Are SARMS Natty?

SARMS bros, do you still consider yourselves natty? Can i do a cycle of osterine or whatever and still claim lifetime natty? Where is the dividing line?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sarmsgoblins are even less natty then trenzombies

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >synthetic compounds
    >natty

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >synthetic
      so is 90% of the goyslop americans eat

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    SARMs have worse side effects than steroids while beeing less effective than steroids

    only braindead tik-tok zoomers take SARMs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they have worse side effects while you're on but much less permanent side effects
      lower risk of gyno, hair loss and permanent hypogonadism

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lmao absolutely false and whatever zoomie instagram chuds you are listening to have lied to you. not even the fact you're wrong but that you'll so confidently say something stupid without there even being long term data on SARMS makes me want to beat your face in.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          how can you even say they have fewer long-term consequences when there is no long term studies

          There is essentially no long term data on sarms.
          Not knowing the long term effects =/= there being no long term effects. It’s the same reason I won’t take your beloved “vaccine”

          >synthetic
          so is 90% of the goyslop americans eat

          Kek maybe you should post it a 5th time to really hammer the point home

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >unique poster count goes up with each post saying the same thing
            >S-s-samefag!!! It couldn’t be that they’re right! Sarms are good for you!!
            Seethe

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Sarms zoomer doesn't understand IP addresses

              Color me surprised

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There is essentially no long term data on sarms.
        Not knowing the long term effects =/= there being no long term effects. It’s the same reason I won’t take your beloved “vaccine”

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Both “SARMS” and “Steroids” are broad terms used to describe many different things. Some sarms have worse side effects than some steroids, and Vice versa. But overall, sarms are much more mild and have fewer long-term consequences. No one who knows what they’re talking about would agree with you.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >“Steroids” are broad terms used to describe many different things.
        arent all androgenic steroids basically diferent synthetic variants of testosterone?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how can you even say they have fewer long-term consequences when there is no long term studies

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        See> >67594702
        You’re an retard

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/5UqcAe0.png

      SARMS bros, do you still consider yourselves natty? Can i do a cycle of osterine or whatever and still claim lifetime natty? Where is the dividing line?

      This. Don’t fall for the meme. And no you’re not natty. But you’ll look natty so why not pretend you still are

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you want a performance boost do test, sarms are for dumbass kids who are afraid of needles

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck no.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yeah they’re just pills i don’t see any problem

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Obviously no but many sarm users claim natty not because they see no gains

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not natural but definitely not worth taking. Most SARMs bros don't break very far past dyel mode

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Depends. Some of them are intense and cause test suppression, hair loss, etc. At that point you might as well be on gear. But there are really mild SARMS like Osterine that aren’t any worse than most of the shit you would get at GNC.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I heard good things about mk 677 anyone try it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you heard bullshit,its the most potentially dangerous one,the russian roulette with diabetes and other shit.
      The other sarms have side effects but much milder like hormone supression and taxing a bit the liver/organs.
      Nothing you cant recover from without extrernal help.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Idk if they’re technically “natty” or not, but who cares. But basically every professional and college athlete is on SARMS because most have a half-life of only 24 hours so unless you’re retarded they won’t show up on a urine test. I think outside the Olympics and UFC no one’s testing for them anyway

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    do not put untested chemicals in your body for any reason, ever. Even if they try to coerce you

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Some of them are heavily tested though. For example, one of the more popular SARMS (I forget which one) was designed to stop muscle degeneration in cancer patients. I believe it’s in the final fda approval stages. You can buy it cuz it’s still classified as a research chemical

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Can i do a cycle of osterine or whatever and still claim lifetime natty?

    Yes

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bros what do you think of alternating between cardarine and GW-0742 daily?

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > Is an exogenous chemical that modulates my receptor “natty”?

    Natty as tren. Have at it. don’t need PCT. Or a test base, those are for gays. I wanna see you get shut down. Do it gay

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Friend gives me mk677 and cardarine
    >Start taking it like a retard off and on no actual cycle plan
    >Get insanely shredded model physique all the bitches mirin
    >dick stops working, gyno comes in, weird lumps and masses growing all over body
    was not worth it, its two years later now and the side effects have just gone away and my endocrine system is back to normal

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like you did it like a retard though

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sounds like you just made up random shit becaue you are butthurt for some reason

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Starting This on Monday bros, what do you think?
    >5mg LGD
    >6.25 Enclo
    >1.2g NAC
    Should I hold off the Enclo for an actual PCT or just take it with?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      take enclo every other day, not every day, and start it at the same time with lgd
      >but im not a doctor

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      split the NAC into two doses morning and evening
      I personally do not recommend SARM+SERM cycles, I would say do only the LGD and then when you're done, IF you feel seriously suppressed (yes you most likely will) you do a PCT with this shit

      The thing is with sarms that I don’t get is, if you take enough of them to actually get a noticeable effect on muscle growth then your body is going to detect it and shut your gonads down. There’s no way around that, so why not just take testosterone that your body already produces anyway and is used to having instead of something we don’t no much about?

      I use it because lower risk of gyno and hair loss

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All of you arguing for/against SARMS, post body so we know who to take seriously. Most of the users on this board look like shit but insist on giving advice anyway

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The thing is with sarms that I don’t get is, if you take enough of them to actually get a noticeable effect on muscle growth then your body is going to detect it and shut your gonads down. There’s no way around that, so why not just take testosterone that your body already produces anyway and is used to having instead of something we don’t no much about?

Your email address will not be published.