Why don't ketards eat fiber? It makes you full on less calories.

Why don't ketards eat fiber? It makes you full on less calories.

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Keto is a diet for low IQ fat people who think that fruits are the same as eating candy.
    Protein + fiber is the best way to cut.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      this I don't know why anyone would give up fruits when cutting they're not calorie dense at all and extremely filling

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >It makes you full

        >extremely filling
        all fat people cope terms

        I just eat till I'm satiated, not fill up my stomach with whatever substance until I literally feel physically unable to put anything into my stomach anymore

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Satiated = filling.

          Keto includes tons of vegetable fiber. I eat 200g of salad every day, 200g tomato, 200g cucumber, 150g avocado, ...

          It's just unnecessary to limit your carb intake especially if you do any exercise

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Satiated = filling
            How are you going to get full on shit you can't digest?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Are you actually retarded and think it just magically disappears within your body?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      this I don't know why anyone would give up fruits when cutting they're not calorie dense at all and extremely filling

      Because fruits are high in sugar.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        And meat is high in protein
        Next irrelevant metric please

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Fruit with its fiber content doesn’t cause the glucose/insulin spike responsible for disease.

          who gives a shit what matters is calories which fruits are not very dense in

          See this is proof how shit fitness education is. Ketolards just say this as if its automatically a bad thing.

          Are you fags not aware of how insulin spikes and their effect to lose weight?
          That's literally why eating windows work. The more sugar you consume, the less likely it is that your body will burn fat. It'll burn sugar instead.
          If calories were all that mattered, then I could lose weight eating a single Ice cream cone per day.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That's not how it works.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Fruit with its fiber content doesn’t cause the glucose/insulin spike responsible for disease.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        who gives a shit what matters is calories which fruits are not very dense in

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        See this is proof how shit fitness education is. Ketolards just say this as if its automatically a bad thing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fructose is even worse than glucose. The difference is a piece of fruit doesn't have much quantity of it. Try introducing fruit juice into your diet and see how you go trying to stay 12% bf 😉

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Fruit juice doesn't have the fiber of the fruit itself, which is why it has about the same effect on your body as a can of coke. That shit is incredibly deceptive by having 'fruit' in the name.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Keto includes tons of vegetable fiber. I eat 200g of salad every day, 200g tomato, 200g cucumber, 150g avocado, ...

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fiber has been shown to cause constipation

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why do garden gnomes fear fiber? I have heard this but fiber always helps my digestion

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They don't. Plenty of junk foods get advertised as healthy because they have added fiber. You have been garden gnomeed

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          garden gnomes are the ones tricking you into eating indigestible, nutrient-devoid trash. You pay them a premium for "food" that literally does nothing positive for your body.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        garden gnomes are the ones tricking you into eating indigestible, nutrient-devoid trash. You pay them a premium for "food" that literally does nothing positive for your body.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Satiated = filling
          How are you going to get full on shit you can't digest?

          fiber has been shown to cause constipation

          This guy shows up every thread trying to convince people fiber and plant foods are bad and have no benefit when literally every study has shown otherwise. Ignore him.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            ZE STOOOOOOOOOODIES HaVE SHOWN

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Okay

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >This guy
            >singular
            Nope.
            Also, see the evidence for yourself: https://youtu.be/xqUO4P9ADI0

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >YouTube docs
              Lol nope

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >totally fair and unbiased evidence bro its not like its a low carb propaganda channel

                All the studies he summarizes are fully cited in the video and you can go look them up for yourselves. At this point you're being willfully ignorant and avoiding new information.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >All the studies he summarizes are fully cited in the video and you can go look them up for yourselves. At this point you're being willfully ignorant and avoiding new information.
                Those shitty videos have been floating around IST for years. Nobody here believes their lies. They are just cherry-picking studies in order to sell you a lifestyle.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >when I present studies that support my preconceived views it's science
                >when you present studies which counter my preconceived views it's cherrypicking
                >I am infallible, therefore only evidence which supports me can be correct
                People like you are so obnoxious to discuss anything with. It's clear you're actively trying to push an agenda and won't even address the studies people counter you with, you just sperg about muh cherrypicking and muh propaganda while literally behaving like a propagandist.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >It's clear you're actively trying to push an agenda
                This actually made me laugh.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >won't even address the studies people counter you with
                Have you countered every study that says fiber is beneficial? Or have you only cited 0.0001% of outliers? Because if you are trying to prove something other than established scientific knowledge you need to present evidence that millions of people and thousands of studies are wrong instead of a few odd papers

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >when I present studies that support my preconceived views it's science
                >when you present studies which counter my preconceived views it's cherrypicking
                >I am infallible, therefore only evidence which supports me can be correct
                People like you are so obnoxious to discuss anything with. It's clear you're actively trying to push an agenda and won't even address the studies people counter you with, you just sperg about muh cherrypicking and muh propaganda while literally behaving like a propagandist.

                Ok so what does it mean that I can find 1000 studies that say the opposite of each study he cites then? Am I "cherrypicking?" Legit question.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Ok so what does it mean that I can find 1000 studies that say the opposite of each study he cites then?
                And where are they?

                >won't even address the studies people counter you with
                Have you countered every study that says fiber is beneficial? Or have you only cited 0.0001% of outliers? Because if you are trying to prove something other than established scientific knowledge you need to present evidence that millions of people and thousands of studies are wrong instead of a few odd papers

                >Have you countered every study that says fiber is beneficial?
                No one has posted any.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Answer the questions instead of posting smartass rhetoricals

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Answer the questions instead of posting smartass rhetoricals
                That's all ketolards do, smugly argue in bad faith to waste everyone's time. I've learned to stop conversing with them when I see the pattern arise.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Based thanks for the advice. Sometimes I can get trapped in my own head because I know they are obviously incorrect. I'll just quit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So posting evidence and then asking for counter-evidence from the opposing side is arguing in bad faith and wasting time? Because that's all I've done so far.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You are the opposition. You have posted 0 evidence disproving the corpus of medical and scientific articles and thats not how scientific consensus works

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I posted

                https://i.imgur.com/MYid6Yj.png

                >This guy
                >singular
                Nope.
                Also, see the evidence for yourself: https://youtu.be/xqUO4P9ADI0

                which is a summary of multiple studies which demonstrate that fiber is not beneficial, including citations. Where are the pro-fiber studies? Show them to me, prove me wrong. So far I'm the only one to post anything even resembling evidence supporting a claim.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Good for youm. You have posted a summary of less than 10 studies which contradict the whole of all medical literature. You are free to start disproving all of the literature and you might finish before your 50th reincarnation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Still no studies supporting the benefits of fiber. You are the one arguing in bad faith. So far the discussion has gone like this:
                >Fiber is good.
                >No, it's not, here are cited studies showing why with a concise summary.
                >That doesn't count because I have 1000 studies that say otherwise.
                >Can I see them?
                >No.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Literally just Google "is fiber good for you?" you disingenuous gay

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's not how this works. You claim there is evidence that proves me wrong, so show it. I already produced evidence for my claim, but your only argument is "nuh-uh, that wrong 'cuz I said so."

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong. You have claimed fiber has no benefit which is contrary to all knowledge. You are the one who needs to present evidence, which you have not, you have presented a biased summary of a tiny few studies.
                You are shifting the burden of proof. Have a good day. I'll not argue further

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not shifting the burden of proof. I provided evidence for my claim, now I'm asking for evidence of yours. You keep saying there's evidence but for some reason find it impossible to post any.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I already produced evidence for my claim
                You resented outliers that resonate with your belief.
                From biased sources

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And you have presented NOTHING except the insistence that mountainous evidence exists which you can't show me.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong. You have claimed fiber has no benefit which is contrary to all knowledge. You are the one who needs to present evidence, which you have not, you have presented a biased summary of a tiny few studies.
                You are shifting the burden of proof. Have a good day. I'll not argue further

                >I'll not argue further

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Literally just Google "is fiber good for you?" you disingenuous gay
                He could very very easily search pubmed "fiber" and come up with a 1,000 studies that all confirm it's health benefits.

                But he won't. He's not interested in learning anything. He's interested in pushing his shitty views.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >He could very very easily search pubmed "fiber" and come up with a 1,000 studies that all confirm it's health benefits.
                So link some. Bring me evidence. That's how debate works. You don't just get to say, "lol google it fag" and declare yourself the winner.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > Still no studies supporting the benefits of fiber

                I’m not that anon but here is a review of RCTs into the impact of fiber on your micro biome

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146107/

                TL:DR - Fiber is consumed by your gut bacteria that go onto release short chain fatty acids that do things like reduce inflammation, improve insulin sensitivity, reduce cholesterol, etc…
                /

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Why can't I just eat these short chain fatty acids and holocaust the gut bacteria?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                People who do holocaust their gut bacteria (typically those who have had many courses of antibiotics) are plagued by abdominal problems (crippling chronic pains, diarrhoea, vomit, etc lasting for months) will require fecal transplants

                Or you could just eat your vegetables young man

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ketones provide the requisite short chain fatty acids with none of the downsides of eating large amounts of indigestible plant matter

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And none of the upsides

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >why eat fiber when you could stress your kidneys and up your salt requirement and become totally devoid of pjytonutrients and critical vitamins and any variety at all huh

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >>why eat fiber
                i dont know which is why i dont
                >improve your kidneys function
                >and lower your blood pressure
                >and become totally replete with vitamins and minerals
                fixed that all for you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                1. Citation needed
                2. How should one get such ketones if they don’t want to be on a weight loss diet?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Because fermentation happens after those fatty acids would be absorbed in the intestine.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So far I'm the only one who has posted any evidence of why I believe fiber is not beneficial and may even be harmful. I'm not posting smartass rhetoricals, I'm asking for evidence from your side. I can't counter studies no one has posted and claiming there are 1000 studies that prove me wrong is meaningless unless you can actually produce some. That's all any of the pro-fiber people ITT can seem to do: make wild claims about the vast number of studies that prove them right without ever being able to actually post any. Presented with actual studies which run counter to their claims, they STILL don't link studies, instead just seething about cherrypicking and "muh 1000 studies" when I have yet to see even ONE in this thread.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257631/

                https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31809-9/fulltext

                https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/fiber/art-20043983

                https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/should-i-be-eating-more-fiber-2019022115927

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The Effect of Dietary Fibre on Gut Microbiota, Lipid Profile, and Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34073366/
                >A disequilibrium of the gut microbial community has been closely associated with systemic inflammation and metabolic syndromes including type 2 diabetes. While low fibre and high fat diets may lead to dysbiosis of the gut microbiome as a result of the loss of useful microbes, it has been reported that a high fibre diet may prevent the fermentation of protein and may promote eubiosis of gut microbiota.
                >Conclusion: DF significantly (p < 0.05) increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and significantly decreased (p < 0.05) LPS, total cholesterol, and BMI as compared with the control.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146107/
                >Dietary Fiber, Gut Microbiota, and Metabolic Regulation—Current Status in Human Randomized Trials
                >New knowledge about the gut microbiota and its interaction with the host’s metabolic regulation has emerged during the last few decades. Several factors may affect the composition of the gut microbiota, including dietary fiber. Dietary fiber is not hydrolyzed by human digestive enzymes, but it is acted upon by gut microbes, and metabolites like short-chain fatty acids are produced. The short-chain fatty acids may be absorbed into the circulation and affect metabolic regulation in the host or be a substrate for other microbes. Some studies have shown improved insulin sensitivity, weight regulation, and reduced inflammation with increases in gut-derived short-chain fatty acids, all of which may reduce the risk of developing metabolic diseases.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                In contrast to an abundance of studies showing positive changes to health markers due to dietary fibre, I am not aware of a single study showing improved gut microbiota or improvement in other health markers on a low fibre diet.

                >The Effect of Dietary Fibre on Gut Microbiota, Lipid Profile, and Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34073366/
                >A disequilibrium of the gut microbial community has been closely associated with systemic inflammation and metabolic syndromes including type 2 diabetes. While low fibre and high fat diets may lead to dysbiosis of the gut microbiome as a result of the loss of useful microbes, it has been reported that a high fibre diet may prevent the fermentation of protein and may promote eubiosis of gut microbiota.
                >Conclusion: DF significantly (p < 0.05) increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and significantly decreased (p < 0.05) LPS, total cholesterol, and BMI as compared with the control.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146107/
                >Dietary Fiber, Gut Microbiota, and Metabolic Regulation—Current Status in Human Randomized Trials
                >New knowledge about the gut microbiota and its interaction with the host’s metabolic regulation has emerged during the last few decades. Several factors may affect the composition of the gut microbiota, including dietary fiber. Dietary fiber is not hydrolyzed by human digestive enzymes, but it is acted upon by gut microbes, and metabolites like short-chain fatty acids are produced. The short-chain fatty acids may be absorbed into the circulation and affect metabolic regulation in the host or be a substrate for other microbes. Some studies have shown improved insulin sensitivity, weight regulation, and reduced inflammation with increases in gut-derived short-chain fatty acids, all of which may reduce the risk of developing metabolic diseases.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257631/

                https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31809-9/fulltext

                https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/fiber/art-20043983

                https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/should-i-be-eating-more-fiber-2019022115927

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The only studies are on people with IBS or some other chronic condition, and keto shills use this and extrapolate that it applies to everyone which is insane

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >totally fair and unbiased evidence bro its not like its a low carb propaganda channel

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Paul Mason is the quack who leads with the same study (oh hey it’s the first one in the video) of people with chronic constipation who were resistant to standard treatment and were referred to a specialist clinic.

              Ffs 50% of the control group had anal bleeding, how is that applicable to the population as a whole?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Ffs 50% of the control group had anal bleeding, how is that applicable to the population as a whole?
                Because more fiber worsened all symptoms and less fiber improved all symptoms, all the way down to 0.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > Let’s say you have 1000 people with condition X.
                > The first line treatment is product Y, which works for most of them
                > You now have 100 people with condition X
                > They go to their doctor
                > Doctor tries treatment with medications A-H
                > These work for most of them
                > You now have 10 people classified as having a resistant form of condition x
                > They are referred to a specialist clinic that is trialing a few things
                > One treatment is a drastic reduction of product Y
                > 6 patients show improvement in symptoms
                > Quack and cultists distort this data to condemn product Y for the general population

                That’s what you’re doing anon. You cannot extrapolate data from a specific and minuscule patient population group resistant to standard treatment and apply it to the population as a whole.

                It’s akin to saying berries are bad for everyone because some people are allergic

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                In people with a medical condition. The study is totally irrelevant to 99.99% of people. that like saying people with an apple allergy responded well to subtraction of apples from their diet, and this proves apples are unhealthy

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              [...]
              All the studies he summarizes are fully cited in the video and you can go look them up for yourselves. At this point you're being willfully ignorant and avoiding new information.

              None of the studies Paul Mason pretends to cite actually support what he is saying on the video. Ketolards always lie.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And water has been shown to cause death

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >he ate the entire container of psyllium

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Can't remember last time I didn't wake up and had oatmeal
    it's been almost 15 years, every morning it's oatmeal

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lemme just eat rocks to fill up my stomach. You dumb moron.
    I eat food to recover and feed my body/organs with needed nutrients. Not to feel full.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Rocks at least provide some essential minerals and don't fuck with the absorption of other vitamins.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bro i eat once a day, try to not be a willpower-let.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do vegans have such a hateboner for keto?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Why do vegans have such a hateboner for keto?

      keto is the gateway drug to the carnivore diet which will inevitably lead you to just starting eating meat and shit raw because cooking is fucking annoying

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > Someone says fiber is good for you
      > They must be a vegan shill
      Christ

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Welcome to the mental illness board, I'm seriously ranking this over 4chan and /LULZ/ in schizo ranking these days

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because we don't undereat like you fags

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They believe it's harmful. They are totally lost cause and should simply be gassed.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You're retarded and so is everyone that agrees with you. Broccoli, spinach, and kale are all keto. Why the fuck do you care, and why the fuck are you shitting up these boards with these retard threads?
    >look at me guys, I defeated the straw man I built
    >I'm so fucking cash
    I'm not even keto but fuck I'm not an ignorant retard.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They eat greens though which are full of fibre, you have a low IQ

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >less
    fewer

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    not everyone is trying to lose weight, fatass
    post body

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >literal nonsense post unrelated to OP

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        dishonest post by a fatty fatty boombaladdy
        you make me sick you fat pig, and the way you try to lie when you get caught literally makes me throw up in my mouth, you are so pathetic

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why don't ketards eat fiber?
    They are convinced that fiber is bad for you, despite hundreds of studies that confirm its benefits and 1 study that says its bad.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I've been on a steady diet of steaks and I feel fine

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i thought i was a ketolard and i eat carbs all the time

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not reading anything here
    Everyone should eat at least 5g of psyllium a day the ghost poop alone justify it

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Assaulter of Adipose. The Brute of Beef. The Crusher of Carbtards. The Destroyer of Diabetes. The Exterminator of Eating. The Finisher of Flabs. The Grinder of Greens. The Harbinger of Health. The Immolator of Indigestion. The Jabber of Jaundice. The Killer of Keys. The Lifebringer of Liver. The Master of Meat. The Nurser of Natiinalism. The Obliterator of Obesity. The Powerwalker of Pussy. The Quackler of Quails. The Ravager of Rabbit starvation. The Smasher of Seed oils. The Trouncer of Trannies. The Usurper of Ulcers. The Violator of Vegans. The Wanderer of Willpower. The Xenotransplanter of Xenium. The Yanker of Yids. The Zinger of Zeaxanthin.
    THE FAT BURNER
    THE EXECUTOR OF B12 DEFICIENCY
    THE ANNIHILATION OF ANCEL KEYS
    THE DEATH OF ISRAEL
    THE WILL OF ALLAH
    THE WILL OF GOD
    KETOREN
    KETO THE REN
    JI THE KETO
    JI TO THE KE TO THE TO TO THE REN
    KE THE REN THE JI THE TO
    ENTER KETOREN

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why don't ketards eat fiber?
    keto must be the most strawmanned diet i've ever seen, literally every ketofag gurus like chiropractor Berg will tell you to eat 8 cups of salads a day just to load up on the fibers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's not strawmanned at all. There are bazillion keto grifters out there all of them selling their own variation of the scam, why, because it doesn't work so they have to keep adding more minor variation bullshit to it all the time.

      ketones provide the requisite short chain fatty acids with none of the downsides of eating large amounts of indigestible plant matter

      >indigestible plant matter
      Not even ruminants digest cellulose you baka, it's for gut microbiome. Next time you exit your retard chamber, touch some grass with cow poop on it and observe how it's mostly undigested straws and shit. But even we can break the cellulose encased cell walls and that's where the nutrition is, not on cellulose cell walls.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >It makes you full on less calories.
    >It makes your stomach bloated to shit making eating extra food painful.
    FTFY

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i do keto because being in ketosis makes me feel great and i wake up feeling happy :]

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >92 posts
    >38 replies
    Why do the discord trannies keep samefagging so shamelessly?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is why we need thread IDs like in biz and pol

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I went zero fiber for over a year and ended up with a bacteria infection that gave me nonstop diarrhea.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sorry to hear that, I hope you are recovered and okay now anon

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thanks. It was horrible. I'm still recovering but I'm no longer shitting liquid multiple times a day.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Good to hear that your movements have improved, I hope for a full recovery soon. Carry the fire.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I went very low fiber keto for a like two months, and that caused so severe constipation i had to pluck the rock solid poop out my anus with fingers. I had to break it down to smaller pieces like that to get it out. the recommended high salt intake also played a role dehydrating my whole body including intestines. Still prone to hemorrhoids after that adventure, years later.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *