With the push to reduce the consumption of animal products due to the environmental impact how are we going to make gains?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
With the push to reduce the consumption of animal products due to the environmental impact how are we going to make gains?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>how are we going to make gains?
Eating meat. However we will probably get to the point where one has to let go of every other luxury in life to be able to afford meat. But then again, nothing is more valuable than your health.
Soon they'll start taxing meat products, just like they do with tobacco and alcohol
this, they should start doing it to very overweight people tho
Oh they won't. Goyslop will still be cheap. Real food on the other hand will become prohibitively expensive.
goyslop isn't cheap at all its actually more expensive than meat now unless its on a market sale.
Worst case scenario, I build a chicken coop for eggs/meat. Maybe a couple goats.
Oi, you got a license for that?
Basically the reality of the situation now that more and more neighborhoods have ~~*HOAs*~~
I'd probably build the coop tucked away where it's not really visible from the street
>living in a israeli scam
Friendly reminder that israelites invented the suburb. Google levittstown ny.
I own chickens and I live right next to Levittown. My gram lives in her original Levit house and it's a pretty nice area still at least. A lot of Indian people moving in now that the 1st gen house owners are dying off but they're all pleasant enough people
There are like 5 levittowns and the entire east coast is a horrific overpopulated decrepit shithole.
Knowing israelites in government, it would only be for pork.
>how are we going to make gains
You can still make gains by eating plants.
Afaik chickpeas, buckwheat, amaranth and quinoa have a good digestibility and are complete protein. Even if you don't eat them you can still mix 2 foods in order to get all EAAs.
Rip ketogays tho.
So you saying I need to eat amouranth's pussy everyday for godtier gains?
This plus pea/rice protein blend, nuts, hemp and even some occasional tofu/tempeh. Life-long vegetarian and vegan for the past 5 years. Very possible to look great on a plant based diet. Most will struggle to get enough protein though
Enjoy being a bloatlord with no energy
> t. Ex vegan/veg for 10+ years
> t. Ex vegan/veg for 10+ years
>Still struggling with bloating
Lmao
>No energy
Just eat carbs bro, were you feeding primarly on hyper processed fake meat or something?
>bro trust me just eat 1 metric cube worth of spinach every day its totally normal and wayyy more healthier than eating deenz or a chicken breast.
Im not even a ketoBlack person and i can see how dumb this is, i think veganism should be a voluntery thing for most of the population, the only people who whould be forced to eat ze plant bazed meatz should be fatties and NEETs or something
>and i can see how dumb this is
Probably because you made a moronic strawman that no one is saying.
>amaranth
Nice try, she's a streamer and doesn't provide any protein
you can make plenty of perfectly good food without meat, and the average slob wouldn't even feel the health effects if you replaced half their hamburgers with beans, chickpeas, etc alternatives.
Of course those are cheap, unprofitable, and don't rub what you're doing in the goyim's face enough. We need to have onions chemical imitation deep fried in seed oil and sold at the same price regular meat cost last year.
>you can make plenty of perfectly good meat with plants, just feed those plants to animals
Fixed that for you
you had to completely change my sentence so you could repeat a joke i've seen in fricking boomer comics. I sentence you to eating 1/2 an impossible burger.
The point was it wouldn't kill the average american to eat some beans or lentils, just not in a way that feeds the consoomer machine.
I hate this shit so much because of how little meat even contributes to muh climate change. It's such of load of shit, no fricking cow farts don't cause global warming you fricking moron methane doesn't stay in the atmosphere as long as CO2 does, and it's cyclical, Cow eats grass -> poos and farts -> leads to more grass. Most of the net pollution that comes from animal agriculture is also from the third world, not highly optimized farms in the US or Australia that yield shit tons of meat every year.
You have to be a complete useful idiot to go vegan because of that shit.
You have a verified, scientific source to back that up?
Whatever the cows fart are already a part of the carbon cycle. Nothing new is added to the system. Even that crazy amount of water is just rain water lmao.
>I'll take photooxidation for $2000 alex
>dodododoodododo DAILY DOUBLE
>This gas, emitted by farm ruminants, and blamed for being a potent "greenhouse gas" photooxidizes in the atmosphere into harmless CO2 and watervapor within 48 hours
>what is methane
>correct!
> "Methane is not a problem. Co2 is!"
> "Methane breaks down into Co2 and harmless vapor"
Lmao
except that's not what fricking little moron glowbull warmists like you harp on and on about. They chant that methane is a "particularly potent greenhouse gas, 500,000x worse than CO2!!!1!1!!" When in reality it quickly just photooxidizes into CO2 and water vapor.
the heads of these type of people that seethe about emissions usually explode if you tell them that without a single emission the planet would continue going to shit.
ecology is my hobby, I forward a lot of information to people that make a living from it, literally none of us think that it's the temperature that's fricking shit up, there's been severe swings in temperature within the recent evolutionary history of literally just about any animal that currently exists.
when we say 'climate change' we don't mean the overarching temperature creep, we mean that we're logging forests which exposes the soil to sunlight and causes it to erode, we're plowing grassland ecosystems because they're easily turned into agriculture, and we're draining swamps for it too, the only nature we actively conserve is rocks and ice.
Any source on the claim that methane dissapears in a matter of days ?
https://acomstaff.acom.ucar.edu/dkin/Documents/Johnston_98JD01213.pdf
So where exactly does that study make the claim that methane dissapears in a matter of day?
Why don't you read it you fricking little moron? Is reading so hard for you?
>Oh noes, he called me out on my off-topic study that I wanted to bluff him with
>Better ad hominem him
that's a very long winded way of saying
>WAHHH I CANT READ AND UNDERSTAND SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
>Can shut me up by just posting a screenshot of the part that agrees with him
>Doesn't do it
Yeah, I'm thinking bullshit.
And judging by your posting style you are also
that got BTFO'ed by other anons for not completely reading another study you posted.
You asked for the source, now read it you ADHD riddled zoomer
Yeah I read it, and no fricking mention of methane photoxidation ending in 48 hours was found.
Why are you so afraid of posting a screenshot?
>Uh I spent five seconds Googling this and uncritically swallowed the first result the algorithm shat out at me, so you're clearly wrong
yea none of this addresses forever chemicals and shit constantly dumped in oceans. CO2 is a tiny part of the shit going on. the planet itself will be here regardless of any CO2 induced disaster, if it actually occurs. The other chemicals, microplastics, etc, will be here for nearly forever - damaging every living creature and corrupting its DNA.
There were far more numerous large animals before in history than there are now with absolutely no impacts on the environment. You will NEVER convince us of cows causing climate change, carbonphobic brainlets will NEVER be correct. You either have financial, ideological, or fear investments in that moronation to even remotely entertain such filthy and obvious distortions.
>There were far more numerous large animals before in history
Source on that claim?
>Dodging the point
I asked for a source anon and I still didn't get it.
>Uh, did you just claim something without a source? You have to send me a source so I can not read it and judge it solely on who made it
>potht thourthe tho I may critique the thourthe
Frick back to rebdit you cripple brained homosexual
Farm animals produce less air pollution than big pharma or big agi.
The problem with farm pollution is from plowing and leaving the land/micro-organisms exposed to sunlight for months and months out of the year. We're killing the soil, which in turn produces nutritionless food. Same problem with pavement, it doesn't absorb anything like soil and plants do so we just bake. We're taking away our insulation and replacing it with fricking heating coils, murdering our sacred place where we bury death and grow life and replacing it with packaged, processed goods and increasingly nutrient starved, artifically enriched flesh. We're putting on the clown make up as we speak, and the sweaty drops are making the paint streak. We gotta fix the way we farm/relate to the land, full stop. We gotta fix the way we raise animals and give them proper access to grazing grounds and nutritious foods, or pretty soon you'll be eating six steaks and still feeling hungry, cuz all that heavy flesh just ain't fricking worth anything.
Photorealistic food, photorealistic people. Only good for screen-shotting.
look at the sources for this video:
Raising lifestock doesn't produce any "new" CO2. The methane that gets released by cows farting gets converted into CO2 within a few days. It's the exact same amount of CO2 that was earlier absorbed by the plants that the cows ate, so there's zero new CO2 being added to that circle.
The same applies to the water "wasted" by raising lifestock - the vast majority of water that's used for raising lifestock is "green" water, meaning just rainwater that isn't drinkable directly anyway. Dirty water gets drunk by cows -> cows piss out the water -> you now have the exact same amount of dirty water that you started out with.
This is all a huge scam by the fossile fuel lobby because they want to blame climate change on something else.
fricking nerd virgin r*ddit Black person, you do not lift I can guarantee it you twink hipster homosexual
Cow farts are legitimately 10-13% of methane released into our atmosphere per annum.
Sorry your simpleton mind cannot grasp these basic concepts. I can tell you've never worked on a farm. Just a dumbass city boy propagandized by your favorite rich spoiled DYEL city boy mouthpieces (Tucker, Alex Jones, Shapiro, etc.)
see
>Now name the two most powerful contributors to global warming
>What is CO2 and water vapor?
>CORRECT!
Chuds are absolutely fricking moronic, they will never learn because information that doesn't confirm their biases legitimately scares them. Thanks for proving my point and making yourself look like a moron. Subhuman intelligence
now name the top causes for environmental decline.
>all of them are habitat loss.
'global warming' only pushes species that were already on the verge of collapse over the edge, but not a single extinction would be prevented without it because that's not how these species ended up being threatened.
Well they gotta grow those søybeans for vegan goyslop somewhere
>Well they gotta grow those søybeans for cattle feed somewhere
Ftfy
it's not specifically plant agriculture that's causing the declines, it's all agriculture.
the human population has been artificially inflated with petrochemical fertilizers to over twice the amount of people that the environment can naturally sustain with it's own nitrogen production, most agriculture would not be possible without this, and it'll stop being possible when it runs out within the next decade and we have no alternatives for it.
ocean acidification hasn't caused any extinctions yet, we just know it can.
most species that are currently in decline, or have gone extinct, went extinct purely due to habitat loss from agriculture.
most 'climate change' has nothing to do with emissions, it's the result of humans altering an environment, changing the biological make up of a habitat alters it's weather.
CO2 and ocean acidification is more dangerous than the higher temperatures.
Either way it has to deal with humans pumping out too much CO2 for the planet's resources to deal with. Whether the planet's resources to deal with CO2 are dwindling or the CO2 itself is increasing is just arguing semantics because both are caused by man and both fall under the umbrella term "global warming"
wonder why that didn't happen in the Eocene period
because without all of our infrastructure populations naturally recede and expand when the weather changes, plants that can't stand the heat recede to mountainous environments for example, there's still relict species from when the planet was much cooler around as a result, picture related, relict from the tertiary period that was once widespread.
when we started using massive amounts of lands and building roads everywhere species stopped being able to do this, they can't cross habitat, it needs to be unfragmented for them to do this.
Yes, but the CO2 that's released from that methane isn't from a fossile carbon source and thus doesn't get added to the total.
Plant grows while sucking CO2 out of the air -> Cow eats plant -> Cow farts -> methane gets into the atmosphere and gets converted into CO2 again -> exact same amount of CO2 gets released back into the air -> repeat.
It's a zero sum game, there's zero CO2 that gets added to the atmosphere via cow farts, it just circulates.
everything that processes plant matter releases methane, this isn't unique to cows, most of the global methane production is from swamps, it's not the reason the climate it going to shit, that's due to habitat loss, almost no species have issues withstanding temperature shifts if they're able to expand and recede into suitable micro-habits but they can't because they've all been fragmented with infrastructure or turned into farmland.
grassland is also a major sequester of carbon.
without greenhouse emissions, you still wouldn't save the planet because it's not the reason why ecosystems are collapsing, that's pretty much entirely due to human expansion, fertilizer pollution, and any and all forms of industrial agriculture.
this is correct, cattle largely eats forage from areas unfit for traditional agriculture, very little land is 'wasted' on them that could be used for anything else.
This might be the most spuedointerrelectual take I have ever read lmao.
Internet academics are the fricking best
nice argument.
oh wait.
Go away you fricking homosexual you are like a robot
We must exterminate all living beings.
>cow eat grass
Cows and every animal eat mostly onions + cereal on those highly optimized farms. They give them the bare minimum of fiber so their rumen doesn't shut down
Cows eat mostly grass until the end of their lives where they are fed all the onions byproducts to fatten them up for slaughter. Maybe in America they are fed a diet of microplastics and iPhones but in Europe the former is the case.
They get all kinds of shit even candy in the US but grass doesn’t seem to be a major part of their diet. Even knew a rancher and he said to qualify as grass fed all they had to do was have them graze a little before getting slaughtered or some shit like that. He fed his cows the byproducts from local brewers which he said was really easy on the cows stomachs for some reason
what do you think malt, barley and maize is?
grass.
their diet is mostly grass.
Uhhh they’re eating the seeds of the grass not the grass itself. Not sure what your point is.
>seed of grass is not grass.
ok moron.
so eggs are same as chicken?
eggs are literally chickens, you are literally eating liquid chicken.
Minus the rooster cum, homosexual.
I mix both in my mouth for the real liquid chicken dining experience.
That's wrong. European cattle is largely fed cattle feed and that feed is usually corn and soi meal. Grass just isn't nutritious enough for cattle to maintain optimal muscle mass.
If we're going to talk about the impact of fricking flatulence, then we need to exterminate all termites, considering they far out produce methane excretions.
No mention of cruise ships
The funniest thing about cruises is they are cheaper than rent now. It's like 700 for a week plus food, water, gym, internet. I have half a mind to just live on cruises for a year while remote working with a laptop just to do it. They make all their money on booze. If you just don't drink you can basically just live on them more/as affordably as an apartment+food with the same amenities.
Just remember the internet on cruises are usually horrendous.
Read homie, read.
>inb4 I don't believe in those particular sources
Yes, I forgot my cow's stomachs that we all learned in school. The rumen, the reticulum, the TOKAMAK toroidal fusion reactor that turns non-carbon into carbon, and the abomasum.
There is exactly one thing that currently causes CO2 in the atmosphere to rise and it's taking carbon from underground where it's been permanently sequestered and lighting it on fire.
Imagine pearl clutching over muh green house gasses beyond the mid 90's. Kek. May you choke on david suzuki's dick.
yeah but cow manure has a very important usage. its not exactly a easy cause effect relationship. also, before our modern cow industries, there were 30-50 million bison that were roaming around in north america.
This. Not to mention a world swarming with monolithic land mammals in pre history that dwarf cows. The praries alone were home to millions of monsters.
Hunt and kill bankers and CEOs. No need to worry about prions or cannibalism as they are not human.
Long as you don't eat their brain like some african Black person you'll be fine
Why would getting protein from processed veggies hurt your gains? I shop at a place that buys the stuff big supermarkets can't sell, and it always has this type of shit extremely dirt cheap so I try a fair bit of it. It's mostly fine taste-wise and has loads of protein per dollar. Is it just schizo shit or is there an actual reason I should stop? I eat meat too btw.
plants have glycoproteins, not proteins. You lack the enzymes to break that completely down into amino acids, moron. Hence, it's not bioavailable. You only get maybe 25% of what's on the label. IDIOT
Can't tell if you're baiting or actually moronic.
Alright you fricking little morons, tell me how the saccharides get cleaved off the peptides in the human digestive system
protip: YOU FRICKING CANT
Glycoproteins aren't unique to plants bro...
>plants have glycoproteins, not proteins
Lmao. What fricking youtube video or whatever did you watch anyway? I'm interested where people get this kind of shit from.
Still can't name the enzyme in the human digestive system that breaks the saccharide off from the peptides in useless plant "protiens"? Maybe because it doesn't exist? Aw, that's a shame. Thanks for playing you fricking brain rotted little vegan morons.
You said that plants "don't have proteins, they have glycoproteins". Let's just stick with that for now.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723444/
>Plant-based proteins are less digestible than animal proteins [50]. This could be due to the different >structure of plant versus animal proteins. The secondary structure of plant proteins is characterized by >a high content in β-sheet conformation and a relatively low α-helix amount compared to that of animal >proteins [64]. The high content in β-sheet conformation is likely related to its resistance to proteolysis in >the gastrointestinal tract.
>resistance to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
>resistance to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
>resistance to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
>resistance to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
>durr that's from a ketolard utub vidya durr hurr
just fricking rope yourself already
Whoa why are you talking about amino acid profiles and shit? You were about to show how "plants don't have proteins, they have glycoproteins". Read the first three words of the study you linked lmao.
to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
to proteolysis in the gastrointestinal tract.
Now look at the meta-analysis 🙂
This has literally nothing to do with what you said.
I'm getting a strong feeling that you don't know what a glycoprotein is, or does, or where they are found.
Lol wut
You just keep linking info that is proving yourself wrong then screaming, "GOTCHA!"
Imbecile
Because plant proteins are literally indigestible. Keep counting the misrepresented values on the labels and crying, wondering why you fail to make any gains, you sickly vegan moron
Black person you are illiterate.
"Resistance" isn't "immunity". Yes plant proteins are more resistant than animal protein but it's not enough to call them indigestible
>red meat less digestible than soi
Read the thing you linked
>WAHHHH I LOST AND NOW I'M GONNA SCREECH MADE UP SHIT
typical braindead vegan logic
Dude... read the table in the paper you linked. What are the values for red meat? What are they values for soi flour or isolate?
>WAHH I CAN'T CITE ANYTHING BECAUSE I JUST MADE IT UP! WAHHH
wow you have some really advanced plant toxin induced brain damage
Table 1, PDCAAS of red meat vs soi flour or isolate in the paper you linked.
Try reading what you link instead of constantly crying and sperging out about unrelated information.
This is why nobody is taking you seriously, it's obvious to everyone BUT YOU that you're some dumbass emotional moron.
Hold on, let's circle back to the "plants don't have protein" argument. I feel like you haven't had a chance to defend that.
Glycoproteins?
Read a book homie.
pure nonsense and broscience
I tried searching for this and nothing is coming up.
i will hunt and eat vegans, human meat is suprisingly high in calories, just stay away from nerves and the brain, and organs.
In my country these fake meat products are in the fridge but now I see that they don't have to necessarily. Maybe they do it to give the illusion that it's natural since it can spoil without cooling just like meat. But ontopic: I'll make gains by eating meat like always. When the covid panic buys were going on meat was gone but these products were not. That tells you all you need to know.
>how are we going to make gains?
The fatties in the: "what I eat in a day as a fat person" videos eat a lot of these if they're vegan. Sure they also drink sugar coffee with oat milk but I do think these give you gains. Just not the kind you'll want
I don't get it. Doesn't processing all this crap for Westoids libcrackers to pretend like it's meat take energy too? At least tofu is just blended up and squished basedbeans and doesn't claim to be meat. Or is it just because cattle poop and fart but comes from the same mouths that espouse anti nuclear and choose to eat plastics processed from hydrocarbons daily and hasn't lived a day away from their electronic device in the last 10 years.
Says the schizo /misc/ posting from his phone. KYS
Literally no argument
funny how environmentalists are always launching a crusade against the meat industry yet they're silent when it comes to Mexican villages having their water supplies cut to produce their beloved avocadoes or how Almonds waste almost or even the same amount of water as beefs
Water is abundant you filthy fricking moron, almonds aren't "wasting" it.
You politicized chuds happily slurp up all the obvious bullshit you possibly can if it even slightly strokes your fragile egos. Go shoot up a school, just stop spreading your moronic parroted talking points.
You know they're litterally ripping out almond orchards in the central valley because there's no longer any water for it? You know that right? I drive past it all the time. LMFAO moron
Fascinating, now tell me what that has to do with global warming or CO2 production, or was it just some rightoid talking point bullshit you threw at the wall of conversation and hoped it would stick and nobody would call you out? Dumbass homosexual, you have no clue how pozzed you are constantly seething about unrelated topics.
We're at a fairly low CO2 level in terms of recorded history. The alarmists point to a sharp rise in CO2 that hasn't been seen before but our net level is still very low.
Idiots like yourself who legitimately believe CO2 is a poison to the planet are the dumbest of the dumb.
Here is another fun one for you - check out global biodiversity vs CO2 levels over the past 100,00 years or so. You'll be surprised to find that it's actually pretty helpful to the general health of the planet even if coasties lose their mcmansions to the sea rising a bit.
>Idiots like yourself who legitimately believe CO2 is a poison to the planet are the dumbest of the dumb.
Who the hell mentioned CO2 at all
It was just about the water supply
Not even him btw
>he doesn't care about the poor Mexican villagerinos
Whoa why are you so hispanophobic
I won't eat the Anti Christ Slop™
Leftoids are total morons. Most of the pollution is caused by the third world, and these countries do not give a shit about their green sperging.
They can burn Europe to the ground, it will not change a thing
>Most of the pollution is caused by the third world, and these countries do not give a shit about their green sperging.
guess who pays for the production and then imports it.
protip: it's the first world, they just relocated their worst industries to the third world so they seem greener on paper.
Yeah, and they will not give these industries away. Asia and Africa are also rapidly developing, which means increased consumption, automobilization and etc. Shitlibs literally can't do a thing about Global Warming, yet, they try to crash their local farming and destroy their countries food security.
Environmental alarmism was originally a right wing idea, but unlike idiotic leftist they understood, that the problem is third world and it's giant population
the problem is mainly subsidation, the third would would never have been able to scale up their production without it and their population would've never have exploded as a result.
anyway that already happened, you can't stop it.
>anyway that already happened, you can't stop it
Sure you can, just not...ethically
Don't forget megacorporations. But don't forget to seperate your plastic and shower less, anon!
The worst part is how self righteous and blind these people are. I have a few friends who are mega envimorons, they really think them buying second hand clothes and expensive vegetables is da wae.
>expensive vegetables is da wae
Most ironic part is that these are usually imported too
I need a farm
Steroids are made from basedbeans so I'm not too concerned
> factory processed mushrooms
> factory processed & bleached sneed oil
> which vegans cook with even more sneed oils
somehow more climate friendly than a piece of steak cook on butter / tallow
how did the globalist work this one out ?
Milk and eggs
Have the Dutch farmers capitulated yet?
Amazing how we got to the point where only elite will soon be able to eat meat.
Thoughts?
perseeseen hyvä laittaa näitä
>california
prabably filled with aids and crack pipes
Yes and thats why theyre doing it.
It's not 'environmental' it's 'climate carbon'. They deliberately shifted this years ago. Beef is literally the solution to the blacksoil problem and monocrop is the problem.
Big israelite is poisoning protein shakes too
>https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/lyons-magnus-expands-voluntary-recall-include-additional-nutritional-and-beverage-products-due
ITT Ketoschizo throws invalid information at the wall hoping it will stick, gets BTFO multiple times, and instead of admitting it he will go on to his next parroted talking point.
He does this constantly and threads where he goes unchecked and unBTFOd he will try to push as much of this bullshit as possible.
He knows he's wrong, but he doesn't care. He's trying to manipulate you rather than give you valid information.
Let this be a lesson to anyone interested in keto.
>That pic
Wait, isn't peanut butter 25% carbs?
Or is the joke that the ketogay isn't aware of that ?
> uses skippy for this dumb meme
Skippy is sugary junk food kek
Dead hookers
reminder blackrock is exxon's biggest investor
Hunt Democrats for meat.
>tfw we're going to save the planet by destoying trillions upon trillions of acres of carbon trapping pasture land to plant unnatural nutrient lacking monocrops then spray them with poisons that will eventually run into the water supply in order to own capitalism and do a wholesome science
I'm not worried at all for the push to be plant-based, because I know for a fact 20 years from now there will be a body of scholarship debunking its benefits outright.
>because I know for a fact 20 years from now there will be a body of scholarship debunking its benefits outright.
It'll be a cassandra truth. Something that, even if the knowledge and data is publicly out there, none of the powers that be will talk about it or admit to it, and they'll just keep toeing the line they have for decades. No different than how, over half a century later, we're still being told that dietary fat/cholesterol are bad and that we should be consuming more processed goyfeed instead. Because it's simply in the corporate interest to get more people to consume cheap inexpensive nonperishable goyslop over consuming real food.
Eat the bugs.
Eat vegan.
Live in the community cage.
Own nothing.
Be happy.
Volunteer at food banks and bring home expired animal products.
Kill the vegans.
> cows bad
> cows eat all grass
> eat plant meat
> made from all grass
>10 calories of plant matter to produce 1 calorie of animal matter
Why are people so fricking stupid?
we can't digest most of the stuff that cows eat
Cows are fed corn and other grains in 97% of US farm and in most of the world really.
Sorry to shatter your wholesome farm fantasy.
You know the corn they use for animal feed isn't the same shit in the supermarket right?
You know that both corns grow in the same soil and that same soil can be used to grow almost any other plant food, right?
Each cow eats about 60 pounds of wet matter each day, I let you calculate how much food all the cows eat and how many square miles are needed for that.
If you can grow corn without the stalks and wheat without the straw I'm sure there's an assload of money waiting for you.
look at the quantity of their fred that is grains and other crops, the vast majority of the feed in conventional beef production is forage
not to mention what they feef livestock isn't what is sold to humans but the leftovers of crops grown for humans that animals like cows can eat and digest without blowing their guts up.
when you buy wheat flour or bread you're eating a tiny portion of actual wheat, you're eating a portion of the wheat grain which is in itself a tiny fraction of the whole plant, what do you think they do with the leftovers? they feed it all to animals as to avoid waste, not human grade wheat/soi flour lmfao.
the agricultural sector in first world countries is as efficient as it can get without causing severe food shortages and rampant nutritional deficiencies in their populations.
this kills the vegantard
>b-but all corn lives matter!
Or grow something that people can eat? Most farmland in this country is for cow feed. What’s it like having an IQ below 90
Why don't you tell us?
eat fricking grass then homosexual kek
if their logic is that meat is bad because the herbivores we eat produce methane farts from digesting plant matter, then couldn't you use the exact same logic to arghue that we should exterminate all ruminants, including cows, horses, deer, moose, goats, sheep, and buffaloes? Since their mere existence is damaging the environment, after all.
we breed cows and sheep into existence moron
Climate change isn't real.
Just push the narrative as hard and unforgivingly as you possibly can.
Screw their satanic söyence. Stop playing their game.
isn't proper livestock management one of the best ways to reverse desertification?
Tesla is a better climate investment
But city slickers will never be hue man anyways and this shit only affects them
lithium batteries arent a long term solution, its a bridge like anything else. ride the lithium mine development train while it lasts. perfect environment for it. still a huge amount of road blocks. Politicians are moronic and want local supply but wont remove red tape to build mines, and the tax credits incentivize locally manufactured batteries, but the infrastructure doesnt exist and tax credits arent investments - especially for companies that are already running at a loss(mine developers, etc)
i dunno bros seems like a lot of things would be sustainable if we just had 1/4 the current population and made an attempt to keep it that way. i dunno how both commies and israelservatives value human life so muhc considering population increase has been exponential since the industrial revolution. you're encouraged to pop out kids so they can be cheap labour and consumers. human life is cheap
no amount of plant based meat will address the reality that agriculture in general is horrible and fertilizer destroys fresh water ways
>you're encouraged to pop out kids so they can be cheap labour and consumers. human life is cheap
>don't have kids let the third worlders do that we don't want more consumers.
frick off israelite
>due to the impact of corrupt super investor's influences
Ftfy
It won't, it just doesn't taste good.
If corporations really are only after money, seems Foster Farms and Tyson would make a killing off of selling plant based meat at twice the price of meat.
you fell for the animal torture and murder lobby's meme that you can only build muscle from animal protein. all while the biggest and strongest animals are plant based.
God says I can eat meat for all things created by God are clean.
I listen to God. End of discussion.
“This guy” is also on copious amounts of steroids, will the government also gib me free vials of test?
>who do you want to listen to?
The one that is not obviously a liar.
Of course it's another picture comparing two people who have nothing in common with at least 30 years age difference.
why is IST from all places filled with the "but muh animal murder" crowd? you would think that the site infested with pedophiles, incels, ketolards, /misc/tards, discord trannies wouldn't give a rats ass about animals being killed for food.
This website has been consistently pummelled by hyper autistic progressives since the dumbass 2016 elections at minimum.
NEDM
>has never eaten meat
Are you sure about that?
Why do you make this thread and post the same images 24/7. You can't be paid much, if anything at all.
Why don't you try yourself by going vegan for a while and see how it will affect your gains? Gains go down, stop, gains continue to go up, stop making these dumb threads. I bet you're a fricking dyel trollshit anyways.
>stocking more land with crop rotation destroying, soil destroying, incomplete proteins is better than eating farm animals that take less space and renew the soil
I hate israelitez
>the best climate investment
Has always been population control - stop encouraging population growth whilst forcing everyone to lower their living standards to accommodate everyone else whilst an 'elite' class laughs from above.
>fails to convince consoomers
Guess BYND is going to need 30 billion stimmies so they can stop inflation
Since no one actually buys their product, as evidenced by all the food shortages where the fake meat shit remained untouched, how much have they spent in total to keep their product on store shelves?
I would unironically eat insect products since they have lots of good nutrients and bioavailable protein.
It varies wildly by insect. The best are about as good as ꜱoy, most are a fair bit worse than that, and some are worse than gluten.
But why though? Weren't our ancestors adapted to eating insects for hundreds of millions of years?
Our digestive systems have shrunk considerably since out monke days and not everything is eaten to obtain protein.
Yeah that's a rabbit hole. It's theorized that early hominids with literally half our brain size subsisted on grubs and shit. Then they scavanged an ate carion. Brains became a little bigger. Then hunted meat, bigger brains. Then cooked with fire. Even bigger brains
Lots of humans and cities during the eocene period you absolute cretinous mongoloid
Does that somehow not make it not the ideal climate for human habitation?
>balmy 80 deg in summer, maybe 60 degrees min in winter
>absolutely frozen solid and uninhabitable year round
pick one
Was being sarcastic homie. Most marine life will be gibbed by carbon cycle in oceans. People like you really don’t understand that earth’s ecosystems have a pretty delicate balance and historically climate change is pretty slow, which gives organisms time to evolve (think 1.2 degrees over millions of years).
You can't seriously be crying over polar bears! Or penguins. Frick them. Literally every other animal will prefer a warmer climate. And adaptability of populations of animals happens way faster than you think. And besides, a "warmer climate" doesn't mean some inhospitably hot bullshit like the propaganda you've been exposed to. I mostly just means the disappearance of winter and the homogonization of climates. Again, check out the Eocene period.
dont care
not eating the slave food
go frick yourself Black person
take the cannibal pill. kill and eat israelites and their golems
some women who looks like this is asking why you aren't vegan
I hope climate change is real. I hope the air grows thin and the seas rise and boil, that the sun makes the outside uninhabitable.
I hope it's all real and I hope it all happens soon so I can watch these rich wannabe puppetmaster wienersuckers burn and boil with the rest of us. All these c**ts buying up farmland, trying to put the working man in pods and feed us bugs while they jet around in private planes eating filet. I hope the whole fricking world dies just so I can watch those fricks go down with the ship, so I can watch them realize that their big dreams of being HNIC of spaceship earth go up in a miasma of carbon and smoke and cancer. So I can watch them realize how little their precious money truly matters when they're about to succumb and face eternal judgment for the sin of their grand designs.
Don't hold your breath. We have been on the brink of climate devestation according to "science" idealogue inc. since the 70's. We were supposed to be underwater by 2010, frozen to death in a great ice age by the mid 80's, boiling in tumours from no ozone layer in the 90's. Acid rain was going to end life as we know it in the 80's. All the while punishing the cleanest countries in to less and less freedoms while ignoring completely the most pollutant places. To truly believe it has anything to do with some cumbersome idea of the "climate" is to willfully be fearful to the point of being the antithesis of the human spirit. There is no other reason. People posting silly pie charts and linking to idealogue "science" blogs will never change that and their irrelevance is not up for argument.
How come every vegan bodybuilder is accused of being on gear? There’s so many huge vegan influencers who are natty, but obese ham addicts seething with jealousy always downplay their success.
How come vegans are so miserably wither brained they can't accept the reality of wide spread gear usage?
Black person I'm a bretharian bodybuilder and I totally mog that vegan nazi who tortures and destroys innocent plant life. Frick him an frick you both of you should burn in hell
Because they are on gear my friend. Nearly all fitness influencers are on gear regardless of whether or not they eat meat.
But believe what you want to believe. You can get big like your favorite marvel superhero on a diet of celery and beet juice alone. Prove us all wrong.
don't you lefties realize pic related is the guy pushing this shit? what they plan to do is stick the whole world's population into as tiny a space as possible.
we're all going to be poor as shit and he hopes you'll be happy to eat the bugs and science experiments by then so you don't lynch him because you're too fricking poor to afford a burger, whether you eat them or not.
>plant-based
>meat
Is anyone working on meat-based plants?
>Here's your plant based meat, buddy
>here's why johnny can't make gains
The author of that the tweet that relayed that info said himself that hé was wrong.
Goyslop
Frick the meat climate people. What a surprise... They're vegetarians/vegans! What a fricking coincidence! Holy shit, their agenda just happens to line up! Give me a fricking break.
Exhibit A for coopting Climate Change to suit an agenda. If these people loved the Earth so much, they'd take a fricking bus, instead of driving everywhere. But we know that won't happen.
I always act like I'm going to buy the vegan meat in the freezer section then place it in another lesser trafficked area so hopefully it spoils. I encourage you to do the same. Poke holes in the packages so the store has to throw it out.
Cool, now make the chinks and the poos eat it
Blaming the climate on meat is absolutely ridiculous, when energy production and transport is 80% of the pollution.
Its just a way for corporations to blame the people, isntead of themselves