>1 lb of chicken breast: 748 calories
>1 lb of cheesecake: 1,437 calories
>eat 1 lb of chicken
>gain 1 lb
>eat 1 lb of cheesecake
>gain 1 lb
??? I thought CICO was legit?
>1 lb of chicken breast: 748 calories. >1 lb of cheesecake: 1,437 calories. >eat 1 lb of chicken. >gain 1 lb
stop swallowing semen.
>pick up a 15 lbs dumbbell
>gain 15 lbs
This is you.
>take 1lb shit
>lose 1lb
I thought calories in being lower than calories out was the only way to lose weight?
My guy it stands for calories in calories out not weight in weight out. If the weight alone mattered it would be called wiwo.
In case you didn't know food calories aren't chemical calories. They are the average chemical calories of a serving of a given food minus the average chemical calories of the poop that results from digesting food. That is to say it's a measure of how much energy your body absorbs from a serving and specifically does not include the weight of the poop you create.
They determine the calories in a given food item by blowing it up in a bomb calorimeter. Our bodies are not heat engines so why is a measure of heat energy relevant to how much energy our body derives from food?
I think you are confused. I'm just trying to help, but if you choose to stay fat it's not my problem.
>wiwo
Neither of those will result in a permanent lb gained. They be processed for energy content and the remaining weight will shat, pissed, breathed and sweated out.
Friendly reminder that
Calories are not metabolically fungible
>Calories are not metabolically fungible
Calories are not metabolically fungible
>Calories are not metabolically fungible
Explain what you believe calories labels measure.
the energy content to raise the temp of water by a defined amount in a lab which is applied as a loose approximation to people, not a quantification of protein synthesis or hypothalamic regulation at scale, you dirt eating Black person
So what you are saying is it does measure energy your body takes in and you use it to take your intake an then adjust it to your personal expenditure.
*track your intake and then
It doesn't matter what you call it or how you define it. We can quantify the amount of food you eat and your mean rate of metabolization, and call the unit "one fat mongloid ketotardies".
Are you a plant that can perform photosynthesis? No? Then every single unit of energy you utilize in some manner is roughly conserved from what you feed yourself in.
Changing metabolic circumstances does not alter this, it only means a different rate.
10000 kcal of basedbean oil and 10000kcal of butter (or ghee if you want to act Semetic over semantics) have very different metabolic effects in spite of both being "10000kcal of fat"
I only eat spoons of sugar
>different food creates body fat at different rates!!
Yes... That's literally what calories are intended to measure. It's a measure of how much energy your body absorbs from a given food. Please stop being moronic.
This post is the definition of bait, moronation, and shitposting