Probably the grizzly bear. People always bring up a gorilla being able to bench, squat, whatever without realizing its just going to be a swingfest on both sides. This means the grizzly bear wins with claws alone. It has about 400lbs on the gorilla and height advantage as well. Anyone who says otherwise hasn't seen how big a bears claws are.
Bear wins easily. A Bear basically wins against almost every land animal in hand to hand, even lions and tigers.
The bear has huge claws. It would spill gorilla guts in seconds.
How is this still a debate? I've seen this thread posted for 10 fricking years and the obvious consensus every time is that the bear wins low-mid dif. Bears are walls of muscle with knives built unto their paws.
I still think the bear would win. Now 3 coordinated gorillas might be different
The bear still wins. The bear wins until you have enough gorillas to basically smother it to death. A full grown grizzly bear weighs twice as much as a full grown gorilla, is far stronger to be able to move that much body mass, and most importantly has claws and teeth that are actual weapons meant for killing. All gorillas have is brute strength, their teeth can be used as weapons but that's really only for self defense.
https://i.imgur.com/xyPPcfs.jpg
Sorry gorilla builds. To win this fight you must spec int enough to unlock tools.
[...]
not the same weight class, obviously elephant wins
But what if the bear comes armed? It's not called right to bear arms for nothing, coem and take it lol
The bear still wins. The bear wins until you have enough gorillas to basically smother it to death. A full grown grizzly bear weighs twice as much as a full grown gorilla, is far stronger to be able to move that much body mass, and most importantly has claws and teeth that are actual weapons meant for killing. All gorillas have is brute strength, their teeth can be used as weapons but that's really only for self defense.
This is basically a sword vs hammer argument, except the bear weighs twice as much and has like 60 swords instead of just one. The goliras can't inflict enough internal damage to kill the bear before the bear guts them and makes them bleed out. Even with a lucky hit where they clock it in the jaw immediately I don't see them winning.
Bear still utterly destroys gorilla cucks. Elephants would obliterate even polar bears (the largest and most sangerous bear species). Hippos and maybe rhinos could take on a bear as well
Probably the grizzly bear. People always bring up a gorilla being able to bench, squat, whatever without realizing its just going to be a swingfest on both sides. This means the grizzly bear wins with claws alone. It has about 400lbs on the gorilla and height advantage as well. Anyone who says otherwise hasn't seen how big a bears claws are.
How is this still a debate? I've seen this thread posted for 10 fricking years and the obvious consensus every time is that the bear wins low-mid dif. Bears are walls of muscle with knives built unto their paws.
>Who would ever think of this scenerio and who would ever care about the outcome
the only person that matters in this world, me, you will never understand, queer
>Who would ever think of this scenerio and who would ever care about the outcome?
The ancient Roman's would pit man and beast against one another fire live entertainment.
Women have the luxury of not habitually thinking about danger and combat precisely because men have protected them for tens of thousands of years. The few women that do think about such danger tend to be mentally damaged in some way, often precisely because there was no man to protect them in a time of need, causing them to see danger in every shadow.
Bears are quite possibly one of the best animals.
Top 5 easily.
There's no way a 400lb gorilla could beat a 600lb brown bear.
Gorillaz >rely on fists >don't often grapple because it doesn't cause as much damage without training for it >Ok band, but peaked at demon dayz
Bears >greater mass and top running speed >large claws >natural grapplers, with a bite attack that not only reduces the chance of escape but causes damage >bigger IQ >doesn't need music because they appreciate the beauty of nature
Big chimpos don't have a chance. Any of you morons who say gorilla come to my house and fight me.
Frick you pussy.
Literally useless. Have you seen these homosexuals move? The slow as frick, they only stand a chance in a big stampeding herd and even then animals know to get the frick out of their way. Their tusks are purely for show, they aren't real weapons in any capacity.
1xHunter and 7xBulls. Bulls form a line against attackers, hunter strikes from the rear.
The spoiler is the rats; enough of them will get through to infect me, the hunter, and the bulls with rabies, assuring our death later on. But they're useless for defense. Fricks the whole meta.
>The spoiler is the rats; enough of them will get through to infect me, the hunter, and the bulls with rabies, assuring our death later on.
This is why you need hawks. You're 100% fricked if you don't take them, nothing else can protect you from them and even a few hawks will shred the frick out of you. A flock(?) of 50 hawks would turn you into a pile of shredded meat. Take the hawks and send them after their natural prey, the rats.
Anyone who doesn't take hawks
This becomes a question of what you don't want to fight against. The hunter is an obvious choice because he can instantly one shot you so you want to pick him.
Second I would go with rats. 10000 rats is just too many rats. That's all.
Pic is gay because you have to pick rats to help you. You can't survive against, at a minimum 200 rats. I've tried. It's impossible. 10 thousand rats godmode and I own Willard on bluray
3 Bears
10,000 Rats
The rats rush the opponent while the bears deal damage.
[...]
The only correct answer: hunter and rats.
is dead 100%.
Hawks are a necessary pick, if only because nothing else can defend you against them. The real question is what you want as your second choice. It's really going to depend on positioning. Can you get to the hunter and kill him and take his gun before anything else gets close to you? This could be a solution; send some of your hawks to slice him up so he can't shoot you until you get close, dodge the rats while your hawks kill them and shoot everything else, gg. In this scenario I'd probably take the wolves since, assuming I can shoot everything else, they'd be the best at killing rats.
If you can't kill the hunter or don't have time, it's a toss up between him and the bears. If you take the hunter you have to hope he can kill everything in time and doesn't get killed himself. If you take the bears, you have to hope that your hawks can frick up the hunter and keep him from shooting you or the bears. Then it's the same as before, dodge the rats while your hawks deal with them. Maybe you could ride a bear for added safety once the other animals are dealt with?
Dodging that many rats is iffy. You would need
1. For them to be located relatively far enough from all the action
2. An area that has shit you can hide behind or sneak around with
It's gonna be tough, no doubt, but the hawks are an absolute necessity to pick and I don't think picking hawks and rats could get it done. Maybe they could wear everything down eventually, but even thousands of rats aren't going to save you when three grizzly bears start charging you. They'll just run right through your hawks and rats and tear you apart.
Only way your options open up is if you have a cave or something where you can hide from the hawks.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>The spoiler is the rats; enough of them will get through to infect me, the hunter, and the bulls with rabies, assuring our death later on.
This is why you need hawks. You're 100% fricked if you don't take them, nothing else can protect you from them and even a few hawks will shred the frick out of you. A flock(?) of 50 hawks would turn you into a pile of shredded meat. Take the hawks and send them after their natural prey, the rats.
Anyone who doesn't take hawks
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
is dead 100%.
Hawks are a necessary pick, if only because nothing else can defend you against them. The real question is what you want as your second choice. It's really going to depend on positioning. Can you get to the hunter and kill him and take his gun before anything else gets close to you? This could be a solution; send some of your hawks to slice him up so he can't shoot you until you get close, dodge the rats while your hawks kill them and shoot everything else, gg. In this scenario I'd probably take the wolves since, assuming I can shoot everything else, they'd be the best at killing rats.
If you can't kill the hunter or don't have time, it's a toss up between him and the bears. If you take the hunter you have to hope he can kill everything in time and doesn't get killed himself. If you take the bears, you have to hope that your hawks can frick up the hunter and keep him from shooting you or the bears. Then it's the same as before, dodge the rats while your hawks deal with them. Maybe you could ride a bear for added safety once the other animals are dealt with?
Thank you for listening to my presentation.
I take 7 bulls and lie below them now I am become immune to hawkBlack folk
9 months ago
Anonymous
Interesting strategy, but now you're easy prey for the rats, so you'll have to take them too. Can the rats win it for you while you hide under the bulls? Doubtful.
This becomes a question of what you don't want to fight against. The hunter is an obvious choice because he can instantly one shot you so you want to pick him.
Second I would go with rats. 10000 rats is just too many rats. That's all.
Pic is gay because you have to pick rats to help you. You can't survive against, at a minimum 200 rats. I've tried. It's impossible. 10 thousand rats godmode and I own Willard on bluray
I may have to go with one Rifleman and 15 Wolves, it's easy to forget how massive a single wolf is, 15 is insane.
The 50 hawks with the Rifleman would be nuts but only you and the Rifleman would be open for attack.
The short nosed bear straight up gatekept humanity until its extinction, whereas we just steamrolled gorillas into the bush before we even invented bows. They’re little b***hes
Grizzly bears are smaller. Especially against east Siberian brown bear who are only second to kodiak brown bears. Grizzly bears are aggressive because of the lack of quality food sources that makes them both more competetive and smaller.
Lion can kill anaconda but can die to all 3
Gorilla Kills Lion and Anaconda but can die to the anaconda
Bear kills all 3 but can get killed by anaconda
Anaconda can kill all 3 but can also die to all 3
A gorilla won't kill a lion. A lion has a massive jaw, claws and loose skin. A gorilla has the same type of skin as humans, which means any slashes and bites will instantly frick you up.
The three mammals would immediately fight each other and not even register the anaconda, which remains hidden by looking like a mound of meat. Then the anaconda finishes off whichever animal was left, which is now too tired to fight back
Max your core, max your goodmornings, max your squat, back extensions, and make sure to do your curls.
If you want to keep your intestines inside you wear some sort of gut protection a gambeson and some boiled leather might work. I don't know how long their tusks get.
You could also get good on your side to side jumps, then grab it from the side as it runs by, dig your heals in the ground and do the suplex that way, that way you wouldn't need the padding.
The grizzly. A full size grizzly bear is 2-3 times larger than the gorilla. Its swipes are strong enough to completely decapitate the gorilla. It's the literal "I'm sure to win because my speed is superior" meme. The grizzly just has to get lucky once.
The elephant enters musth rage and slaughters everyone. Not even close, you brainrot trannies are mentally unhinged if you think otherwise.
Below is an african elephant, they weight 14.000lbs.
>elephant bleeds out eventually after getting cut up by all the fangs and claws in the pic
What, in your mind you think they're gonna team up against it? kek, also the elephant's hide is thick as frick, it has low vascularity and the arteries are below inches of muscles. Cope seethe and dial8
>fatty got angry huh ?
Not a fatty, your LULZ weird troon. Post body right the frick now. >We are comparing animals made to kill, can't compare them to normies
They are not warring murder machines you fricking sperg, when they get threatened they run away like gays. As I said, elephants beat every single land based animal with ease, they're multiple thousands of tons in weight, they have thick hides that slashes from claws/bites really struggle to rend, and despite their mild mannered nature they have the most dangerous rage in the animal kingdom, their fricking T levels literally multiply by 60 times at minimum. I know your sub 150 ng/dl little basedboy ass can't comprehend that, but still. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musth
As I said, elephants are the strongest. Until you post body, our interaction is officially over, I'm done arguing with a fat anonymous troony.
moron, even the largest power lifter can only be like 3x the size of an average person. Elephant are ten times the size of almost any of those animals in the image.
The elephant enters musth rage and slaughters everyone. Not even close, you brainrot trannies are mentally unhinged if you think otherwise.
Below is an african elephant, they weight 14.000lbs.
>they weight 14.000lbs.
That is to say, all the animals above combined and multiplied by 2 still don't reach the elephant's weight.
The only contender is elephant.
Phants regularly merc everything in Africa. Even the killer hippo doesn't stand a chance. A brown bear, un-bloodlustedn would be absolutely terrified. Snake can't do shit because snakes don't even fricking have legs.
A polar bear MIGHT attempt to fight back against an elephant, but their teeth and claws aren't even big enough to kill walrus, so they won't do any considerable damage to anything besides the elephant's trunk, which has two, 3foot long ivory spears protecting it.
Elephant is an incredible build.
10/10 would not frick with an elephant.
>The only contender is elephant. >Phants regularly merc everything in Africa. Even the killer hippo doesn't stand a chance. A brown bear, un-bloodlustedn would be absolutely terrified. Snake can't do shit because snakes don't even fricking have legs. >A polar bear MIGHT attempt to fight back against an elephant, but their teeth and claws aren't even big enough to kill walrus, so they won't do any considerable damage to anything besides the elephant's trunk, which has two, 3foot long ivory spears protecting it. >Elephant is an incredible build. >10/10 would not frick with an elephant.
Finally, someone with a brain on this fricking board. All the dexterity morons are mentally ill.
Using elephants is cheating. That said even those frickers get mogged to oblivion by exctinct mammals.
Also check out this grandest list of all time mogs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_prehistoric_animals
>Wins by every measure >Chapter before he dies even confirms that Sukuna couldn't do anything to beat him >Except this one dumb move he pulled from his ass
Sure but it was never established beforehand that Sukuna required a blue print, that was something Gege came up to kill Gojo with. Also there was no reason for Gojo to hesitate when he had Sukuna with his back turned against the wall especially considering Gege explicitly made a point about "sparks" the chapter before.
>Sure but it was never established beforehand that Sukuna required a blue print
It doesn't have to be explicitly stated. Sukuna only had two ways of bypassing infinity being his domain and mahoraga. Sukuna lost MS due to brain damage and mahoraga alone wasn't enough to beat gojo. Even in pic related Sukuna is monologuing about how he wants to see how mahoraga bypasses infinity, which he does in the very next page. >No reason for Gojo to hesitate
He never did? He kept talking about how he did to finish the fight before mahoraga adapted and he went for purple as soon as the agito b***h died
>>Wins by every measure
before he dies even confirms that Sukuna couldn't do anything to beat him
this one dumb move he pulled from his ass
Sukuna has been literally built up from LITERAL episode 1. Your comment is troony cope.
>lost to toji >gave megumi brain damage >didn't fk utahime (died a virgin) >made sukuna unbeatable for the rest of the cast >failed to save his best friend
Gojo was a cuck who accomplished nothing
>lost to toji
came back and mogged him when became enlightened to RCT >gave megumi brain damage
UV only hit his soul, Megumi will be fine and Sukuna can probably restore his brain eventually anyways >didn't fk utahime (died a virgin)
will creampie her at the end of the series when he returns with an even deeper understand of Jujutsu (as the metaphorical Buddha) >made sukuna unbeatable for the rest of the cast
Unbeatable for now, he will return and win (like he promised) >failed to save his best friend
after he kills sukuna he'll properly bury his friend
trust the plan. Kekshitmo was but a herald for the return of the Enlightened One
I don't thinks humans can even hurt bears outside of the obviousl sensitive bits like eyes, mouth, genitals..etc A bear could probably kill half a dozen humans before tiring out then what are left manage to gouge it's eyes out or something
Before the advent of the gun, Native Indians considered the grizzly bear a man eating monster and to kill one would've made you a legend within the tribe. Before the advent of the gun, local tribes in Africa would regularly hunt gorillas for sport.
Lions and tigers hunt elephants, i bet orcas just frick with great whites because sharks cruise around by the ocean floor not the surface aka they eat dead ones, sharks are cooler walruses are probably afraid of sharks.
A Gorilla would only win if he used a long blade - then he could kill the bear. A pack of Tigers would also pulverize a bear. One on one there's no chance.
bear wins
what about now
Still the Bear. He one-shots both.
What about now?
Gorilla would have no idea how to operate that rocket launcher. It's possible he gibs himself before approaching the bear.
The gorilla would be like a soldier when he sees a spy in TF2. Immediately aims at his feet and blows both of them up.
>Close range rocker launcher
I still think the bear would win. Now 3 coordinated gorillas might be different
The bear still wins. The bear wins until you have enough gorillas to basically smother it to death. A full grown grizzly bear weighs twice as much as a full grown gorilla, is far stronger to be able to move that much body mass, and most importantly has claws and teeth that are actual weapons meant for killing. All gorillas have is brute strength, their teeth can be used as weapons but that's really only for self defense.
Sorry gorilla builds. To win this fight you must spec int enough to unlock tools.
But what if the bear comes armed? It's not called right to bear arms for nothing, coem and take it lol
This is basically a sword vs hammer argument, except the bear weighs twice as much and has like 60 swords instead of just one. The goliras can't inflict enough internal damage to kill the bear before the bear guts them and makes them bleed out. Even with a lucky hit where they clock it in the jaw immediately I don't see them winning.
>they
>them
commit suicide troony
Bear still utterly destroys gorilla cucks. Elephants would obliterate even polar bears (the largest and most sangerous bear species). Hippos and maybe rhinos could take on a bear as well
Probably the grizzly bear. People always bring up a gorilla being able to bench, squat, whatever without realizing its just going to be a swingfest on both sides. This means the grizzly bear wins with claws alone. It has about 400lbs on the gorilla and height advantage as well. Anyone who says otherwise hasn't seen how big a bears claws are.
Bear wins easily. A Bear basically wins against almost every land animal in hand to hand, even lions and tigers.
>A Bear basically wins against almost every land animal in hand to hand
I could take a black bear
White woman moment.
You would just kneel before it, Amerimutt.
0 cost habitation
>I can take on the much smaller, more docile species of bear any day.
Well yeah, I wouldn't be able to fight a grizzly or polar bear. Let's be real
I Bet a heavy silverback would throw a Blackbear 2meters around
If you're lucky, you could scare a black bear into thinking it might not be worth it. Lock it in a room and piss it off and youre fricked
Ok Jason Genova
>I could take a black bear
A gorilla would rape a black bear, grizzly bears are on another level.
bear is no match for this fricker
not the same weight class, obviously elephant wins
The elephant is like “nah just playin”
Correct
Maxing STR and CON is an unbreakable build. It was basically the dominant meta for all of the dinosaur period.
and where are the dinosaurs now?
Idk man. I haven't seen any in a while.
Birds are theropods
server got hard reset because they broke the game, class got locked
The bear has huge claws. It would spill gorilla guts in seconds.
The gorilla is faster and far more intelligent. The bear wouldn't even be able to get a hit in.
>The gorilla is faster and far more intelligent. The bear wouldn't even be able to get a hit in.
No, bears are bigger, stronger AND faster.
The gorilla will run away from a confrontation with a bear because it's more intelligent.
Ok jamaal Jackson
Gorillas arent that intelligent. They just have human eyes which makes people project intelligence onto it..
If you put them in a cage they probably just sit in their respective corners. They're not very confrontational.
How is this still a debate? I've seen this thread posted for 10 fricking years and the obvious consensus every time is that the bear wins low-mid dif. Bears are walls of muscle with knives built unto their paws.
I love being a man kek
That said... I could kill both of them 2v1
Bears are so cute there's no way they could hurt anything
Why are men like this? Who would ever think of this scenerio and who would ever care about the outcome?
Imagine you and your gym nemesis reincarnate as the respective animal and by chance you encounter one another. It has to be considered
>Who would ever think of this scenerio and who would ever care about the outcome
the only person that matters in this world, me, you will never understand, queer
Ywnbaw
>Who would ever think of this scenerio and who would ever care about the outcome?
The ancient Roman's would pit man and beast against one another fire live entertainment.
roastie GTFO
Women have the luxury of not habitually thinking about danger and combat precisely because men have protected them for tens of thousands of years. The few women that do think about such danger tend to be mentally damaged in some way, often precisely because there was no man to protect them in a time of need, causing them to see danger in every shadow.
Based, what kind of man are you if you don't think about fighting even from time to time?
you will always be a man
I also think about Roman Empire daily.
kys israelite
your testosterone simply isnt high enough to understand.
>Why are men like this? Who would ever think of this scenerio and who would ever care about the outcome?
good bait
You never played pokemon?
Bears are quite possibly one of the best animals.
Top 5 easily.
There's no way a 400lb gorilla could beat a 600lb brown bear.
Gorillaz
>rely on fists
>don't often grapple because it doesn't cause as much damage without training for it
>Ok band, but peaked at demon dayz
Bears
>greater mass and top running speed
>large claws
>natural grapplers, with a bite attack that not only reduces the chance of escape but causes damage
>bigger IQ
>doesn't need music because they appreciate the beauty of nature
Big chimpos don't have a chance. Any of you morons who say gorilla come to my house and fight me.
Frick you pussy.
>>Ok band, but peaked at demon dayz
kek
Also witnessed
ENTER
Literally useless. Have you seen these homosexuals move? The slow as frick, they only stand a chance in a big stampeding herd and even then animals know to get the frick out of their way. Their tusks are purely for show, they aren't real weapons in any capacity.
10,000 rats
50 Hawks
easy choice.
You do not want the hawks to frick you, none of the other animals can defend you from the air.
10,000 rats is OP cannon fodder while you run away.
It all depends on location.
50 hawks vs 10,000 rats in the middle of the ocean? Hawks win no questions asked.
Rifleman can solo everything on this list except the rats who I pick as my second choice as a zergling rush distraction.
Not going to do shit with a fricking shotgun
crocodiles and sniper
1xHunter and 7xBulls. Bulls form a line against attackers, hunter strikes from the rear.
The spoiler is the rats; enough of them will get through to infect me, the hunter, and the bulls with rabies, assuring our death later on. But they're useless for defense. Fricks the whole meta.
You’re assuming how coordinated they are.
As soon as a few animals come, even rats, the bulls have to split. It’s game over.
No, they are coming to defend you. Classic reddit moment where he tries to defeat a fun hypothetical question by applying logic to it
>The spoiler is the rats; enough of them will get through to infect me, the hunter, and the bulls with rabies, assuring our death later on.
This is why you need hawks. You're 100% fricked if you don't take them, nothing else can protect you from them and even a few hawks will shred the frick out of you. A flock(?) of 50 hawks would turn you into a pile of shredded meat. Take the hawks and send them after their natural prey, the rats.
Anyone who doesn't take hawks
is dead 100%.
Hawks are a necessary pick, if only because nothing else can defend you against them. The real question is what you want as your second choice. It's really going to depend on positioning. Can you get to the hunter and kill him and take his gun before anything else gets close to you? This could be a solution; send some of your hawks to slice him up so he can't shoot you until you get close, dodge the rats while your hawks kill them and shoot everything else, gg. In this scenario I'd probably take the wolves since, assuming I can shoot everything else, they'd be the best at killing rats.
If you can't kill the hunter or don't have time, it's a toss up between him and the bears. If you take the hunter you have to hope he can kill everything in time and doesn't get killed himself. If you take the bears, you have to hope that your hawks can frick up the hunter and keep him from shooting you or the bears. Then it's the same as before, dodge the rats while your hawks deal with them. Maybe you could ride a bear for added safety once the other animals are dealt with?
Thank you for listening to my presentation.
Dodging that many rats is iffy. You would need
1. For them to be located relatively far enough from all the action
2. An area that has shit you can hide behind or sneak around with
It's gonna be tough, no doubt, but the hawks are an absolute necessity to pick and I don't think picking hawks and rats could get it done. Maybe they could wear everything down eventually, but even thousands of rats aren't going to save you when three grizzly bears start charging you. They'll just run right through your hawks and rats and tear you apart.
Only way your options open up is if you have a cave or something where you can hide from the hawks.
I take 7 bulls and lie below them now I am become immune to hawkBlack folk
Interesting strategy, but now you're easy prey for the rats, so you'll have to take them too. Can the rats win it for you while you hide under the bulls? Doubtful.
Imagine picking literal cows. Side-of-head eyes are herbivore tier. Aka meat tier.
The only correct answer: hunter and rats.
*dies immediately from bird attack*
3 Bears
10,000 Rats
The rats rush the opponent while the bears deal damage.
Rifleman disposes of bears in the first minute.
The rats swarm him before he gets the chance
This becomes a question of what you don't want to fight against. The hunter is an obvious choice because he can instantly one shot you so you want to pick him.
Second I would go with rats. 10000 rats is just too many rats. That's all.
I'm not fighting any of them
T. bear
Wolves and hawks. I am the hunter. I'd just Deliverance the other gay immediately and then get to work using his tools
Pic is gay because you have to pick rats to help you. You can't survive against, at a minimum 200 rats. I've tried. It's impossible. 10 thousand rats godmode and I own Willard on bluray
7 bulls to form a defensive circle with a hunter in the middle assuming he has enough ammo to shoot the rest. This is the current meta
I may have to go with one Rifleman and 15 Wolves, it's easy to forget how massive a single wolf is, 15 is insane.
The 50 hawks with the Rifleman would be nuts but only you and the Rifleman would be open for attack.
The gorilla uses bananas as boomerangs to range kite the bear until it is weakened enough to tame it by using a lasso made with vines and his own shit
>murders both of them in a single strike
kitty 🙂
My ancestor :^)
Orcas would frick up both in water. Orcas would frick up anything in water.
A polar bear might give it a few licks meanwhile an orca on land would die to a seagull
Wrong. A male sperm whale destroys orcas with ease
It really depends on location.
In the middle of a rainforest?
Orca wins hands down.
The short nosed bear straight up gatekept humanity until its extinction, whereas we just steamrolled gorillas into the bush before we even invented bows. They’re little b***hes
Bear>tiger>gorilla
How do we respond bearbros?
It's the brain worms from cat poop type propaganda.
Brown bears are smaller and less dangerous. This tiger will be remembered as the fool who thought he killed the Grizzly.
Grizzly bears are smaller. Especially against east Siberian brown bear who are only second to kodiak brown bears. Grizzly bears are aggressive because of the lack of quality food sources that makes them both more competetive and smaller.
>east Siberian brown bear
300-550lbs
Sad
Brown pears are only mogged by Polar bears.
Bear>Lion>>>>>
.
Poor anaconda
Bear >>>>>Lion=Gorilla>>
actual smart person here
Lion can kill anaconda but can die to all 3
Gorilla Kills Lion and Anaconda but can die to the anaconda
Bear kills all 3 but can get killed by anaconda
Anaconda can kill all 3 but can also die to all 3
A gorilla won't kill a lion. A lion has a massive jaw, claws and loose skin. A gorilla has the same type of skin as humans, which means any slashes and bites will instantly frick you up.
Shittiest Rock-Paper-Scissors meta yet
Bear does not die to anaconda. Bear can bite that thing in half
Anaconda can potentially one shot but has very low accuracy
The anaconda can come out of the cage alive because he can slither between the bars
The three mammals would immediately fight each other and not even register the anaconda, which remains hidden by looking like a mound of meat. Then the anaconda finishes off whichever animal was left, which is now too tired to fight back
Gorilla = Anaconda < tiger < bear
What should my minimum lifts be to safely wrestle and supplex one of these bad boys (a 90-100kg specimen, not the 300kg behemoths)
Max your core, max your goodmornings, max your squat, back extensions, and make sure to do your curls.
If you want to keep your intestines inside you wear some sort of gut protection a gambeson and some boiled leather might work. I don't know how long their tusks get.
You could also get good on your side to side jumps, then grab it from the side as it runs by, dig your heals in the ground and do the suplex that way, that way you wouldn't need the padding.
The grizzly. A full size grizzly bear is 2-3 times larger than the gorilla. Its swipes are strong enough to completely decapitate the gorilla. It's the literal "I'm sure to win because my speed is superior" meme. The grizzly just has to get lucky once.
10 Brock Lesnars
Are you damned trannies forreal? The kodiak bear SPLATTERHOUSEstomps
The elephant enters musth rage and slaughters everyone. Not even close, you brainrot trannies are mentally unhinged if you think otherwise.
Below is an african elephant, they weight 14.000lbs.
>they weight 14.000lbs.
That is to say, all the animals above combined and multiplied by 2 still don't reach the elephant's weight.
elephant bleeds out eventually after getting cut up by all the fangs and claws in the pic
>elephant bleeds out eventually after getting cut up by all the fangs and claws in the pic
What, in your mind you think they're gonna team up against it? kek, also the elephant's hide is thick as frick, it has low vascularity and the arteries are below inches of muscles. Cope seethe and dial8
literal powershitter logic
Your average powershitter murderstomps your average normie, what's your point, you fricking transexual
fatty got angry huh ?
fat =/= strength, sorry bro
We are comparing animals made to kill, can't compare them to normies
>fatty got angry huh ?
Not a fatty, your LULZ weird troon. Post body right the frick now.
>We are comparing animals made to kill, can't compare them to normies
They are not warring murder machines you fricking sperg, when they get threatened they run away like gays. As I said, elephants beat every single land based animal with ease, they're multiple thousands of tons in weight, they have thick hides that slashes from claws/bites really struggle to rend, and despite their mild mannered nature they have the most dangerous rage in the animal kingdom, their fricking T levels literally multiply by 60 times at minimum. I know your sub 150 ng/dl little basedboy ass can't comprehend that, but still.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musth
As I said, elephants are the strongest. Until you post body, our interaction is officially over, I'm done arguing with a fat anonymous troony.
>roidtroony
moron, even the largest power lifter can only be like 3x the size of an average person. Elephant are ten times the size of almost any of those animals in the image.
>musth rage
>(in specific individuals these testosterone levels can even reach as much as 140 times the normal)
How do I invoke this in myself?
Just wait for breeding season moron.
it's the tiger no contest and that's not just the toxo talking.
>it's the tiger no contest
You're insane, read
The only contender is elephant.
Phants regularly merc everything in Africa. Even the killer hippo doesn't stand a chance. A brown bear, un-bloodlustedn would be absolutely terrified. Snake can't do shit because snakes don't even fricking have legs.
A polar bear MIGHT attempt to fight back against an elephant, but their teeth and claws aren't even big enough to kill walrus, so they won't do any considerable damage to anything besides the elephant's trunk, which has two, 3foot long ivory spears protecting it.
Elephant is an incredible build.
10/10 would not frick with an elephant.
>The only contender is elephant.
>Phants regularly merc everything in Africa. Even the killer hippo doesn't stand a chance. A brown bear, un-bloodlustedn would be absolutely terrified. Snake can't do shit because snakes don't even fricking have legs.
>A polar bear MIGHT attempt to fight back against an elephant, but their teeth and claws aren't even big enough to kill walrus, so they won't do any considerable damage to anything besides the elephant's trunk, which has two, 3foot long ivory spears protecting it.
>Elephant is an incredible build.
>10/10 would not frick with an elephant.
Finally, someone with a brain on this fricking board. All the dexterity morons are mentally ill.
Elephant stomps so hard I'm not gonna bother ordering them
Elephant> Hippo> Polar Bear> Tiger> Grizzly Bear> Lion> Anaconda> Gorilla
How u put a elephant in a cage dumass homie
Using elephants is cheating. That said even those frickers get mogged to oblivion by exctinct mammals.
Also check out this grandest list of all time mogs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_prehistoric_animals
Elephant or Hippo
Toss an Elephant Seal in the mix, too.
Bears can cover 100 yards in less than 6 seconds.
Think about that for a second.
gorillas are acutally terrible fighters. very wonky and uncoordinated if you watch enough fights on YT.
Bears have natural wrestling abilities.
Natural grapplers.
Maybe that's why my friends growing up all called my uncle Big Bear
My kind of thread. How many humans would it take to take on a single bear though? No weapons allowed.
>Wins by every measure
>Chapter before he dies even confirms that Sukuna couldn't do anything to beat him
>Except this one dumb move he pulled from his ass
Mahoraga gave Sukuna the blueprints in order to bypass infinity. Gojo had to kill Sukuna before Mahoraga adapted to infinity and he failed to do so.
Sure but it was never established beforehand that Sukuna required a blue print, that was something Gege came up to kill Gojo with. Also there was no reason for Gojo to hesitate when he had Sukuna with his back turned against the wall especially considering Gege explicitly made a point about "sparks" the chapter before.
>Sure but it was never established beforehand that Sukuna required a blue print
It doesn't have to be explicitly stated. Sukuna only had two ways of bypassing infinity being his domain and mahoraga. Sukuna lost MS due to brain damage and mahoraga alone wasn't enough to beat gojo. Even in pic related Sukuna is monologuing about how he wants to see how mahoraga bypasses infinity, which he does in the very next page.
>No reason for Gojo to hesitate
He never did? He kept talking about how he did to finish the fight before mahoraga adapted and he went for purple as soon as the agito b***h died
>>Wins by every measure
before he dies even confirms that Sukuna couldn't do anything to beat him
this one dumb move he pulled from his ass
Sukuna has been literally built up from LITERAL episode 1. Your comment is troony cope.
>sukuBlack folk infesting IST too
Gojo will return and mog the shit out of that fraud
>lost to toji
>gave megumi brain damage
>didn't fk utahime (died a virgin)
>made sukuna unbeatable for the rest of the cast
>failed to save his best friend
Gojo was a cuck who accomplished nothing
>lost to toji
came back and mogged him when became enlightened to RCT
>gave megumi brain damage
UV only hit his soul, Megumi will be fine and Sukuna can probably restore his brain eventually anyways
>didn't fk utahime (died a virgin)
will creampie her at the end of the series when he returns with an even deeper understand of Jujutsu (as the metaphorical Buddha)
>made sukuna unbeatable for the rest of the cast
Unbeatable for now, he will return and win (like he promised)
>failed to save his best friend
after he kills sukuna he'll properly bury his friend
trust the plan. Kekshitmo was but a herald for the return of the Enlightened One
I don't thinks humans can even hurt bears outside of the obviousl sensitive bits like eyes, mouth, genitals..etc A bear could probably kill half a dozen humans before tiring out then what are left manage to gouge it's eyes out or something
>tranime
have a nice day
anime website btw
Frick you
What if the gorilla had a spear?
Bear will destroy
The bear, end of.
Before the advent of the gun, Native Indians considered the grizzly bear a man eating monster and to kill one would've made you a legend within the tribe. Before the advent of the gun, local tribes in Africa would regularly hunt gorillas for sport.
It's no contest.
What about sabertooth tigers and giant cave bears of old? Did african wild beasts used to be bigger?
>local tribes in Africa would regularly hunt gorillas for sport.
They also hunted and ate Black folk
What beats a polar bear?
elephant
orca
walrus
Lions and tigers hunt elephants, i bet orcas just frick with great whites because sharks cruise around by the ocean floor not the surface aka they eat dead ones, sharks are cooler walruses are probably afraid of sharks.
Bears are cats
I'm not saying I would win, but I could survive an encounter with any land mammal unarmed.
A Gorilla would only win if he used a long blade - then he could kill the bear. A pack of Tigers would also pulverize a bear. One on one there's no chance.