# After working really hard on my pull ups I came to the conclusion that full rom is a meme.

After working really hard on my pull ups I came to the conclusion that full rom is a meme.
Also that a narrow grip+arched back are really good, this instantly added a few reps.
And that if you're not growing or getting stronger then you need to do more volume. There's different ways of putting on volume, but my favorite are partials, from the bottom to the middle.
When I started doing these my pull up numbers sky rocketed, from multiple sets of 8 to multiple of 15 (chin over bar ofc). My back also grew a lot.

 Ape Out Shirt \$21.68
1. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Why?
6/2=3
(1+2)=3
then you multiply those two and you get 9

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

PEMDAS you moron, the P is parenthesis, meaning you solve that first. I made It through HS with strait D-'s in math and I knew that.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

The parenthesis does not extend to the numbers outside of it. You do not distribute first if it is out of order. It's 9. You can verify it if you want using a scientific calculator.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>You can verify it if you want using a scientific calculator.
I forgot tried that yesterday, it gives 9
What's pemdas anyway

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

PEMDAS is just a very basic rule of algebra, which, qlong woth every other rule of algebra and trig, caries over into calculus.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>The parenthesis does not extend to the numbers outside of it
Literally every math teacher of mine in middle school and high school had us multiply what was in the parentheses with what was next to/outside of them.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>Literally every math teacher of mine in middle school and high school had us multiply what was in the parentheses with what was next to/outside of them.
education must be real shit where you live...
a(b+c) is the same as a * (b+c), yes, but that doesn't mean that multiplication notation doesn't imply any particular priority difference from other multiplications
and anyway dividing by N is exactly equal to multiplying by 1/N, so 6/2(1+2) is exactly the same as 6 * 1/2 * (1+2)
and is therefore very much:
- equal to 9 and nothing else
- not ambiguous whatsoever
no matter how much this displeases un/mal-educated morons on the internet

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

You moron, you only solve the part of the equation inside the parenthesis first.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I can see why you made a D minus in math.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Yes and is still 9.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Exactly
Parenthesis
Exponents
Division
Then Multiplication

So you do the bit in brackets, then do the division after. That leaves you with 3x3

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

you do brackets first dumbass

PEMDAS you moron, the P is parenthesis, meaning you solve that first. I made It through HS with strait D-'s in math and I knew that.

BEDMAS master race

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>Why?
because it's an approximation of math, and the rules of the approximation are unknown. You can find different physical calculators that apply different rules for different answers. The response to this challenge should be
a. "rewrite it in standard math notation, and I'll solve that"
b. "rewrite it in some specific programming language, and I'll solve that"

https://i.imgur.com/R9ttJJK.jpeg

After working really hard on my pull ups I came to the conclusion that full rom is a meme.
Also that a narrow grip+arched back are really good, this instantly added a few reps.
And that if you're not growing or getting stronger then you need to do more volume. There's different ways of putting on volume, but my favorite are partials, from the bottom to the middle.
When I started doing these my pull up numbers sky rocketed, from multiple sets of 8 to multiple of 15 (chin over bar ofc). My back also grew a lot.

what I find frustrating about getting to doing pullups, is that the easier variations don't prepare you much for the harder variations.
I think I wasted my time not just going with assisted pullups.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

This. Unless everything ive ever been taught is wrong, the answer for me will always be 1

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

To do 6 divided by 2(1+2), solve parentheses first using distributive property. It would be 6 divided by 2 divided by 4. The answer is 3/4, stupid DYEL brainlets. Maybe hit the books and hit some weights.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Correct.

Why?
6/2=3
(1+2)=3
then you multiply those two and you get 9

This homie doesn't even PEMDAS! SAD!

https://i.imgur.com/R9ttJJK.jpeg

After working really hard on my pull ups I came to the conclusion that full rom is a meme.
Also that a narrow grip+arched back are really good, this instantly added a few reps.
And that if you're not growing or getting stronger then you need to do more volume. There's different ways of putting on volume, but my favorite are partials, from the bottom to the middle.
When I started doing these my pull up numbers sky rocketed, from multiple sets of 8 to multiple of 15 (chin over bar ofc). My back also grew a lot.

Yes op, full range of motion is what is natural and comfortable. Pushing yourself to the absolute limit of what your limbs can extend to is how you hurt yourself and anyone who disagrees is too new to have an opinion anyway.

2. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

6 / 2(1+2) = x
6 / 2(3) = x
6 / 6 = x
1 = x

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

You wouldn't do the multiplication before you do the division. Learn your orders of operation.GN0W

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Go take 5th grade math again.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>I'm a smart boy because I memorized how to make useless calculations

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>I'm a smart boy because I memorized how to make useless calculations
yes >:^)

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It's nothing worth praise to remember what's solved first. While you memorized your gay formulas I was partying fricking and being fricked

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous
• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

You take pride in remembering which part of an equation's solved first, I take pride in having sex...
PECULIAR!

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>being fricked

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Fifth grade math will yell you that the precedence is the same for both multiplication and division, so they're done in the order they appear.

After summing the parentheses, you do the division and then the multiplication to get 9.

If you think otherwise, you're wrong.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

6/3*3 = 9
???

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
3(3)
9

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I learned this in first grade ap math
That and negative numbers

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Dude it’s not literally PEMDAS in direct order it has pairs. It’s P.E.(M/D).(A/S).

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>P(arenthesis)
>E(xponents)
>M(ultiply)
>D(ivision)
>A(dd)
>S(ubtraction)
You're wrong, simple as.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

PEMDAS you moron, the P is parenthesis, meaning you solve that first. I made It through HS with strait D-'s in math and I knew that.

6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 ) = x
6 / 2 + 4 = x
6 / 6 = x
x= 0

It doesn't matter. As it's written, it is 9. If it was 6 over 2(1+2), then it would be 1

Simple, really.
1 + 2 is 3, multiply 3 by 2, divide 6 by 6.

You just outed yourself as a boomer, we don't use this method since 1917.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Boomers weren’t even alive back then, moron

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>we don't use this method since 1917

The moronation of America at its finest

3. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

dayum I forgot you're supposed to solve only the parenthesis first

4. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

6 / 2 ( 1 + 2 ) = x
6 / 2 + 4 = x
6 / 6 = x
x= 0

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

nice

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

finally someone with a brain

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>6/6 = 0
kek,
I have 6 sweets and i have 6 children, grandpa is a lucky nonce, each kid gets 1 sweet you dope

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>1+2
>4

Are you moronic

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Thank u anon i laughed

5. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

The equation isn't written correctly. It mixes algebraic and arithmetic notation. The only way to win is to not play.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It doesn't matter. As it's written, it is 9. If it was 6 over 2(1+2), then it would be 1

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

t. mathlette

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

As it's written, it's nonsense. Written in algebraic notation, it's 1.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

We get it, you're moronic.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

We get it, you tapped out of school in third grade.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Insightful poster.

It doesn't matter. As it's written, it is 9. If it was 6 over 2(1+2), then it would be 1

This is the way.

6. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I don't know man, I just like to lift heavy things

7. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

6 / 2(1+2) = x
6 / 2(3) = x
6 / 6 = x
1 = x

But PEMDAS is just a nuemonic, not an actual rule of math. It is generally considered that multiplication and division have the same precedence, in which case you perform the equally precedented operations left to right.

6 / 2(1+2) = x
6 / 2 * 3 = x
3 * 3 = x
9 = x

However, if you want to be a real mathlete, you know that the answer is undefined, because the question is incorrectly written. Because multiplication and division have equal precedence, for the equation to be "correct" it needs an additional set of parentheses to clarify the order of operations defined.

Either:
(6 / 2)(1+2)
Or:
6 / (2(1+2))

Being proud you can answer an incorrectly defined question is like being proud you can read a sentence like: "Hey, a because stamp waffle dimsum ran tomorrow". Just because you think you know what it means doesn't mean you're "right".

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Big brain. Also, mnemonic, not "neumonic".
>t. grammar nerd

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>you know that the answer is undefined
Finally man. These questions are always so lame and played out.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

was gonna post this but you did it better, cheers

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>Because multiplication and division have equal precedence

Can't you just start from the left???

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>It is generally considered that multiplication and division have the same precedence
it is not "generally considered", it is a hard rule
because they are the exact same operation
a/b is the same as a * (1/b)

>if you want to be a real mathlete, you know that the answer is undefined, because the question is incorrectly written
you should have stopped just before spouting this nonsense. it is very much well-defined for the reason above.

This is why math is stupid, the notation is so subjective and most teachers were C+ students themselves and don't understand how to write questions and piss themselves when confronted.

Was taught that the division symbol was synonymous with "over" and then you move up a grade or into college you're told the exact opposite.
The answer I came up with was 1 as well.

>This is why math is stupid, the notation is so subjective and most teachers were C+ students themselves
no, your teachers just sucked ass, which is not the case in all countries, thankfully
it is unambiguously 9, see

>Literally every math teacher of mine in middle school and high school had us multiply what was in the parentheses with what was next to/outside of them.
education must be real shit where you live...
a(b+c) is the same as a * (b+c), yes, but that doesn't mean that multiplication notation doesn't imply any particular priority difference from other multiplications
and anyway dividing by N is exactly equal to multiplying by 1/N, so 6/2(1+2) is exactly the same as 6 * 1/2 * (1+2)
and is therefore very much:
- equal to 9 and nothing else
- not ambiguous whatsoever
no matter how much this displeases un/mal-educated morons on the internet

and

you are interpreting the horizontal division the same way I'd prefer to, but it's an interpretation and the expression is so ambiguous that calculators implement it differently. Division and multiplication operators have the same precedence. 2(1+2) is just 2*(1+2). So you have N mulop N mulop N. Without some extra rule, and math doesn't provide it because normal math notation uses two dimensions as in your picture, there's no reason to parse it further as (N mulop N) mulop N, vs. N mulop (N mulop N).
6 % 2 * (1+2)
6 * 1/2 * 3
3 * 3
9

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

(You)

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous
8. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

?si=VOkoOSBYbG2zSmM2

9. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Simple, really.
1 + 2 is 3, multiply 3 by 2, divide 6 by 6.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

a number divided by itself is always 1 btw

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Show me the rule of math! As

6 / 2(1+2) = x
6 / 2(3) = x
6 / 6 = x
1 = x

But PEMDAS is just a nuemonic, not an actual rule of math. It is generally considered that multiplication and division have the same precedence, in which case you perform the equally precedented operations left to right.

6 / 2(1+2) = x
6 / 2 * 3 = x
3 * 3 = x
9 = x

However, if you want to be a real mathlete, you know that the answer is undefined, because the question is incorrectly written. Because multiplication and division have equal precedence, for the equation to be "correct" it needs an additional set of parentheses to clarify the order of operations defined.

Either:
(6 / 2)(1+2)
Or:
6 / (2(1+2))

Being proud you can answer an incorrectly defined question is like being proud you can read a sentence like: "Hey, a because stamp waffle dimsum ran tomorrow". Just because you think you know what it means doesn't mean you're "right".

said, that's just a Pneumatic.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

You both spelled it wrong, it's "mnemonic". And as above poster noted, it's just a short-hand to do arithmetic that breaks down once students get into real math.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Whatever, Hylic.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous
• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Wait until you get into hyper and hypo operations. That was fun to dabble in during middle and high school. Explaining how logic from one operator carries into the next, and how the order of operations is derived from that, can be quite entertaining when your audience is capable of thinking at least a step ahead. It's frustrating with morons like these.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

No its not, try doing a division by hand,
3
3|____
3 1
0

How is it going to be 0?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Not zero

https://i.imgur.com/R9ttJJK.jpeg

After working really hard on my pull ups I came to the conclusion that full rom is a meme.
Also that a narrow grip+arched back are really good, this instantly added a few reps.
And that if you're not growing or getting stronger then you need to do more volume. There's different ways of putting on volume, but my favorite are partials, from the bottom to the middle.
When I started doing these my pull up numbers sky rocketed, from multiple sets of 8 to multiple of 15 (chin over bar ofc). My back also grew a lot.

This fools people by intentionally being ambiguous. Literal interpretation per order of operations is equivalent to (6÷2)*(1+2)=9, however the way it's grouped leads people to believe they're looking at 6÷(2(1+2))=1. Representation as a fraction is superior, but they didn't do that because they want people who don't understand the interchangeable nature of multiplication and division to take pemdas literally as multiplication preceding division

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>Not zero
What do you mean?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

0/0 is ambiguous and only defined in the limit of some functions. That's because dividing by zero is in general not compatible with standard arithmetic.

For what I mean about the limit, go to wolframalpha and plot sin(x)/x. At x=0, you get 0/0, but this evaluates to 1 in the limit in this case. However, cos(x)/x gives -infinity from the left and infinity from the right, so it's undefined.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

0/0 lacks dimension. Numerical values have one dimension. The function that produces 0/0 has to be evaluated in context to have any meaning.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Not incorrect, but the statement "any number divided by itself" is false unless zero is not considered a number.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It's not.
Zero wasn't invented until the Indians domesticated elephants.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Zero has no value, it is a placeholder digit. The dimension of a value is dependent on its distance relative to zero. Zero as it is symbolically represented is fictitious; its true value is as a comparative reference for true values. Read Godel's proof of 1+1 and you'll see what I mean.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It's not.
Zero wasn't invented until the Indians domesticated elephants.

You're being really careful to avoid saying "zero is not a number" because you recognize that's a tough sell.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>explain
How many times can you put 6 into itself? You can do it 1 time. Welcome to class, lunch is at 11.

10. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

This can be rewritten as
> 6 / 2 * (1+ 2)
> 6 / 2 * (3)
> (3) * (3)
> 9
But it is a bit ambiguous since it uses the classic division sign, rather than the fractional sign (which is generally clearer to use, since the means of writing dictates whether a group is evaluated as being parenthetical or not). If signage is unclear, it must be assumed that the entities are separate; hence, 9 is the answer. If it was written as either (6/2)(1+2) it would be 9 still, whereas writing it as 6 / (2*(1+2)) would evaluate to 1. It can't be assumed to be that case unless it's written with 6 as a numerator and 2(1+2) as a denominator.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Fricking idiot

11. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

The equation is poorly phrased.
You should really put brackets around everything.
(6)÷(2)×((1)+(2))
Now it's easy.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>It's always the ~~*~~*((2*~~*~~*~~'s

12. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I very nearly have a masters degree in chem. engineering and I have suffered through a lot of math and physics.
Nobody fricking writes things out like that. I have no idea what the order of operations are and have made it this far.
I read it as 6 / 6 = 1. If that's wrong then frick the person writing the question for using sloppy notation, stop complicating simple things in the future.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I already have advanced degrees in Physics and Math and I will now be writing things out this way on a permanent basis to increase suffering for my Chem E students.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I will plant chemicals that simultaneously smell like rotting fish and faeces in the ventilator shaft in your office.
Will your colleagues be able to tell the difference given your usual body odour?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>Colleagues

I am without peer.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>Engineering student
>Ready to make everything smell like shit
Calm down there, pajeet, my office already reeks of your mom's vagene

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Pajeets are mostly into computer science 'engineering'

>Colleagues

I am without peer.

Good one, now quantify these nuts on your face.
No weight classes in the jungle (physics department)

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Exactly this. It's also using keyboard notation which tends to use proximity to indicate grouped denominators
>6 ÷ 2 x 3
Which has to go in standard order
>6 ÷ 2(3)
Which implies 2(3) is the denominator

The point is to be ambiguous, strip context, then flip expectations so it can call everyone wrong and stupid, and reddit brained pedants can strut around and puff out their spoon chests.

13. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Infinity doesn't exist and anyone who says otherwise is a cum huffing moron.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Infinity definitely does not exist in reality, which makes it all the cooler. The human imagination can exceed the bounds of the universe.

Also, how does one huff cum? Do you want in the aroma or actually inhale the liquid? For what purpose???

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Infinity doesn't exist and anyone who says otherwise is a cum huffing moron.

Infinity doesn't exist in the same way that a true hexagon doesn't exist. It's hair splitting between reality and platonic ideals. Infinity exists in a "close-enough" sense of the word which is pretty much how human beings operate anyway

14. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I disagree about ROM. No need for a pause, but you must fully stretch and control the eccentric.
Volume is king for progress, setting total rep goals really helped with that. Trying to 3x5 and add weight sucked. Banging out ever more pull-ups per session worked.

15. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

you are all unfathomably moronic I rest my case with picrel frick all of you I hope you all die a slow painful death

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

you are interpreting the horizontal division the same way I'd prefer to, but it's an interpretation and the expression is so ambiguous that calculators implement it differently. Division and multiplication operators have the same precedence. 2(1+2) is just 2*(1+2). So you have N mulop N mulop N. Without some extra rule, and math doesn't provide it because normal math notation uses two dimensions as in your picture, there's no reason to parse it further as (N mulop N) mulop N, vs. N mulop (N mulop N).
6 % 2 * (1+2)
6 * 1/2 * 3
3 * 3
9

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

This is why math is stupid, the notation is so subjective and most teachers were C+ students themselves and don't understand how to write questions and piss themselves when confronted.

Was taught that the division symbol was synonymous with "over" and then you move up a grade or into college you're told the exact opposite.
The answer I came up with was 1 as well.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Incredible self own.

Order of operations:
Everything in parenthesis
All Multiplication and division left to right.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Bc multiplication and division have equal importance. It's also the same with addition and subtraction. So you go from left to right just bc okay?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

https://i.imgur.com/tq21hqQ.png

you are all unfathomably moronic I rest my case with picrel frick all of you I hope you all die a slow painful death

This is why everyone is confused because of the division sign. We use fractions for a reason.
Now stop replying you fricking brainlet Black folk.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

6 divided by 2 multiplied by 3, now that requires a very big brain!

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Mathlette doesn't understand basic math

16. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

pemdas=1
bedmas=9
I hate math so much it's unreal engine 4

17. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

it’s either 1 or 9

i don’t give a shit which one

18. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It's 5.

19. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I hate these dumbfrick posts. The only reason that people have different answers is because they re-wrote the math interpretations we've been using for frickin' centuries so black kids wouldn't feel stupid.

20. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>6÷2(1+2)
>6÷2(3)
>6÷6
>1

Are you all moronic?
Is this American education in action?

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Yeah pretty much.

21. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

You spastics all posting in a troll thread.

22. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

(6(1 + 2))/2

This is how you solve it, never post this image again, you've been warned.

23. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I hate PENISDAS so much. I have no idea what it stands for. It's such a stupid way to remember anything. I fricking hate when people try to teach things with some abbreviation or some catchy phrase.
What the FRICK does PEMDAS stand for?
Just solve the parentheses first. That's it. That's the entire trick with these math problems.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Parentheses
Evolution
Mind-blowing
Dick
Ass
Sucking.

Pemdas

24. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

It’s interesting reading this thread. I haven’t done “math” in 25 years. What I learnt in school were 2x1 and 2x2 to remove the brackets and then having 6 / 6 left.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Correct good sir!
Seems the schools don't teach basic math anymore

25. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

26. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

9

27. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Well huh... if it works well for you, to each his own I guess. But you're contradicting so many years of experienced trainers/coaches and the science (physics, anatomy, etc) instead of going the intelligent way: research on the internet or read books or acquire from whatever source (as long as it's actually good and reliable) actual, proven knowledge and applying it to your program.
For me I simply did (taken from the most basic common sense) literally only chin-ups and push-ups (executed right, especially the latter) in a scheme of 3xF and after a while 5xF. I never added on bw squats and some effective exercise for abs because of laziness. And I also stopped it all anyway because I want to desperately go back to a black iron gym or a powerlifting gym and run SS again.
I miss weights so bad. Sure SS makes you suffer like a motherfricker but it's needless to say it's worth the huge results. Problem is lack of money for gym and food and supplements... and the fact that I don't even really enjoy eating...
Oh and by the way the answer to that image is 9, or in case you have to apply distributive property or some shit it would be 1. I despise math as much as eating.

28. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

wypepo are morons and illetrate. this site is a case study and a reason why they need outsiders to baby sit them. Brainstorming over some kindergarten problem, clown nation.

29. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>stumped the internet
Only stumped morons who don't understand that
a(b + c) = a * (b + c)

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>t. primary schooler
ab = (a*b)
Otherwise, 1N / 10N/kg = 0.1N2/kg, for example.
Thus 6/2(1+2)=1
And yes, writing a unit behind something is just multiplying it with that unit, or more precisely, that unit vector.

30. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

The old classic americans vs rest of the world issue.

• 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

>t. primary schooler
ab = (a*b)
Otherwise, 1N / 10N/kg = 0.1N2/kg, for example.
Thus 6/2(1+2)=1
And yes, writing a unit behind something is just multiplying it with that unit, or more precisely, that unit vector.

>americans
>amerishart lardbrain proves point

31. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Math is such a good brainlet filter
It may not serve a purpose in real life but it's great in university because it makes morons fail and go do a trade

32. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

I hate math so much its unreal

33. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous

Why not do them with perfect form until you can't get another one with good form and only then add a few more with questionable form?

34. 2 weeks ago
Anonymous