>animals that consume more mercury live longer
>animals that consume more mercury are larger and more muscular
>animals that consume more mercury are higher on the food chain
Does this sound like a poison to you? What don't they want us to know?
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Always do opposite of experts advice
So I should fap every day?
jerk it every 3 days buddy
Most experts advise fapping every day. So doing the opposite of them would be fapping as little as you can.
It's only people on the Internet who advise against jerking off. Experts who are given funding by the Government, who write our school textbooks, who are considered reliable sources by Wikipedia, who are allowed on TV, etc, those people are pro-masturbation and beg you to do it as much as you can.
If the experts are always wrong, then they aren't real experts by definition. So doing the opposite of what they say would be right. But then you would be doing what a real expert would tell you to do. So you would be going against your own premise of always doing the opposite of what experts recommend. Therefore your advice is impossible to follow.
And people were chugging mercury in "elixirs" at the start of the last century. Learn history.
Hold up, higher on the food chain? That’s just the concentrating effect of heavy metals as you go up the food chain, same reason why tuna has mercury, and is also larger and longer lived than other fish. Nice try, schlomo.
take your meds schizo
Take the murcurypill, Anon
Thank you OP boutta take sumadat liquid silver hehe
The propaganda against murcury is to make people eat less fish.
I was talking to a girl and told her I eat 4 times slamon a day. She said
>Oh my God, you should check your mercury levels...
lol, scaring people away from eggs (colesterol), red meat and fish to eat processed goyslop
correlation
causation
There is a causal connection in this case. It just goes the opposite way than op is implying.
Mercury poisoning isn't real, it only happens to eskimo children. Name 1 (one) case of a non eskimo, non child getting mercury poisoning from too much tuna.
It's related to the Mercury and selenium in the fish. It's functionally impossible to get Mercury poisoning from a fish that has more selenium than mercury, as Mercury will bind to the selenium, become inert, and leave as waste.
Mercury poisoning is selenium deficiency. There are, like, three fish with this issue and you still have to eat a gratuitous amount over a long period to do this to yourself.
You fell for the industry propaganda.
Regardless of how much selenium is in the fish, there will still be significant toxic effects from the mercury.
Honestly makes me curious. Not about to eat it buy the spoonful, but maybe eating 10 cans a tuna for a week and seeing the effects or swordfish every meal.
This is correlation, not causation. The animals consuming mercury does not make them bigger/longer lived/top dogs, in fact it's more likely the other way around. Contaminants accumulate moving up the food chain.
For example: plankton don't have much contamination, but fish eat THOUSANDS of plankton and accumulate a measurable amount of contamination. Then eagles eat THOUSANDS of fish and at that point the amount of accumulated contamination affects their health.
Animals at the top of the food chain tend to be larger and longer lived.
>>>/x/
Mercury just slides through your digestive tract lol. You gain nothing from eating it except silver shit I guess.
Just don't breathe it in,
Nobody ITT talking about how anything is a poison in the right dosage fr for real
its the other way around you tard
>mercury
That's not even a mercury thermometer, lol