You better not eat more than 60g of protein a day, otherwise you're ruining this earth

You better not eat more than 60g of protein a day, otherwise you're ruining this earth

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Ape Out, Gorilla Mindset Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My piss is dangerous, but thats because I abuse stimulants

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah sure the problem is protein, not fluoride, SSRIs, hormonal birth control, recreational drugs, PFSAs nor microplastics.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You also get kidney disease and gout.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I hate the antichrist!
    I hate the antichrist!
    I hate the antichrist!
    I hate the antichrist!
    I hate the antichrist!

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile, not a peep about women pissing birthcontrol

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    but how will i eat all those high protein bugs now? am i going to have to go bug-free? im confused

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pay premium for the new government mandated safe bugs

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I HATE THE ANTICHRIST
    I HATE THE ANTICHRIST

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Black folk are a problem pollutant in the US.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    can we talk about how difficult it is to get 180g of protein in 2500 calories?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Do you actually need that much? What's your bodyweight.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        176, goal weight is 185 starting a bulk into the winter. i decided to split the difference on the 1g/1lb rule

        are you a woman or just a dyel sissy?

        see attached, DYEL

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why do they test impedance? How do they test body impedance?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >why
            different tissue has different impedance because the water content varies. measuring impedance and subtracting a constant (your bones/organs) gives a number which can be used to estimate bf%

            >how
            by passing a current through you

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          those machines are laughably inaccurate. yours is also very old and doesn't have handles. you'd be better off with a $30 huawei scale

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      are you a woman or just a dyel sissy?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Chicken and broccoli
      It's easy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what about carbs? assuming you eat 40% carbs, 30% fat, 30% protein each meal that's 2 chicken breasts per meal (282 cals) which means the others are (376 cals carbs, 282 cals fat) times 3, that's 2820 cals per day. which for me is probably an 800 cal surplus.

        • 2 years ago
          uvo11

          If I understand what you're getting at it should be impossible to get enough protein while keeping that macro spread and not eating a surplus.

          Chicken broccoli guy is saying you must take a different macro spread: one with more protein and less of everything else. I think this is a mathematical necessity. Luckily verification isn't required.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >60g from whey
      >33g from beef jerky
      >10g from peanut butter
      >36g from greek yogurt
      >49g from chicken breast
      EZ

    • 2 years ago
      uvo11

      I'm genuinely unsure if you're right. On the one hand, I got about 160g protein today with 1500 kcals and felt pretty unstressed about it. On the other hand, it was only easy because I was clean of sugar today. On days when I'm eating sweets it's a tough choice between almost no protein and far too many calories.

      Maybe the problem is not getting enough protein, but cutting out enough low protein foods.

      For later ref.

      Breakfast: chicken breast, cut up bell pepper, 2x coffee shot in frothed milk. I forget the name for that-- Fred made it with an espresso machine

      Dinner: cod with big butter, broccoli, green beans, corn cob, large amount hard cheese. Cod prepped by Fred w big butter. Surprisingly fish not gross

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If I understand what you're getting at it should be impossible to get enough protein while keeping that macro spread and not eating a surplus.

        Chicken broccoli guy is saying you must take a different macro spread: one with more protein and less of everything else. I think this is a mathematical necessity. Luckily verification isn't required.

        not sure if same poster, but yes, basically I need to cut carbs and replace with. for most people that's not a problem, however i get regimented meals for brek (yogurt & granola) and lunch (whatever they give me, could be like vegetable soup and bread) this means usually to either have a small lunch and try to hit my protein macros later which is difficult because I'm now taking more than 30% of my target protein in the evening (risking lack of utilization).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >having a diet with 28% protein calories is difficult
      you're moronic

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >woman opinion
    Discarded

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >You VILL only eat protein as a once a year TREAT

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >put out articles that hurt people on platforms only leftists trust
    >cause leftists to become weak and infertile
    lol, I'm starting to think mainstream media is based

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >fake science to justify mass control
    many such cases!

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    good

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Frick the earth

  17. 2 years ago
    SwedishBrorsan

    > plastics still being used/allowed whilst safer alternatives is available & other wrapping material made of mushroom, sugarcane and more.
    > continously forced to clean up the sea floors over and over
    > contraceptives still not banned despite women pissing it out, causing problems for sea life & humanity long term
    > peat mining still allowed despite safer & cheaper alternatives being available (causing x2 times the polution compared to all cars)

    > "OHH UHHH, MAN ATE FOOD AND FARTY AND DID THE POOPIES!
    > STOP EATING STUPID HUMAN"
    - your sincerely, Scientific AMerican collumnist (Totally not paid by the WEF)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > Prime ministers ("Young Global Leaders"~ WEF Language) around europe shutting down many nuclear reactors, some countries more than half their total power grid
      by making up lies about either climate or implementing effect/tax costs or other bs to fuel the globalist agenda, WEF Narratives forced ordered by the Global Elite so that
      these filthy corrupt prime ministers, presidents / young global leaders will be elected into luxurious seats of global power in the WEF/EU/UN/Trilateral Commission,
      the Bilderberg group and etc

      if you ever see anything that falls in line in the patterns of a narrative that is inconsistent with optimizing the economy of the average family household, their bills and etc
      then think twice before swallowing the bullshit because there is NOTHING that the planet can benefit from the average joe not being capable of thriving economically by
      their invested time, effort and capacity to maintain all quality of life under the roof over their heads.

      Wealth, thriving and more time leads to more people optimizing their "climate pressure" they have more time to recycle, prioritise what to do with the waste and having
      more money to invest in solar panels to help them ultimately thrive more in the long run, this is lifestyle patterns that happens about 80% of the time for every average citizen
      and only the absolute most disgustingly filthy rich being the ones that consume more than they can keep

      most of the climate will happen wether we like it or not and people just like plants will migrate along with it because a majority of the change is completely natural,
      the globalists priorities has always been invested in the wrong places which easily exposed their hipocrisy.

      if it doesnt make sense, dont support it.

      kys schizo

  18. 2 years ago
    SwedishBrorsan

    > Prime ministers ("Young Global Leaders"~ WEF Language) around europe shutting down many nuclear reactors, some countries more than half their total power grid
    by making up lies about either climate or implementing effect/tax costs or other bs to fuel the globalist agenda, WEF Narratives forced ordered by the Global Elite so that
    these filthy corrupt prime ministers, presidents / young global leaders will be elected into luxurious seats of global power in the WEF/EU/UN/Trilateral Commission,
    the Bilderberg group and etc

    if you ever see anything that falls in line in the patterns of a narrative that is inconsistent with optimizing the economy of the average family household, their bills and etc
    then think twice before swallowing the bullshit because there is NOTHING that the planet can benefit from the average joe not being capable of thriving economically by
    their invested time, effort and capacity to maintain all quality of life under the roof over their heads.

    Wealth, thriving and more time leads to more people optimizing their "climate pressure" they have more time to recycle, prioritise what to do with the waste and having
    more money to invest in solar panels to help them ultimately thrive more in the long run, this is lifestyle patterns that happens about 80% of the time for every average citizen
    and only the absolute most disgustingly filthy rich being the ones that consume more than they can keep

    most of the climate will happen wether we like it or not and people just like plants will migrate along with it because a majority of the change is completely natural,
    the globalists priorities has always been invested in the wrong places which easily exposed their hipocrisy.

    if it doesnt make sense, dont support it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > plastics still being used/allowed whilst safer alternatives is available & other wrapping material made of mushroom, sugarcane and more.
      > continously forced to clean up the sea floors over and over
      > contraceptives still not banned despite women pissing it out, causing problems for sea life & humanity long term
      > peat mining still allowed despite safer & cheaper alternatives being available (causing x2 times the polution compared to all cars)

      > "OHH UHHH, MAN ATE FOOD AND FARTY AND DID THE POOPIES!
      > STOP EATING STUPID HUMAN"
      - your sincerely, Scientific AMerican collumnist (Totally not paid by the WEF)

      Keyed and redpilled

      [...]
      kys schizo

      KYS dumbfrick

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >KYS dumbfrick

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Birth control is worse

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >half the population is on blood pressure meds
    >half is on SSRIs and other psych meds
    >all this shit gets pissed into the water system and is impossible or just plain hard to filter out
    >its all the excess nitrogen
    Of course.
    Theres actually enough blood pressure meds found in tap water that it can actually affect the body. The more of the population is on a single medication, the more likely you'll find more than just trace amounts in the tap.

    • 2 years ago
      SwedishBrorsan

      obviously many medications can be filtered fine by the human body but some just doesnt and whats the absolute most scary
      is how weve known for some time now that contraceptives of all things doesnt and the impact it has on the human body long term
      should have lead to a global ban and if it cant be regulated to stick to condoms and/or taking it up the ass, suck sum dick or just
      dont frick aorund like sex is a sense of entertainment like videogames and sports then maybe "THEY" really want the worst possible
      outcome from women are all being hooked up on contraceptives that theyre pissing out and sharing for everyone else to become
      completely fricking infertile for life, growing erectile dysfunction problems and more

      either way, on the greater scheme of things we're pretty fricked if these things arent massively cracked down upon in the near future

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >You better not eat more than 60g
    if you weigh less than 60kg youd be permanently malnourished lol

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >it's another urban consumers telling everyone what's best for the world episode

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Black folk tung my anus.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *