>2023
>still zero arguments against sugar free drinks
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>2023. >still zero arguments against sugar free drinks
>2023
>still zero arguments against sugar free drinks
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
If the product is free you are the product
yeah I'm a bit of a sweetheart
cute
Embalming fluid?
>zero arguments against sugar free drinks
Uh yeah breh, artificial sweeteners that are linked to cancers and also cause insulin spikes, no problem at all! No argument at all!
>The sweet taste of artificial sweeteners triggers cephalic phase insulin release, causing a small rise in insulin levels. Regular use changes the balance of our gut bacteria. This could make our cells resistant to the insulin we produce, leading to both increased blood sugar and insulin levels
The sugar option of soda is the healthier one.
>This could make our cells resistant to the insulin we produce, leading to both increased blood sugar and insulin levels
this is a nonissue that has an astronomically low chance of affecting your life. the real thing is that the "zero sugar" sodas cause insulin release (just like the regular soda) and don't actually have calories (unlike the regular soda) this causes your blood sugar to tank quicker than it should, increasing your appetite in the long run and essentially defeating the purpose of "diet" soda
True, true.
Seething fatties who can't stop guzzling soda and tell themselves it's OK because it is zero sugar
Sweeteners are CANCER.
>mfw U MAD!?
The amount of artificial sweeteners you'd need to drink in a day to have "cancer causing" side effects is extremely high. You'd need to drink a lot of soda to reach that thresholds. The recommended limit for aspartame is 40 mg per kg of body weight, so if you're like 200lbs, you'd need to drink about 18 cans, which is about a gallon and a bit more than a half; which I'm surprised if anyone can do without puking halfway through.
Aspartame is only toxic if you have Phenylketonuria.
Also you're a moronic tripgay and should have a nice day.
Hurr durr you can have x amount but not x amount durrr
Imagine risking cancer thinking in those terms. There are too many variables.
The mere fact it can cause cancer is an alarm bell to stay away from any of that shit.
You don't get cancer from eating 1 apple or 100 apples.
>Also you're a moronic tripgay and should have a nice day.
Yo momma bro, yo momma.
Better stay inside then, sunlight can cause cancer.
Oh wait, you're already ontop of that.
Ah the big brain reductio ad absurdum fallacy. Lol moron.
You just got schooled and educated too:
>You don't get cancer from eating 1 apple or 100 apples.
no but if you could muscle that many apples down you'd die from the cyanide. Even water kills us if we drink too much.
Well, you would need to eat 2kg of bacon every day for 30 years to increase a change of a single type of cancer by 50%. Yeat, ever leftie media tells everyone that meat is bad and causes cancer.
While artificial sweeteners actually increase the chance of cancer and have a shit ton of other side effects, like insulin spikes and nuking your microbiom. There is a spray that is used to kill every bacteria or virus in your nose. Do you know what it uses? Artificial sweetener xylitol. It's worse for your immune system than taking antibiotics.
moron question: I thought Xylitol was found naturally, and has been used for a sweetener for a long time. Why is it used to kill bacteria/viruses in your nose and if it's been around since the 1900s why haven't people been calling it out if it's "worse for your immune system than taking antibiotics"?
yeah xylitol is a leaf or something, but there's plenty of leafs that can kill us. Penicillin is a fungus after all. xylitol isn't commonly used in the US so I think no one cares about it.
People were using arsenic in cosmetics and wall paint for centuries. The fact it's used doesn't mean it's healthy. Like someone drinks soda every day and gets cancer. Will that person be able to link the cancer to a single ingridient in soda? It might be not that ingridient, but something else that caused cancer. That's why you need randomized studies. And if you look up any sweetener, the studies are there. But the industry is so dependent on sweeteeners and they lobby a lot. As soon as they discover a new sweetener, all old ones will be banned immidiately. But for now, they need them and don't care about your health.
>tripgay being moronic
kys by drinking 100G of diet soda a day
Oh wait nvm drink 100 G of sugary soda a day
Your reading comprehension is that of an illiterate and autistic small child.
Sugar is better than sweeteners, but you should avoid both and drink water. What can't you understand? I simply said sugar is healthier, not that you should have it or drink sugar soda.
>tripgay being moronic
And seriously, lower your tone when talking to me. I'm a well liked and respected ISTer. The same can't be said for you.
OR.
>say that to my face irl and not online and see what happens
Goysloppers would say anything to convince themselves that the dopamine spike is not unhealthy
>sweet water drinkers
>flavored vapor inhalers
>porn waters
I wonder why men are such homosexuals nowadays
>watchers*
If anything , even not physical health related, stop this shit just to train yourself not to be slaves to your instant gratification desires
Drinking water leads to lead poisoning and also nerve issues and cancer and tumors.
>main component of soda is water
So, diet soda leads to cancer?
>uh yeah bro diet drink 0 calories 0 sugar that wont affect your weight loss progress and known for being safe for diabetics will cause cancer, wreck your gut, insulin resistance, fricking up rest of your body bro
>so instead, drink sugary drink with calories and sugar that will affect your weight loss progress and also causes cancer, gut wrecking, IR fricking, JUST'd your body
Dumb frick never post again
>artificial sweeteners that are linked to cancers
Souce: my massive gaping boihole
you can find an article linking fricking anything to cancer, interacting with pretty much anything that ever exists "increases risk of cancer" solely due to how shit works
Source is more trustworthy that whatever you pull out to say coca fricking cola zero is healthy. have a nice day
>source says meat causes cancer
>haha lol no way it's all big pharma haha carnivores shawn baker argggh I'm a man I eat meat
>source says sugarless soda causes cancer
>absolutely, they are reputable and smart people
post your Deadlift 1rm lmao
lmfao tell that to my diabetic cousin you fricking moron. get fricked moron
Shut up tripgay
Facebook is not a valid source.
>and also cause insulin spikes
Since insulin inhibits gluconeogenesis from muscle tissue, are you saying artificial sweeteners are the perfect cutting food to preserve muscle mass?
>this post
>8 replies
>all seething with no counter argument
Shills out in force today. Fit-tards are some of the stupidest motherfrickers on all of IST. Keep doing the lord's work anon. Also...
>tell that to my diabetic cousin
>is diabetic
>drinks zero sugar soda
>thinks this is somehow a win
lol lmao even. moron proved his opposition correct
sweeters are in 2C category for cancer risk which is literally nothing. it is the "there might be a mechanism in theory, weak petri dish proof or very very weak animal research" tier proof. something like eating red meat, arsenic (which is in rice in very minimal and irrelevant doses) or getting sun (UV radiation) are in category 1 which is "has proof of causing cancer in humans" tier.
if you really wanna be big brain and learn about this stuff just listen to this mini course by SBS: https://www.strongerbyscience.com/podcast-episode-116/
I think there is 99% chance (You) won't but any sensible anons reading this might be interested to actually get educated.
>5h43min of good shit
>linked to
>could
white monster >>>
>still zero arguments against sugar free drinks
Buy an ad.
It tastes gross. Doesn't relieve the headaches you get when you eat too little sugar.
>fricks your long term guy flora, giving you dementia
psst, nothing personal
>drinks the occasional probiotic
Heh, maybe next time, kid.
I accept your concession.
> Ingredient names:Carbonic acid, caramel color, acidifier, sweeteners (sucralose, acesulfame K), flavoring, caffeine
Just drink water
The carbonation still causes damage to your tooth enamel.
>taste buds get fricked up and can’t eat normal not chemically enhanced to trigger massive dopamine foods
>fricks up your gut biome which takes forever to fix and has long term lasting health consequences
>causes cancer
>too good to be true, but i’m sure it’s fine
>can’t just be a normal man and MUST consume LE SWEET TASTING GOYSLOP BECAUSE IT MAKES ME FEEEEEEEL GOOD
>it says 0 calories SO IT MUST BE GOOD FOR ME
>Im sure the companies wouldn’t sell me something dangerous for their own profit
>vapers are bad they can’t control their urges and need to inhale le sweet tasty vapor
>hehe im a princess i need the sweet water now!!
The only sweetener I drink is zevia leaf extract if I'm craving a soda.
What about monkfruit sweetener?
It causes an insulin spike which inhibits leptin production and makes you feel hungrier.
Get hungry
Drink another
???
Profit
My point is that with self-control, they're fine and are probably better for you than the sugar ones.
But the average fatass drinks them to "lose weight", and just makes themself fatter.
For me, it's diet coke. It's so drinkable and has the perfect balance of fizz and deliciousness.
I've never seen a fat person drink regular coke. That's why I still always drink regular soft drinks
Every disgusting fatass that doesnt take care of thenselves seems to drink 8 diet cokes a day because its 0 calories
That should speak for itself
it costs more many than water from my tap
>option A: teeth meltingly acidic drink that provides a short-term energy boost
>option B: teeth meltingly acidic drink that provides sharts and possibly cancer
Coke Zero is better than original Coca Cola
pretty sure i heard something alarming recently that many zero sugar drinks contain sugar, they just use mildly different forms of it so they can legally say it isnt sugar.
they use artificial sweeteners which cannot be broken down for energy like normal sugar
https://bme.unc.edu/2023/06/chemical-found-in-common-sweetener-damages-dna/
>zero arguments against sugar free dr-ACK
Additives
I was gonna get the cherry zero ones at walmart but I decided to wait till the next day and they were all gone. I have never been so disappointed in myself.
>WHO correctly says they're a cancer risk
>IST contrarianism starts shilling aspartame, despite saying they were a cancer risk before the WHO said it.
Both meat and sun posses more cancer risk than aspartame.
I never understood the point of diet and zero sugar, you're paying $2 for a 20oz or 2L or $7 for a 12-pack for what is basically watered down soda.
Imagine consuming caffeine by choice when this exists.
what the frick? IST is pro goyslop now? is this a slide thread, what the frick is happening
>still zero arguments against sugar free drinks
Self respect. What are you a child? What a waste or money.
>no you don’t get it I NEED my yummy syrupy drink - and since this one has no sugar it’s totally fine and safe for me to drink as often as I want
If you want something sweet to drink I recommend adding something to your milk. You should ideally be only drinking milk, water and tea. Not artificial goy fluid they get kids addicted to
Bad for teef