W*men are so weak it's laughable

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200205132404.htm
>males' upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females'
>the males' average power during a punching motion was 162% greater than females', with the least-powerful man still stronger than the most powerful woman

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17186303/
>90% of females produced less force than 95% of males. Though female athletes were significantly stronger (444 N) than their untrained female counterparts, this value corresponded to only the 25th percentile of the male subjects.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To make them rapeable when they reject your genes.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      unironically, yes. It's natures safety mechanism.
      All the combinations where women were unrappable, died out evolutonarily speaking.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope you get incarcerated rajesh

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are so weak but they still control the dating market. How is this fair.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they play to their strengths, as they should. Next time you cry about women being manipulative ask yourself what you'd do to survive in a world where every other person could physically dominate you and kill you barehanded like it's nothing

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yup, israelites learned from them

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Next time you cry about women being manipulative ask yourself what you'd do to survive in a world where every other person could physically dominate you and kill you barehanded like it's nothing

        marrying an intelligent respectful man who has the resources and skills to set up a safe and organized environment with a monogamous culture so that civilization springs up from the ground to protect the community from barbarians by means of superior numbers and technology?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >where every other person could physically dominate you and kill you barehanded like it's nothing
        what's crazy is how many roasties thing they can body slam the average guy. most of them how no idea most men could kill them with their bare hands

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Women are the prize, men are the fighters. That's why no one cares for gay men, they already gave up.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Only like 10-20% or so of breeding age American women I would consider a "prize"

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >incel black pill ideology squared times ten divided by the femoid's constant rotated around the imaginary axis into the LeGrange Integral of the LaPlace Transform of COMPLICATED b***hING differential
      Women r smarter

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because men have morals

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah and men suck at giving birth to babies, ying and yang motha fricka OP

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just you wait you stupid b***h and you'll have your comeuppance

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >20XX
        >still transphobic

        You will never be a real mom

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >movie
        israeli humiliation ritual

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >20XX
      >still transphobic

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *blocks your path*

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Once we can give men wombs and sex robots take off women will truly be obsolete

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >males' upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females'

    Imagine how much stronger you are than the average woman if you have a 5pl8 diddly. If you have 6 inches of height on someone and 1000+% more strength you simply live in a different reality than them.

    Maybe that's why only men compliment me on my strength (and they do it often while women, even the ones that let me creampie them, never do) they lack the requisite strength to navigate the world, much less have a major excess of strength.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who is this beautiful, smart looking lady?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Samantha Hyde

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >males' upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females'
    pure cope. go outside. hit the gym. the study is a meme. there have been plenty other studies. women got about 60-70% OF men strength in lower body and 50-60% in upper body. Look at powerlifting records, go outside, look in your gym.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your reply sounds like you disagree, but women having 50-60% of mens upper body strength translates almost perfectly to men having 90% more upper body strength than women.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The state record for open weight (100kg+) women's squat is 5kg less than the state records for 63kg men's division where I am

      • 2 weeks ago
        I ignore women

        When I was 18 I was stronger than the the heaviest female squat and deadlift records while being 160lbs without even cutting. Women stand no chance

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        When I was 18 I was stronger than the the heaviest female squat and deadlift records while being 160lbs without even cutting. Women stand no chance

        https://boysvswomen.com/#/

        records for high school boys vs women olympic events

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Smartest IST poster

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is why you should breed ogre women, genes that give sons a sizable step up over average and daughters potential to reach upper end of female strength

      >pure cope. go outside. hit the gym. the study is a meme. there have been plenty other studies. women got about 60-70% OF men strength in lower body and 50-60% in upper body. Look at powerlifting records, go outside, look in your gym.
      this tracks entirely with op's original post, selection for aptitude+roids warps the tail for pro and semi pro athletes

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the truth is the difference is actually negligible when accounting for height and social factors.
        take a 1.70m woman vs a 1.70m man. there would only be a 10% difference in strenght at most.
        consider that:
        >1)more men work out compared to women.
        even the laziest slobs probably had one period in their life where they used to work out briefly. not the case for women, most haven't and never will workout in their life. so if you take a random sample of the population for a study, it's skewed in favor of men.
        >2)even if they both work out, men tend to specifically prioritize strenght and getting huge, while women do abs and stuff to look good in bikinis. most dont want to achieve big muscles.

        am i saying women are just as strong as men or other woke shit? no, because men are taller on average so of course they're gonna btfo any woman. but if you do a proper study, with male and female of same height, same exact exercise routine, the difference would be pretty negligible. even so,

        https://i.imgur.com/XpGnhcy.png

        https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200205132404.htm
        >males' upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females'
        >the males' average power during a punching motion was 162% greater than females', with the least-powerful man still stronger than the most powerful woman

        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17186303/
        >90% of females produced less force than 95% of males. Though female athletes were significantly stronger (444 N) than their untrained female counterparts, this value corresponded to only the 25th percentile of the male subjects.

        >female athletes were significantly stronger (444 N) than their untrained female counterparts, this value corresponded to only the 25th percentile of the male subjects.
        25% not accounting for height is not that crazy.
        again, the strongest woman in question was maybe 1.70m tall, while the strongest men were all 1.85m and above.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the truth is the difference is actually negligible when accounting for height and social factors.
          You're an idiot.

          >take a 1.70m woman vs a 1.70m man. there would only be a 10% difference in strenght at most.
          Obviously wrong.

          You your eyes for once in your life.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i have. testing men and women of same height would be unfair because short men would be outliers, which is just as unfair as if you picked the outlier strongest women and pitted them vs the weakest men specifically.
            so of course, in REAL LIFE men are stronger than women, my point was that it's mostly due to stature, cause if you use your eyes too, you will see that the anatomy of our species is not that different unlike other animals.
            they still are slightly weaker, but not to the insane degree that people imagine.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Holy cope.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >take a 1.70m woman vs a 1.70m man. there would only be a 10% difference in strenght at most.
          i love the strong ladies but that doesn't mean i deny natty aptitude for strength places them at something like 50% of male upper body and 70% of male lower body strength. men are just pound for pound much stronger, accounting for height just shows strength scales with size to a certain extent and it's probably less of an effect for women.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're absolutely moronic. A man of equal height will still have a bigger frame, denser bones, much better ability to put on muscle mass etc

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A wiry manlet with no psychological barriers would utterly frick up all your wheyfus you dumb c**t

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      retake 3rd grade math homie

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >women having 50-60% the upper body strength of men is different than men having 90% more upper body strength than women
      ...

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Studies are for redditors OP is gay once again

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    teedy

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Daily reminder that gays hate women

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based and suppository proposition positioned (it's a pill)

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women don't need physical strength.

    https://strawpoll.com/xVg71RYDRyr

    • 2 weeks ago
      I ignore women

      glowing datamining post don’t respond

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    also might i add if you grew up in a rural area, especially somewhere like russia, you would be surprised how strong all the women who work in the farms get, even if they dont look it. my grandma could move cows and shit, actually scary.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who gives a frick you loser. Pathetic

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They probably care less about strength as well. Like what would they even need it for unless they are an athlete

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Like what would they even need it for unless they are an athlete
      You could say the same about men

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They probably care less about strength as well. Like what would they even need it for unless they are an athlete
      our evil, moronic society programs women to think this and they either end up weak and fat or frail in the long run or they something motivates them to actually develop physical strength and they realize strength is good and that mindset is bullshit. the most extreme form of this is women who get way in to fbb, strength sports, etc including gear use but more commonly it's average women who have someone, usually a husband or bf, get them in to lifting and notice health problems go away and quality of life improve.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Muscular women are gross

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Muscular women are gross
          incorrect

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            correct*

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >correct*
              incorrect

              i want her to crush my skull between her thighs and pee on me

              >i want her to crush my skull between her thighs and pee on me
              first one yes second one no

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >first one yes second one no
                why dont you appreciate the 2nd one too?
                keep the lust provoking pictures coming

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/GGKY2KT.jpeg

                >Muscular women are gross
                incorrect

                Repulsive

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i want her to crush my skull between her thighs and pee on me

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, they are. Heavily muscled women look like men, which is gross. There is nothing feminine about it. It doesn't necessarily make you gay, but you have a fetish, as in you like something that is not natural or normal due to conditioning/brainwashing.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Heavily muscled women look like men, which is gross
              the biggest gear freak fbbs still have female frames and their proportional muscle development and insertions are still feminine, they're just way bigger than they could get with natty test levels. when they're way too lean it's gross but if they have higher bodyfat it's just more of what makes women attractive.
              >There is nothing feminine about it.
              if you use troon logic maybe, i'll take an ogre woman who can give me a platoon of children and will be a loving wife and mother
              >It doesn't necessarily make you gay, but you have a fetish, as in you like something that is not natural or normal due to conditioning/brainwashing.
              excepting guys who go all in specifically on the super lean, shredded, dehydrated fbb look and only being attracted to women on gear, which are definitely fetishes, the idea being attracted to signals for evolutionary fitness is a "fetish" is absurd. society was brainwashed out of valuing female physical power and competence.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >gear freak fbbs
                Stop talking like a homosexual.
                >still feminine
                No.
                >troon logic
                You can't just attach 'troon' to things and make them wrong. I am using logic. Ironically, you are thinking like a troon by denying reality.
                >uh no only those other guys who have a more extreme version of the fetish have a fetish, my fetish is not a fetish because it's not as extreme as their version
                No. You have a fetish. Why can't you just admit what you are and what you like? You still have to try and solve the dissonance in your mind for some reason. You literally have a fetish for women who look more like men than they do women. Are you scared that means you're gay? It doesn't, necessarily, though you are certainly on the road to liking things that are gay.

                That picture you posted literally looks like a man shoving vaguely spherical objects up his shirt as a joke, btw.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No. You have a fetish. Why can't you just admit what you are and what you like? You still have to try and solve the dissonance in your mind for some reason. You literally have a fetish for women who look more like men than they do women. Are you scared that means you're gay? It doesn't, necessarily, though you are certainly on the road to liking things that are gay.
                i'm being as direct as possible about what i like and you're acting like a cloying gay.
                >That picture you posted literally looks like a man shoving vaguely spherical objects up his shirt as a joke, btw.
                wide hips, massive quads, hourglass figure but small boobs=man is troon logic. i can post ogre girls who are built but have super feminine figures from not being too lean and you'll still treat it like i can only get off to women who have hard masculinization sides from roid overuse.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/R27Ijnm.jpeg

                >Heavily muscled women look like men, which is gross
                the biggest gear freak fbbs still have female frames and their proportional muscle development and insertions are still feminine, they're just way bigger than they could get with natty test levels. when they're way too lean it's gross but if they have higher bodyfat it's just more of what makes women attractive.
                >There is nothing feminine about it.
                if you use troon logic maybe, i'll take an ogre woman who can give me a platoon of children and will be a loving wife and mother
                >It doesn't necessarily make you gay, but you have a fetish, as in you like something that is not natural or normal due to conditioning/brainwashing.
                excepting guys who go all in specifically on the super lean, shredded, dehydrated fbb look and only being attracted to women on gear, which are definitely fetishes, the idea being attracted to signals for evolutionary fitness is a "fetish" is absurd. society was brainwashed out of valuing female physical power and competence.

                youre a victim weight oriental

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *