carb plus protein and wriggle your way down to fitness. At least for some people

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not true at all, the body just needs to adapt after it's been screwed with by carbs for so long. https://youtu.be/utIhWszH204?si=RttURv41xBG7-AID

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You couldn't be more mistaken. you must have gotten the vax as well to fall for that narrative.

        ?si=RttURv41xBG7-AID

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >SS
      Why wouldn't he know what Starting Strength is?

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Depends on how low carb.
    Low carb feels fricking great you have so much energy. Just stop eating bread. Even hamburger buns.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cutting out carbs appears to be a brute force way to lower your insulin and lose weight until your body loses whatever weight it’s storing due to a malfunction. I believe overuse of sugar and removal of fiber from the diet amongst other things leads to some people’s insulin sperging out and malfunctioning. When insulin is high your body goes into fat storage mode. When it’s low or normal you burn fat, or at least burn fat more easily. I’m trying to up my fiber and protein intake to see if what many people say is true.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Just stop eating fat, high blood lipids are the problem and insulin is just trying to fix it and not really succeeding they won't drop that low even if you had a 0 fat diet since constantly fat from your stores is drawn into circulation and this plus excess intake is the cause of type 2 diabetes note that the treatment is never to reduce insulin so people calling insulin the villain is idiotic

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        high blood lipids are from carbs

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          High blood lipids are from being fat. Leaner people readily metabolize any mobilized fat.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Leaner people readily metabolize any mobilized fat.
            Well and they are simply starting from a lower baseline the more fat you have the more is mobilised so any intake is less likely to be an immediate issue if you are thin

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          So the thing that lipids are (fat) is not the cause of the presence of it self even though obesity and type 2 diabetes have direct correlation? I dunno where you are getting your opinions but they make no sense

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            your liver makes triglycerides from carbs. you can be obese without diabetes or have diabetes without being obese. sumo wrestlers get less diabetes than their leaner japanese countrymen

            High blood lipids are from being fat. Leaner people readily metabolize any mobilized fat.

            not true

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >not true
              How is either part untrue in a non-diabetic person?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                read the rest of the post

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's not an answer.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you can change blood lipids quickly without weight loss

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Also not an answer.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >High blood lipids are from being fat
                it disproves this. you can stay fat and lose high blood lipids. are you a moron? im thinking yes

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You can't even follow your own reasoning. It would be laughable if this wasn't the norm here.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                now you are coping

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >your liver makes triglycerides from carbs
              This is effectively not true unless you overeat in the extreme. Carbs are not converted to fats in meaningful quantities in humans

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >High-carbohydrate/low-fat, isocaloric diets have repeatedly been shown to increase plasma triglyceride concentrations.
                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11790961/
                do i have to explain what isocaloric means?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                An abstract with no detail it will be a study where they fed them a ton of fructose with no glucose to balance it out which can be an issue but isnt likely to be replicated under any normal conditions not even drinking American soda

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                wrong but sure carry on with your fantasy

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Other carbs aren't even processed in the liver in the same way as fructose they go directly into the bloodstream and then may be pushed I to the cells and quickly metabolised or stored as glycogen in the liver or muscle but in this case glucose for instance does not convert to fat. Also you don't have the full text of that study so its worthless to cite you need to find one that explicitly says glucose or starch which is just a chain of glucose

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                yeah thats wrong but carry on

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry your cortisol levels are to high to formulate a proper response but such is the fate of all keto types, typically they don't even realise they are mentally decaying until they return to a normal diet.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                no complicated response necessary. carbs raise blood fats yes fructose does it more but so does starch. now feel free to cope all you want

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Are you trying to say that fat intake has no impact on blood lipids? Or less than carbs?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Additional to this you are arguing that fat is in fact bad but carbs are worse than fat because they become fat but fat is already fat and mostly in worse forms than any produced in your body. What sort of logic is that?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                How do you lower triglycerides?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    nice

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Female pedos are nowhere near as bad as male pedos and the vast majority of teenage guys would enjoy having sex with an adult woman. I don't see anything wrong with the teacher's actions as presented in the OP bait pic. The only problem I would have is if she got pregnant and demands child support from the student or his family.

    Male pedos should get the bullet.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What about a boy of 10 or younger? There’s still consent, violation, and emotional disfunction even in male sex abuse victims.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The only people who think female pedos are cool are men who were never abused by one of them and female pedos themselves, because they imagine what the situation would be like with their horny ass adult brain. Even if you're a teenager when it happens, it'll frick you up somehow. All pedos should get the bullet.

        I would say under 15 is way too low and they should get the bullet too if they have sex with a 10yo boy (or girl for that matter)

        I know that there's still a chance of emotional damage but the chances of a teenage boy suffering long-term harm to his development and mental health as a consequence of being groomed by an adult woman are much lower that in the case of male pedos grooming teenage girls. There are exceptionally few cases of men having their lives completely devastated because they had sex with an adult woman when they were teens. It's much, much more harmful for women.

        Not that I look down on men who do suffer because of it. I think that having to deal with trauma and metal illness of any kind is a tough thing to have to push through, I just think that it's far less likely to happen to boys that were groomed by women. Boys groomed by men I think suffer as much as girls groomed by men

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, female pedos are even worse than male pedos and more mentally fricked up.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The only people who think female pedos are cool are men who were never abused by one of them and female pedos themselves, because they imagine what the situation would be like with their horny ass adult brain. Even if you're a teenager when it happens, it'll frick you up somehow. All pedos should get the bullet.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >26
    Wtf
    She looks nearly 40

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No she doesn’t, go outside

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You probably look old
        I know 26 year olds that look younger than her.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *